09:02:10 RRSAgent has joined #mediafrag 09:02:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/29-mediafrag-irc 09:02:12 RRSAgent, make logs public 09:02:12 Zakim has joined #mediafrag 09:02:14 Zakim, this will be IA_MFWG 09:02:14 ok, trackbot; I see IA_MFWG()5:00AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago 09:02:15 Meeting: Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 09:02:15 Date: 29 September 2010 09:03:03 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Sep/0075.html 09:03:35 IA_MFWG()5:00AM has now started 09:03:42 +raphael 09:03:55 Chair: Erik 09:04:03 Regrets: Silvia, Erik 09:04:05 Chair: Raphael 09:04:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/29-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 09:04:46 +chris 09:05:06 zakim, chris is davy 09:05:06 +davy; got it 09:05:09 dvdeurse has joined #mediafrag 09:06:19 +Yves 09:09:28 dvdeurse has joined #mediafrag 09:11:02 Present: Yves, Davy, Raphael 09:11:51 davy has joined #mediafrag 09:12:36 TOPIC 1. ADMIN 09:12:48 scribenick: davy 09:12:49 s/TOPIC/Topic: 09:12:56 s/1.// 09:12:58 http://www.w3.org/2010/09/22-mediafrag-minutes.html 09:13:00 PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 22 September 2010 telecon: 09:13:00 http://www.w3.org/2010/09/22-mediafrag-minutes.html 09:13:10 +1 09:13:13 +1 09:13:14 +1 09:13:21 RESOLUTION: minutes accepted 09:13:21 ACTIOn-183? 09:13:21 ACTION-183 -- Raphaël Troncy to send reminders to all relevant groups -- due 2010-09-15 -- OPEN 09:13:21 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/183 09:13:35 raphael: will finish that today 09:13:42 ACTIOn-185? 09:13:42 ACTION-185 -- Yves Lafon to book zakim for the 2 days meeting of the group on Mon 1st and Tue 2nd Nov -- due 2010-09-29 -- OPEN 09:13:42 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/185 09:14:02 Yves: pending, will do that right now 09:14:06 TPAC registration: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/#Registration 09:15:02 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2010reg/registrants#MediaF 09:15:29 Registered persons for TPAC from the group: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2010reg/registrants#MediaF 09:16:25 action: troncy to remind Jack and Michael to register asap for TPAC 09:16:26 Created ACTION-188 - Remind Jack and Michael to register asap for TPAC [on Raphaël Troncy - due 2010-10-06]. 09:17:31 TOPIC: MEDIA FRAGMENT EXTENSION: 09:17:38 action-186? 09:17:38 ACTION-186 -- Philip Jägenstedt to send his list of test cases to the mailing list for understanding how browsers handle %-encodded and html-encoded URL -- due 2010-09-29 -- OPEN 09:17:38 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/186 09:17:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Sep/0057.html 09:18:49 Yves: wonder if the same thing can be obtained with firebug 09:19:09 close action-186 09:19:09 ACTION-186 Send his list of test cases to the mailing list for understanding how browsers handle %-encodded and html-encoded URL closed 09:19:23 action-187? 09:19:23 ACTION-187 -- Philip Jägenstedt to start a new thread about extensibility of the Media Fragments in order to get consensus by next week -- due 2010-09-29 -- OPEN 09:19:23 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/187 09:20:07 raphael: people agreed with proposal (2) of Philip 09:20:22 yves: would like to know the opinion of Jack 09:21:11 raphael: first decide which proposal, afterwards decide how it is written in the spec 09:22:13 yves: just against the fact that saying that all key-value pairs are media fragments 09:22:54 raphael: on condition is that you need to have keys that we understand 09:23:03 ... if this is not the case, it's not a media fragment 09:23:27 yves: not in favour, but also not against this 09:23:49 close action-187 09:23:49 ACTION-187 Start a new thread about extensibility of the Media Fragments in order to get consensus by next week closed 09:24:36 raphael: philip would like to distinghuis between validity and parsing 09:25:08 s/distinghuis/distinguish 09:26:12 yves: if we have grammar explaining what should be there, and a parsing algorithm, that's fine 09:26:14 Is this grammar could be http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Aug/0005.html 09:26:40 yves: this is not a grammar 09:27:47 ... it's a general approach to parse key-value pairs 09:28:29 raphael: the grammar we currently have, will be kept of course 09:29:05 I propose, keep the current grammar and add the extension point, _and_ define a parsing algorithm for those who need it 09:30:10 mediasegment = namesegment / axissegment 09:30:10 axissegment = ( timesegment / spacesegment / tracksegment ) 09:30:10 *( "&" ( timesegment / spacesegment / tracksegment ) 09:30:11 ; 09:30:20 => add extensionsegment there 09:31:47 yves: a mediasegment can't be only an extensionsegment 09:31:57 Yves propose that: mediasegment = namesegment / axissegment / extensionsegment + prose to state that a media segment cannot be only an extension segment 09:43:54 yves: we have to state that extensions should remain compatible with the current spec 09:44:25 ... e.g., bounding box (through xywh) as fallback for an arbitrary shape (through ref) 09:44:26 extensionsegment = extensionname '=' extensionvalue 09:45:52 extensionsegment = extensionprefix '=' extensionparam 09:46:23 issue is with extensions that conflict with already defined axis, like 'ref' being impacting the spatial dimension defined by 'xywh' 09:46:54 raphael: top-level production rules of the grammar should be in de document as well, not only in the appendix 09:47:09 ... in section 3.5 or 4.1 09:47:21 s/3.5/4.3.5 09:49:32 action: troncy to put the top-level production rules back into the document (in section 4.3.5 or 4.1) 09:49:32 Created ACTION-189 - Put the top-level production rules back into the document (in section 4.3.5 or 4.1) [on Raphaël Troncy - due 2010-10-06]. 09:50:12 raphael: still missing is a paragraph how things should be parsed 09:50:42 ... I will ask Philip regarding this issue 09:51:04 close action-187 09:51:04 ACTION-187 Start a new thread about extensibility of the Media Fragments in order to get consensus by next week closed 09:51:15 action-173? 09:51:16 ACTION-173 -- Yves Lafon to produce the code that will check the grammar of both the URI syntax and the Headers syntax -- due 2010-06-22 -- OPEN 09:51:16 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/173 09:51:45 yves: not done yet for the header syntax 09:52:08 Topic: PUBLIC COMMENTS 09:52:15 ACTION-184? 09:52:15 ACTION-184 -- Yves Lafon to email Chris the reply on when to send the range header -- due 2010-09-15 -- OPEN 09:52:15 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/184 09:52:49 close action-184 09:52:49 ACTION-184 Email Chris the reply on when to send the range header closed 09:53:39 raphael: should we use the bug tracker for LC comments? 09:55:41 yves: a manual approach should be feasible (e.g., manually building an HTML table) 09:56:48 raphael: suggest to start with manual approach, when a lot of comments are coming, we might consider using the bug tracker 09:57:03 ACTION-167? 09:57:03 ACTION-167 -- Erik Mannens to find licence free movies for the automatic test suite ... starting with Elephant Dreams and the creative commons -- due 2010-06-02 -- OPEN 09:57:03 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/167 09:58:28 Topic: AOB 09:58:55 [adjourned] 09:59:04 -raphael 09:59:06 -Yves 09:59:07 IA_MFWG()5:00AM has ended 09:59:07 Attendees were raphael, davy, Yves 09:59:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/29-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 10:22:11 ScribeOptions: -final -noEmbedDiagnostics 10:22:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/29-mediafrag-minutes.html raphael 12:10:08 Zakim has left #mediafrag