15:35:11 RRSAgent has joined #CSS 15:35:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/11-CSS-irc 15:35:17 Zakim, this will be Style 15:35:17 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 25 minutes 15:35:22 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:46:38 arronei has joined #CSS 15:52:44 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:52:49 +dsinger 15:53:12 dsinger has joined #css 15:54:04 Zakim, who is here? 15:54:04 On the phone I see dsinger 15:54:05 On IRC I see dsinger, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou_bbl, MoZ, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie, Peter, 15:54:07 ... lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham 15:54:18 zakim, mute dsinger 15:54:18 sorry, dsinger, muting is not permitted when only one person is present 15:55:18 oyvind has joined #css 15:55:21 -dsinger 15:55:22 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 15:55:22 Attendees were dsinger 15:55:43 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:55:45 dethbakin has joined #css 15:55:50 +dsinger 15:56:07 dsinger has joined #css 15:56:34 zakim, who is here? 15:56:34 On the phone I see dsinger 15:56:36 On IRC I see dsinger, dethbakin, oyvind, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie, 15:56:38 ... Peter, lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham 15:59:18 + +1.617.650.aaaa 15:59:22 Zakim, aaaa is me 15:59:22 +dethbakin; got it 15:59:22 zakim, mute dsinger 15:59:23 dsinger should now be muted 15:59:53 +glazou 16:00:07 Zakim, who is here? 16:00:07 On the phone I see dsinger (muted), dethbakin, glazou 16:00:09 On IRC I see dsinger, dethbakin, oyvind, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie, 16:00:13 ... Peter, lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham 16:00:31 hi dsinger 16:00:37 +[Microsoft] 16:00:39 zakim, microsoft is me 16:00:39 +arronei; got it 16:01:16 +plinss_ 16:01:29 +??P20 16:02:15 zakim, ?P20 is fantasai 16:02:15 sorry, plinss, I do not recognize a party named '?P20' 16:02:21 +David_Baron 16:02:30 Zakim, ??p20 is fantasai 16:02:30 +fantasai; got it 16:03:24 shepazu has joined #css 16:03:34 + +47.21.65.aabb 16:03:43 dsinger: trying to make us avoid next ftf ?-) 16:03:45 +sylvaing 16:03:53 shepazu has joined #css 16:05:43 dsinger: sun for the 22nd, probability 2/5 16:06:55 +SteveZ 16:08:05 ChrisL has joined #css 16:08:07 ScribeNick: dbaron 16:08:28 Zakim, +47 is howcome 16:08:28 +howcome; got it 16:08:29 -SteveZ 16:08:44 Topic: face-to-face meeting 16:08:49 howcome: any questions about f2f? 16:08:57 +SteveZ 16:09:29 +Bert 16:09:49 +ChrisL 16:10:31 SteveZ: Wanted to add one thing to agenda; will send email. 16:10:34 Topic: test suite 16:10:49 fantasai: Arron and I went through issues list and identified which issues need tests. 16:10:59 fantasai: want to do beta3 at end of week 16:11:33 howcome has joined #css 16:11:34 ScribeNick: fantasai 16:11:39 Topic: CSS 2.1 issue 185 16:11:43 JohnJansen has joined #css 16:11:44 fantasai: Please try to get in fixes by the end of the week 16:11:48 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-185 16:12:45 I had a proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0178.html 16:12:47 sylvaing has joined #css 16:12:47 fantasai: The mailing list also brought up the question of negative-height floats 16:13:20 dbaron: I do prefer the idea that zero-height floats don't push line boxes, because it's easier to think about the range we're dealing with 16:15:24 shepazu has joined #css 16:16:48 dsinger has joined #css 16:16:50 fantasai: And negative height floats would also be excluded because they can't satisfy both c and d at the same time 16:16:59 +[Apple] 16:17:04 zakim, [apple] has dsinger 16:17:04 +dsinger; got it 16:17:16 -dsinger 16:17:39 ok, so maybe s/is a vertical position/exists a point/ and add Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative height do not move line boxes. 16:17:47 fantasai: I would be okay with this if there was a note saying that zero-height floats don't affect line boxes (and maybe explain why that's the case wrt wording in the text) 16:18:31 maybe change "when there is" to "when there exists" and 16:18:33 fantasai: Could we change "not above" to "below or at"? I think that would help 16:18:48 that is to "that satisfies all of these four conditions 16:19:55 Bert: So this means the zero or negative height float won't affect line boxes next to it 16:20:05 Bert: but if it has clear, it still can affect layout around it 16:20:13 Bert: What about floats next to floats, are those rules clear? 16:20:20 dbaron: I think they're clear, but it might be worth rereading 16:20:56 Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative 16:20:56 height do not move line boxes. 16:21:01 oops 16:21:07 In other words, we could add a sentence after (maybe immediately 16:21:07 after, maybe a little later): # However, line boxes created next to the float are shortened to # make room for the margin box of the float. 16:21:10 that says something like: | A line box is next to a float when there exists a vertical position | that satisfies all of these four conditions: | (a) at or below the top of the line box, (b) at or above the | bottom of the line box, (c) below the top margin edge of the | float, and (d) above the bottom margin edge of the float. | Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative 16:21:16 | heght do not m ove line boxes. 16:21:18 .... 16:21:49 Arron: I have a testcase for zero-height floats in the middle of the line box. 16:21:59 ... 16:22:45 dbaron: Last I checked neither Opera nor Webkit handle positive height floats in the middle of the line anyway 16:23:11 maybe Opera is ok; my memory is a little fuzzy 16:24:01 dbaron and Arron discuss the testcase 16:25:50 http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/incoming/float-zero-height.htm 16:26:23 http://pastebin.mozilla.org/766057 16:27:49 Opera indeed doesn't handle it 16:29:59 Peter: Any other comments on the proposal? 16:30:19 ChrisL: I'm hearing disagreement on which implementations need to change, but everyone seems to like the wording. 16:30:32 RESOLVED: dbaron's proposal accepted as modified above 16:31:40 Peter: CSS2.1 Issue 118 16:31:43 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-118 16:33:06 +1 16:33:42 Steve: The existing text makes a reference to centering, but it's not clear what it centers or what it means. 16:33:56 Steve: The text I suggested clarifies that, and Bert confirms that's what it means 16:34:35 Zakim, mute me 16:34:35 glazou should now be muted 16:34:45 Bert: I will try to avoid the word "centering"; your text describes what actually should be done. 16:35:14 Zakim, unmute me 16:35:14 glazou should no longer be muted 16:36:21 WG votes to resolve on this now and protest Bert's edits afterwards if necessary 16:36:37 RESOLVED: Bert's proposal accepted with Steve's modifications as to be edited in by Bert 16:37:41 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-144 16:39:51 dbaron: Given the new model for text decoration that we haven't implemented yet, I would follow Opera's lead on question one 16:40:34 arronei: I'm running the tests and everyone shows the underline 16:40:45 ChrisL: Is there a use case for showing the nderline under invisible text? 16:40:58 fantasai: No, it's just something that falls out of the previous model. 16:41:35 fantasai: It doesn't make much sense to show the underline if you're trying to hide something. 16:41:59 Gecko 2.0 underlines once the whole thing 16:42:20 ChrisL: Then perhaps we should change it to be more useful, not as likely to break things. 16:42:33 ChrisL: But if we don't have implementations, that will hold back PR. 16:42:40 Steve: We could go with "it's undefined". 16:43:15 dbaron: I think we're already at the place where most implementations disagree with the spec on text-decoration, and we're planning to fix it but we haven't gotten around to it yet 16:43:29 Steve: So you're going to have to change it to match the current 2.1 text anyway 16:43:42 Steve: If that's true, fine, we'll just make it another piece of the model change. 16:44:09 fantasai: we could change it and mark it at-risk 16:45:32 Seem to have agreement that if the text isn't there, the underline shouldn't be either. 16:46:37 Bert: I would expect to see the blue line, but not the red one in that email 16:49:05 fantasai summarizes Appendix E's contents 16:49:35 fantasai: If you want the underline visible but not the text, you can make the text transparent. 16:51:28 Bert and Peter discuss the underlining model -- specifically that the underline is continuous through the child elements, and if they have underlines they are additional (may paint over) 16:51:53 Steve: I'm confused about what the current model is. 16:52:03 Steve: There's two ways of thinking about it. One is, the property draws an underline 16:52:22 Steve: The other way is that it turns on a mode so that each glyph draws its own piece of the underline 16:52:31 Steve: I thought that the latter model is what the new one is doing 16:54:41 fantasai explains the current model 16:56:04 fantasai: The question is now whether the underline is drawn with the color *and* visibility of the underlining element, or it uses the visibility of the element with the text being underline 16:56:08 dd 16:56:43 Steve: Suppose that you're animating the text to disappear, so the underline is there. What should happen at the end of the animation? 16:56:51 Steve: Does the underline now jump to the text around it? 16:57:21 Bert: The underline's position can be adapted to the child elements; it doesn't have to but it may. 16:57:38 (but it has to be a single line per linebox) 17:00:59 fantasai: Consider also if I set text-decoration on a
with block-level children 17:01:31 fantasai: If you set visibility hidden on one of them, would it disappear the text but not the underlining? 17:03:02 Arron: Older versions of IE don't draw the underline, but they're just mostly broken 17:03:17 unicorn underlines 17:03:25 -ChrisL 17:03:26 Over time 17:03:29 Meeting closed. 17:03:32 -arronei 17:03:34 -dethbakin 17:03:34 -sylvaing 17:03:35 -Bert 17:03:36 -plinss_ 17:03:39 -[Apple] 17:03:41 -glazou 17:03:42 -SteveZ 17:03:46 -howcome 17:03:51 -David_Baron 17:08:51 disconnecting the lone participant, fantasai, in Style_CSS FP()12:00PM 17:08:55 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 17:08:57 Attendees were dsinger, +1.617.650.aaaa, dethbakin, glazou, arronei, plinss_, David_Baron, fantasai, +47.21.65.aabb, sylvaing, SteveZ, howcome, Bert, ChrisL 18:06:57 dsinger has joined #css 18:41:04 Zakim has left #CSS 19:52:14 fantasai: You interested in staying in the Oslo apartment an extra day with dbaron and tantek? 20:11:48 tabatkins: yes 20:12:15 k, I'll confirm with the rental dude. 20:21:36 ooh, fantasai is around 20:21:57 (do we know when the other people staying in the Apartment are leaving?)