16:53:56 RRSAgent has joined #ua 16:53:56 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-irc 16:53:56 chair: Ford_Kelly, Allan_James 16:53:58 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:53:58 Zakim has joined #ua 16:54:00 Zakim, this will be WAI_UAWG 16:54:00 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_UAWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 16:54:01 Meeting: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 16:54:01 Date: 30 September 2010 16:54:06 scribe: Harper_Simon 16:54:06 ScribeNick: sharper 16:54:48 Date: Thursday, 30 September 2010 16:54:48 Time: 1:00-2:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html 16:54:48 Call-in: Zakim bridge at: +1-617-761-6200, code 82941# for UK use +44.203.318.0479 (London) 16:54:49 IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #ua. 16:55:17 kford has joined #ua 16:55:28 jeanne has joined #ua 16:55:42 zakim, agenda? 16:55:42 I see nothing on the agenda 16:55:50 editor versions 16:55:50 Guidelines: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/ED-UAAG20-20100920/ 16:55:51 Implementing: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/ED-IMPLEMENTING-UAAG20-20100920/ 16:55:51 Public documents 16:55:51 Guidelines - http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-UAAG20-20100617/ 16:55:52 Implementing - http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-IMPLEMENTING-UAAG20-20100617/ 16:55:53 -- Attendance survey: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/UAWG20100707/ 16:55:55 -- Scribe schedule and scribing help: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/scribing.html 16:55:57 -- Please monitor your open Action Items: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/actions/open 16:55:59 -- Open Issues: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/issues/open s updated documents 16:56:01 Agenda+ Action Item Review 16:56:03 Agenda+ Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/ 16:56:05 Agenda+ November F2F 16:56:07 Agenda+ Browser Implementations 16:56:09 Agenda+ HTML5 Concerns/Bugs 16:56:38 zakim, save agenda 16:56:45 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-agenda.rdf 16:56:45 rrsagent, make logs public 16:56:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:56:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 16:56:58 Agenda+ Action Item Review 16:57:00 Agenda+ Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/ 16:57:01 Agenda+ November F2F 16:57:04 Agenda+ Browser Implementations 16:57:06 Agenda+ HTML5 Concerns/Bugs 16:57:52 zakim, delete item 10 16:57:52 agendum 10, HTML5 Concerns/Bugs, dropped 16:58:00 zakim, delete item 9 16:58:00 agendum 9, Browser Implementations, dropped 16:58:07 zakim, delete item 8 16:58:07 agendum 8, November F2F, dropped 16:58:15 zakim, delete item 7 16:58:15 agendum 7, Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/, dropped 16:58:28 zakim, delete item 6 16:58:28 agendum 6, Action Item Review, dropped 16:58:41 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2010JulSep/0105.html 16:58:58 agenda+ HTML 5 Media Group Request 16:59:08 zakim, agenda? 16:59:08 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 16:59:10 1. Action Item Review [from sharper] 16:59:11 2. Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/ [from sharper] 16:59:13 3. November F2F [from sharper] 16:59:15 4. Browser Implementations [from sharper] 16:59:17 5. HTML5 Concerns/Bugs [from sharper] 16:59:19 11. HTML 5 Media Group Request [from kford] 16:59:43 present+ Harper_Simon 16:59:51 zakim, order is 5, 11, 2, 1, 3, 4 16:59:51 I don't understand 'order is 5, 11, 2, 1, 3, 4', kford 16:59:58 present+ Ford_Kelly 17:00:12 present+ Spellman_Jeanne 17:00:14 zakim, agenda? 17:00:14 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 17:00:16 1. Action Item Review [from sharper] 17:00:17 2. Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/ [from sharper] 17:00:20 3. November F2F [from sharper] 17:00:22 4. Browser Implementations [from sharper] 17:00:23 5. HTML5 Concerns/Bugs [from sharper] 17:00:24 11. HTML 5 Media Group Request [from kford] 17:00:27 zakim, save agenda 17:00:27 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-agenda.rdf 17:00:29 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started 17:00:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:00:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:00:37 +Jeanne 17:00:42 +Gregory_Rosmaita 17:01:06 present+ Rosmaita_Gregory 17:01:34 zakim: code? 17:01:50 zakim, code? 17:01:50 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), sharper 17:02:31 +??P6 17:02:41 zakim, ??P6 is sharper 17:02:41 +sharper; got it 17:03:26 +[Microsoft] 17:03:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:03:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:03:36 zakim, microsoft is kford 17:03:36 +kford; got it 17:03:43 +??P8 17:05:33 + +1.617.325.aaaa 17:05:39 zakim, who is here? 17:05:39 On the phone I see Jeanne, Gregory_Rosmaita, sharper, kford, ??P8, +1.617.325.aaaa 17:05:41 On IRC I see jeanne, kford, Zakim, RRSAgent, sharper, oedipus, trackbot 17:06:05 zakim, aaaa is Kim_Patch 17:06:05 +Kim_Patch; got it 17:07:02 zakim, who is noisy? 17:07:12 zakim, who is making noise? 17:07:13 oedipus, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gregory_Rosmaita (32%), Jeanne (14%), ??P8 (86%), Kim_Patch (5%) 17:07:23 sharper, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Gregory_Rosmaita (25%), Jeanne (19%), kford (5%), Kim_Patch (19%) 17:07:25 KimPatch has joined #ua 17:07:42 zakim, mute Gregory_Rosmaita 17:07:42 Gregory_Rosmaita should now be muted 17:07:51 Regrets:Jim 17:08:02 zakim, ??P8 is Hakkinen_Mark 17:08:02 +Hakkinen_Mark; got it 17:08:13 minutes from HTML A11y TF telecon 2010-09-30 http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-html-a11y-minutes.html 17:08:23 zakim, agenda 17:08:23 I don't understand 'agenda', kford 17:08:26 zakim, unmute Gregory_Rosmaita 17:08:26 Gregory_Rosmaita should no longer be muted 17:08:28 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:08:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 17:08:51 zakim, agenda 17:08:51 I don't understand 'agenda', kford 17:08:59 zakim, agenda? 17:08:59 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 17:09:01 1. Action Item Review [from sharper] 17:09:03 2. Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/ [from sharper] 17:09:05 3. November F2F [from sharper] 17:09:06 4. Browser Implementations [from sharper] 17:09:07 5. HTML5 Concerns/Bugs [from sharper] 17:09:08 11. HTML 5 Media Group Request [from kford] 17:09:10 zakim, take up item 5 17:09:10 agendum 5. "HTML5 Concerns/Bugs" taken up [from sharper] 17:09:23 q+ to ask if HTML5 can be addressed first 17:09:26 ack oed 17:09:26 oedipus, you wanted to ask if HTML5 can be addressed first 17:09:31 zakim, take up item 5 17:09:31 agendum 5. "HTML5 Concerns/Bugs" taken up [from sharper] 17:10:19 make @title a required attribute of FRAME and IFRAME http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10709 17:10:24 GR: Keyboard requirements approved by task force so logging as a bug 17:10:24 mhakkinen has joined #ua 17:11:34 GR: JAs suggestion for @title requirement of FRAME and IFRAME - people not supportive - we need to take this bug on in bugzilla 17:12:18 GR: As issues get logged HTML5 can comment directly in the bug 17:12:49 GR: Also filing a number of other comprehensive bugs. 17:13:34 Greg has joined #ua 17:13:37 GR: After tomorrow no bugs will be logged as pre-last call bugs - but bugs already in (even if closed by the editor) will be pre-last call bugs 17:14:02 regrets+ Richards_Jan 17:14:17 GR: will compile bug list and send to UA list 17:15:07 JS: will be back-up bug entry person if GR has systems failure before close of business Boston Time. 17:15:18 +??P11 17:16:08 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Access/pf_requirements_revision 17:16:15 zakim close item 5 17:16:46 KP: Going directly to links - is this more of a UI issue? 17:17:12 GR: yes - would like to talk with KP more about it - GR could not convince peorple it is not a UA issue 17:17:25 s/peorple/people 17:18:47 JS: about what an other codes and what the UA does ie providing a numeric for each link is something the UA should do, not the content developer 17:19:23 GR: we can work together on this - KP agrees - post meeting (meeting) agreed 17:19:34 zakim, close item 5 17:19:34 agendum 5, HTML5 Concerns/Bugs, closed 17:19:36 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:19:37 1. Action Item Review [from sharper] 17:19:46 zakim, take up item 11 17:19:46 agendum 11. "HTML 5 Media Group Request" taken up [from kford] 17:21:10 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Media_Accessibility_Checklist#ka 17:21:11 KF: Media Group have asked us to review a document: 17:21:18 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_Accessibility_Checklist 17:22:07 KF: is it accurate if they say we don't have a direct corrolation 2) how important do we think this is? 17:22:52 KF: First req - provide an indication that descriptions are available and are active or nonactive 17:23:18 KF: they say that it is not required for UAAG conformance - we say it is required 17:23:47 KF: We don't use 'audio description' ... 17:24:13 KF: they have 130 entries which we need to review and give answers to 17:24:47 KF: Discussion - Logistics of doing this. 17:27:06 KF: Meeting arranged - JS: KF: MH: 17:27:27 3.1.1 Identify Presence of Alternative Content: The user can have indicators rendered along with rendered elements that have alternative content (e.g. visual icons rendered in proximity of content that has short text alternatives, long descriptions, or captions). (Level A). 17:28:17 MH stepping away for a few mins 17:28:24 zakim, is there room for 3 tomorrow at 11:00? 17:28:27 ok, jeanne; conference Team_(ua)15:00Z scheduled with code 82942 (uawg2) tomorrow at 11:00 for 60 minutes until 1600Z 17:29:14 RESOLVED: Meeting arranged - JS KF MH 17:29:15 regrets+ Jan 17:29:28 zakim, close item 11 17:29:28 agendum 11, HTML 5 Media Group Request, closed 17:29:29 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:29:30 1. Action Item Review [from sharper] 17:29:41 zakim, take up item 2 17:29:41 agendum 2. "Finish Writers Meeting Survey#4 - http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100802-4/" taken up [from sharper] 17:30:43 topic: 3.6.3 Option Range Intent, Examples and Related Resources. 17:30:50 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/ED-UAAG20-20100802/MasterUAAG20100802.html#gl-text-config 17:31:46 A 1/ C 1 / D 3 17:36:12 GL: 3.6.1 doesn't say anthing about the range 17:36:23 s/anthing/anything/ 17:39:22 GL: Should we combine the 2 sc's 3.6.1 + 3.6.3 - but many iffs 17:40:19 KP: what is the advantage of combining - how clear will it be? 17:42:38 KP: add 3.6.3 after 3.6.1 17:42:47 GL Combines this to be 17:43:02 Here's the first draft of merging 3.6.3 into 3.6.1: 17:43:04 3.6.1 Configure Text: The user can globally set the following characteristics of visually rendered text content, overriding any specified by the author or user agent defaults (Level A): 17:43:06 • (a) text scale (i.e., the general size of text) , 17:43:07 • (b) font family, and 17:43:09 • (c) text color (i.e., foreground and background). 17:43:10 The range of options for each text characteristic includes at least (Level A): 17:43:12 • (a) the range offered by global preference settings supported by the operating environment (i.e configured though the Control Panel or System) utility, or 17:43:13 • (b) if no such utility is available, the range supported by the conventional APIs of the operating environment for drawing text. 17:43:29 GL needs to be smoothed 17:49:41 -Jeanne 17:50:04 +Jeanne 17:53:11 -Gregory_Rosmaita 17:53:49 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/actions/435 17:54:37 RESOLVED: GR: to complete 435 - http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/actions/435 17:54:55 Gregory going to combine 3.6.1 and 3.6.3 17:55:23 +Gregory_Rosmaita 17:56:25 KF: to accept GL's changes for beginning of intent for 3.6.3 17:56:33 Propose rewriting beginning of Intent for 3.6.3 (which might be folded into 3.6.1) to read "Users need to able to access a wide range of font sizes, styles, colors, and other attributes in order to find the combination that works best for their particular needs. For example, some users want to increase font size to make text more legible, while other users want to reduce the font size to... 17:56:35 ...decrease the need to scroll the content. " 17:57:14 Note that I changed to from "visual needs" to "needs" because it's more general than just vision. 17:58:03 KF: Intent and examples also need to be merged in this case 17:58:04 KimPatch, you might be interested in a previous attempt to get direct access to links and form controls: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/iaap/index.html 17:58:47 What I just pasted in would replace the Intent for 3.6.1 and the first sentence of the intent of 3.6.3. 18:00:27 GL: JS could combine these two and then await GR's updates 18:00:34 action: Jeanne to combine 3.6.1 and 3.6.3 using the minutes of the meeting of 30 September 18:00:34 Created ACTION-453 - Combine 3.6.1 and 3.6.3 using the minutes of the meeting of 30 September [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2010-10-07]. 18:01:03 RESOLVED: Jeanne to combine 3.6.1 and 3.6.3 using the minutes of the meeting of 30 September 18:02:33 RESOLVED: We will need to revisit 3.6.3 after GRs changes which will drive changes to the intent para 18:03:07 topic: 3.1.4 Rendering Alternative (Enhanced) Intent, Examples and Related Resources 18:03:07 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/ED-UAAG20-20100802/MasterUAAG20100802.html#gl-text-config 18:03:08 That is, changes to how the combined SC describes the required range of options will drive changes to the Intent paragraph. 18:03:42 Accept 1/ Changes 1 / Discuss 2 18:05:11 My attempt to explain *why* this SC was needed, by changing the last sentence to: "The user may find different alternatives more useful or appropriate depending on the nature of the document and their task. By specifying which item(s) to render by default, and the order of the cascade of alternatives to render when the author failed to provide some types of alternatives, they can ensure that... 18:05:12 ...the information presented to them makes their task as efficient as possible." 18:05:24 -Hakkinen_Mark 18:05:55 plus 1 to concept expressed by GL 18:06:08 GL = Greg Lowney, not guideline 18:06:26 +Mark_Hakkinen 18:09:22 -Gregory_Rosmaita 18:09:22 KF: / GL Discussion regarding 3.1.2 (not about a cascade of types) 3.1.4 is about a cascade of types 18:09:55 Kelly questions the title of "Rendering Alternative (Enhanced)", which was probably more appropriate before we changed the title of 3.1.2 or the like. 18:10:03 GL: Intent of 3.1.4 could clarify that it is extending 3.1.2 - providing additional / complex alternatives 18:13:20 GL: the sc's are not written in a simple form - more in a legal format 18:17:04 do you want me to call you gregory, if so e-mail my number 18:17:14 -Jeanne 18:17:39 +Jeanne 18:17:50 -Mark_Hakkinen 18:20:00 The upshot of 3.1 is that you should be able to see at a glance which pieces of content have alternatives like alt text or longdesc (3.1.1) and click on an item to see which alternatives are available for it (3.3.3); they can also choose at least one alternative like alt text to be always displayed (3.1.2), but it’s recommended that they also be able to specify a cascade, like alt text if... 18:20:01 ...it’s there, otherwise longdesc, otherwise, filename, etc. 18:21:44 -Jeanne 18:21:48 thanks, kelly, but i need to let my phones recharge 18:22:02 +Jeanne 18:22:31 FYI, since you mentioned longdesc, HTML5 lacks a verbose description mechanism HTML Bug 10853: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10853 18:26:55 KP: Discussion re the desire to create these short overviews - when should it be done? 18:29:50 RESOLVED: add agenda item to next call so that we can run through a few of these - KP proposes GL and KP to thrash out a couple more ready for discussion next Thursday. 18:32:15 -sharper 18:32:52 what was your question Simon? 18:33:21 I don't think we have a clear action yet. 18:33:31 Let's leave it open in the minutes for now. 18:34:05 -Jeanne 18:34:17 rrsagent, make logs public 18:34:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:34:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:34:31 zakim, please part 18:34:31 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Jeanne, Gregory_Rosmaita, sharper, kford, +1.617.325.aaaa, Kim_Patch, Hakkinen_Mark, Mark_Hakkinen 18:34:31 Zakim has left #ua 18:34:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:34:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:35:22 present+ Greg_Lowney 18:35:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:35:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:35:48 present- +1.617.325.aaaa 18:36:09 rrsagent, please part 18:36:09 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-actions.rdf : 18:36:09 ACTION: Jeanne to combine 3.6.1 and 3.6.3 using the minutes of the meeting of 30 September [1] 18:36:09 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-ua-irc#T18-00-34