15:58:34 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 15:58:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/10/05-soap-jms-irc 15:58:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:58:36 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 15:58:38 Zakim, this will be SJMS 15:58:38 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 15:58:39 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 15:58:39 Date: 05 October 2010 16:01:13 + +1.708.246.aabb 16:01:28 Derek has joined #SOAP-JMS 16:01:36 + +1.650.846.aacc 16:02:02 eric has joined #soap-jms 16:02:18 Zakim, who is here? 16:02:18 On the phone I see alewis, +1.708.246.aabb, +1.650.846.aacc 16:02:20 On IRC I see eric, Derek, Zakim, RRSAgent, alewis, mphillip, trackbot, Yves 16:02:25 padams2 has joined #soap-jms 16:02:28 Zakim, aacc is eric 16:02:28 +eric; got it 16:02:53 Zakim, aabb is Derek 16:02:53 +Derek; got it 16:02:55 + +1.512.286.aadd 16:03:24 Zakim, aadd is padams 16:03:24 +padams; got it 16:03:25 + +44.196.287.aaee 16:03:35 Zakim, aaee is me 16:03:36 +mphillip; got it 16:03:57 Scribe: Mark 16:04:01 Chair: Eric 16:04:18 TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes 16:04:36 Minutes approved with no amendments 16:04:47 TOPIC: Review the agenda 16:05:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Sep/0022.html 16:05:39 Link to minor issue 16:06:13 To be discuss under "Raised spec issues" 16:07:19 No other modifications 16:07:33 TOPIC: Administrative items 16:07:58 Eric: Apologies for cancellation last week 16:08:07 TOPIC: Review action items 16:08:48 Eric: Progress on 213 (prepare disposition of comments document ) but more work to do 16:09:42 Eric: Suggest we close 213 and raise new actions based on feedback 16:10:13 Eric: Rseponded to question about whitespace in URI per 215 16:10:55 close action-215 16:10:55 ACTION-215 Respond to question about encoding of white space in parameters closed 16:11:29 TOPIC: Raised spec issues: 16:11:34 + +1.617.519.aaff 16:11:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Sep/0022.html 16:13:18 peaston has joined #soap-jms 16:15:06 Mark: Issue is the paragraph describing encoding is too specific - suggest we broaden it to all characters in the URI instead of just parameter values 16:16:17 Eric: Doesn't affect normative text - could be considered an editorial change 16:16:50 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/64 16:17:39 RESOLUTION: No objections to opening this issue 16:18:32 No comments on proposed resolution 16:19:01 TOPIC: Accepting proposals to close open issues 16:19:21 RESOLUTION: The proposal for issue 64 is accepted as written 16:19:35 action mark to apply the proposal for issue 64 16:19:35 Created ACTION-216 - Apply the proposal for issue 64 [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-10-12]. 16:20:01 TOPIC: Accepting applied resolutions 16:20:03 None 16:20:11 TOPIC: Moving to PR (via CR) 16:20:48 Eric: Has the action to change the status of the document to reflect new status 16:21:35 Eric: Need to make a copy of the document so that the editors draft does not show new status 16:22:42 Eric: ...and make associated build changes. The run the pubrules checker over the document, and add the "status of the document" section 16:23:07 Eric: ...other last call working draft documents can be used for reference 16:23:32 Eric: Yves will be able to help chek the document 16:24:07 Eric: Still need the 2 working implementations to move to PR 16:25:15 Mark: Will have a go at updating the document with those changes 16:25:29 Eric: Action 212 reassigned to Mark 16:26:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Oct/0002.html 16:26:25 Eric: Disposition of comments at above link 16:26:51 Eric: About to check this document into CVS so oher people can edit 16:30:52 Eric: Other examples of Disposition of Comments documents have more complex status sections, but most of the SOAP/JMS issues have been raised and resolved by the workgroup without the resolutions being rejected, so we should be able to have a relatively simple set of tables 16:32:24 Mark: What is the section "Issues Agreed In Specification"? 16:34:24 Eric: "Issues Agreed In Specification" will be issues raised by people outside workgroup. 16:34:33 Eric: Question for workgroup - what to put in commentary section? 16:36:05 Eric: e.g. a link to the minutes where the resolution was discussed 16:37:24 Mark: A link to the email which describes the application should be sufficient 16:38:35 Eric: ...and a link to the minutes where we approved the proposed resolution - or modified the proposal to come up with a resolution 16:39:20 Eric: OK - will commit the current version to CVS and start to fill in the Commentary. 16:39:47 Eric: (Using OpenOffice to edit HTML if anyone else wants to help editing) 16:39:57 TOPIC: URI Scheme 16:40:56 Mark Nottingham is the reviewer - we owe him a response to his comments so far 16:42:30 Eric: (e.g. comment on the suggestion for a registry of JMS variants) 16:45:55 TOPIC: AOB 16:46:28 None 16:46:33 -Derek 16:46:34 -padams 16:46:34 -eric 16:46:35 -mphillip 16:46:37 - +1.617.519.aaff 16:46:37 -alewis 16:46:38 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 16:46:40 Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.708.246.aabb, +1.650.846.aacc, eric, Derek, +1.512.286.aadd, padams, +44.196.287.aaee, mphillip, +1.617.519.aaff 16:47:00 rrsagent, make minutes 16:47:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/10/05-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 16:47:02 padams has left #soap-jms 16:47:06 rrsagent, make log public 16:47:45 eric has left #soap-jms 17:48:06 mphillip1 has joined #soap-jms 18:36:06 Zakim has left #soap-jms 18:40:21 mphillip has joined #soap-jms