IRC log of soap-jms on 2010-08-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:05:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms
- 16:05:13 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-irc
- 16:05:39 [eric]
- Zakim, this is SJMS
- 16:05:39 [Zakim]
- ok, eric; that matches WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM
- 16:05:45 [eric]
- Zakim, start telcon
- 16:05:45 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'start telcon', eric
- 16:07:11 [eric]
- Zakim, this will be SJMS
- 16:07:11 [Zakim]
- ok, eric; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start 7 minutes ago
- 16:07:41 [eric]
- Zakim, who is here?
- 16:07:41 [Zakim]
- I notice WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has restarted
- 16:07:43 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.209.474.aaaa, +1.512.286.aabb, +1.781.280.aacc
- 16:07:44 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, eric, peaston, padams, Yves, trackbot
- 16:07:56 [eric]
- Zakim, aaaa is eric
- 16:07:56 [Zakim]
- +eric; got it
- 16:08:21 [padams]
- Zakim, aabb is padams
- 16:08:21 [Zakim]
- +padams; got it
- 16:08:21 [eric]
- Zakim, aabb is padams
- 16:08:22 [Zakim]
- sorry, eric, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb'
- 16:08:38 [eric]
- Zakim, aacc is peaston
- 16:08:38 [Zakim]
- +peaston; got it
- 16:08:43 [eric]
- Zakim, who is here?
- 16:08:43 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see eric, padams, peaston
- 16:08:45 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, eric, peaston, padams, Yves, trackbot
- 16:10:30 [peaston]
- Chair: eric
- 16:10:37 [peaston]
- Scribe:peaston
- 16:11:41 [eric]
- Topic: minutes from last week.
- 16:11:47 [eric]
- Issue 48 what did we do with it?
- 16:11:48 [eric]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/48
- 16:13:50 [peaston]
- No objections approving minutes from last week
- 16:14:10 [peaston]
- Topic: Administrative items
- 16:15:33 [peaston]
- There is NO meeting next week August 10 2010
- 16:15:50 [peaston]
- Eric should we do a face to face?
- 16:16:33 [peaston]
- Face to face would be useful to capture attention
- 16:16:54 [peaston]
- Phil: what about a virtual face to face
- 16:18:28 [peaston]
- Eric: We should consider it, and the timing e.g. prior to PR?
- 16:18:46 [peaston]
- Topic:Review action items
- 16:20:12 [peaston]
- Re 193 hopeful of provisional registration
- 16:20:33 [peaston]
- Close: Action-196
- 16:20:51 [peaston]
- close action-196
- 16:20:51 [trackbot]
- ACTION-196 Apply resolutions for the resolved issues above closed
- 16:21:21 [peaston]
- Topic Raised spec issues:
- 16:23:42 [peaston]
- Resolution: All agree to open issue-55
- 16:27:00 [peaston]
- DIscussing issue-55
- 16:27:32 [peaston]
- Phil : hesitent to remove 2.7.2 perhaps get rid of the key words
- 16:28:28 [peaston]
- Action: Phil to create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution
- 16:28:28 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-197 - Create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution [on Phil Adams - due 2010-08-10].
- 16:29:16 [peaston]
- Discussing issue-56
- 16:30:40 [peaston]
- Presence of transport attribute in WSDL
- 16:31:24 [peaston]
- phil: what do we lose by not mandating it?
- 16:32:19 [peaston]
- eric: how do interpret other extensions, how do you understand the core binding
- 16:34:28 [peaston]
- phil: tend to have aversion to lots of transport info other than minimum all you need it the endpoint address
- 16:38:57 [peaston]
- phil: implemetations could be smart enough to act on endpoint only
- 16:39:34 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to open issue-56
- 16:41:34 [peaston]
- phil: can we add an untestable assertion
- 16:42:20 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to proposed resolution (in issue) for issue-56
- 16:42:31 [peaston]
- discussing issue-57
- 16:43:15 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to open issue-57
- 16:44:05 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to proposed resolution (in issue) for issue-57
- 16:46:44 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to open issue-58
- 16:50:30 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to proposed resolution (in issue) for issue-58
- 16:51:15 [peaston]
- issue059 is test case
- 16:51:57 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to open issue-57
- 16:52:05 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to open issue-59
- 16:53:10 [peaston]
- eric: we should repurpose existing test cases to cover these case
- 16:54:42 [peaston]
- phil: we are not requiring the vendor a means to set correlation id on the request, right?
- 16:55:39 [peaston]
- e.g. we dont expect JAXWS clients to set this
- 16:56:44 [peaston]
- the requirement is a receiving requirement
- 16:58:02 [peaston]
- all agree - no sending node constraints
- 16:58:37 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to proposed resolution (in issue) for issue-58
- 16:58:45 [peaston]
- Resolution: all agree to proposed resolution (in issue) for issue-59
- 16:59:30 [peaston]
- Action: peaston to update test cases per issue-59 suggestion
- 16:59:30 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-198 - Update test cases per issue-59 suggestion [on Peter Easton - due 2010-08-10].
- 17:00:11 [peaston]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 17:00:11 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-minutes.html peaston
- 17:00:15 [Zakim]
- -padams
- 17:00:17 [Zakim]
- -peaston
- 17:00:19 [Zakim]
- -eric
- 17:00:20 [Zakim]
- WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended
- 17:00:21 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.209.474.aaaa, +1.512.286.aabb, +1.781.280.aacc, eric, padams, peaston
- 17:00:25 [padams]
- padams has left #soap-jms
- 17:00:42 [eric]
- rrsagent, make minutes public
- 17:00:42 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', eric. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 17:01:47 [eric]
- rrsagent, publish minutes
- 17:01:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-minutes.html eric
- 17:02:46 [eric]
- rrsa, make log public
- 17:02:54 [eric]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 17:03:09 [eric]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 17:03:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-minutes.html eric
- 18:17:29 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #soap-jms