15:18:36 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 15:18:36 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/20-prov-xg-irc 15:18:38 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:18:38 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 15:18:40 Zakim, this will be 98765 15:18:40 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start 18 minutes ago 15:18:41 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 15:18:41 Date: 20 August 2010 15:20:26 thanks Simon! 15:26:04 q+ 15:27:05 lkagal has joined #prov-xg 15:29:57 q- 15:34:36 Agenda item 1: Gap analysis for the Disease Outbreak scenario 15:35:21 James added a number of references to the section on "Relevant Research on Provenance" 15:35:49 Yolanda and James added the gap analysis items 15:36:23 All the items from the gap analysis of the News Aggregator scenario are relevant to this DO scenario as well, so they are all incorporated 15:36:59 On the issue of overlap of gap analysis across scenarios, we thought it was good to reiterate the conclusions to make a stronger case of why they are important 15:39:06 Paolo has joined #prov-xg 15:40:16 q+ 15:42:11 James suggests that we distinguish issues that can be resolved by developing a system or solution, versus items that require the development of standards and general mechanisms and infrastructure 15:43:01 Jun mentions that from medical researchers a big issue is dealing with granularity of provenance 15:44:07 q+ 15:45:16 zakim, ack paulo 15:45:16 I see michaelp on the speaker queue 15:46:11 zakim, ack michaelp 15:46:11 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:46:50 We deal with granularity in two ways: 1) how to attach provenance to collections of objects, 2) abstraction when reporting provenance to a user. The former is under content, the latter is under use. 15:48:36 q+ 15:55:13 Yolanda encourages everyone to continue to contribute references and comments to the scenario, but we will not be discussing details in future telecons 15:56:10 Agenda item 2: Discuss provenance research relevant to the Business Contract scenario 15:56:42 Simon points to his email where he mentions relevant work: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Aug/0029.html 15:57:56 Yolanda mentions that this scenario is unique in highlighting justification and privacy in provenance, also unlike the other two it does not have the issue of integration from various sources 16:00:19 michaelp has left #prov-xg 16:00:59 Paulo brings up issues in privacy: the provenance is recorded internally in a system, then at publication time you want to move the records out and make them public. 16:01:48 Michael responds that a system internally has to manage persistence 16:03:30 Yolanda suggests to highlight in this scenario the importance of standards: even though there are only two parties in the scenario that care about the provenance and could agree to a shared representation between them, we should highlight that the company has many customers and would not want to develop a new provenance representation for each customer so a standard is useful 16:04:38 Yolanda: next week we will discuss the gap analysis for the Business Contract scenario, and wrap up this scenario analysis in a concise document 16:04:58 Agenda was at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Aug/0028.html 16:05:17 rrsagent, set log public 16:05:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:05:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/20-prov-xg-minutes.html YolandaGil 16:05:51 Zakim, this will be inc_provxg 16:05:51 ok, YolandaGil, I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM already started 16:06:01 Scribe: YolandaGil 16:06:07 rrsagent, make logs public 16:06:54 trackbot, end telcon 16:06:54 Zakim, list attendees 16:06:54 As of this point the attendees have been [IPcaller], michaelp, [ISI], +1.915.747.aaaa, +1.706.461.aabb 16:06:55 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:06:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/20-prov-xg-minutes.html trackbot 16:06:56 RRSAgent, bye 16:06:56 I see no action items