16:03:35 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:03:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/11/02-soap-jms-irc 16:03:37 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:03:37 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:03:39 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:03:39 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start 3 minutes ago 16:03:40 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:03:40 Date: 02 November 2010 16:03:44 Zakim, who is here? 16:03:44 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has not yet started, padams 16:03:45 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Derek, peaston, eric, mphillip1, padams, trackbot, Yves 16:04:19 trackbot, start telcon 16:04:21 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:04:23 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:04:23 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start 4 minutes ago 16:04:24 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:04:24 Date: 02 November 2010 16:04:35 Zakim, who is here? 16:04:35 Zakim, who is here? 16:04:35 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has not yet started, eric 16:04:37 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has not yet started, mphillip1 16:04:38 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Derek, peaston, eric, mphillip1, padams, trackbot, Yves 16:04:54 Zakim, this is [will be] WS_SOAP-JM 16:04:54 sorry, mphillip1, I do not see a conference named '[will be] WS_SOAP-JM' in progress or scheduled at this time 16:05:02 Zakim, this is WS_SOAP-JM 16:05:02 ok, mphillip1; that matches WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM 16:05:17 Zakim, list 16:05:17 I see IA_WebApps(TPAC)4:00AM, XML_QueryWG(XQUERY)3:30AM, WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM, W3C_AC(*)8:00AM, IA_MFWG(TPAC)3:00AM, WAI_EOWG(EOWG)3:30AM, Team_(forms)12:33Z active 16:05:20 also scheduled at this time are T&S_XMLSEC(TPAC)3:00AM, WAI_PFWG(WAIPF)3:00AM, XML_ET-TF()11:00AM, SW_RIF()11:00AM, SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM 16:05:25 Zakim, who is here? 16:05:25 On the phone I see padams, Derek, +1.781.280.aaaa, mphillip, eric 16:05:26 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Derek, peaston, eric, mphillip1, padams, trackbot, Yves 16:06:08 Chair: Eric 16:06:25 alewis has joined #soap-jms 16:06:26 TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe 16:06:30 Scribe: Mark 16:06:41 TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes 16:06:52 http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-soap-jms-minutes.html 16:06:59 +alewis 16:07:27 Minutes are approved without modification 16:07:36 TOPIC: Review the agenda 16:08:00 No amendments to agenda 16:08:09 TOPIC: Administrative items 16:08:49 DST changes - US adjusts clock this week so back to normal next time 16:09:22 Week of Thanksgiving in US: Amy will not be available, but all other attendees expect to be here 16:09:46 We will see prior to the call whether it is worth having a meeting 16:11:17 Between Christmas and New Year Eric Mark, and Peter will definitely not be available 16:11:31 RESOLUTION: We will not have a meeting between Christmas and New Year 16:12:25 Eric: Charter for the workgroup runs until end of 2010, so producing a PR before then would be advantageous, but the W3C may tolerate an extension as long as the group is making progress 16:12:37 TOPIC: Review action items 16:12:56 Eric: 181 is complete - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Nov/0000.html 16:13:01 close action-181 16:13:01 ACTION-181 Fix broken link on landing page closed 16:13:40 Eric: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/193 - would like to declare complete 16:14:05 we are on tract to declare provisional URI 16:14:11 close action-193 16:14:11 ACTION-193 Investigate provisional uri process and how we would move forward after that closed 16:14:42 Eric: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/218 - has sent proposal for variant registry to mailing liost 16:14:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Oct/0031.html 16:15:48 close action-218 16:15:48 ACTION-218 Report back to the group on options for IANA registration of JMS variants closed 16:15:59 TOPIC: Specification Issues 16:16:02 No new issues 16:16:12 TOPIC: Moving to PR (via CR? & LC) 16:16:23 Eric: What do we need to do for test cases? 16:17:03 Peter: Will check the test cases are up to date 16:17:14 action peter to check the test cases are up to date 16:17:14 Created ACTION-219 - Check the test cases are up to date [on Peter Easton - due 2010-11-09]. 16:17:30 Eric: Any updates to the FAQ? 16:18:21 action Eric to review the FAQ 16:18:21 Created ACTION-220 - Review the FAQ [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-11-09]. 16:19:07 Eric: Shall we get the PR version of the doc ready? 16:20:13 Eric: Need to update the status of the document, change the URIs etc. 16:21:59 Eric: Suggest we wait a week or two then take an action to create a new PR copy 16:23:29 Eric: Next step is getting two implementations 16:23:40 Peter: Does IBM WAS support JAX-WS 16:23:47 Phil: Yes, it does 16:24:23 Peter: So that might be the closest option - tesing the WAS server against a CXF client 16:25:06 Derek: How would this work - set up VPN to a common server? 16:25:54 Eric: Should be sufficent to use (open source) CXF talking to another implementation, to work through the test cases 16:26:50 Eric: It is sufficent for us to assert to the W3C that the tests have been run and passed 16:27:26 Derek: Wouldn't it be better to have a portable test suite / WSDL etc. that all vendors could run 16:28:06 Phil: We agreed that we'd define the test suite but not create a common implementation of the tests 16:29:01 Peter: Should be possible to plug vendor's JMS implementations into CXF so that CXF test suite can talk to 3rd party vendors 16:33:35 Peter: Using the CXF test suite is straightforward if you know Maven and can buid 16:37:27 Discussion on allocation of test work 16:40:23 action Peter to send some orientation material on getting started and running CXF SOAP/JMS tests to Phil 16:40:23 Created ACTION-221 - Send some orientation material on getting started and running CXF SOAP/JMS tests to Phil [on Peter Easton - due 2010-11-09]. 16:46:41 Derek: Are the CXF test cases a full implementation of the SOAP/JMS tests? 16:46:54 Peter: Yes - apart from WSDL 2.0 16:49:14 Phil needs to drop off the call... I'll assume an action item for me will be created for looking into the testing of WAS and CXF... see you all next week :) 16:49:17 -padams 16:49:19 padams has left #soap-jms 16:51:50 action Derek to review the CXF tests to see if they can be tested against a Software AG implementation 16:51:50 Created ACTION-222 - Review the CXF tests to see if they can be tested against a Software AG implementation [on Derek Rokicki - due 2010-11-09]. 16:52:38 action Phil to Look into building and running the CXF tests against WAS 16:52:38 Created ACTION-223 - Look into building and running the CXF tests against WAS [on Phil Adams - due 2010-11-09]. 16:52:48 TOPIC: URI scheme 16:53:17 IETF is starting a new working group to take one-off RFCs like ours and help them through the process 16:53:43 Eric: IETF is closed for submitting new drafts until next Monday 16:54:10 Eric: Will aim to have a new draft for submission next week. 16:54:45 Eric: Has discussed IETF copyright with Oracle - still trying to progress this issue 16:55:36 Eric: There is an IETF apps mailing list where this is discussed 16:56:08 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss 16:56:26 TOPIC: AOB 16:56:39 None 16:56:42 -alewis 16:56:46 -Derek 16:56:47 -eric 16:56:48 - +1.781.280.aaaa 16:56:49 -mphillip 16:56:49 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 16:56:51 Attendees were padams, Derek, +1.781.280.aaaa, mphillip, eric, alewis 16:57:05 rrsagent, make minutes 16:57:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/11/02-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip1 16:57:28 eric has left #soap-jms 18:41:11 Zakim has left #soap-jms