15:15:55 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 15:15:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/18-prov-xg-irc 15:15:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:15:57 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 15:15:59 Zakim, this will be 98765 15:15:59 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start 16 minutes ago 15:16:00 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 15:16:00 Date: 18 June 2010 15:16:24 Simon: 15:17:20 I thought about this as a hierarchy 15:17:24 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_News_Aggregator_Scenario 15:17:49 topic - user requirements - technical requirements 15:18:18 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Disease_Outbreak_Scenario 15:18:21 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_Disease_Outbreak_Scenario 15:20:14 entry points would be good 15:20:23 from the research 15:20:30 have fun everyone 15:20:32 i'm off 15:22:06 Yolanda: by anchoring state of the art analyses in scenarios, helps those who need to represent provenance 15:23:03 James: worry about saying the same thing in several places, as state of art/TR apply in multiple scenarios 15:23:41 q+ 15:23:42 Yolanda: general TRs have overlap, need to be cut down 15:23:58 yes, that's what I meant 15:25:28 James: can start analysis by looking at general state of art known about (e.g. prov in databases) and say how it applies - part of gap analysis 15:25:54 q? 15:26:33 q- 15:26:58 James: some people, including me, could work on analyses of technology towards scenarios 15:27:16 Yolanda: also signs up for this 15:27:37 me too 15:28:10 James: 1-2 page survey of technology area for provenance (e.g. me for databases) - who is interested in joining? 15:28:21 Yolanda: use existing survey papers as guidance 15:28:55 Yolanda: get started on it, bring it up on later telecon to recruit more people 15:39:03 Simon: scenario-specific user requirements as instances of the general user requirements originally listed as relevant to scenario 15:45:39 The conclusions of the report may then be incorporated into policy briefing documents used by civil servants or experts on behalf of the government to identify possible policy decisions that will be made by (non-expert) decision makers, to help avoid or respond to future outbreaks of owl flu. This process may involve considering hypotheticals or reevaluating the primary data using different methodologies than those applied originally by Alice. The report and 15:46:37 Yolanda: need to rephrase, cut out general requirements where ambiguous, overlapping - check coverage by 3 scenarios after all analyses 15:50:56 this seems to be very specific now, checking out I will catch up on the details 15:55:15 Simon: attach specific examples to user requirements (as in analysis of scenario 1) to aid understanding 15:56:20 Yolanda: remaining content user requirements seem relevant 15:58:45 Yolanda: not sure whether long list of general reqs will be a product of the group 15:59:13 Simon: Paul intends to copy back rephrased requirements from scenarios to long list after analyses 16:00:12 Sure 16:00:21 i dont have a mic sorry 16:00:53 ok 16:01:28 Yolanda: to work on URs for scenario 2, TRs will be started in later telecon 16:02:10 Yolanda: diagrams very helpful - anyone willing to help with this? 16:04:27 bye 16:04:28 afreitas has left #prov-xg 16:04:31 jcheney has left #prov-xg 16:04:40 trackbot, end telecon 16:04:40 Zakim, list attendees 16:04:40 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:04:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:04:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/18-prov-xg-minutes.html trackbot 16:04:42 RRSAgent, bye 16:04:42 I see no action items