14:57:21 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:57:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/21-rif-irc 14:57:29 zakim, this will be rif 14:57:29 ok, sandro; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 14:58:41 Harold has joined #rif 15:00:39 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 15:00:43 +LeoraMorgenstern 15:01:40 +[NRCC] 15:01:47 leora has joined #rif 15:02:01 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:02:39 ChrisW has joined #rif 15:02:43 PaschkeAdrian has joined #rif 15:02:52 +Sandro 15:03:17 +[IBM] 15:03:20 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:03:20 +Harold; got it 15:03:22 +[IPcaller] 15:03:24 + +1.512.342.aaaa 15:03:38 Doug has joined #rif 15:03:48 Adrian, I just made a bunch of changes to the UCR document. 15:03:51 zakim, this is rif 15:03:51 ChrisW, this was already SW_RIF()11:00AM 15:03:52 ok, ChrisW; that matches SW_RIF()11:00AM 15:04:48 zakim, who is on the call? 15:04:48 On the phone I see LeoraMorgenstern, Harold, Sandro, [IBM], DaveReynolds, +1.512.342.aaaa 15:04:56 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 15:04:56 +ChrisW; got it 15:05:21 zakim, aaaa is Doug 15:05:21 +Doug; got it 15:05:24 Chris, I did the changes you requested to UCR, including softening the statements that something CANNOT be represented in BLD. (See the intro.) 15:05:41 +??P37 15:05:59 zakim, ??P37 is PaschkeAdrian 15:05:59 +PaschkeAdrian; got it 15:06:06 Scribe: PaschkeAdrian 15:06:12 scribenick: PaschkeAdrian 15:06:18 TOPIC: Admin 15:06:21 +Gary_Hallmark 15:06:31 Last meeting minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Sep/att-0020/2010-09-14-rif-minutes.html 15:06:46 PROPOSED: accept last week's minutes 15:06:53 RESOLVED: accept last week's minutes 15:07:07 TOPIC: Liason 15:08:07 TOPIC: Actions 15:08:54 close action-1053 15:08:54 ACTION-1053 Review UCR closed 15:09:37 close action-1051 15:09:37 ACTION-1051 Annotate use cases wrt implmentability w existing dialects closed 15:11:22 csma has joined #rif 15:12:56 TOPIC: RIF Primer 15:13:09 + +33.9.53.56.aabb 15:13:28 zakim, aabb is me 15:13:28 +csma; got it 15:13:37 Leora: need to add a summary of Christian's XML document 15:13:50 Leora: would prefer to leave it out since it is not finished yet 15:14:17 Note that RIF+XML-Data already is in http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Overview#A_General_Survey_of_the_RIF_Documents 15:14:42 csma: motivation is report on the combination of RIF and XML data since the other combinations are in the primer 15:15:22 csma: want to show that you can use RIF also with other formats not just Semantic Web data / formats 15:15:57 Harold: OWL2RL is not in the primer as well 15:16:22 ChrisW: thought we can write different primers with different focus 15:16:32 ChrisW: but do not have the bandwith 15:16:50 Doug: would be good to have a list of what is missing 15:17:03 Note http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Primer#What_this_document_doesn.27t_cover 15:17:21 Doug: make it explicit what this document does not cover 15:17:37 Leora: there is already a section about this 15:18:46 Sandro: primer mostly about Core, i.e. RIF Core Primer 15:19:30 ChrisW: yes we can make it more specific 15:19:40 Harold: 5.1 mentions equality 15:19:54 Sandro: yes, is the only section about BLD 15:21:10 Sandro: prefer to have it as a RIF Core primer 15:21:34 Harold: built-ins are also in PRD 15:22:40 We have "RIF Datatypes and Built-Ins 1.0" 15:23:50 Leora: problem of time to address all dialects in the Primer, e..g would be good to address PRD as well, but no time for it 15:24:02 ChrisW: what about RIF Primer for Logic 15:24:20 Leora: to generic title 15:24:44 q? 15:25:23 Suspect my mic isn't working. The document primarily mentions BLD not Core. The examles and features might be mostly the Core subset but the prose keeps referring to BLD> 15:25:49 I suggest "RIF Logic Primer" 15:25:57 Sandro: if we call it RIF Core primer we should take out section 5.1 15:26:05 Leora: we need 5.1 15:26:21 Sandro: get someone else to contribute PRD to Primer 15:26:38 Garry: can contribute something 15:26:45 action: Gary to try and add a PRD section to primer 15:26:46 Created ACTION-1054 - Try and add a PRD section to primer [on Gary Hallmark - due 2010-09-28]. 15:27:03 ACTION: Gary to contribute a PRD section like the BLD section (5.1) to the Primer 15:27:03 Created ACTION-1055 - Contribute a PRD section like the BLD section (5.1) to the Primer [on Gary Hallmark - due 2010-09-28]. 15:27:46 close action-1054 15:27:47 ACTION-1054 Try and add a PRD section to primer closed 15:28:01 -csma 15:28:42 Sandro: will correct some additional review comments in the primer 15:29:36 +csma 15:29:57 TOPIC: xml data 15:30:51 csma: review comments from Gary ... 15:31:50 csma: abbreviated presentation synatx, although not normative, is used, since it is more compact 15:32:34 csma: need to change the EBNF 15:33:49 csma: implementation dependent - undefined; will change this 15:34:05 csma: singelton list - in Schema you know if it is a list or not; 15:34:28 csma: without schema, i.e. just data, hard to know if it is a list or singel data 15:34:45 csma: depends on the application in casw without schema 15:35:06 Gary: zero linked lists should be mentioned 15:37:27 csma: regarding comment on "modify XMl document" 15:38:17 csma: benefit of abstract model is, that it does not specify the semantics for adding data to the source XML document 15:38:39 csma: it is up to your application if it reserializes inferred data 15:43:22 csma: next point - consumer side input; should that apply to OWL-RDF data 15:47:17 csma: question is, can we make a technical note of this spec. although it is only an initial spec, e.g. withouth beeing detailed 15:47:27 csma: only 1 1/2 week left 15:48:10 Gary: would be good if more people read it; short time frame is a concern; so it will not be complete and consistent 15:48:31 Gary: would be good to have it as placeholder; do not know about the procedure ehre 15:49:03 ChrisW: release it as working draft next week; last working group meeting next week 15:49:10 Sandro: can publish as a note 15:49:22 ChrisW: sound more like a draft than a note 15:49:40 csma: can we leave editors notes in a note? 15:50:07 Sandro: we can do what we want; either note or working draft 15:50:10 StellaMitchell has joined #RIF 15:51:55 +??P10 15:52:11 zakom, ??p10 is me 15:52:17 ChrisW: think working draft is the right state to leave it when the working group ends, to point out that it is not finished 15:52:25 csma: agree, prefer WD as well 15:52:33 zakim, ??p10 is me 15:52:33 +StellaMitchell; got it 15:52:36 cmsa: agreed -- XML-Data will be a WD in the next (last) version. 15:52:53 ChrisW: will vote on publication next Tuesday 15:53:03 ChrisW: what can be done by then 15:53:15 csma: will work on Garys comments 15:53:28 csma: asked Jos and Michael 15:53:57 cmsa: Jos reviewed an older version; Michael will be travelling 15:54:27 csma: maybe Jos can do, but good to have anotehr reviewer 15:55:05 leora has joined #rif 15:55:56 zakim, pick a victim 15:55:56 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose PaschkeAdrian 15:56:52 action: Adrian to review XML data 15:56:52 Created ACTION-1056 - Review XML data [on Adrian Paschke - due 2010-09-28]. 15:57:17 TOPIC: UCR 15:58:40 Stella: proposed to remove section http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/UCR#Structure_of_RIF 15:59:14 Leora: add a link to the RIF overview document 15:59:28 Stella: add RIf PRD in the bullet list 15:59:49 Harold: in the bullet list which are relevant to the use cases 16:00:12 Harold: in the bullet list only those dialects that are relevant to the use cases 16:01:36 Leora: Stella to review the changes by Leora 16:01:38 Typo: second bullet in section 3: use present, not past tense 16:02:20 Stella: distinction between general and basic requirements http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/UCR#Requirements 16:02:40 Leora: had some historic reasons; 16:03:46 csma: basic requirements where from an earlier version of UCR where we had critical success factors, phase I and phase II requirement etc. 16:03:53 csma: later we simplified it 16:04:07 ChrisW: get rid of the distinction 16:04:30 Adrian: will list them as requirements; will change it 16:05:18 Adrian: changes from Leora are open; from this morning 16:05:26 ChrisW: looks ready for publication 16:05:33 plan is to publish UCR as Note. 16:05:33 Sandro: publish as note 16:05:34 zakim, mute me 16:05:34 csma should now be muted 16:05:54 ChrisW: will be voted next week 16:06:16 Leora: want to add a reference on deontic logic; which is mentioned in one of the comments 16:06:27 TOPIC: Test Cases 16:06:51 Stella: approved all test cases; 16:07:05 Stella: Sandro wanted to add a new one about RIF XMl data 16:07:40 Stella: section on test results 6.2 16:07:44 q+ 16:07:56 Stella: test results page might be removed? 16:08:47 Stella: result page is not complete; 16:09:19 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/test/results/report 16:10:32 There are 4 test cases in the "proposed" section, and 5 in the "in development" section... 16:10:39 What do we do with them? 16:10:43 q- 16:11:19 Leora: should be linked from some document, so that we do not lose it 16:11:33 ChrisW: could be used in a community page 16:11:50 zakim, unmute me 16:11:50 csma should no longer be muted 16:12:39 ChrisW: csma what about the 4 open test cases? 16:13:01 csma: if I have time I will work on them; I have the XML, but need to update the PS 16:13:25 Sandro: can use tool for translation from XML to PS 16:13:36 csma: does it support PRD 16:13:55 Sandro: probably yes; do not know if it is working 16:14:03 csma: will send you the XML 16:15:51 Stella: test cases also need to be structure as entailment test 16:16:01 csma: will look at it 16:17:35 Leora_ has joined #rif 16:17:51 csma: other test cases (in development) 16:18:42 Stella: three UCR use cases 16:19:59 csma: equality test cases 16:20:18 Adrian: was the original use case and later refined to different factorial use cases 16:21:03 csma: do we want nothing left "in development"? 16:25:10 ChrisW: no oppinion about it 16:25:23 csma: can drop the equality test case 16:25:36 csma: is the same a factorial 16:26:26 AOB? 16:26:34 next meeting in 1 week, last meeting! 16:27:21 -Gary_Hallmark 16:27:23 zakim, list attendees 16:27:23 As of this point the attendees have been LeoraMorgenstern, Sandro, Harold, +1.512.342.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ChrisW, Doug, PaschkeAdrian, Gary_Hallmark, +33.9.53.56.aabb, csma, 16:27:27 ... StellaMitchell 16:27:27 -LeoraMorgenstern 16:27:27 -Harold 16:27:28 -Doug 16:27:29 -DaveReynolds 16:27:32 rrsagent, make minutes 16:27:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/21-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 16:27:38 -StellaMitchell 16:27:40 rrsagent, make logs public 16:28:18 -PaschkeAdrian 16:29:24 -csma 16:29:49 I was dropped again 16:30:05 Is Friday 9am/3pm fine for you, Sandro? 16:30:06 9AM ET is fine for sandro 16:30:08 ttyt 16:30:15 ok ttyt 16:30:15 -ChrisW 16:30:16 -Sandro 16:30:16 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:30:18 Attendees were LeoraMorgenstern, Sandro, Harold, +1.512.342.aaaa, DaveReynolds, ChrisW, Doug, PaschkeAdrian, Gary_Hallmark, +33.9.53.56.aabb, csma, StellaMitchell 16:41:00 ChrisW_ has joined #rif