14:52:43 RRSAgent has joined #rif 14:52:43 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/13-rif-irc 14:52:49 zakim, this will be rif 14:52:49 ok, ChrisW; I see SW_RIF()11:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 14:52:56 Chair: Chris Welty 14:53:11 Meeting: RIF Telecon 13-Jul-2010 14:53:35 ChrisW has changed the topic to: RIF Telecon 13 Jul (ChrisW) 14:53:44 rrsagent, make minutes 14:53:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 14:53:51 rrsagent, make logs public 14:54:03 agenda+ Admin 14:54:12 agenda+ Liason 14:54:16 agenda+ actions 14:54:43 agenda+ XML data 14:54:50 agenda+ RIF in RDF 14:54:56 agenda+ Test 14:55:05 agenda+ Primer 14:55:37 SW_RIF()11:00AM has now started 14:55:44 +Sandro 14:56:21 +[IBM] 14:56:31 zakim, ibm is temporarily me 14:56:31 +ChrisW; got it 14:58:48 Harold has joined #rif 14:59:55 dave has joined #rif 15:00:04 mdean has joined #rif 15:00:47 +Mike_Dean 15:00:56 lmorgens has joined #rif 15:01:05 DaveReynolds has joined #rif 15:01:31 +Leora_Morgenstern 15:02:23 +??P9 15:03:10 zakim, who is talking? 15:03:20 ChrisW, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sandro (49%), DaveReynolds (33%), ChrisW (28%) 15:03:40 -DaveReynolds 15:04:34 +[IPcaller] 15:06:05 Minutes from last meeting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jun/att-0006/08-rif-minutes.html 15:06:16 PROPOSED: accept last meeting minutes 15:06:23 +[NRCC] 15:06:25 RESOLVED: accept last meeting minutes 15:06:41 zakim, pick a victim 15:06:41 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Mike_Dean 15:07:01 scribenick: Mike_Dean 15:07:02 zakim, [NRCC] is me 15:07:02 +Harold; got it 15:07:08 Scribe: Mike Dean 15:07:10 scribenick: mdean 15:07:14 next item 15:07:23 zakim, take up item 2 15:07:23 agendum 2. "Liason" taken up [from ChrisW] 15:08:07 Sandro: SPARQL 1.1 adds entailment regimes 15:08:28 ... specifies what it means to use SPARQL with OWL 2, RDFS, ..., RIF 15:08:35 ... FPWG a month or so ago 15:08:55 ... should be reviewed by at least one other RIF WG member 15:09:17 ... need official RIF WG review 15:09:32 ... only a page or 2, but fairly mathematical 15:09:38 zakim, pick a victim 15:09:38 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Mike_Dean 15:10:28 action: Mike_Dean to review sparql entailment regimes on sparql 15:10:28 Sorry, couldn't find user - Mike_Dean 15:10:32 http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/#id35811294 15:10:39 action: MDean to review sparql entailment regimes on sparql 15:10:41 Created ACTION-1033 - Review sparql entailment regimes on sparql [on Mike Dean - due 2010-07-20]. 15:10:41 + +1.631.833.aaaa 15:10:50 zakim, aaaa is me 15:10:50 +MichaelKifer; got it 15:11:21 ChrisW: RDFRDB? 15:11:36 Sandro: Eric Prud'hommeaux sent email to various folks a couple weeks ago 15:11:51 ... define a standard mapping from RDBMS to RDF graph with minimal configuration 15:12:07 ... use RIF for other mappings - frames to frames 15:12:20 ... provided RIF examples recently 15:12:37 ... propose as RIF test cases - e.g. changing URLs 15:12:50 ... also other proposals 15:13:26 ... remains to be seen how well other RDF2RDB WG members will accept this - lots of folks would like to do everything in SQL 15:14:31 next item 15:14:33 ... want these transformations for other cases as well 15:14:41 zakim, close item 1 15:14:41 agendum 1, Admin, closed 15:14:43 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:14:45 3. actions [from ChrisW] 15:14:48 next item 15:14:57 Sandro: eGov is thinking of starting at WG on government linked data 15:15:05 ... still working on proposed charter 15:15:23 ... see eGov IG email list 15:15:58 close action-1030 15:15:59 ACTION-1030 Setup poll for RIF WG meeting for Jun 17th or 18th, to talk about XML-Data and RIF-in-RDF drafts for publication on 22nd. closed 15:16:09 csma has joined #rif 15:16:45 close action-1029 15:16:45 ACTION-1029 Contact Bijan re: AC support closed 15:16:50 close action-1028 15:16:50 ACTION-1028 Contact Jeff Pan re: AC support closed 15:16:53 close action-1026 15:16:53 ACTION-1026 Talk to Elisa re: AC support closed 15:16:57 close action-1025 15:16:57 ACTION-1025 Talk to Mark Proctor re: AC support closed 15:16:59 close action-1024 15:17:00 ACTION-1024 Talk to OMG re: AC support closed 15:17:03 close action-1023 15:17:03 ACTION-1023 Talk to Ed Barkmeyer re: AC support closed 15:17:06 close action-1022 15:17:08 ACTION-1022 Talk to Guido re: AC support closed 15:17:09 close action-1021 15:17:12 ACTION-1021 Talk to Ken for Mitre re: AC support closed 15:17:14 close action-1019 15:17:16 ACTION-1019 Contact Mohamed Zergaoui re: AC suport closed 15:17:24 close action-1018 15:17:24 ACTION-1018 Contact Michael Sintek re AC support closed 15:17:28 close action-1017 15:17:28 ACTION-1017 Email Luis Polo re AC support closed 15:17:32 close action-1016 15:17:32 ACTION-1016 Email Enrico Franconi re AC support closed 15:17:49 close action-1015 15:17:49 ACTION-1015 Email Markus Krotzsch re AC support closed 15:17:53 close action-1014 15:17:53 ACTION-1014 Contact Clevand Clinic to encourage AC support closed 15:18:08 ChrisW: do we have a record of how AC voted? 15:18:25 Sandro: no - about 15 support - don't remember exact number 15:18:31 close action-1013 15:18:31 ACTION-1013 Fix the reference to Proposed Rec in the Media Type Registraiton, in Core closed 15:19:01 christian? 15:19:19 yes 15:19:24 just found the number 15:19:35 close action-968 15:19:36 ACTION-968 Document an rdf syntax for rif closed 15:20:10 zakim, what is the code? 15:20:10 the conference code is 74394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), csma 15:20:22 + +33.9.53.62.aabb 15:20:34 ChrisW: open actions will be closed when WG ends 15:20:37 zakim, aabb is me 15:20:37 +csma; got it 15:21:44 csma: sent agenda from private address, so it didn't go to public email list 15:21:45 next item 15:22:26 csma: posted remaining issues 15:22:33 ... needs to be finished 15:22:43 ... RDF plain literals - get rid of string match 15:23:02 ... Jos suggestions 15:23:06 s/string/name/ 15:23:30 ... choice of syntax - @ vs attribute - not sure if allowed in IRIs 15:24:12 ... dealing with case where elements/attributes not in namespace - cannot use rif:iri's - currently use strings, but not sure if this is allowed 15:24:32 ... document must be completed with more and better examples, reviewed in more depth, etc. 15:24:41 ... don't expect major changes in content 15:24:50 ... Jos and Mike didn't find any showstoppers 15:25:33 ... plan to work on this next week - proposed solutions for above issues - discuss at next meeting 15:26:17 ... don't currently need help - will need later for review, implementation, etc. 15:26:40 ... expect new version in 2 weeks 15:27:01 ... would like Michael to look at it also 15:27:32 MichaelKifer: looked at version before Jos's comments, but didn't formally review 15:27:56 csma: incorporated Jos' and Mike's comments - haven't yet gotten feedback from Jos 15:28:04 MichaelKifer: will take a look 15:28:43 Sandro: use of special "no namespace" namespace rather than strings? 15:29:15 csma: most obvious solution would be to change rif:iri to allow local names 15:29:27 ... but potentially opens up a can of worms 15:29:37 ... don't like "no namespace" namespace 15:29:56 ... only preferences - need to find most practical and least intrusive solution 15:30:24 ... do other specs have this problem? 15:30:50 Sandro: RDF and OWL don't deal with XML - others model in full complexity (might or might not have namespace) 15:31:35 next item 15:31:40 csma: would prefer ... 15:32:00 Sandro: 2 open issues and omission from FPWG 15:32:38 ... both about what modeling is done: use type arcs, what to name various properties 15:32:53 ... mapping between RIF syntactic structures and RDF graphs 15:32:59 zakim, mute me 15:32:59 csma should now be muted 15:33:12 ... should these include rdf:type arcs, e.g. for RIF formula 15:33:23 ... or could just list properties 15:33:30 ... seems to be purely stylistic 15:33:47 ... left out rdf:type arcs for now - recorded as open issue 15:33:57 ChrisW: define semantics so that this is implied 15:34:21 Sandro: could provide OWL ontology 15:34:23 (csma would prefer...) using ony rif:iri to address children and attributes, instead of having to support both rif:ri and xs:strings just because of the nonamespace case 15:34:29 mdean: or RDFS domain/range 15:35:25 Sandro: have to name some things differently than XML syntax, e.g. distinguish AND and OR 15:35:46 ... made up names 15:36:12 Sandro: 3rd thing: importing or asserting RIF from RDF 15:36:53 ... use case: Facebook RDF data using vocabulary unlike most others, e.g. using strings rather than URIs 15:37:10 ... can be mapped using RIF rules - but how does one find these? 15:37:21 ... triples in RDF should specify RIF rules to use 15:37:29 ... SPARQL also needs for entailment regime 15:37:41 ... would add to SWC if not too late 15:38:00 ChrisW: what happens when you dereference URIs? 15:38:09 For the record, as Sandro says, I prefer use of type arcs to enable consistent property naming and for consistency with other specs, e.g. OWL. Easy to say which are require and which optional. 15:38:21 Sandro: have so far only handled RIF import RDF case, not RDF import RIF 15:38:46 +q 15:39:08 Sandro: how will RDF find rules 15:39:27 ... extra parameter beyond owl:imports to specify profile 15:39:41 ... possibly property that implies profile 15:40:00 ChrisW: not simple, seems very tricky 15:40:16 DaveReynolds: shouldn't do the same job 15:40:28 ... need RDF imports 15:41:01 Sandro: not discussed at RDF NS workshop 15:41:13 ... little awareness of RIF 15:41:31 ... not in final list 15:41:46 ... SPARQL has in entailment WDs 15:42:19 ... part of graph 15:42:46 ChrisW: seems like it should be part of RDF 15:43:20 Sandro: semantics and namespace more important than which document it's in 15:43:24 ack dave 15:43:28 next item 15:43:42 ChrisW: Stella not here 15:43:56 ... no active development 15:44:05 zakim, unmute me 15:44:05 csma should no longer be muted 15:45:25 Christian: no need to publish until updated 15:45:51 Sandro: can't run Google Analytics on W3C site, to tell who's reading documents and how they got there 15:46:11 action: Chris to contact Stella about test cases status 15:46:11 Created ACTION-1034 - Contact Stella about test cases status [on Christopher Welty - due 2010-07-20]. 15:46:14 next item 15:46:31 zakim, mute me 15:46:31 csma should now be muted 15:46:48 Leora: late, but have draft on Wiki - bulk of it is there 15:47:07 http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Primer 15:47:32 ... had hoped to have Harold and Chris review 15:48:01 ChrisW: meeting to follow up on Friday 11am Eastern 15:49:01 lmorgens: not sure if reached right level of detail and approachability 15:50:01 ... e.g. section on reasoning - brief discussion of semantic issues, approximation 15:50:11 ... good to get feedback on sections like this 15:50:51 ChrisW: concrete example from Facebook use case 15:51:01 Sandro: would like to make concrete 15:51:51 ... properties associated with page, rather than object - and values are strings rather than URIs 15:51:58 http://developers.facebook.com/docs/opengraph 15:52:11 ... can see whether appropriate for Primer 15:52:43 Sounds like a good use case for the primer given interest in OGF and emphasises RDF connection. 15:52:50 Leora: current examples stick to one theme, but another might be helpful given that RIF users will also have to deal with issues like this 15:54:39 ChrisW: will review this week for Friday's meeting 15:55:00 Sandro: what syntax does the primer use? 15:55:24 Leora: antecedent preceding consequent 15:55:36 ... Chris wants to change slot value 15:56:07 ... or use both, with hide/show button - simplified vs. presentation 15:56:15 Sandro: prefers button 15:56:41 Here's one hide/show bit: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/multisyntax-support/example-1.html 15:56:50 ChrisW: should provide XML for each example 15:57:17 AdrianP has joined #rif 15:57:24 Sandro: totally in favor of having every widely used syntax 15:57:37 +1 to having multiple syntaxes in the primer 15:57:38 ... very helpful in OWL primer 15:57:46 ... but a lot of work 15:57:53 ChrisW: can be done at end 15:57:59 ... once content is stable 15:58:29 Harold: would prefer Simplified RIF Syntax to RIF Simplified Syntax (another RSS) 15:58:34 Leora: Will do 15:58:45 -1 to "Simplified RIF Syntax" 15:58:55 Leora: haven't checked parens - will do later today 15:59:28 Harold: eliminate extra spaces 15:59:50 Sandro: Simplified RIF Syntax implies something official 16:00:07 ChrisW: perhaps RIF Primer Syntax 16:00:07 "RIF Primer Syntax" is fine. 16:00:14 why do you need a name? 16:00:35 zakim, unmute me 16:00:35 csma should no longer be muted 16:00:38 Sandro: rest of world calls this tutorial not primer 16:00:48 ... other W3C specs also use primer 16:01:06 csma: primer not necessarily tutorial 16:01:17 ... just examples, not necessarily complete 16:01:39 ChrisW: send naming suggestions by email 16:01:46 ChrisW: Any other Business? 16:01:47 (I agree, CSMA -- I guess I don't know which this is.) 16:02:31 ChrisW: Meeting in 2 weeks, July 27? 16:02:47 Date OK for me 16:04:14 +??P7 16:04:30 ChrisW: meeting in 2 weeks, same agenda as today 16:04:46 ChrisW: adjourned 16:04:49 -Harold 16:04:52 -Leora_Morgenstern 16:04:53 -MichaelKifer 16:04:55 zakim, list attendees 16:04:55 As of this point the attendees have been Sandro, ChrisW, Mike_Dean, Leora_Morgenstern, DaveReynolds, Harold, +1.631.833.aaaa, MichaelKifer, +33.9.53.62.aabb, csma 16:04:57 Adrian joined late, in UK 16:04:58 -DaveReynolds 16:04:58 -??P7 16:05:05 MichaelKifer has left #rif 16:05:15 REgrets: StellaMitchell JosDeBruijn 16:05:23 rrsagent, make minutes 16:05:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/13-rif-minutes.html ChrisW 16:05:58 -Mike_Dean 16:05:58 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:05:59 On the phone I see Sandro, ChrisW, csma 16:08:49 -csma 16:08:51 -ChrisW 16:08:52 -Sandro 16:08:52 SW_RIF()11:00AM has ended 16:08:53 Attendees were Sandro, ChrisW, Mike_Dean, Leora_Morgenstern, DaveReynolds, Harold, +1.631.833.aaaa, MichaelKifer, +33.9.53.62.aabb, csma