16:07:24 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 16:07:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/12-prov-xg-irc 16:07:26 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:07:26 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 16:07:28 Zakim, this will be 98765 16:07:28 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start 7 minutes ago 16:07:29 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 16:07:29 Date: 12 November 2010 16:07:34 Yolanda: Discussing report. Needs to go into official format. 16:07:45 rrsagent, make logs public 16:08:00 Paul: Report would benefit from an overall introduction. 16:10:42 ssahoo2 has joined #prov-xg 16:13:57 [Discussion of structure of report] 16:14:09 Yolanda: Need to explain the need for provenance at the beginning. 16:15:16 Paulo: Final report needs to be consistent with text in wiki. 16:17:26 Yolanda: The information does not have to be presented in the same way. Want a structure that is helpful for people new to provenance. 16:19:38 Yolanda: Christine volunteered to edit the final report. In doing this she can also provide the perspective of a reader new to provenance. 16:21:58 Paul: Suggest move paragraphs re statistics in terms on dimensions in provencance dimensions in the importance of provenance 16:24:59 Yolanda: We might be missing use cases of provenance so a bit worried about having statistics. The most useful statistic is that they highlight a variety of things. 16:26:35 Paulo: Why are we only focusing on the 3 use cases? 16:27:12 Yolanda: Because they have coverage over the dimensions and the use cases - to exemplify the issues. 16:27:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/State_of_the_Art_Report is done 16:28:10 Jim: State of the Art Report is now done. 16:29:13 Jim: If just a list Paul suggested just point to wiki page. Do we expand more? 16:29:26 I agree - brief description of vocabularies is good 16:29:49 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Final_Report_Draft#Relevant_technologies 16:30:14 +q 16:30:35 I think it is redundant to certain extent 16:31:49 I think removing the repeated vocabularies will be helpful 16:35:14 agree 16:35:21 yes 16:35:40 [? Re relevant technologies - list in an appendix] 16:36:32 [Events related to provenance - important to show that there is a lot of activity but perhaps move to an appendix] 16:37:07 -q 16:37:13 Yolanda: Suggest listing recurring series 16:37:25 agree 16:38:00 Yolanda: Might merge with literature survey 16:41:11 looks good 16:42:53 [Consensus - provenance voculabury is in the right section] 16:44:56 Jim: Current technology discussion - longer or shorter? 16:45:42 Yolanda: Concern - here we only cite a few - but have mentioned lots of references elsewhere 16:46:13 Yolanda: perhaps put a pointer and say it is not an exhaustive list (qualifier) 16:48:07 Paul; Could remove inline references because just examples and reference elsewhere 16:49:21 Paul: I don't think the big table is particularly useful in this report. 16:49:55 don't remove it, move it to the bibliography page. 16:50:07 yes 16:50:31 great 16:51:35 Simon: Roadmap - different sections written by different authors 16:52:03 Simon: Is there something people particularly want to see in this section? 16:54:04 Yolanda: Recommendations - are actually high-level, not comprehensive, most pressing ones we extracted - in short-term/long-term priority section - could say see these recurring themes ...core set of concepts 16:55:04 So you should introduce the recommendations 16:55:06 :-) 16:55:14 The group analysed the scenarios and looking at the scenarios - were some themes recurring and important - following 3 very important that provenance should address 16:55:38 yeah akk! 16:55:43 :- 16:55:45 :-) 16:56:35 eliminate all C-Attr 16:56:36 :-) 16:56:46 ok 16:57:14 Yolanda: Provenance in Web Architecture - could add something that Olaf drafted 16:57:55 Yolanda: Only a couple of telecons left. How to most effectively draft a charter? 16:58:42 Yolanda: Temporal constraint to finish by 30 November 2010. 16:59:30 +q 17:00:32 Paul: Suggest upload draft on the wiki and people provide comments there. 17:00:35 q- 17:00:36 +1 to the third idea. It is allways better start from something rather than start a new charter. 17:00:46 q+ 17:01:10 I think an interactive version of the Luc+Paul charter with deadline for putting in all comments and then have a telcon to discuss the comments would be helpful 17:01:55 Yolanda: Yes, follow that approach 17:01:55 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Proposal_for_a_Working_Group_on_Provenance 17:02:57 Paulo: Better to have a more collectively drafted document. 17:05:03 Yolanda: Understand that Paul is asking us to suggest changes via the wiki. 17:05:48 Yolanda: Maybe a call next week might be useful - to converge faster 17:06:43 Paul: Think collectively rewriting document is faster. 17:08:21 amen, specifics are good 17:10:58 sure 17:12:32 cool 17:15:03 Paulo will work on sending out a list of concrete issues that would be good to change in the charter put forward by Luc and Paul, perhaps having Jim's help 17:15:56 We expect that many items in this list will be agreable, but will also be better able to identify what needs to be further discussed. 17:30:18 Paulo will circulate this list by early next week so we can discuss by email and if needed have a telecon before the weekly group's telecon next Friday. 17:30:32 We need to do as much work as possible since we have 2 weeks left. 17:35:55 rrsagent, set log public 17:36:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:36:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/12-prov-xg-minutes.html YolandaGil 19:30:47 Zakim has left #prov-xg