19:54:11 RRSAgent has joined #svg 19:54:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-irc 19:54:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:54:13 Zakim has joined #svg 19:54:15 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 19:54:15 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 19:54:16 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 19:54:16 Date: 22 June 2010 19:54:30 zakim, room for 8? 19:54:31 ok, ChrisL; conference Team_(svg)19:54Z scheduled with code 26631 (CONF1) for 60 minutes until 2054Z 19:54:52 zakim, this will be 26631 19:54:52 ok, ChrisL; I see Team_(svg)19:54Z scheduled to start now 19:55:15 ChrisL has changed the topic to: code today is 26631 19:58:22 Team_(svg)19:54Z has now started 19:58:29 +[IPcaller] 19:58:35 Zakim, [IP is me 19:58:35 +ed; got it 19:59:21 +ChrisL 19:59:33 +[IPcaller] 19:59:54 Zakim, [IP is me 19:59:54 +anthony; got it 20:00:01 zakim, +[IPcaller] is anthony 20:00:01 sorry, ChrisL, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 20:06:06 Tav has joined #svg 20:07:12 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ 20:08:02 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010AprJun/0141.html 20:08:08 I actually am on vacation this week so I won't be calling in. 20:08:54 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/disco 20:09:53 Scribe: anthony 20:10:07 Topic: Tracking comments 20:10:32 CL: Whatever we use it should be easy to use 20:10:45 AG: I thought we used Tracker for Tiny 1.2 20:11:08 CL: Can pull information from Tracker using DisCo 20:11:15 example http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/112 20:12:03 CL: I guess that is ok. As long as people put the issue number in the email 20:12:10 ... we should get a complete list of all the comments 20:12:33 AG: I think Doug said that in an email when we went to LC for Tiny 1.2 20:12:51 ED: Ok, I guess what we'll know what we're doing in July 20:13:02 ... we have to address all of the last call comments before taking the next step 20:13:19 ... what's the likely hood of that taking place before SVG Open 20:13:34 CL: Should be ok. We can't add new features and if the comments are too complicated 20:13:46 ... we probably can consider them for SVG 2.0 20:14:13 ED: Sounds like we have the issue tracking thing solved - using Tracker 20:14:29 ... we should make a product for 1.1 Full 2nd last call 20:14:36 CL: Ok I'll do that now 20:15:38 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/24 20:16:15 test suite for 1.1 F2 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/3 20:16:20 ED: Would be good to have that for PR. Want to have a bit more than what we have for SVG Open 20:16:33 ... depending on everyone schedule 20:16:42 CL: The useful thing is we have it published 20:16:46 ... so there's something to show people 20:17:16 ED: That was the reason I put in the announcement we are looking for feedback on the test suite 20:17:27 ... I added those PNG tests 20:17:34 ... and ran them through Batik 20:17:43 ... they didn't produce anything that looked correct 20:17:47 ... I wasn't sure 20:17:52 ... I checked in the reference images 20:17:55 ACTION-2799 20:17:58 ACTION-2799? 20:17:58 ACTION-2799 -- Erik Dahlström to review the png tests and generate reference images -- due 2010-06-24 -- OPEN 20:17:58 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2799 20:18:02 ... I don't know what to do 20:18:11 CL: I tried them in Opera and FF they were fine there 20:18:20 ED: Could be the way Batik handles the PNGs 20:18:34 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObject/struct-image-13-f.html 20:19:32 CL: I see what the bug is 20:19:44 all the 16 bit per component images are wrong in batik 20:20:34 CL: Probably got the high and low bytes wrong. I'll raise a bug on it 20:20:51 ED: I didn't want to mark it as properly reviewed yet 20:21:02 ... and you said you'll change some of the passCriteria wording 20:21:10 ... what I did do is update the harness 20:22:24 eseidel has joined #svg 20:22:43 AG: I had an action to convert the harness to XHTML 20:23:21 ... there are still tests to be done? 20:23:28 CL: Yes 20:23:57 ED: Waiting for Patrick to get back to me on some of them 20:24:48 ACTION: Erik to Add XHTML validation to the SVG 1.1 Full 2nd Edition test harness 20:24:48 Created ACTION-2803 - Add XHTML validation to the SVG 1.1 Full 2nd Edition test harness [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29]. 20:25:35 Topic: Telcon Schedule 20:25:45 ED: I'll be around until the end of the July 20:25:52 ... around the 20th I go on holidays 20:25:57 ... then I'll be back 3 weeks later 20:26:36 ... do we expect to have telcons for that period 20:27:10 CL: Depends. Currently we have low attendance 20:28:12 ED: I guess we'll do part tracking comments and part test suite work 20:28:23 ... we have F2F meeting set up for directly after SVG Open 20:28:51 ... has anyone spoken to the organising committee? 20:29:02 CL: I can speak to him when I get back from holidays 20:29:11 s/holidays/travel/ 20:30:09 ED: We can try to have a telcon a week 20:30:23 ... then hold off for a block of weeks 20:30:32 CL: We can have telcons for the first 3 weeks of July 20:30:44 ... so we cancel from Tue 27th July to SVG Open 20:31:09 ED: I might still be around on IRC or email 20:31:40 ACTION: Erik to Send out telcon reminder for everyone 20:31:40 Created ACTION-2804 - Send out telcon reminder for everyone [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29]. 20:32:15 CL: I think we can move back to one telcon a week 20:32:20 ... probably the Tuesday time 20:32:33 ED: Tuesday is a good time for me 20:32:41 AG: I'll be there for that 20:33:14 Topic: Cascading of presentational attributes 20:33:27 CL: Fantasi proposed wording for 2.1 and SVG 20:33:34 ... it is good for both, but a bit short for SVG 20:33:46 ... and she's proposed wording for 2.1 20:34:04 ... but we can't use 2.1 because but we reference 2.0 20:34:22 ED: We should probably reiterate the specificity 20:34:36 CL: Can you email back and say you like the wording 20:35:59 ED: Can we accept her wording as a comment? 20:36:06 ... can we take her wording? 20:36:13 CL: The essential part has not changed 20:36:42 ... we test it in a selectors test 20:36:56 ED: Even if we reference 2.0 it doesn't change anything? 20:37:15 CL: There a few places were we have a direct link to a spec 20:37:31 ... I think we can work out some wording for it 20:38:25 ACTION: Erik to Respond and put Fantasi's comment into Tracker 20:38:26 Created ACTION-2805 - Respond and put Fantasi's comment into Tracker [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29]. 20:39:12 ED: No other agenda requests 20:39:40 -ChrisL 20:39:42 -ed 20:39:44 -anthony 20:39:45 Team_(svg)19:54Z has ended 20:39:46 Attendees were [IPcaller], ed, ChrisL, anthony 20:55:17 rrsagent, make minutes 20:55:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-minutes.html ChrisL 21:26:26 eseidel has joined #svg 21:37:36 eseidel has joined #svg 21:38:20 shepazu has joined #svg 21:47:24 ed_work, ed, anthony, when was the telcon? 21:47:42 about 1:45 ago 21:47:55 1 hour 45 mins 21:48:58 ah, ok 21:49:17 was the telcon time changed? I must have missed that... 22:06:50 yes, to Tuesday 20:00 UTC 22:07:00 but the other telcon time is the same 22:07:23 although, as of this week, I think we're moving to one telcon a week for now while people are away 22:13:03 Zakim has left #svg 23:45:13 eseidel has joined #svg 23:46:05 anthony has left #svg 23:47:23 anthony_work has joined #svg