15:01:11 RRSAgent has joined #hcg 15:01:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-irc 15:01:13 RRSAgent, make logs member 15:01:13 Zakim has joined #hcg 15:01:15 Zakim, this will be HTML_CG 15:01:15 ok, trackbot, I see HTML_CG()10:00AM already started 15:01:16 Meeting: Hypertext Coordination Group Teleconference 15:01:16 Date: 19 November 2010 15:01:56 +Bert 15:01:59 Bert has joined #hcg 15:02:20 +ChrisL 15:03:16 plh-home has joined #hcg 15:03:24 +Plh 15:04:02 shepazu has joined #hcg 15:04:07 zakim, drop plh 15:04:07 Plh is being disconnected 15:04:08 -Plh 15:04:15 +Plh 15:04:26 kaz has joined #hcg 15:04:59 Regrets: Daniel Glazman, Robin Berjon, Cameron McCormack, Erik Dahlström, Art Barstow, Charles 15:04:59 McCathieNevile, Frederick Hirsch, Lofton Henderson 15:05:05 +??P10 15:05:26 zakim, ??P10 is Kaz 15:05:26 +Kaz; got it 15:05:39 zakim, who is here? 15:05:39 On the phone I see Debbie_Dahl, Bert, ChrisL, Plh, Kaz 15:05:41 On IRC I see kaz, shepazu, plh-home, Bert, Zakim, RRSAgent, ChrisL, ddahl, plinss, ed, trackbot 15:06:12 zakim, mute plh 15:06:12 Plh should now be muted 15:06:18 +Shepazu 15:06:18 +Doug_Schepers 15:06:32 -Doug_Schepers 15:06:39 volunteer for scribe? 15:07:26 scribe: plh 15:07:50 Topic: Action items 15:08:09 ACTION-58? 15:08:09 ACTION-58 -- Philippe Le Hégaret to follow up on bugzilla accessibility issues -- due 2010-10-29 -- OPEN 15:08:09 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/CoordGroup/track/actions/58 15:08:20 zakim, plh is me 15:08:20 +plh-home; got it 15:08:47 plh: systeam updated to latest bugzilla, may have helped. 15:08:56 close ACTION-58 15:08:57 ACTION-58 Follow up on bugzilla accessibility issues closed 15:09:27 Topic: Status report 15:09:51 chris: would be good if people were sending status report 15:10:04 ... maybe Debiie and I can put back the list of status report 15:10:12 ... it is possible for staff contacts to send them 15:10:18 ... nit just chairs 15:10:53 Debbie: don't think there is anything we can do to make it easier 15:11:06 ... it's a matter of a few sentence on what's going on 15:11:29 agenda+ TC 39 15:11:41 Chris: it's quite useful to have them all in one place 15:11:51 ... it's useful if there are upcoming last call 15:12:19 Doug: having some sort of structure might help. resolutions, working drafts, etc. 15:12:50 agenda+ TR draft warnings 15:13:32 Chris: yes, maybe Debbie and I can work on a template 15:13:49 ACTION: Chris to develop a template for WG status report 15:13:49 Created ACTION-61 - Develop a template for WG status report [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-11-26]. 15:14:05 Debbie: key thing is how it affects other groups 15:14:43 zakim, move to next agendum 15:14:43 agendum 1. "TC 39" taken up [from plh-home] 15:14:43 agenda+ Web Events and Touch Interface 15:14:55 scribenick: chrisl 15:15:14 plh remotely attended tc39 in california 15:15:32 ... topics included working better with w3c, liason list will be sent 15:15:51 ... cameron was there and other webapps wg folks, talked about webidl 15:16:11 .. to better understand it. expect iason request soon - webapps, dap, etc 15:16:21 s/iason/liaison 15:16:27 ds: webevents? 15:16:33 plh (long list) 15:17:21 s/liason/liaison/ 15:18:31 ds: we don't do org to org liaison, mostly group to group 15:18:46 plh; we do, sometimes, but don't favour it 15:18:52 ds: say we don't do it 15:18:56 s/plh;/plh:/ 15:18:59 plh: its not true though 15:19:44 plh: once we have a request we will direct them to the right groups 15:20:03 ds: we already have a mailing list specifically for webapps webidl work 15:20:21 plh: they do not necessarily understand everything we do in this space 15:20:39 ... like multiple additions to the window object 15:21:05 ds: don't think a formal liaison will help here 15:21:16 plh: only caught the end of the discussion 15:21:35 ... we could give them a full list of specs containing apis 15:21:44 ds: sounds like makework 15:21:53 plh: /TR has that already 15:22:26 agenda? 15:22:32 Topic: LC 15:22:38 Chris: WOFF is ongoing 15:22:44 ... any other? 15:22:45 agenda+ Web-on-TV 15:23:01 zakin, close agendum 1 15:23:10 zakim, close agendum 1 15:23:10 agendum 1, TC 39, closed 15:23:11 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:23:13 2. TR draft warnings [from plh-home] 15:23:22 zakim, move to next agendum 15:23:23 agendum 2. "TR draft warnings" taken up [from plh-home] 15:24:10 plh: html wg started it, now spread to others; warning that editors draft is more up to date 15:25:27 plh: so they wanted to redirect people to editors drafts where feedback is incorporated rapidly 15:26:10 plh: so its fne to warn people but remind WGs to update /TR version at least every three months 15:26:21 ... some drafts not updated for a year or more 15:26:35 ... heartbeat requirement 15:27:11 ... was not enoughfor html wg, more frequent than 3 months was needed 15:27:24 q+ 15:27:30 s/enoughfor/enough for/ 15:27:44 http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html 15:27:50 chris: how to add this while still meeting pubrules? 15:28:17 plh: various ways to do it, people still miss the link sometimes 15:28:22 q+ to ask that WG's refrain from making public editor's drafts. It is hard enough already to explain to people what the various statuses on /TR mean... 15:28:25 [I've added an Editor's Draft and Public Comments link to the top of DOM3 Events] 15:28:59 plh: some groups have popups. any of these is fine, no specific format is recommended at the moment 15:29:11 ... more and more groups have public editors versions 15:29:20 ack shepazu 15:29:53 ds: its fine to experiment but there is a lot to be said for consistency across specs. should have a standardised way to do it 15:30:12 ... otherwise its harder for casual consumers of secs to figure it out 15:30:33 ... dom3 events has editors draft link at the top, also added a public comments link 15:30:47 ... because people cat figure out how to comment on a spec 15:31:02 s/cat/can't/ 15:31:15 ... people don't read the sotd 15:32:01 chris: people ignore sotd? 15:32:29 ds: this is a good way to present it 15:33:26 ChrisL: looks lie a clear way, we could standardize on that 15:33:28 Doug: check out how I did for DOM3 events to advertize the archive for public comments 15:33:29 ack bert 15:33:29 Bert, you wanted to ask that WG's refrain from making public editor's drafts. It is hard enough already to explain to people what the various statuses on /TR mean... 15:34:00 bert: agree on consistency, public comment link is good, but now its different from other wgs 15:34:08 ... need rules for this 15:34:16 Bert: agree with consistency otherwise it will be impossible to follow between working groups 15:34:24 ... the /TR process is the right one 15:34:33 ... we should keep to w3c process 15:34:55 Doug: it's appropriate to experiment with several ways. don't see a problem with that, as long as we get to the best way 15:35:11 bert: the format was set more than 10 years ago 15:35:28 doug: don't think we should simply follow history 15:35:56 chris: 10 years ago, everything single group worked in members space and it was easy to update /TR 15:36:15 ... things have changed now. we have public groups, with public editor's drafts 15:36:29 (For example, Doug's draft doesn't have "latest version" but "latest stable version", which means some of my scripts fail. :-( ) 15:36:37 ... and responses to comments can point to editor's draft 15:37:27 Bert: we have a dozen state for /TR drafts nowadays. it's impossible to explain all of that to people? 15:37:57 Doug: so, how do we explain to people that the draft they're looking at is out of date? 15:38:29 [stop minuting] 15:40:41 Chris: linking to editor's drafts should be done in a consistent manner. don't forget to update your /TR, ie don't let them rot. 15:41:33 ... let's pick one way to link to editor's draft and follow up 15:41:48 ... as well as the comment link 15:42:02 ... next step? seems we should take that to chairs 15:42:43 zakim, agenda? 15:42:43 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 15:42:45 ACTION: Doug to follow up to chairs on links to comments and editor's drafts 15:42:45 2. TR draft warnings [from plh-home] 15:42:45 Created ACTION-62 - Follow up to chairs on links to comments and editor's drafts [on Doug Schepers - due 2010-11-26]. 15:42:46 3. Web Events and Touch Interface [from shepazu] 15:42:48 4. Web-on-TV [from shepazu] 15:43:06 zakim, move to next agendum 15:43:06 agendum 3. "Web Events and Touch Interface" taken up [from shepazu] 15:43:14 Doug: we launched the Working Group 15:43:45 ... we're going to work on touch interfaces 15:43:54 ... physical actions 15:44:04 ... and high level events 15:44:10 ... such as undo 15:44:57 ... there are several ways to do undo (shake, menu edit, etc.) 15:45:24 ... similar to DOMActivate but more likely to be implemented. 15:45:38 Chris: sounds like a useful direction, similar to textevent 15:45:46 zakim, move to next agendum 15:45:46 agendum 4. "Web-on-TV" taken up [from shepazu] 15:46:06 Doug: head a lot at TPAC and in Japan. 15:46:11 s/head/heard/ 15:46:21 ... had discussion with various companies 15:46:31 ... remote controls is one case 15:46:48 ... we have this all new situation. browser/tv agents 15:46:55 ... kaz is the contact for this 15:47:42 chris: good to see activity in this area, but let's not create an other vertical silo. 15:47:54 ... ie let's avoid the subsetting effect 15:48:03 q+ 15:48:06 ... what sort of steps are being taken again that? 15:48:17 q? 15:48:29 Doug: received an email from comcast expressing that same sentiment 15:48:46 ack kaz 15:49:17 kaz: the conclusion has been to create an IG 15:50:18 ... we're not planning to create a new silo or new spec, but concentrate on use cases from broadcasters instead 15:51:00 -> http://www.w3.org/2010/09/web-on-tv/summary.html workshop summary 15:51:28 debbie: lots of different type of organizations are interested in this domain 15:51:35 -> http://www.w3.org/2010/09/web-on-tv/minutes.html#attendees workshop attendees 15:51:43 ... browser vendors, hardware makers, broadcasters, etc. 15:51:57 zakim, agenda? 15:51:58 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:52:00 4. Web-on-TV [from shepazu] 15:52:05 s/... browser/debbie: browser/ 15:52:32 Topic: Next meeting 15:52:39 Debbie: Dec 31 will be canceled 15:52:48 ... next one is Dec 3 15:53:04 Chris: Dec 17 will be fine as well. 15:53:36 Next meeting is Dec 3 15:53:57 [adjourned] 15:54:02 zakim, list participants 15:54:02 As of this point the attendees have been Debbie_Dahl, Bert, ChrisL, Kaz, Shepazu, Doug_Schepers, plh-home 15:54:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-minutes.html plh-home 15:54:05 -ChrisL 15:54:06 -plh-home 15:54:07 -Shepazu 15:54:09 -Debbie_Dahl 15:54:10 ddahl has left #hcg 15:54:16 -Kaz 15:54:27 -Bert 15:54:28 HTML_CG()10:00AM has ended 15:54:30 Attendees were Debbie_Dahl, Bert, ChrisL, Kaz, Shepazu, Doug_Schepers, plh-home 15:59:22 i/Chris: WOFF is ongoing/scribenick: plh-home/ 15:59:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-minutes.html plh-home 15:59:51 Chair: Chris 16:00:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-minutes.html plh-home 16:00:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-minutes.html plh-home 16:01:09 I'm working on them 16:01:38 scribenick: plh-home 16:01:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/19-hcg-minutes.html plh-home 16:15:50 Bert has left #hcg