14:40:26 RRSAgent has joined #lld 14:40:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc 14:40:41 zakim, this will be LLD 14:40:41 ok, emma; I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 20 minutes 14:42:14 rrsagent, bookmark 14:42:14 See http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc#T14-42-14 14:42:35 Meeting: LLD XG 14:42:51 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0122.html 14:43:09 Chair: Emma 14:43:32 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/18-lld-minutes.html 14:43:59 Regrets: Ray, Tom, Ed 14:44:50 Regrets+: Peter, Jeff, Kevin, Marcia, Anette, Andras, Lars, Martin 14:45:40 markva has joined #lld 14:45:50 rrsagent, please make record public 14:46:29 aconstan has joined #lld 14:47:15 aconstan has left #lld 14:50:06 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:50:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html emma 14:50:14 antoine has joined #lld 14:54:07 INC_LLDXG()10:00AM has now started 14:54:08 AlexanderH has joined #lld 14:54:14 +??P0 14:54:27 zakim, ??P0 is me 14:54:27 +antoine; got it 14:55:15 +emma 14:55:36 GordonD has joined #lld 14:57:05 fsasaki has joined #lld 14:58:53 +??P2 14:59:12 zakim, ??P2 is GordonD 14:59:12 +GordonD; got it 14:59:21 +[VrijeUni] 14:59:29 ww has joined #lld 14:59:34 zakim, VrijeUni is markva 14:59:34 +markva; got it 14:59:58 +??P4 15:00:12 zakim, ??P4 is AlexanderH 15:00:12 +AlexanderH; got it 15:00:28 zakim, who is here? 15:00:28 On the phone I see antoine, emma, GordonD (muted), markva, AlexanderH 15:00:29 On IRC I see ww, fsasaki, GordonD, AlexanderH, antoine, markva, RRSAgent, Zakim, emma, danbri, digikim, edsu 15:00:35 +??P5 15:00:41 monica has joined #lld 15:00:52 kcoyle has joined #lld 15:00:53 +??P6 15:01:00 Zakim: ??P6 is me 15:01:02 zakim, mute markva 15:01:02 markva should now be muted 15:01:13 kai has joined #lld 15:01:13 +Jodi 15:01:16 Zakim: P6 is me 15:01:23 jodi has joined #LLD 15:01:25 Zakim, ??P6 is me 15:01:25 +ww; got it 15:02:03 zakim, who's here ? 15:02:03 + +44.194.346.aaaa 15:02:04 On the phone I see antoine, emma, GordonD (muted), markva (muted), AlexanderH, felix (muted), ww, Jodi, +44.194.346.aaaa 15:02:07 On IRC I see jodi, kai, kcoyle, monica, ww, fsasaki, GordonD, AlexanderH, antoine, markva, RRSAgent, Zakim, emma, danbri, digikim, edsu 15:02:15 zakim, aaaa is monica 15:02:15 +monica; got it 15:02:47 marcia has joined #lld 15:02:53 +??P10 15:03:04 zakim, ??P10 is kcoyle 15:03:04 +kcoyle; got it 15:03:14 Scribe: Monica 15:03:24 scribenick: monica 15:04:31 +marcia 15:04:41 PROPOSED: To accept minutes of previous telecon: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/18-lld-minutes.html 15:04:53 Topic: Admin 15:05:17 ACCEPTED 15:05:19 +[IPcaller] 15:05:30 zakim, IPcaller is kai 15:05:30 +kai; got it 15:06:04 Topic PITTSBURGH MEETING - RESULTS 15:06:19 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/FinalReportOutline 15:06:24 Emma: Outline of the report 15:06:51 ?? has asked for outline of report 15:07:13 ..this is very early draft in early stages everyone welcome to comment 15:07:14 s/??/some partcipants 15:07:17 Zakim, mute me 15:07:17 ww should now be muted 15:07:36 +??P13 15:07:41 P13 is me 15:07:52 Zakim, ??P13 is digikim 15:07:52 +digikim; got it 15:07:53 usecases and requirements extracted from UC will be in section of report 15:08:01 ww: thanks, never remember the syntax :) 15:08:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0120.html 15:08:24 ....we need to figure out what it will look like 15:08:27 np. me neither. took me several tries when i logged in 15:08:59 zakim, who is making noise? 15:08:59 \me too much keyboard noise 15:09:06 I hear someone typing; cannot hear discussion well 15:09:11 jodi, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: antoine (13%), emma (30%) 15:09:15 zakim, please mute me 15:09:15 antoine should now be muted 15:09:17 -GordonD 15:09:28 .. next report section - available data 15:09:43 + +49.173.609.aabb 15:09:47 q+ 15:10:07 zakin, aabb is jneubert 15:10:31 +??P2 15:11:04 zakim, ??P2 is GordonD 15:11:05 I already had ??P2 as gordon, antoine 15:11:22 ack markva 15:11:26 zakim, gordon is GordonD 15:11:26 +GordonD; got it 15:11:27 Zakim, gordon is GordonD 15:11:28 +GordonD; got it 15:11:39 markva q about terminology 15:11:55 ...'vocabulary' a loaded term 15:12:17 ...element sets proposed for things like FRBR 15:12:28 ...is htis the time to make the decision 15:12:36 +1 value vocabularies 15:12:40 at least in the report what is aimed is "metadata element set" 15:12:49 ...limited number of people joined in the discussion 15:12:54 ... in section "vocabularies" 15:13:00 ...what is the process for coming to a decision? 15:13:10 FRBR is a conceptual model 15:13:42 ...discussion seems to be spread across multiple thread 15:13:50 Re: AW: SemWeb terminology page is one of the other threads 15:14:00 there is also a frbr ontology that has been defined in a number of formats 15:14:09 emma: placeholder in report for terminology 15:14:13 there is frbroo, frbrer, and frbr core 15:14:26 conceptual model and data model should be differently identified 15:14:36 ...sees discussion on irc invites contribs 15:15:14 marcia: conceptual models are models, implementations are different 15:15:25 ...original FRBR is still conceptual model 15:15:30 q+ 15:15:35 they are -- they have been defined in rdf 15:15:41 ack alex 15:15:43 emma: once in RDF would they be vocabs? 15:16:07 +1 Alexander 15:16:22 ??: discussion is more about separation between value vocabs and element sets 15:16:29 s/??/AlexanderH 15:16:37 Vocabularies derived from conceptual models can be used in same way as those derived from data models - just expect conceptual models to be broader or less detailed 15:16:38 yes, that is the discussion 15:16:52 q+ 15:16:58 ack ant 15:17:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html fsasaki 15:17:34 -digikim 15:17:42 antoine: points made that ? 15:17:47 but there are properties that don't derive from models i.e. FOAF 15:18:00 +??P13 15:18:04 there is an implicit model in docs of FOAF 15:18:06 Zakim: P13 is digikim 15:18:07 emma: agress with AlexanderH 15:18:17 Zakim, P13 is digikim 15:18:17 sorry, digikim, I do not recognize a party named 'P13' 15:18:22 I think model/implementation discussion not relevant here 15:18:30 Zakim, ??P13 is digikim 15:18:30 +digikim; got it 15:18:40 AlexanderH: make distinction that conceptual models are models and have been implemented 15:19:13 emma: not make decision now but on mailing list 15:19:24 emma: back to outline of report 15:19:31 there certainly was some thinking behind the FOAF design; it wasn't arbitrary, although it evolved bit by bit. But FOAF isn't an RDFification of some pre-existing, written down 'model'... 15:19:34 s/points made that/the report should only mention conceptual models through their implementation as metadata vocabularies 15:19:37 emma: next section recommendations 15:20:09 ...tried to organise outcomes of F2F mtg into sections 15:20:32 ...again very early draft to give idea of how to organise report, non-definitive 15:20:43 ...everybody please look at report outline 15:20:52 Why say "LLdata should be produced using the FR's as domain model."? There are other domain models, eg ISBD ... 15:20:54 is an action? 15:21:08 ...we need feedback on early draft to move forward 15:21:44 ...any comments? 15:21:45 @GordonD: good point to make in your future remarks on the outline :-) 15:21:45 sounds good 15:22:25 emma: feedback welcome on list discuss further on future call 15:22:33 TOPIC: USECASES 15:22:51 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases 15:23:05 emma: invites comments from cluster owners 15:23:08 q+ 15:23:14 ack markva 15:23:32 markv: no further progress to report 15:23:45 ...emails suggested scenarios need to be extracted 15:24:10 emma: idea is to suggest how it could look like in report 15:24:25 ...how to tranform use cases into something readable for report 15:24:28 Gordon and Martin yet to start on their cluster - but expect to make good progress after we get started ;-) 15:24:32 mark: no time to look at that yet 15:24:46 idea of abstract scenarios was also mentioned in previous calls here 15:24:55 ??: is this agreed what is the status? 15:25:03 s/??/markva 15:25:05 emma: not decided mentioned on previous call 15:25:49 ...need feedback from clusters if it is a good idea 15:25:59 +1 for abstraction 15:26:00 markv: agrees it is a good idea to give more abstraction 15:26:00 +1 with abstracting 15:26:16 s/markv/markva/ 15:26:35 emma: in archive cluster we have started to look at this and work in that direction 15:26:47 zakim, mute me 15:26:47 markva should now be muted 15:27:12 regrets+ Martin 15:27:26 hard time hearing 15:27:50 we have new goals; we need to decide whether to add them to the goals page 15:28:01 or to create a new page, or a new section on that page 15:28:01 great!! 15:28:05 emma: we tried to make goals fit ones from mark's cluster, but they were quite different 15:28:12 ...we need to add new page 15:28:26 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Goals 15:28:55 +1 with that process! 15:28:59 s/new page/new goals to teh page/ 15:29:45 ... more description for goals needed 15:29:52 ...any otehr feedback? 15:30:02 s/otehr/other/ 15:30:14 yep, hard to define goals clearly, generic and specific at same time 15:30:27 TOPIC: USE CASE ACTIONS 15:30:37 q+ 15:30:55 ack monica 15:30:57 scribe:antoine 15:31:06 scribenick:antoin 15:31:11 scribenick:antoine 15:31:30 monica: my colleagues at JISC couldn't make it for today 15:31:39 ... but they're happy to discuss on the public list 15:31:46 +??P15 15:32:39 monica: what is the interest of the group here? 15:32:53 ... how JISC gathers information? Something else? 15:33:17 ... this will help identify who would come and talk about the JISC work 15:33:18 for me the interest is how they gathered the use cases 15:33:27 Asaf has joined #lld 15:33:34 emma: interest in on UCs they gathered on the web site 15:33:34 and whether they have any suggestions for comparing our use cases to theirs 15:33:54 (I'd like to make sure we don't have systematic bias in how we've come up with them, by doing them the same way.) 15:34:15 monica: ok, I'll see if someone (??) if he can answers questions 15:34:37 owen stephens is our contact 15:34:38 ... easier however if discussion start on list for better scoping 15:34:50 ACTION: Antoine to ask Monica to lead discussion about JISC use cases at http://obd.jisc.ac.uk/navigate [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/18-lld-minutes.html#action03] 15:34:52 --DONE 15:35:18 ACTION: Monica and JISC colleagues to introduce and discuss JISC work on next call 15:35:38 scribe: Monica 15:35:44 scribenick: monica 15:35:44 scribenick:monica 15:37:04 TOPIC:wikipages 15:37:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0107.html 15:37:12 ACTION: William: to summarize options for using CKAN to the list, before next concall [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/11-lld-minutes.html#action01] 15:37:13 --DONE 15:37:14 Zakim, unmute me 15:37:14 ww should no longer be muted 15:37:15 q+ 15:37:22 ack ww 15:37:33 william: reiterate what is in email 15:37:50 for people to curate group people need to login to CKAN 15:38:02 ...inform ww and kcoyle about their openID 15:38:15 ...could we all do this? 15:38:18 I'm interested, need to login, etc. :) 15:38:22 +1 15:38:26 long-term, maybe. Right now, quite over-committed. 15:38:26 emma: volunteers to curate CKAN 15:38:38 ...jodi, antoine 15:38:44 +1 15:39:11 ACTION: volunteers to send login information to william waite to curate CKAN 15:39:20 Zakim, mute me 15:39:20 ww should now be muted 15:39:23 q+ 15:39:31 ksclarke has joined #lld 15:39:40 ack ant 15:39:43 TOPIC UPCOMING FACE-TO-FACE MEETING AT SWIB10 IN COLOGNE 15:40:06 antoine: in ww's mail there was a proposed strategy 15:40:24 relation between bibliographic and LOD group 15:40:30 +1 15:40:42 ksclarke has joined #lld 15:40:43 emma: idea is to create an LLD group 15:41:30 Zakim, unmute me 15:41:30 ww should no longer be muted 15:41:31 ...was there feedback on the list? 15:41:52 ww: there was a question about relationship between LOD and LODCloud 15:42:04 ...LODCloud has more requirements e.g. quality 15:42:12 ...quality checked manually 15:42:17 q+ 15:42:21 ...that was extent of questions 15:42:39 ack antoine 15:42:46 anotoine: no objection to suggestion 15:43:03 ...propose to resolve to follow strategy as suggested by ww 15:43:35 -??P15 15:43:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0107.html 15:43:58 RESOLVE: follow strategy of creating LLD group for CKAN http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0107.html 15:44:24 +[IPcaller] 15:44:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html antoine 15:44:35 Zakim, mute me 15:44:35 ww should now be muted 15:44:38 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Nov/0128.html 15:44:40 Zakim, IPcaller is me 15:44:40 +Asaf; got it 15:44:49 TOPIC UPCOMING FACE-TO-FACE MEETING AT SWIB10 IN COLOGNE 15:44:53 zakim, mute me 15:44:53 markva was already muted, markva 15:44:56 emma: agenda has been sent 15:45:09 antoine: an informal meeting 15:45:21 ...entire group copied for information 15:45:48 ...have informal discussion, continue discussion from last weeks 15:46:13 ...first topic use case clusters 15:46:22 second topic final report outline 15:46:49 ...would people be interested in remote participation? 15:47:07 emma: is it possible to provide remote participation facility? 15:47:21 background noise? 15:47:26 ppl talking 15:47:26 ...who is interested is it worth doing? 15:47:43 antoine: annette is not here 15:47:57 zakim, who makes noise ? 15:47:57 I don't understand your question, emma. 15:48:03 zakim, who is making noise 15:48:03 I don't understand 'who is making noise', antoine 15:48:05 zakim, who is making noise? 15:48:09 zakim, who is noisy ? 15:48:19 antoine, listening for 13 seconds I heard sound from the following: antoine (8%), Asaf (79%), joachim (79%) 15:48:25 zakim, mute asaf 15:48:25 Asaf should now be muted 15:48:31 emma, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: antoine (32%), Asaf (44%), joachim (59%) 15:49:28 antoine: is it worth to make the effort to find the phone 15:49:49 emma: irc implies need to scribe which is more complicated than summarising the call 15:50:14 ??: there is a chance to have microphone on the phone will let us know 15:50:24 s/??/jneubert 15:50:33 q+ 15:50:39 emma: who else would liek to attend on irc or phone? 15:50:41 ack ant 15:50:51 ...not alot of interest 15:51:08 antoine: not the intention to force people to participate 15:51:24 ...but anyone wanting to join is welcome but keep it simple 15:51:43 emma: any other business 15:51:56 Has any of you been in touch with the Interedition group? 15:52:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html antoine 15:52:24 I just got back from an Interedition meeting in Pisa. 15:52:34 They are not too aware of linked data. 15:52:43 I tried to get them interested. 15:52:46 (still a bit noisy here) 15:52:50 (probably better to type_) 15:53:17 So they're doing digital editions of manuscripts. I'll add something about it on the wiki, yes. 15:53:20 yes. 15:53:32 -AlexanderH 15:53:35 -Jodi 15:53:36 bye! 15:53:37 thanks 15:53:37 -joachim 15:53:37 jodi has left #LLD 15:53:38 -kai 15:53:40 -GordonD 15:53:40 -felix 15:53:41 -ww 15:53:41 -Asaf 15:53:42 -digikim 15:53:44 -kcoyle 15:53:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html antoine 15:53:48 adjourned 15:53:52 zakim, list attendees 15:53:52 As of this point the attendees have been antoine, emma, GordonD, markva, AlexanderH, felix, Jodi, ww, +44.194.346.aaaa, monica, kcoyle, marcia, kai, digikim, +49.173.609.aabb, 15:53:52 zakim, unmute me 15:53:55 ... joachim, Asaf 15:53:55 markva should no longer be muted 15:53:56 -marcia 15:53:59 thanks everyone 15:55:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html antoine 15:55:43 -markva 15:57:51 -monica 15:58:03 -emma 15:58:08 zakim, bye 15:58:08 leaving. As of this point the attendees were antoine, emma, GordonD, markva, AlexanderH, felix, Jodi, ww, +44.194.346.aaaa, monica, kcoyle, marcia, kai, digikim, +49.173.609.aabb, 15:58:08 Zakim has left #lld 15:58:11 ... joachim, Asaf 15:58:32 rrsagent, bye 15:58:32 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-actions.rdf : 15:58:32 ACTION: Antoine to ask Monica to lead discussion about JISC use cases at http://obd.jisc.ac.uk/navigate [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/18-lld-minutes.html#action03] [1] 15:58:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc#T15-34-50 15:58:32 ACTION: Monica and JISC colleagues to introduce and discuss JISC work on next call [2] 15:58:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc#T15-35-18 15:58:32 ACTION: William: to summarize options for using CKAN to the list, before next concall [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/11-lld-minutes.html#action01] [3] 15:58:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc#T15-37-12 15:58:32 ACTION: volunteers to send login information to william waite to curate CKAN [4] 15:58:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-irc#T15-39-11