IRC log of soap-jms on 2010-08-24

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:52:48 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms
15:52:48 [RRSAgent]
logging to
15:52:50 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
15:52:50 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #soap-jms
15:52:52 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be SJMS
15:52:52 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
15:52:53 [trackbot]
Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference
15:52:53 [trackbot]
Date: 24 August 2010
15:58:42 [Zakim]
WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started
15:58:49 [Zakim]
15:59:33 [Zakim]
+ +1.512.918.aaaa
15:59:45 [padams]
Zakim, aaaa is padams
15:59:45 [Zakim]
+padams; got it
16:01:01 [Zakim]
16:01:17 [eric]
eric has joined #soap-jms
16:01:26 [Derek]
Derek has joined #SOAP-JMS
16:01:43 [Zakim]
16:02:08 [Zakim]
+ +1.708.246.aabb
16:02:27 [mphillip]
Chair: Eric
16:03:05 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe
16:03:09 [mphillip]
Scribe: Mark
16:03:18 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes
16:04:29 [mphillip]
Minutes approved with no amendments
16:04:36 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Review the agenda
16:05:42 [mphillip]
Mark: A couple of new issues raised in mailing list
16:05:48 [mphillip]
Agenda approved with no amendments
16:06:24 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Administrative items
16:07:16 [mphillip]
Eric: Any value in F2F? May be useful to finish CR.
16:10:06 [mphillip]
East coast / central US would be best, but it seems likely that travel restrictions would prohibit this.
16:11:05 [mphillip]
Eric: Suggest we check whether travel approvals from our organisations are likely to be forthcoming, and how much lead time would be required. Two days should be sufficient.
16:13:09 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Review action items
16:13:44 [mphillip]
Eric: Some investigation done, but none complete
16:14:41 [mphillip]
Derek: - discussed in list, and mail sent to list
16:16:59 [mphillip]
Derek: There will be some cases where a service provider would know that expected properties- e.g. targetService - have not been specified and so a fault could be thrown in these circumstances
16:18:52 [mphillip]
Eric: Suggest Derek raises as a new issue
16:19:33 [mphillip]
Mark: Originally thought that missing targetService would be untestable, but now agree with Derek that there are cases where a fault would be useful
16:25:00 [mphillip]
Phil: soapAction is different from targetService - it's usually specified in the WSDL - could restrict the fault to properties specified in the WSDL
16:25:54 [mphillip]
Eric: Discussion is centred around the clarity of the text and whether it would be solved by a fault
16:26:06 [mphillip]
Derek: Will keep action open and raise an issue
16:26:19 [mphillip]
Phil: - done
16:26:24 [mphillip]
close action-197
16:26:25 [trackbot]
ACTION-197 Create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution closed
16:27:01 [mphillip]
Mark: - done
16:27:05 [mphillip]
close action-199
16:27:05 [trackbot]
ACTION-199 Review the proposal for issue 48 and make a counter proposal if he does not agree closed
16:27:25 [mphillip]
Mark: action200 done
16:27:29 [mphillip]
close action-200
16:27:29 [trackbot]
ACTION-200 Apply the changes for issue 50 closed
16:28:06 [mphillip]
Mark: Action 201 - still pending
16:28:25 [mphillip]
Eric: Action 202 - still pending
16:28:47 [mphillip]
Eric: Will make the necesary changes once all issues have been resolved
16:29:00 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Raised spec issues
16:29:10 [mphillip]
16:29:34 [mphillip]
Mark: New issue - complete WSDL example
16:31:15 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: No objections to opening this as an issue
16:32:04 [mphillip]
16:34:34 [mphillip]
Phil: Good idea - we should probably scrub the SOAP messages in the test cases too to check that they are using consistent encoding
16:35:20 [mphillip]
Phil: Suggest we review the test cases once the issues are resolved
16:35:40 [mphillip]
action Phil to check the SOAP encoding in the test cases once the issues are resolved
16:35:40 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-203 - Check the SOAP encoding in the test cases once the issues are resolved [on Phil Adams - due 2010-08-31].
16:36:21 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: No objections to opening this as an issue
16:36:32 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Accepting proposals to close open issues
16:36:47 [mphillip] - leaving open
16:37:14 [mphillip]
16:38:25 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: The proposal for Issue 48 is approved as written
16:38:54 [mphillip]
action eric to apply the resolution for issue 48
16:38:54 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-204 - Apply the resolution for issue 48 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].
16:39:11 [mphillip] -
16:41:11 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: The proposal for Issue 55 is approved as written
16:41:24 [mphillip]
action eric to apply the resolution for issue 55
16:41:24 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-205 - Apply the resolution for issue 55 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].
16:41:46 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Accepting applied resolutions:
16:42:31 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Accepting proposals to close open issues
16:42:37 [eric]
16:47:07 [mphillip]
Eric: The WSDL contains some spurious periods and incorrect angle bracket positions
16:47:43 [mphillip]
Mark: Email seems to have been mangled - will send the WSDL file as an attachment to the list
16:48:44 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: The proposal for the Issue in is approved - subject to the WSDL being correctly formed - see attached WSDL
16:49:21 [mphillip]
action Eric to apply the resolution for the issue described in
16:49:21 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-206 - Apply the resolution for the issue described in [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-08-31].
16:49:43 [mphillip]
SOAP samples issue :
16:50:27 [mphillip]
Mark: Needs more complete proposal - example messages
16:50:39 [mphillip]
action mark to finish proposal for issue
16:50:39 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-207 - Finish proposal for issue [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-08-31].
16:51:00 [mphillip]
TOPIC: Accepting applied resolutions:
16:51:19 [mphillip]
16:51:52 [mphillip]
16:55:48 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: The application of the resolution for issue 50 is accepted
16:56:22 [mphillip]
Issue 56 & 57
16:56:29 [eric]
16:58:35 [mphillip]
RESOLUTION: The application of the resolutions for issues 56 and 57 have been accepted
16:58:59 [mphillip]
TOPIC: URI scheme
16:59:32 [mphillip]
Eric: Sent email to the list - intent is to develop another draft of the URI scheme spec. for feedback
17:00:18 [mphillip]
17:00:19 [mphillip]
17:00:26 [Zakim]
- +1.708.246.aabb
17:00:27 [Zakim]
17:00:29 [Zakim]
17:00:29 [Zakim]
17:00:40 [mphillip]
rrsagent, make minutes
17:00:40 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate mphillip
17:00:43 [Zakim]
17:00:45 [Zakim]
WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended
17:00:47 [Zakim]
Attendees were alewis, +1.512.918.aaaa, padams, [IBM-Hursley], eric, +1.708.246.aabb
17:00:55 [padams]
padams has left #soap-jms
17:01:03 [eric]
rrsagent, make logs public
17:01:50 [eric]
eric has left #soap-jms
17:51:55 [mphillip]
mphillip has left #soap-jms
18:26:31 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #soap-jms