See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 13 August 2010
<jcheney> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/User_Requirements#Disease_Outbreak_Scenario
James will talk abt his ideas on the Disease Outbreak scenario that he has worked out until now
<jcheney> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Disease_Outbreak_Scenario
imagine having a richer provenance infrastructure layer to handle with this problem.
not sure if we can associate this with the other scenarios
for instance the cases in the presence of dynamic data -- might be illustrated by other scenarios but might be more complex in this one.
Tim: how does james see the form of information and how can this interact with structured data
James: info starts as
unstructured, but eventually people are interested in asking
structured complex queries
... this observation comes from people in Bioinformatics. from
a usability point of view, figuring out a schema is not trivial
as data grows in different ways.
... the provenance infrastructure should be agnostic from the
structure below
... the important parts of the scenario can be found at :
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/User_Requirements#Disease_Outbreak_Scenario
and
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Disease_Outbreak_Scenario
... on the public policy side-- there is work that
automatically record decision making
... in the UK it is required to produce reports for cost
benefit analysis (e.g., what the impact on X is on Y)
... triangular structure in the scenario (users who are trying
to understand, reuse, the data and decision makers)
... the point is that there are multiple levels of abstraction
for the specification of provenance -- different ways of saying
/ expressing provenance information)
Tagging
Daniel: no substantial progress, 46 untagged papers & relevant papers for the scenario
untagged papers should be tagged in the following weeks. & progress of tagging of relevant papers for the disease outbreak scenario
& we should tag the relevant papers to provenance with the #provenance tag
(this is not done)
James: better to think of the scenario and then tag relevant papers instead of going through the list and tag
+1 from me
Daniel: before uploading entries make sure that the entry does not exist
<timlebo_rpi> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Dimensions
<DGarijo> that url is what I used too ;)
<timlebo_rpi> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Requirements
trackbot, end telcon
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Irini Inferring Scribes: Irini WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: +1.518.326.aaaa, +30281039aabb, +30281039aacc Present: +1.518.326.aaaa +30281039aabb +30281039aacc WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 13 Aug 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/08/13-prov-xg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]