14:14:15 RRSAgent has joined #dap 14:14:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/17-dap-irc 14:14:17 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:14:17 Zakim has joined #dap 14:14:19 Zakim, this will be DAP 14:14:19 ok, trackbot; I see UW_DAP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 46 minutes 14:14:20 Meeting: Device APIs and Policy Working Group Teleconference 14:14:20 Date: 17 November 2010 14:14:54 Regrets+ John_Morris, Marco_Marengo, Suresh_Chitturi 14:15:36 Regrets+ Robin_Berjon 14:24:09 soonho has joined #dap 14:24:42 Present+ Soonho_Lee 14:27:20 Marcos has joined #dap 14:39:57 fjh has joined #dap 14:40:06 Chair: Frederick_Hirsch 14:40:15 Present+ Frederick_Hirsch 14:40:24 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0049.html 14:41:30 Regrets+ Claes_Nilsson 14:56:36 UW_DAP()10:00AM has now started 14:56:43 +??P0 14:56:46 zakim, ??P0 is me 14:56:46 +fjh; got it 14:58:44 cmarc has joined #dap 14:58:54 Present+ Cecile_Marc 14:59:36 Zakim, code? 14:59:36 the conference code is 3279 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), dom 14:59:46 dom has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0049.html 15:00:10 + +358.504.86aaaa 15:00:10 +Dom 15:00:20 zakim, aaaa is ilkka 15:00:20 +ilkka; got it 15:00:21 Present+ Dominique_Hazael-Massieux 15:00:29 Present+ Ilkka_Oksanen 15:00:31 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:00:31 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom 15:00:43 zakim, who is here? 15:00:43 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom 15:00:44 On IRC I see cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, richt, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:01:07 richt has joined #dap 15:01:36 maoteo has joined #dap 15:01:55 Present+ Maria_Oteo 15:02:19 + +1.781.266.aabb 15:03:27 Zakim, aabb probably Cathy_Chan 15:03:28 I don't understand 'aabb probably Cathy_Chan', dom 15:03:34 Zakim, aabb is probably Cathy_Chan 15:03:34 +Cathy_Chan?; got it 15:03:41 AnssiK has joined #dap 15:03:55 zakim, who is here? 15:03:55 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom, Cathy_Chan? 15:03:56 On IRC I see AnssiK, maoteo, richt, cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:04:15 nwidell has joined #dap 15:04:19 cathy has joined #dap 15:04:43 + +358.504.86aacc 15:04:45 + +34.97.421.aadd 15:04:46 Present+ Anssi_Kostiainen 15:04:53 zakim, aacc is AnssiK 15:04:53 +AnssiK; got it 15:05:05 + +46.1.07.15.aaee 15:05:10 +??P8 15:05:15 Zakim, aadd is maoteo 15:05:15 +maoteo; got it 15:05:18 jgiraud has joined #dap 15:05:18 Present+ Cathy_Chan 15:05:26 Zakim, aaee is nwidell 15:05:26 +nwidell; got it 15:05:33 Present+ Niklas_Widell 15:05:36 Present+ Jerome_Giraud 15:06:05 dcoloma has joined #dap 15:06:14 Present+ Daniel_Coloma 15:06:41 zakim, who is here? 15:06:41 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom, Cathy_Chan?, AnssiK, maoteo, nwidell, ??P8 15:06:43 On IRC I see dcoloma, jgiraud, cathy, nwidell, AnssiK, maoteo, richt, cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:07:38 + +44.757.091.aaff 15:07:46 zakim, aaff is me 15:07:46 +richt; got it 15:07:51 + +1.781.534.aagg 15:07:53 Present+ Richard_Tibbett 15:08:19 Zakim, ??P8 is soonho 15:08:19 +soonho; got it 15:08:20 Present+ Laszlo_Gombos 15:08:23 zakim, who is here? 15:08:23 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom, Cathy_Chan?, AnssiK, maoteo, nwidell, soonho, richt, +1.781.534.aagg 15:08:25 On IRC I see dcoloma, jgiraud, cathy, nwidell, AnssiK, maoteo, richt, cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:08:28 Zakim, aagg is probably Laszlo 15:08:28 +Laszlo?; got it 15:08:48 zakim, aagg is me 15:08:48 sorry, lgombos, I do not recognize a party named 'aagg' 15:09:07 zakim, who is here? 15:09:07 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom, Cathy_Chan?, AnssiK, maoteo, nwidell, soonho, richt, Laszlo? 15:09:09 On IRC I see dcoloma, jgiraud, cathy, nwidell, AnssiK, maoteo, richt, cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:09:15 scribeNick: maoteo 15:09:21 Zakim, aagg is really lgombos 15:09:21 sorry, dom, I do not recognize a party named 'aagg' 15:09:28 Zakim, laszlo is really lgombos 15:09:28 +lgombos; got it 15:09:32 +Vincent_Mahe 15:10:04 TOPIC: Administrativia 15:10:06 If you attended this year's TPAC meeting, the W3C created a related survey for your feedback: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/tpac2010-feedback/ 15:10:19 2011 1H publishing moratorium 13-18 May, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-device-apis/2010Nov/0006.html 15:10:29 fjh: there is a survey for getting feedback about TPAC 15:10:43 fjh: can we approve the F2F minutes? 15:10:58 TOPIC: Minutes approval 15:11:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/att-0047/minutes-2010-11-04.html 15:11:01 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/att-0047/minutes-2010-11-05.html 15:11:16 RESOLUTION: The F2F minutes were approved 15:11:26 TOPIC: Media Capture API 15:11:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0048.html 15:11:53 ilkka: sent a summary to the mailing list about the changes done 15:11:54 http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/Overview-API.html 15:12:07 ... the biggest change is about supported video/audio formats 15:12:08 In a nutshell Capture API is not anymore using MediaFileData interface 15:12:08 from HTML Media Capture spec as MediaFileData can't describe well 15:12:08 available image, audio and video modes. To replace MediaFileData I added 15:12:09 new ConfigurationData interface that currently contains height, width, 15:12:09 and MIME type attributes. 15:12:26 dditionally user of the API is now able to select one of the available 15:12:26 image/audio/video modes while starting the capture process. Updated 15:12:27 example illustrates this. 15:12:41 s/dditionally/Additionally 15:13:46 ... users can select the supported mode for image/audio/video 15:13:55 ... with the latest version of the spec. 15:14:43 ... Another change is that former API used MediaFileData 15:15:11 ... that was not very well suited for capture API, so I have added a separate interface for that. 15:15:56 q+ to ask about default mode 15:16:27 ack AnssiK 15:16:27 AnssiK, you wanted to ask about default mode 15:16:28 fjh: is it stable now, should we launch a CFC? 15:17:08 AnssiK: should we specify the default mode in case no mode is specified by developer? or should it be decided by the implementors? 15:17:43 ilkka: currently no default mode concept, if the parameter is not present, the behaviour is not specified. 15:17:55 ... it may make sense to specify it. 15:18:45 AnssiK: How can I know the characteristics of a mode without launching the capture method? 15:19:50 -nwidell 15:20:29 +nwidell 15:20:29 fjh: do we need any changes in the API to address AnssiK coments? 15:20:40 AnssiK: no changes required, happy as it is 15:21:08 fjh: suggestion, one extra week to review it and decide to go for CFC during next call 15:22:00 ilkka: No rush to publish a media capture API as it was published recently 15:22:14 s/publish a/publish a new/ 15:22:31 TOPIC: Sysinfo 15:22:41 ACTION-294? 15:22:41 ACTION-294 -- Richard Tibbett to create an editors draft for new proposed network connection API -- due 2010-11-11 -- OPEN 15:22:41 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/294 15:22:57 fjh: There was an action to create a new draft based on a new model (294) 15:23:11 zakim, who is here? 15:23:11 On the phone I see fjh, ilkka, Dom, Cathy_Chan?, AnssiK, maoteo, soonho, richt, lgombos, Vincent_Mahe, nwidell 15:23:13 On IRC I see dcoloma, jgiraud, cathy, nwidell, AnssiK, maoteo, richt, cmarc, fjh, Marcos, soonho, Zakim, RRSAgent, JonathanJ, wmaslowski, ilkka, lgombos, trackbot, dom 15:23:48 cannot hear what richt is saying 15:23:55 can you please summarize in IRC 15:24:46 richt: I will create a new proposal for this API, there is a lot of work to be done 15:25:19 ... an API only for network connection might be simpler 15:25:24 general agreement that no consensus at this point 15:25:43 fjh: Need to wait for richt proposal 15:25:49 TOPIC: Contacts 15:26:11 http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/Writer.html 15:26:16 (also linked from DAP home page) 15:26:17 fjh: is there an editor's draft for contacts writing? 15:26:28 richt: I sent an e-mail with the info 15:26:48 ... available at http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/Writer.html 15:26:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0002.html 15:27:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0027.html 15:27:25 ... the e-mail is available at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0027.html 15:28:05 ... this is for creating a Contact Blob Writer 15:28:19 ... Now we have two competing ways to write contacts. 15:28:39 Contact Blob Writer spec is here: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/BlobWriter.html 15:28:48 fjh: can somebody take an action to review it? 15:28:54 ACTION: Dom to review Contact Blob writer proposal http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/BlobWriter.html 15:28:54 Created ACTION-306 - Review Contact Blob writer proposal http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/BlobWriter.html [on Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux - due 2010-11-24]. 15:29:02 dom: I can review the new API 15:30:08 richt: It would be good to stabilize the API and go soon for a Last Call 15:30:25 ... and start working on test cases 15:30:33 plan to publish updated WD of contacts api, http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/contacts/Overview.html 15:30:42 dom: what is preventing us from going to last call at this stage? 15:31:13 q+ to ask about testing changes before Last Call 15:31:23 there are 5 open issues with Contacts API http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/products/5 15:31:24 richt: The reader side at least is quite solid 15:32:42 dom: the only problem could be still having open issues on the API 15:32:48 need to review issues related to contacts before last call 15:32:52 q? 15:32:54 q- 15:33:45 action: rich to send email to list with resolutions for open issues against contacts, clarifying status 15:33:45 Sorry, couldn't find user - rich 15:33:53 richt: I will review the open issues and send an e-mail 15:34:03 action: richt to send email to list with resolutions for open issues against contacts, clarifying status 15:34:03 Created ACTION-307 - Send email to list with resolutions for open issues against contacts, clarifying status [on Richard Tibbett - due 2010-11-24]. 15:34:57 fjh: Can we do a CFC via e-mail or do we need to wait for next call? 15:35:09 JonathanJ has left #DAP 15:35:12 ... for the Last Call of the Contacts API. 15:36:20 fjh: none of the chairs will be around next week, so it may be better to wait for the following call 15:36:45 dom: I suggest to wait for the review of the open issues before deciding what to do 15:37:02 dom, agreed 15:37:27 next steps: rich to send closure of contacts issues, WG and chairs to review and agree, then CfC for Last Call for Contacts API 15:38:10 TOPIC: Messaging 15:38:40 parameterization deferred, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Nov/0052.html 15:38:43 ACTION-302? 15:38:43 ACTION-302 -- Maria Angeles Oteo to morph Messaging API into an API that wraps URI schemes options and adds attachment/success callback, and split off subscription -- due 2010-11-12 -- OPEN 15:38:43 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/302 15:38:46 fjh: is the parameterization deferred? 15:40:05 maoteo: I have distributed the proposal with the other editors 15:40:11 maria- plan to publish update later this week 15:40:14 ... could upload it to the CVS by end of this week 15:40:31 TOPIC: Other APIs 15:40:38 fjh: Gallery, any update? 15:41:04 TOPIC: Security and Privacy 15:41:20 fjh: no concrete actions or updates at this point 15:42:00 TOPIC: Interop and testing 15:42:06 Information on WebApps/HTML5 javascript framework 15:42:13 http://test.w3.org/resources/testharness.js 15:42:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2010Nov/ 15:42:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2010Nov/0055.html 15:42:46 fjh: Do we have something we should share with regards to the test framework? 15:43:15 dom: There has been already some discussions on the html testsuite mailing list 15:43:34 to see your actions, use http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/users/my 15:43:45 TOPIC: Actions 15:44:03 fjh: you can can check them on http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/users/my 15:44:41 fjh: where are we with regards to the Calendar discussions? 15:45:02 richt: we have an action to rewrite the calendar API, based in x-calendar 15:45:10 ... it is quite a long specification 15:45:36 ... I cannot dedicate all the time it needs 15:46:17 If someone else would like to work on the Calendar API, please step forward! 15:46:30 fjh: No call next week 15:46:41 I will certainly continue to assist with optimisations that we have in e.g. Contacts API (i.e. data minimization, etc). 15:46:45 ... next call will take place 1st December 15:46:57 -AnssiK 15:46:59 -Dom 15:47:01 -richt 15:47:02 -maoteo 15:47:02 -ilkka 15:47:04 -nwidell 15:47:04 -Cathy_Chan? 15:47:05 -fjh 15:47:05 -lgombos 15:47:11 -Vincent_Mahe 15:47:12 rrsagent, generate minutes 15:47:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/17-dap-minutes.html fjh 15:47:42 -soonho 15:47:43 UW_DAP()10:00AM has ended 15:47:45 Attendees were fjh, +358.504.86aaaa, Dom, ilkka, +1.781.266.aabb, Cathy_Chan?, +358.504.86aacc, +34.97.421.aadd, AnssiK, +46.1.07.15.aaee, maoteo, nwidell, +44.757.091.aaff, richt, 15:47:48 ... +1.781.534.aagg, soonho, Laszlo?, lgombos, Vincent_Mahe 17:48:28 Zakim has left #dap