14:57:14 RRSAgent has joined #xproc 14:57:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/01-xproc-irc 14:59:24 Norm, thank _you_! 14:59:45 Meeting: XML Processing Model WG 14:59:45 Date: 1 July 2010 14:59:45 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/01-agenda 14:59:45 Meeting: 176 14:59:45 Chair: Norm 14:59:46 Scribe: Norm 14:59:48 ScribeNick: Norm 15:01:13 Vojtech has joined #xproc 15:01:39 ht has joined #xproc 15:01:49 zakim, please call ht-781 15:01:49 ok, ht; the call is being made 15:01:50 XML_PMWG()11:00AM has now started 15:01:52 +Ht 15:01:59 PGrosso has joined #xproc 15:02:07 zakim, what's the passcode? 15:02:09 +Jeroen 15:02:16 zakim, Jeroen is Vojtech 15:02:19 the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Norm 15:02:24 +Vojtech; got it 15:02:31 +[ArborText] 15:02:49 +Norm 15:02:58 zakim, jeroen is Vojtech 15:03:02 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:03:05 sorry, Norm, I do not recognize a party named 'jeroen' 15:03:11 On the phone I see Ht, Vojtech, PGrosso, Norm 15:03:16 Regrets: Mohamed 15:03:59 Regrets: Mohamed, Alex 15:05:07 Present: Norm, Henry, Vojtech, Paul 15:05:14 Topic: Accept this agenda? 15:05:14 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/07/01-agenda 15:05:26 Accepted. 15:05:31 Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting? 15:05:31 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/06/24-minutes 15:05:34 Accepted. 15:05:38 Topic: Next meeting: telcon, 8 July 2010? 15:06:00 Paul and Vojtech give regrets 15:06:23 Topic: XProc Errata 15:06:34 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xproc-proposed-errata 15:06:55 Norm: Anyone have any questions or comments about E01 and/or E02? 15:07:02 ...Hearing none, I propose that we accept them. 15:07:11 Accepted. 15:08:21 Some discussion of what to do next; updating the errata document is the answer. 15:08:59 ACTION: Norm to construct an update to the errata document pointed to from the spec and pass it off to someone who can update it. 15:10:07 Norm: Vojtech, you had a question about namespace bindings. 15:11:06 Vojtech: Yes, in 5.7.5, in the first list, there are rules about how to construct namespace bindings. 15:11:47 ...The way I understand it now, if an XPath expression returns a sequence of nodes, then we use the in-scope namespace bindings off the first node if the expression returns a node set. 15:14:14 Norm: I think that exists so that if an expression selects a QName in content, the right namespace bindings are carried forward. 15:15:03 General agreement that everything is ok. 15:15:21 Topic: Editor's draft of XML Processor Profiles 15:15:34 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles 15:17:32 Some discussion of Paul's comment 15:18:19 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Jun/0026.html 15:18:54 Henry: I think this would be clearer if we changed "conformant processor" to "conformant XProc processor" in that sentence. 15:19:00 Paul: I think that could be clearer. 15:20:19 ...I'm happy to leave the improvements to the editor. 15:21:14 Norm: Paul also asks about a profile that's smaller than "minimum". I don't feel strongly about the names. 15:22:11 Norm: How about "minimum", "basic", "modest", and "recommended" 15:22:16 Paul: That sounds good. 15:23:11 Norm: Anyone have concerns about these names? 15:23:13 None heard. 15:24:17 Norm: Paul's last comment is mostly editorial, but I agree. 15:27:00 General agreement that it should read "reading and processing" as Paul suggests. 15:27:52 Henry: Perhaps I should report on my action to add something about invariants 15:28:16 ...I've started. Looking over the XML Spec again, it's not going to be as nice as I'd like. 15:28:56 ...The best I can do for the first two profiles (which don't read any external markup) is to say things in two parts. 15:29:15 ...For documents which are, or should be, standalone=yes and for documents which are standalone=no 15:29:29 ...Because for documents which are standalone=no, if you don't read the external subset there isn't much you can say. 15:29:49 ...You aren't gauranteed to get much at all. 15:30:46 MoZ has joined #xproc 15:30:46 ...The most you can say is that you'll get the document element name and attributes (provided they don't contain entity references) 15:31:18 ...But almost no one bothers with standalone="yes" and the default is standalone="no", so it'll be tricky to get right. 15:31:34 ...Especially since processors aren't required to report unexpanded entities. 15:31:45 Henry: But the other two are easier and I think we can get somewhere with them. 15:31:59 ...The scope for variation is reduced after the external subset has been read and processed. 15:32:59 Norm summarizes the state of the issues list, not much progress to be made today 15:33:52 Topic: Any other business 15:34:07 -Norm 15:34:09 -Vojtech 15:34:09 Adjourned 15:34:10 -PGrosso 15:34:14 rrsagent, set logs world visible 15:34:15 -Ht 15:34:17 XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended 15:34:18 Attendees were Ht, Vojtech, Norm, PGrosso 15:34:18 rrsagent draft minutes 15:34:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:34:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/07/01-xproc-minutes.html Norm 15:37:43 PGrosso has left #xproc 17:27:56 Zakim has left #xproc 17:38:44 rrsagent, bye 17:38:44 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/07/01-xproc-actions.rdf : 17:38:44 ACTION: Norm to construct an update to the errata document pointed to from the spec and pass it off to someone who can update it. [1] 17:38:44 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/07/01-xproc-irc#T15-08-59