14:56:45 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 14:56:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-irc 14:56:47 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:56:47 Zakim has joined #html-a11y 14:56:49 Zakim, this will be 2119 14:56:50 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 14:56:50 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 14:56:50 Date: 10 June 2010 14:57:31 JF has joined #html-a11y 14:57:43 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0126.html 14:57:52 chair: Janina_Sajka 14:57:57 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM has now started 14:58:04 +Michael_Cooper 14:58:06 +John_Foliot 14:58:52 regrets: Laura_Carlson, Marco_Ranon, Steven_Faulkner, Denis_Boudreau, Ben_Caldwell 14:59:20 janina has joined #html-a11y 14:59:32 +Gregory_Rosmaita 14:59:40 zakim, call janina 14:59:40 ok, janina; the call is being made 14:59:42 +Janina 15:00:29 regrets+ Silvia_Pfeiffer 15:01:04 +Matt_May 15:01:24 kliehm has joined #html-a11y 15:01:55 + +49.179.103.aaaa 15:02:23 MikeSmith has joined #html-a11y 15:02:59 richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y 15:03:22 zakim, call Mike 15:03:24 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 15:03:24 +Mike 15:03:31 +Rich 15:03:47 Zakim, Mike is me 15:03:47 +MikeSmith; got it 15:04:29 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:04:29 On the phone I see Michael_Cooper, John_Foliot, Gregory_Rosmaita, Janina, Matt_May, kliehm (muted), MikeSmith, Rich 15:05:48 ah me 15:05:55 Zakim, mute me 15:05:55 MikeSmith should now be muted 15:05:59 jongunderson has joined #html-a11y 15:06:16 chaals- has joined #html-a11y 15:06:22 +??P9 15:06:25 zakim, code? 15:06:25 the conference code is 2119 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), chaals- 15:07:00 action-28 due 1 July 15:07:01 ACTION-28 - prepare text for SteveF's guidance document about future of data-mining using RDFPic methodology outlined in post to list due date now 1 July 15:07:08 mattmay has joined #html-a11y 15:07:17 action-44 due 1 July 15:07:17 ACTION-44 - monitor status of @alt in HTML5 spec; when SteveF's Alt Guidance is published, ensure that what is in SteveF's note supersedes or corrects HTML5 verbiage; propose changes to HTML5 based on SteveF's alt doc due date now 1 July 15:07:34 Zakim, unmute me 15:07:34 MikeSmith should no longer be muted 15:08:23 +[IPcaller] 15:08:35 zakim, [IPCaller] is me 15:08:35 +chaals-; got it 15:09:48 Zakim, mute me 15:09:48 MikeSmith should now be muted 15:10:19 js: subteam reports: canvas 15:11:16 q+ 15:11:19 +Cynthia_Shelly 15:11:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010AprJun/att-0054/2dcontext10-June-7.html 15:11:35 ack me 15:11:41 richardschwerdtfe: Proposal for canvas focus ready for straw poll. More coming, but do we want to wait? 15:11:59 i/js: subteam reports/TOPIC: SubTeam Reports/ 15:12:06 janina: How much delay are we talking about? 15:12:31 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/ Survey on canvas proposal 15:12:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/ Canvas Draft Straw Poll 15:12:40 richardschwerdtfe: HTML WG already working on part of it. Need another piece. 15:13:39 i/action-28 due 1 July/TOPIC: Action Item Review/ 15:13:50 q? 15:13:55 chaals: It should be clear that they all work together. Working on my part today. 15:14:07 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010AprJun/att-0054/2dcontext10-June-7.html Lastest 2D Canvas proposal from RichS 15:14:19 chaals has joined #html-a11y 15:14:20 richardschwerdtfe: Propose we look at 2D context, and wait for chaals' proposal. 15:14:32 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/ 15:14:33 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/results 15:15:08 richardschwerdtfe: We can always take it to the TF with chaals' proposal. 15:15:14 isn't deadline 24 june 2010 15:15:56 janina: Would anyone here vote against it? 15:17:09 chaals: Should bring it to the WG. The larger group is going to make a larger-group decision better than the smaller group. 15:17:34 chaals: The outcome of either proposal is basically the same. Question is what authors will find easier to work with. 15:18:21 current results of Canvas poll: 7 yes submit now as-is and 1 submit with following changes (references chaals' work) 15:18:28 janina: Not sure what the point is in waiting for your proposal. 15:19:03 oedipus: Do you see this as an either/or proposition? 15:19:29 chaals: Yes. If you have both, it's going to be confusing for authors. 15:19:53 oedipus: Like aria-describedby vs. longdesc 15:21:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 15:21:26 i can live with chaals' plan 15:21:28 chaals: Should plan to take Rich's proposal forward and expect me to make a different proposal, or not. 15:21:57 MichaelC: Proposal set to close tomorrow. 15:22:10 richardschwerdtfe: Can't get a proposal to the WG before next week then, anyway. 15:22:18 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/canvasaccessibility 15:25:53 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: based on the results http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/results take RichS' proposal to HTMLWG; Chaals will continue work on IMAGEMAP proposal and propose to TF or not 15:26:38 chaals: We have 2 possible approaches for ISSUE-74. They can work in concert, without breaking things. It's best to choose one over the other. Outcome would be better for HTML5. 15:26:48 chaals: Which one is better should be left to the larger group. 15:26:59 chaals: What matters is what authors are going to do. 15:27:55 cyns has joined #html-a11y 15:28:07 GJR notes that most blind/VI devs and programmers and site maintainers have a preference for the IMAGEMAP approach 15:28:54 chaals: My proposal for ISSUE-74 automatically resolves ISSUE-105. 15:29:13 -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/Map4NotAdom Chaals' Change Proposal for CANVAS 15:29:55 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010AprJun/att-0054/2dcontext10-June-7.html RichS proposal for CANVAS (7 june 2010) 15:30:09 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/74 15:30:39 -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/canvasaccessibilitynonav Second Piece of RichS CANVAS proposal (with SteveF) 15:31:02 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/105 15:31:07 q? 15:32:34 -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/105 Issue-106 allow image maps on the canvas element Zakim (canvas-usemap) 15:33:14 s/Issue-106 allow image/Issue-105 allow image/ 15:33:20 Zakim, unmute me 15:33:20 MikeSmith should no longer be muted 15:33:28 chaals: If the current proposals are accepted, ISSUE-74 is resolved. If my proposal is accepted, it will resolve both 74 and 105. 15:35:11 regrets+ Eric_Carlson 15:36:08 richardschwerdtfe: I think chaals' proposal is going to need some of the canvas API from ours. Caret tracking, for example. 15:36:15 chaals: caret tracking should stay in there. 15:38:32 janina: we can vote a resolution now and possibly vote on chaals' as a counterproposal later. 15:39:05 janina: What is 105 and what do we do with it? 15:39:44 richardschwerdtfe: If we have a counterproposal, do we leave 74 open? 15:39:50 s/element Zakim (canvas/element (canvas/ 15:40:03 MikeSmith: I think so. Just mention more info is coming. 15:40:17 richardschwerdtfe: Would be a change to the 2D API. 15:41:25 Zakim, mute me 15:41:25 MikeSmith should now be muted 15:41:42 janina: So move ISSUE-74 by voting on the focus proposal, then work on closing 105 by saying there's a proposal on 74. 15:41:44 Zakim, unmute me 15:41:45 MikeSmith should no longer be muted 15:41:51 plus 1 to keep 105 open as HTML WG issue 15:42:09 chaals: If my proposal isn't accepted, 105 is still open. 15:42:36 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: based on the results http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20100610_canvas/results take RichS' proposal to HTMLWG; Chaals will continue work on IMAGEMAP proposal to satisfy HTML WG ISSUE-150 15:43:17 Proposed resolution: HTML-a11y taskforce supports the proposal ... as a resolution for ISSUE-74. Note that we *expect* a counter-proposal (based on image maps) which we would also support, but believe the wider working group should choose between them. 15:45:02 matt, Rich's CANVAS proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010AprJun/att-0054/2dcontext10-June-7.html 15:47:37 RESOLUTION: HTML-a11y taskforce supports the proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010AprJun/att-0054/2dcontext10-June-7.html as a resolution for ISSUE-74. Note that we *expect* a counter-proposal (based on image maps) which we would also support, but believe the wider working group should choose between them. 15:47:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 15:47:50 plus 1 15:48:06 +! 15:48:11 +1 15:48:17 +1 15:49:39 janina: media group 15:50:20 JF: Got some good questions. At this point, there are technical questions we need to resolve, but we've captured requirements. 15:50:21 media group last meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-html-a11y-minutes.html 15:50:24 zakim, who's making noise? 15:50:34 mattmay, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Rich (11%), John_Foliot (85%), chaals- (40%) 15:51:07 JF: We encourage people to continue to point to the document. Open to additional feedback. 15:51:34 JF: Would still like to hear from a broader community, incl. deaf-blind. 15:51:55 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_Accessibility_Requirements 15:53:44 -kliehm 15:54:20 JF: Laura has asked for clarification on how to apply a11ytf keyword. 15:54:33 plus 1 to JF's agendum addition 15:55:45 Laura's weekly bug report: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0055.html 15:56:05 -> http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-minutes#item04 Last week's discussion on formal bug handling procedures 15:56:56 RESOLUTION: The TF reserves the right to assign the A11yTF keyword. However, the TF wishes Laura's guidance as to which bugs should receive that tag 15:58:03 zakim, who is noisy? 15:58:13 oedipus, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 15:58:16 RESOLUTION: The TF will assign the A11YTF keyword to any bugs deemed appropriate during its weekly teleconference meeting. However, the TF wishes Laura to advise it as to which bugs should be assigned that keyword. 15:58:30 plus 1 15:58:36 +1 15:58:45 no objectino from me 15:58:51 +1 15:59:12 +1 15:59:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:59:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html mattmay 16:00:13 -??P9 16:00:25 I will be on 16:00:45 -John_Foliot 16:01:01 Zakim, drop me 16:01:01 MikeSmith is being disconnected 16:01:01 -Janina 16:01:03 -MikeSmith 16:01:03 -chaals- 16:01:04 -Matt_May 16:01:04 -Rich 16:01:04 janina has left #html-a11y 16:01:06 -Gregory_Rosmaita 16:02:29 zakim, please part 16:02:29 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Michael_Cooper, John_Foliot, Gregory_Rosmaita, Janina, Matt_May, +49.179.103.aaaa, kliehm, Rich, MikeSmith, chaals-, Cynthia_Shelly 16:02:29 Zakim has left #html-a11y 16:02:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 16:05:35 present+ Cynthia_Shelly, Gregory_Rosmaita, Chaals, John_Foliot, Matt_May, Michael_Cooper, MikeSmith, Rich, Cyns, Janina_Sajka, Jon_Gunderson, kliehm, Richard_Schwerdtfeger 16:05:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 16:06:43 present- +49.179.103.aaaa, chaals-, Cyns 16:06:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 16:08:36 i/RESOLUTION: The TF will assign the A11YTF keyword/scribenick+ janina/ 16:08:42 i/no objectino/scribenick: mattmay/ 16:08:47 s/no objectino/no objection/ 16:08:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 16:09:30 i/RESOLUTION: The TF will assign the A11YTF keyword/scribe: janina/ 16:09:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/10-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus 16:26:32 I see no action items