14:00:34 RRSAgent has joined #sparql 14:00:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-sparql-irc 14:00:36 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:00:36 Zakim, I am here 14:00:36 sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'here' 14:00:38 Zakim, this will be 77277 14:00:38 ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now 14:00:39 Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference 14:00:39 Date: 29 June 2010 14:00:42 AxelPolleres has joined #sparql 14:00:44 zakim, this is SPARQL 14:00:44 ok, LeeF; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 14:00:47 Zakim, I am bglimm 14:00:47 sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'bglimm' 14:00:53 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:00:54 On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb 14:00:58 - +44.186.528.aaaa 14:00:59 chimezie has joined #sparql 14:01:09 zakim, code? 14:01:10 the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), LeeF 14:01:18 zakim, aabb is me 14:01:18 +MattPerry; got it 14:01:47 +AxelPolleres 14:01:56 morning Axel 14:01:58 +Chimezie_Ogbuji 14:02:06 + +1.617.553.aacc 14:02:13 Zakim, mute me 14:02:15 zakim, aacc is me 14:02:18 Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted 14:02:20 +LeeF; got it 14:02:29 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:32 On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF 14:02:38 I am just dialing in again 14:02:46 + +44.186.528.aadd 14:02:55 Zakim, +44.186.528.aadd is me 14:02:55 +bglimm; got it 14:03:02 Zakim, mute me 14:03:02 bglimm should now be muted 14:03:23 (for the record, next week I'd like to discuss LET and also start reviewing & approving test cases) 14:03:25 scribe: paul gearon 14:03:30 scribenick: pgearon 14:03:37 Chair: AxelPolleres 14:03:42 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-29 14:03:43 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-29 14:04:18 AxelPolleres: Focus on admin issues today. Action issues, etc 14:04:44 Axel, are you still talking? I can't hear any more 14:04:52 focus on tech issues tomorrow in upcoming testcases call 14:04:53 :-( 14:04:55 +??P1 14:04:57 silence 14:05:08 Zakim, ??P1 is me 14:05:14 +NickH; got it 14:05:21 Yes, our telephone system has problems today and Zakim forces me to call US 14:05:27 -bglimm 14:05:27 member:AxelPolleres: Summary of Semtech 14:06:06 +[IPcaller] 14:06:14 Zakim, +[IPcaller] is me 14:06:14 sorry, AlexPassant, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 14:06:30 LeeF: Tuesday gave a tutorial on SPARQL. Wednesday there was a SPARQL 1.1 panel. Fewer people at the panel 14:06:51 LeeF: panel had questions on federation. One person asked about LET 14:07:25 LeeF: people in the community seem to be engaged in SPARQL and are following what we're doing 14:08:46 Zakim, unmute me 14:08:46 Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted 14:08:47 LeeF: no real criticism. One question about LET. Another question asking if we've defined everything needed for federation (which we aren't) 14:09:30 chimezie: presentation on REST and HTTP. Most of the feedback was just about filling in details of the protocol 14:10:02 Zakim, mute me 14:10:02 Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted 14:10:21 http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/ 14:10:22 AxelPolleres: RDF Next Steps workshop 14:11:19 AxelPolleres: lots of presentations, lots of differing opinions 14:11:49 +bglimm 14:12:00 AxelPolleres: breakout groups on Semantics, Syntax, Named Graphs, and Linked Data issues 14:12:31 AxelPolleres: decided not to worry much about XML. Look at new syntax, and more "webby" things like JSON 14:12:51 Zakim, mute me 14:12:51 bglimm should now be muted 14:13:32 AxelPolleres: Semantics group wanted to align semantics with what people are expecting 14:14:38 AxelPolleres: syntax - don't touch XML semantics. Annotations should be allowed in RDF, which will be different to current reification syntax 14:14:41 See http://www.w3.org/2010/06/rdf-work-items/table 14:14:56 Souri has joined #sparql 14:15:02 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF/NextStepWorkshop 14:15:26 + +1.603.897.aaee 14:15:28 AxelPolleres: using "weakly deprecated" on several features, such as reificiation. This means that people should avoid using them in new applications 14:15:35 zakim, aaee is Souri 14:15:36 +Souri; got it 14:16:05 +[IPcaller.a] 14:16:17 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 14:16:26 Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 14:16:26 +bglimm; got it 14:16:30 topic: Comments 14:16:30 -bglimm 14:16:31 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 14:16:34 Zakim, [IPcaller] is me 14:16:34 +AlexPassant; got it 14:16:36 pgearon: the outcome of the workshop is that there will likely be a new RDF working group 14:16:49 Zakim, mute me 14:16:49 bglimm.a should now be muted 14:17:24 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:17:24 On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF, NickH, AlexPassant, Souri, bglimm.a (muted) 14:17:25 AxelPolleres: asking everyone on the list about comments 14:17:38 Zakim, unmute me 14:17:38 bglimm.a should no longer be muted 14:18:11 Zakim, unmute me 14:18:11 Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted 14:18:41 EF-1, EF-2, EF-3. Birte responded, and there was no response. Is this acceptable or do we need to follow up? 14:19:13 LeeF: good practice to follow up, but not required to at this stage (not until Last Call) 14:19:41 LeeF: suggestion to track comments beyond sending response only by last call with a standard question for acknowledgement. 14:19:54 Zakim, mute me 14:19:54 bglimm.a should now be muted 14:20:26 JC-1. LeeF has sent another email opening this discussion again 14:20:49 AxelPolleres: can this be closed, or left open? 14:20:54 LeeF: leave open 14:21:03 ASSIGNMENT to be put on next TC agenda 14:21:18 RV-2 is waiting on a second response from SteveH. 14:21:22 HK-1. Similar to JC-1 14:21:46 oops. jumped ahead a bit on that. sorry. 14:24:23 ACTION: Paul to check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table. 14:24:23 Created ACTION-259 - Check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. 14:24:25 RN-1. Response was not formal, but in public. Richard Newman was satisfied with response 14:25:23 DR-1. Property Paths question still open. Axel with follow up with Andy to see if it is resolved 14:25:27 ACTION: Axel to contact Andy about open comments assigned to him 14:25:27 Created ACTION-260 - Contact Andy about open comments assigned to him [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06]. 14:25:58 RV-2 isn't actually done, despite what the wiki says. 14:26:02 ST-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html 14:26:29 ST-1. This has not been responded to. pgearon to follow up 14:26:31 ACTION: Paul to look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly 14:26:31 Created ACTION-261 - Look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. 14:27:49 RV-2. Responded to, but followup mail not in table 14:28:31 chimezie_2 has joined #sparql 14:28:41 ACTION: greg to add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table 14:28:41 Created ACTION-262 - Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06]. 14:28:45 Steve did send regrets (most likely cannot make it he said) 14:29:26 that's different 14:29:33 Steve needed for RV-3 and RV-4 14:29:54 aha. RV-4 is the same as the followup on RV-1 14:30:10 ACTION: ask stefve about RV-3 RV-4 responses 14:30:10 Sorry, couldn't find user - ask 14:30:44 close ACTION-262 14:30:44 ACTION-262 Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table closed 14:31:24 RH-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html 14:32:04 RH-1. More complex. This is an input paper which proposes an abstract syntax for Update 14:32:25 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 14:32:46 AxelPolleres: not responded, but have a reply draft. Draft says that we may consider this 14:34:52 -AlexPassant 14:35:03 AxelPolleres: Lee wanted to hold off on the reply 14:35:25 +[IPcaller] 14:35:27 Zakim, [IPcaller] is me 14:35:27 +AlexPassant; got it 14:37:22 ACTION: paul to reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list. 14:37:22 Created ACTION-263 - Reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. 14:37:34 pgearon: feels that the draft response is a "brush off" and volunteers to update the response 14:39:21 KK-1. ISSUE-49. Ivan asked, said we can reference informatively 14:40:04 AxelPolleres: can replicate ISSUE-49 in the text and explain that there may be an issue if not used as expected 14:40:48 ACTION: Chime to draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc. 14:40:48 Created ACTION-264 - Draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc. [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-07-06]. 14:41:12 I drafted a response, but never got WG feedback on it. 14:41:54 kasei: discussing MH-3, TI-3 response 14:42:13 s/MH-3/MH-1/ 14:42:25 +1 chimezie 14:43:10 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MH-1 14:43:12 +1 14:43:23 kasei: don't plan to follow up with "well known" endpoint without a concrete proposal 14:43:23 supoort 14:43:30 support 14:43:54 either way 14:44:16 kasei to follow up without action 14:44:39 PA-1 14:44:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0002.html 14:45:15 Andy suggested that functions from XPath can be used 14:45:22 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PA-1 14:45:58 AxelPolleres: can someone please check. Concern about syntactic correctness 14:46:36 AxelPolleres: noticed use of "+" instead of concat function 14:47:03 works in a real implementation? 14:47:09 does anybody implement those functions yet? 14:47:17 my main concern is fn:concat and fn:encode-for-uri 14:47:20 which we haven't settled on yet, right? 14:47:43 which functions & via which URIs 14:47:53 Sure 14:48:16 i think you're missing braces in the WHERE clause 14:48:35 the sub-SELECT needs to be wrapped in braces 14:49:22 pgearon: also includes example:percentEncode in query, which shouldn't be there 14:49:36 I think the current grammar allows WHERE { SELECT ... } 14:50:33 it should be: select exp as var (instead of var as exp) 14:50:38 ACTION: Axel to update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change 14:50:38 Created ACTION-265 - Update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06]. 14:51:52 yes 14:52:25 PA-2. Semantics of Describe. AxelPolleres has this on his list 14:52:42 I can draft a response to PA-2 w.r.t. service descriptions. 14:53:56 DS-1 needs discussion 14:53:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0011.html 14:54:03 DS-1. mentioned before, and kasei thinks we need more discussion 14:54:44 kasei: Andy provided compelling example, response suggested that entailment can interact and cause problems 14:54:59 we had that discussion on F2F ... looks like we have to discuss this in the group again. 14:55:48 ACTION: greg to write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options 14:55:49 Created ACTION-266 - Write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06]. 14:55:59 kasei following up, will be discussed in next teleconference 14:57:09 what time is the call tomorrow? 14:58:24 topic: aob 14:58:35 -Chimezie_Ogbuji 14:58:36 adjourned 14:58:37 -LeeF 14:58:38 adjourned 14:58:39 -bglimm.a 14:58:45 -MattPerry 14:58:47 -AlexPassant 14:58:49 -OlivierCorby 14:58:53 -NickH 14:58:55 -pgearon 14:58:55 rrsagent, make records public 14:58:57 -kasei 14:59:01 -AxelPolleres 15:22:59 AxelPolleres, ping? 15:35:01 disconnecting the lone participant, Souri, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 15:35:05 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended 15:35:07 Attendees were OlivierCorby, pgearon, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji, +1.617.553.aacc, LeeF, bglimm, NickH, +1.603.897.aaee, 15:35:09 ... Souri, AlexPassant 15:38:41 AxelPolleres has left #sparql 15:39:10 AxelPolleres has joined #sparql 17:03:06 Zakim has left #sparql 19:22:25 AndyS has joined #sparql 21:26:42 AxelPolleres has joined #sparql 22:39:01 AxelPolleres has joined #sparql