14:57:15 RRSAgent has joined #forms 14:57:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-irc 14:57:17 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:57:17 Zakim has joined #forms 14:57:19 Zakim, this will be HTML_Forms 14:57:19 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 14:57:20 Meeting: Forms Working Group Teleconference 14:57:20 Date: 14 July 2010 14:57:53 zakim, this will be forms 14:57:53 ok, Steven_; I see IA_XForms()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 14:58:23 pfennell has joined #forms 14:58:52 wiecha has joined #forms 14:58:57 Regrets: Erik, Leigh, Uli 14:59:09 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Jul/0013.html 14:59:13 Chair: Steven 14:59:21 rrsagent, make minutes 14:59:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-minutes.html Steven_ 14:59:27 IA_XForms()11:00AM has now started 14:59:34 +[IBM] 14:59:36 + +33.5.40.05.aaaa 14:59:42 zakim, [IBM is me 14:59:42 +wiecha; got it 14:59:43 zakim, dial steven-617 14:59:43 ok, Steven_; the call is being made 14:59:45 nick has joined #forms 14:59:45 +Steven 15:00:08 alain has joined #forms 15:00:10 zakim, aaaa is Alain 15:00:10 +Alain; got it 15:00:15 zakim, code? 15:00:15 the conference code is 93676 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), nick 15:00:31 zakim, I am Steven 15:00:31 ok, Steven_, I now associate you with Steven 15:01:09 +Nick_van_den_Bleeken 15:02:07 + +44.782.483.aabb 15:02:27 zakim, aabb is pfennell 15:02:27 +pfennell; got it 15:03:16 I'm in the office at the moment so I'll be mostly on 'Mute' to keep the noise down. 15:03:42 John_Boyer has joined #forms 15:04:37 +John_Boyer 15:05:39 scribe: nick 15:06:15 TOPIC Upcoming telecons 15:06:31 steven: Next is July 21, 2010; Steven to chair. after that I'm on holiday 15:06:44 TOPIC: New Draft Tutorial 15:07:10 -Alain 15:07:40 +Alain 15:07:42 steven: New version is on-line http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Jul/0011.html it now contains live forms 15:08:38 steven: I would like people to have a look at it and send in comments (both editorial and structural changes are welcome) during my vacation 15:09:18 TOPIC: The replace attribute for method put and method delete 15:09:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Jul/0008.html 15:10:20 John: Uli responded to this and said it is possible to send a response for PUT and DELETE 15:11:08 John_Boyer: We talked about this in the past, and said it wasn't important enough to make a special case for it 15:11:17 TOPIC: Parse and serialize function 15:11:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Jul/0006 15:15:33 nick: parse() and serialize() are in XPath 2.1, so if we add them they should be as close as possible to those, and maybe we should say how you can add xpath 2.x functions to XForms 15:15:51 John_Boyer: we already have a couple of functions in our spec 15:16:48 nick: In XPath 2.0 you have a default function namespace, in most languages equal to the xpath functions and operators ns 15:17:32 John_Boyer: we decided in the past to add our functions in our namespace when we add support for xpath 2.0 15:18:08 John_Boyer: we could add this new functions in xforms ns, XPath 1.0 supports name spaced functions too 15:18:46 John_Boyer: we could add all our functions in the XForms name space also if using XPath 1.0 engine 15:23:45 Steven_: was your question to point to the xpath spec and not to incorporate them in our spec 15:23:49 klotz has joined #forms 15:24:20 nick: yes, I would prefer not to add all the usefull XPath functions to our spec 15:25:40 John_Boyer: we have the possibility already by the functions attribute on model, the functions could be added as extensions 15:27:26 John_Boyer: If we are concerned if a function is not fully compatible with the XPath 2.x version we could add it as an only namespace qualified function 15:27:47 with the same local name? ugh 15:29:11 We did that with id() 15:30:03 Steven_: Are we now finished on this topic 15:30:26 Leigh, did you mean to imply that using the same local name *without namespace qualifying it* is an ugh? 15:32:10 John_Boyer: All new XForms functions will only be available in the XForms namespace 15:32:52 John_Boyer: Al functions from XF11 are both available in the default and the XForms Namespace 15:33:22 topic done but to answer John_Boyer's question, I am concerned about having two functions with the same local name and different behavior; with id we justfiied it by saying it's just argument overloading (added instance id). 15:33:43 RESOLUTION: All new XForms functions will only be available in the XForms namespace, all functions that are available in XForms 1.1 will be available in both the default and the XForms namespace 15:33:55 Topic: * xforms 1.1 view refresh question http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2010Apr/0015.html Responses http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2010Apr/0016.html (related to switch/@case?) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2010Apr/0017.html Is this closed? 15:35:30 Steven_: Does the spec requires a refresh to set the to their default case? 15:35:41 John_Boyer: No, I think we also answered it 15:35:48 John_Boyer: not to be the case 15:35:58 Topic: * switch/@appearance http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2010Mar/0048.html 15:37:52 John_Boyer: The idea was that on the FtF we had different expectations of a switch, which were different in nature not only 'appearance' 15:38:36 Steven_: On a server side implementation the non relevant cases aren't sent to the client 15:39:07 John_Boyer: with AJAX you can simulate the zombie case 15:39:09 unl has joined #forms 15:41:35 Steven_: explains that we need to be careful not to introduce dependencies on a lot of communication between client and server (JavaScript) 15:41:37 I need to step out for a moment. 15:43:12 + +1.307.544.aacc 15:43:20 John_Boyer: The decision was that the appearance attribute wasn't the attribute that we should use, if we add an extra attributes some implementation should do more then they do today (not available versus available for non selected cases) 15:43:26 zakim, +1.307.544.aacc is me 15:43:26 +unl; got it 15:43:32 zakim, mute me 15:43:32 unl should now be muted 15:43:38 regrets-uli 15:43:49 John_Boyer: In some cases the users use the switch as a multiple page wizard 15:44:35 John_Boyer: In this case they want to keep receiving events for the non displayed cases (e.g.: to build an error overview) 15:46:46 John_Boyer: reminds us of why we sometimes want to receive the events in non selected cases 15:48:29 Sorry about that, I'm back now. 15:50:12 John_Boyer: we say in the spec that non selected cases non-relevant, because we want to disable events and style it as hidden 15:50:52 John_Boyer: the spec says that you can style non-relevant controls 15:52:55 Steven_: the use case is that we want to make non-relevant cases live, the question is how are we accomplish this feature 15:53:23 Steven_: is it a property of the case and/or the switch 15:53:50 John_Boyer: For now it is a property of the switch 15:55:14 for the multi-page wizard use case we may want to associate state with the switch (as with @ref) so that constraints can be applied only during certain cases (state machine). 15:55:15 John_Boyer: We could even maybe to add buttons atomically to toggle to the cases 15:55:59 John_Boyer: We add an attribute cases-are-live with values true/false 15:57:10 Steven_: do you think that the automatic buttons only are available in the live case?Isn't it another feature that is useful in both cases 15:57:28 ? 15:58:28 -unl 15:58:30 -Steven 15:58:31 -pfennell 15:58:31 -wiecha 15:58:32 -John_Boyer 15:58:34 -Alain 15:58:39 Steven_: The the two use cases are: 15:58:39 1) The ease of authoring to automatically add buttons 15:58:39 2) The liveness of non-relevant cases 15:58:44 -Nick_van_den_Bleeken 15:58:45 IA_XForms()11:00AM has ended 15:58:47 Attendees were [IBM], +33.5.40.05.aaaa, wiecha, Steven, Alain, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, +44.782.483.aabb, pfennell, John_Boyer, unl 15:59:06 rrsagent, make minutes 15:59:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-minutes.html nick 15:59:21 liveness *and absence* of non-selected cases 15:59:48 people wanted non-selected cases to be absent, not just non-relevant 15:59:54 rrsagent, make minutes public 15:59:54 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', nick. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:00:02 rrsagent, make minutes 16:00:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-minutes.html John_Boyer 16:00:08 rrsagent, make log public 16:00:23 yes 16:00:54 bye 16:01:12 thanks nick 16:01:34 rssagent, bye 16:01:58 rrsagent, bye 16:01:58 I see no action items 16:07:45 RRSAgent has joined #forms 16:07:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-irc 16:07:51 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-minutes.html Steven_ 16:08:27 s/TOPIC Upcoming telecons/TOPIC: Upcoming telecons 16:08:42 rrsagent, make minutes 16:08:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/14-forms-minutes.html Steven_ 17:59:45 Zakim has left #forms