16:00:12 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:00:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/06-soap-jms-irc 16:00:14 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:00:14 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:00:16 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:00:16 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start now 16:00:17 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:00:17 Date: 06 July 2010 16:00:28 Chair: Eric 16:00:36 Scribe: Mark 16:00:53 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0004.html 16:01:07 Regrets: Phil Adams, Amy Lewis 16:02:17 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started 16:02:21 peaston has joined #soap-jms 16:02:24 +Mark 16:02:34 + +1.708.246.aaaa 16:02:46 Derek has joined #SOAP-JMS 16:03:27 + +1.209.474.aabb 16:03:45 + +1.781.280.aacc 16:04:12 eric has joined #soap-jms 16:04:32 Zakim, who is here? 16:04:32 On the phone I see Mark, +1.708.246.aaaa, +1.209.474.aabb, +1.781.280.aacc 16:04:34 On IRC I see eric, Derek, peaston, Zakim, RRSAgent, mphillip, Yves, trackbot 16:04:41 Zakim, aabb is eric 16:04:41 +eric; got it 16:05:13 TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe 16:05:15 Mark 16:05:25 Scribe: mphillip 16:05:30 Zakim, aaa is Derek 16:05:30 sorry, Derek, I do not recognize a party named 'aaa' 16:05:40 TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes 16:05:42 Zakim, aaaa is Derek 16:05:42 +Derek; got it 16:06:14 No objections to approving the minutes 16:06:19 TOPIC: Review the agenda 16:07:34 No objections 16:07:45 TOPIC: Review action items 16:07:52 Eric - no progress on actions 16:07:56 Peter - no progress 16:09:21 Mark, 185 done, 188 still pending 16:09:30 close action-185 16:09:30 ACTION-185 Change the namespace to http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms closed 16:10:10 Derek: 187 - reviewing the spec... 16:11:30 Derek: In Binding spec section 2.2.3 we say that targetService MUST appear in requestURI but there is no corresponding fault or specified behaviour 16:12:33 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#binding-message-props 16:15:16 Mark: The receiver may not know that the targetService was specified and so may not me able to throw a fault 16:17:36 Eric: Agreed, this may be untestable - can test the positive but can't test the negative 16:20:29 Peter: There is an analagy with SOAP/HTTP if there is no match for soapAction and I have seen that handled in several ways 16:20:54 SOAP Action in SOAP 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383528 16:23:01 Derek: Will raise this as an issue for later discussion 16:23:41 close action-187 16:23:41 ACTION-187 Review the spec. looking for other items that will need to change - e.g. editorial notes / nits closed 16:24:00 action: Derek to raise an issue regarding targetService and the missing fault 16:24:00 Created ACTION-191 - Raise an issue regarding targetService and the missing fault [on Derek Rokicki - due 2010-07-13]. 16:24:27 TOPIC: Namespace discussion 16:24:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0002.html 16:25:03 Mark: For action 185 16:33:35 Mark: Describes changes for namespace 16:34:37 RESOLUTION: Changes approved, issue 39 can be closed 16:34:53 TOPIC: URI Scheme 16:34:55 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0001.html 16:41:35 Eric: Reads note from IETF reviewer - outling options 16:42:07 Eric: Provisional registration makes some sense 16:42:38 Eric: URN prefix is an option 16:43:18 Consensus on call is that it is not the ideal option 16:44:32 Mark: Does provisional URI expire? 16:45:08 Eric: No, but it could be replaced either by a provisional or permanent URI 16:45:58 Eric: Provisional *should* block the registration of another "jms" URI unless the new one was demonstrably better 16:46:33 Eric: and IETF *should* look for backward compatibility before replacing a provisional URI 16:47:42 Eric: Can push to turn a provisional URI into a permanent URI but it could take some time 16:48:14 Mark: What's the provisional process? 16:48:18 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-merrick-jms-uri-07#section-9 16:49:53 We would change the status in section 9 of our document and re-submit as a provisional draft 16:51:41 Mark: A colleague in IBM has a list of all the existing SOAP/JMS formats - perhaps we can use that to demonstrate this needs standardisation 16:52:19 action: mark to send list of known JMS URI formats to the SOAP/JMS list 16:52:20 Created ACTION-192 - Send list of known JMS URI formats to the SOAP/JMS list [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-07-13]. 16:53:20 Eric: We would prefer to keep a URI rather than a URN so I will follow up on the procedure for provisional registration and find out how we would move forward to permanent 16:53:42 action eric to Investigate provisional uri process and how we would move forward after that 16:53:42 Created ACTION-193 - Investigate provisional uri process and how we would move forward after that [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-07-13]. 16:56:20 TOPIC: Moving to PR (via CR) 16:56:52 Eric: We will need to prepare a document detailing the differences since the last CR, so we will discuss that work next week 16:56:59 TOPIC: AOB 16:57:08 None 16:57:17 -Mark 16:57:18 -eric 16:57:18 -Derek 16:57:43 rrsagent, make minutes 16:57:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/06-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip 17:05:00 disconnecting the lone participant, +1.781.280.aacc, in WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM 17:05:05 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 17:05:06 Attendees were Mark, +1.708.246.aaaa, +1.209.474.aabb, +1.781.280.aacc, eric, Derek 17:13:38 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 18:45:12 Zakim has left #soap-jms