13:24:04 RRSAgent has joined #bpwg 13:24:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-irc 13:24:06 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:24:06 Zakim has joined #bpwg 13:24:08 Zakim, this will be BPWG 13:24:08 ok, trackbot; I see MWI_BPWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 13:24:09 Meeting: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 13:24:09 Date: 28 September 2010 13:26:31 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Sep/0010.html 13:26:37 Chair: jo 13:27:07 Regrets: yeliz, kai, miguel 13:27:21 adam has joined #bpwg 13:27:22 Zakim, what is the code? 13:27:22 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), twhume 13:27:49 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has now started 13:27:56 +adam 13:29:54 +DKA 13:30:12 DKA has joined #bpwg 13:30:14 +francois 13:30:15 + +44.203.141.aaaa 13:30:21 EdC has joined #bpwg 13:30:21 zakim, aaaa is me 13:30:22 +jo; got it 13:30:50 zakim, mute me 13:30:50 francois should now be muted 13:31:57 twhume, you want to try again? 13:32:28 i am in on UK 13:32:45 zakim, what is the code? 13:32:45 the conference code is 2794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), DKA 13:32:49 + +31.97.2.aabb 13:33:26 ack me 13:33:53 + +44.127.381.aacc 13:34:02 Zakim, aacc is me 13:34:02 +twhume; got it 13:34:24 zakim, mute me 13:34:24 francois should now be muted 13:34:29 Scribe: Dan 13:34:31 ScribeNick: DKA 13:34:37 Topic: BP2 13:34:47 Jo: Francois? A run-down? 13:34:54 ack me 13:35:03 -> http://www.w3.org/2010/07/mwabp-implementation-report MWABP implementation report 13:35:51 The matrix of implementation reports looks good. 13:36:07 Francois: We are good. There are 3 best practices for which we don't have 2 proper implementation reports but I think it's OK. We have evidence of implementation in the world of "fingerprinting" - links in discussion in the mailing list. 13:36:26 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We are good to go on fingerprinting. 13:36:42 Why are entries in the column Uxebu marked "yes" instead of "pass" ? 13:36:52 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We are good to go on fingerprinting - i.e. point 14 of the implementation report ya know. 13:37:00 +1 13:37:01 +1 13:37:03 +1 13:37:07 +1 13:37:10 +1 13:37:16 0 13:37:18 RESOLUTION: We are good to go on fingerprinting - i.e. point 14 of the implementation report. 13:37:25 [no objections] 13:37:26 [EdC, there's indeed a slight problem in the table layout, I'll fix that] 13:38:37 Francois: Moving to number 21. We have 2 implementation reports for that. I just note that the last implementation report said that they don't think it's that useful on mobile devices. I don't think we should worry about it. 13:39:00 Francois: Unless there are any objections don't think we need a resolution. 13:39:03 Jo: OK. 13:39:14 Francois: Number 22- use fragment ID... 13:39:49 Francois: We have multiple implementation reports but they all come from the same companies. Pity we don't have evidence from more than 1 company but it does exist in the wild... 13:40:11 Jo: It is extemely widely used - so not worried. 13:40:22 Adam: It's worth noting that it's wildly used on desktop as well. 13:40:48 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We agree that Nunber 22- use fragment ID is OK to go even though all the formal implementation reports are from one company... 13:40:57 +1 13:41:00 +1 13:41:03 +1 13:41:08 +1 13:41:08 +1 13:41:08 +1 13:41:21 RESOLUTION: We agree that Nunber 22- use fragment ID is OK to go even though all the formal implementation reports are from one company 13:41:54 Francois: Last one is 26 - consider ... - 3 partial implementations from 3 different companies. So I think we are good to go. 13:42:23 Francois: It's a "consider" best practice so difficult to define where line should be drawn. 13:42:54 And it proposes several methods, so partial might have been interpreted as "we use only one of all these". 13:43:03 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We are agreed that nunber 26 - consider .. is OK even considering we only have 3 partial implementations... 13:43:07 +1 13:43:10 +1 13:43:17 +1 13:43:20 +1 13:43:22 +1 13:43:30 RESOLUTION: We are agreed that nunber 26 - consider .. is OK even considering we only have 3 partial implementations... 13:43:53 Jo: Now we go to the transition request... 13:45:03 Francois: before that I'd like to mention replies to the last call comments. We received the response from PFWG - they sent a positive response. One of the responses was not send to the public mailing list - it has not arrived there yet - I will chase him for this. 13:45:16 Jo: We have a record from you (here) that this response has been received. 13:45:32 Francois: yes, we are not waiting for any further reply - I will prepare disposition of comments. 13:46:04 ACTION: Daoust to prepare distribution of comments for BP2. 13:46:04 Created ACTION-1072 - Prepare distribution of comments for BP2. [on François Daoust - due 2010-10-05]. 13:46:22 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests transition of Mobile Web Applications Best Practices (aka BP2) to Proposed Recommendation. There is no need for the document to go through Candidate Recommendation again. 13:46:51 +1 13:46:51 +1 13:46:53 +1 13:46:54 +1 13:46:54 +1 13:47:04 Jo: Any objections? 13:47:06 + 13:47:07 +1 13:47:08 [none heard] 13:47:11 RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests transition of Mobile Web Applications Best Practices (aka BP2) to Proposed Recommendation. There is no need for the document to go through Candidate Recommendation again. 13:47:17 woo hoo! 13:48:01 Francois: This means we need to request transition - it will take some time... Then Dan, Jo and I will have to attend a transition call with "the Director". 13:48:35 SeanP has joined #bpwg 13:48:42 Jo: Transition call within 2 weeks... 13:48:57 Francois: Hopefully. Then 4 weeks minimum in PR. 13:49:19 +SeanP 13:49:38 Thanks Adam! 13:49:58 Topic: [lovely] CT Guidelines 13:50:28 Jo: Any last minute news from anybody on an implementation report that is forthcoming? 13:50:41 Jo: If not, we don't have sufficient implementation evidence. 13:50:45 Francois: That's correct. 13:51:00 Jo: Anybody on this call here have anything to say about this? 13:51:13 Adam: Aaron said he was going to... 13:51:33 q+ 13:51:33 Jo: He kindly provided a report but it did not support a sufficient number of the points of conformance. 13:51:39 ack seanp 13:52:21 Sean: Bad news [from Nokia]: we're not going to provide a report. 13:52:44 Jo: I don't see any option that we have. Are we allowed to leave this in CR? 13:53:14 Francois: As soon as the group closes, any remaining work items need to be published as a working group note. Seems to be a good idea to [publish it as a note] now. 13:53:48 Jo: It seems a great shame but unless anyone has any brilliant ideas - I suggest we go ahead an publish it as a working group note. 13:54:07 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: "Downgrade" CT Guidelines to a WG Note and request publication as such. 13:54:19 +1 (reluctantly) 13:54:24 +1 13:54:27 +1 13:54:27 +1 13:54:37 +1 with a meh 13:54:42 +1 (sadly) 13:54:45 +1 (it's a bitter pill to swallow) 13:54:58 how are group members (especiallly 13:54:58 operators and transcoder vendors) will utilize the CTG, 13:54:58 even if only as a WG note? 13:55:10 RESOLUTION: "Downgrade" CT Guidelines to a WG Note and request publication as such. 13:56:11 Jo: Whilst it would have more force as a recommendation, in practice getting the work out there in a published form is worth-while [whether it be Note or Recommendation]. 13:56:44 Jo: Francois, can you adjust the content of the document to turn it from a Rec into a Note. The main bits are in the preamble. We will take it offline. 13:56:57 ACTION: Jo to talk with Francois about what is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines 13:56:57 Created ACTION-1073 - Talk with Francois about what is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines [on Jo Rabin - due 2010-10-05]. 13:57:17 Jo: Anything else on CT guidelines? 13:57:21 Topic: AOB? 13:58:00 Jo: Charter extension - sounds like it's going to take at least 6 weeks for BP2 to reach rec. So we need to request an extension or make w3m aware that we need an extension. 13:58:27 Francois: We need to wait for response on our request to transition to PR. 13:58:52 s/need to/should/ 13:58:53 Jo: ok - so later in october we will request an extension. 13:59:05 Jo: We should close off outstanding issues and actions. 13:59:16 Topic: Issues & Actions clean-up 13:59:30 Jo: No open issues. 13:59:43 Jo: Open Actions - we have 21... 13:59:46 ACTION-1003? 13:59:47 ACTION-1003 -- Bruce Lawson to follow up within Opera as to what exactly the XSS test scripts supplied by chaals guard against -- due 2009-09-08 -- OPEN 13:59:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1003 14:00:02 close action-1003 14:00:02 ACTION-1003 Follow up within Opera as to what exactly the XSS test scripts supplied by chaals guard against closed 14:00:08 action-1008 14:00:10 action-1008? 14:00:10 ACTION-1008 -- Adam Connors to check if Google has tests they could contribute for CT guidelines -- due 2009-09-22 -- OPEN 14:00:10 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1008 14:00:20 close action-1008 14:00:20 ACTION-1008 Check if Google has tests they could contribute for CT guidelines closed 14:00:27 action-1022? 14:00:27 ACTION-1022 -- Daniel Appelquist to ping internally in Vodafone to see if we have any ability to help with CT test suites. -- due 2009-10-27 -- OPEN 14:00:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1022 14:00:31 Do we close at least with an indication that they are closed without final resolution ? 14:00:38 I never got any joy. 14:00:44 close action-1022 14:00:44 ACTION-1022 Ping internally in Vodafone to see if we have any ability to help with CT test suites. closed 14:00:47 action-1035? 14:00:47 ACTION-1035 -- Daniel Appelquist to create a plan to raise awareness on mobileOK through some campaign -- due 2009-12-18 -- OPEN 14:00:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1035 14:00:56 ongoing 14:01:03 yes 14:01:05 leave it open 14:01:11 action-1038? 14:01:11 ACTION-1038 -- François Daoust to look into mobile Web Applications within W3C that implement some of the Mobile Web Application Best Practices. -- due 2010-02-16 -- OPEN 14:01:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1038 14:01:55 Francois: I've had a look... 14:01:56 close action-1038 14:01:56 ACTION-1038 Look into mobile Web Applications within W3C that implement some of the Mobile Web Application Best Practices. closed 14:02:01 action-1039? 14:02:01 ACTION-1039 -- Tom Hume to look into mobile Web Application within Future Platforms and provide implementation report for MWABP -- due 2010-02-16 -- OPEN 14:02:01 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1039 14:02:25 Tom: Provided. 14:02:29 Jo: done and closed. 14:02:35 close action-1039 14:02:35 ACTION-1039 Look into mobile Web Application within Future Platforms and provide implementation report for MWABP closed 14:02:38 Didn't do. 14:02:49 close action-1040 14:02:49 ACTION-1040 Make a post about MWABP to entice people to provide feedback closed 14:02:53 Did do but no response. 14:03:02 Once more, when you close, is there an indication that the actions were actually dropped (no resolution) instead of closed with a resolution? 14:03:02 action-1041? 14:03:02 ACTION-1041 -- Daniel Appelquist to contact facebook and Opera ref implementation reports for BP2 -- due 2010-03-09 -- OPEN 14:03:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1041 14:03:07 did but no response. 14:03:12 close action-1041 14:03:12 ACTION-1041 Contact facebook and Opera ref implementation reports for BP2 closed 14:03:20 action-1043? 14:03:20 ACTION-1043 -- Daniel Appelquist to see if on-deck apps and betavine could be a source of implementation reports -- due 2010-04-06 -- OPEN 14:03:20 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1043 14:03:31 Nothing forthcoming here. 14:03:35 close action-1043 14:03:35 ACTION-1043 See if on-deck apps and betavine could be a source of implementation reports closed 14:03:41 action-1050? 14:03:41 ACTION-1050 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to help find 2 implementations of 5 and 6 by 30 June. -- due 2010-06-29 -- OPEN 14:03:41 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1050 14:03:51 close action-1050 14:03:51 ACTION-1050 Help find 2 implementations of 5 and 6 by 30 June. closed 14:04:00 action-1052 14:04:04 close action-1052 14:04:04 ACTION-1052 Investigate CT implementation report closed 14:04:19 close action-1053 14:04:19 ACTION-1053 Investigate CT implementation report closed 14:04:28 action-1055? 14:04:28 ACTION-1055 -- François Daoust to see with Jérôme about CT implementation report -- due 2010-06-29 -- OPEN 14:04:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1055 14:04:32 close action-1055 14:04:32 ACTION-1055 See with Jérôme about CT implementation report closed 14:04:56 action-1059? 14:04:56 ACTION-1059 -- Daniel Appelquist to ping Bytemobile about CT implementation report -- due 2010-06-29 -- OPEN 14:04:56 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1059 14:05:03 no response... 14:05:09 close action-1059 14:05:09 ACTION-1059 Ping Bytemobile about CT implementation report closed 14:05:18 action-1061? 14:05:18 ACTION-1061 -- Daniel Appelquist to write the explanatory text for the "further considerations" section. -- due 2010-07-13 -- OPEN 14:05:18 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1061 14:05:30 close action-1061 14:05:30 ACTION-1061 Write the explanatory text for the "further considerations" section. closed 14:05:41 action-1062? 14:05:41 ACTION-1062 -- Jo Rabin to formulate action plan with Francois and Dan -- due 2010-07-27 -- OPEN 14:05:41 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1062 14:05:59 close action-1062 14:05:59 ACTION-1062 Formulate action plan with Francois and Dan closed 14:06:04 action-1066? 14:06:04 ACTION-1066 -- Adam Connors to enact LC-2415 -- due 2010-08-31 -- OPEN 14:06:04 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1066 14:06:11 Jo: Done. 14:06:17 close action-1066 14:06:17 ACTION-1066 Enact LC-2415 closed 14:06:21 action-1070? 14:06:21 ACTION-1070 -- Adam Connors to find prepare a short doc with references to remaining best practices -- due 2010-09-14 -- OPEN 14:06:21 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1070 14:06:43 francois; THis was done. 14:06:53 close action-1070 14:06:53 ACTION-1070 Find prepare a short doc with references to remaining best practices closed 14:07:02 action-1071? 14:07:02 ACTION-1071 -- Daniel Appelquist to send inspirational email to working group to get people to send implementation reports on CT -- due 2010-09-14 -- OPEN 14:07:02 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1071 14:07:04 s/francois;/francois:/ 14:07:11 didn't feel inspirational. 14:07:14 s/THis/This/ 14:07:17 close action-1071 14:07:17 ACTION-1071 Send inspirational email to working group to get people to send implementation reports on CT closed 14:07:25 ok 14:07:56 Jo: 3 actions remain... and that is about it. 14:08:00 ACTION: daoust to send transition request to PR for MWABP 14:08:00 Created ACTION-1074 - Send transition request to PR for MWABP [on François Daoust - due 2010-10-05]. 14:08:29 jo: anything else? 14:09:04 Jo: Little point in having a call next week (Oct 5 2010) and to resume following transition call. 14:09:09 OK with me. 14:09:14 Ok with me as well. 14:09:15 thx! 14:09:21 -DKA 14:09:22 -jo 14:09:23 -francois 14:09:25 -adam 14:09:26 -twhume 14:09:28 -SeanP 14:09:28 - +31.97.2.aabb 14:09:28 MWI_BPWG()9:30AM has ended 14:09:30 Attendees were adam, DKA, francois, +44.203.141.aaaa, jo, +31.97.2.aabb, +44.127.381.aacc, twhume, SeanP 14:09:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:09:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-minutes.html francois 14:09:44 jo has left #bpwg 16:04:59 Zakim has left #bpwg 16:05:28 RRSAgent, bye 16:05:28 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-actions.rdf : 16:05:28 ACTION: Daoust to prepare distribution of comments for BP2. [1] 16:05:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-irc#T13-46-04 16:05:28 ACTION: Jo to talk with Francois about what is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines [2] 16:05:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-irc#T13-56-57 16:05:28 ACTION: daoust to send transition request to PR for MWABP [3] 16:05:28 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-bpwg-irc#T14-08-00