13:50:52 RRSAgent has joined #dap 13:50:52 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-irc 13:50:54 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:50:54 Zakim has joined #dap 13:50:56 Zakim, this will be DAP 13:50:56 ok, trackbot; I see UW_DAP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 13:50:57 Meeting: Device APIs and Policy Working Group Teleconference 13:50:58 Date: 09 June 2010 13:57:34 Suresh has joined #dap 13:58:08 UW_DAP()10:00AM has now started 13:58:15 + +1.972.373.aaaa 13:58:28 zakim, aaaa is Suresh 13:58:28 +Suresh; got it 13:59:11 alissa has joined #dap 13:59:30 jsalsman has joined #dap 13:59:44 + +1.202.436.aabb 14:00:06 jmorris has joined #dap 14:00:10 zakim, +1.202.436.aabb is alissa 14:00:10 +alissa; got it 14:00:22 + +1.650.335.aacc 14:00:22 Present+ Alissa_Cooper 14:00:40 Present+ John_Morris 14:00:56 Chair: Robin_Berjon 14:01:00 Present+ James_Salsman 14:01:01 Present+ Robin_Berjon 14:01:05 +Dom 14:01:16 PRESENT+ Dominique_Hazael-Massieux 14:01:22 + +1.301.581.aadd 14:01:22 zakim, mute me 14:01:24 Dom should now be muted 14:01:27 + +04871719aaee 14:01:27 +1.650.335... is jsalsman 14:01:31 Claes has joined #dap 14:01:33 drogersuk has joined #dap 14:01:36 enewland has joined #dap 14:01:40 zakim, .aadd is jmorris 14:01:40 sorry, jmorris, I do not recognize a party named '.aadd' 14:01:42 Regrets: Frederick_Hirsh 14:01:43 Present+ Wojciech_maslowski 14:01:44 zakim, aacc is jsalsman 14:01:44 +jsalsman; got it 14:01:44 present+ enewland 14:01:49 Present+ Claes_Nilsson 14:01:50 richt has joined #dap 14:01:50 zakim, aadd is jmorris 14:01:50 +jmorris; got it 14:01:56 Present+ James_Salsman 14:02:02 +darobin 14:02:06 zakim, who's on the call? 14:02:06 On the phone I see Suresh, alissa, jsalsman, Dom (muted), jmorris, +04871719aaee, darobin 14:02:08 + +1.202.637.aaff 14:02:16 zakim, aaff is enewland 14:02:16 +enewland; got it 14:02:23 Present+ Richard_Tibbett 14:02:51 zakim, aaee is wojtekM 14:02:51 +wojtekM; got it 14:02:53 LauraA has joined #dap 14:03:01 Present+ LauraA 14:03:08 + +04610801aagg 14:03:31 zakim, aagg is Claes 14:03:31 +Claes; got it 14:03:40 maoteo has joined #dap 14:03:41 + +0777541aahh 14:03:42 + +1.425.214.aaii 14:03:49 Present+ Suresh_Chitturi 14:03:52 bryan_sullivan has joined #dap 14:03:52 +??P1 14:03:58 zakim, aahh is LauraA 14:03:58 +LauraA; got it 14:04:03 Present+ David_Rogers 14:04:16 Present+ Maria_Oteo 14:04:26 zakim, ??P1 is David_Rogers 14:04:26 +David_Rogers; got it 14:04:35 present+ bryan_sullivan 14:04:46 Scribe: Laura 14:04:51 Scribenick: LauraA 14:05:03 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Jun/0069.html 14:05:19 zakim, aaii is bryan_sullivan 14:05:19 +bryan_sullivan; got it 14:05:44 topic: announcements 14:05:45 -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/43696/london2010/ registration 14:05:55 ack 14:05:57 ack me 14:06:04 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/LondonF2F2010 14:06:04 darobin: reminder to register for the July F2F in London 14:06:06 + +03491337aajj 14:06:17 dom: added list of hotels into the wiki page 14:06:37 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Jun/0031.html last week's minutes 14:06:38 topic: minutes' approval 14:06:41 Zakim, aajj is maoteo 14:06:41 +maoteo; got it 14:06:52 darobin: minutes approved 14:07:36 topic: policy 14:08:04 darobin: proposal to public Policy Framework doc 14:08:15 ... request publication on the 24th 14:08:32 danielcoloma has joined #dap 14:08:38 richt has joined #dap 14:08:51 Present+ Daniel_Coloma 14:09:01 ... any opinions about 1st public working draft of policy framework? 14:09:06 q+ 14:09:24 LauraA: sent an email with last changes right before call 14:09:29 ... suggest people look at it 14:09:36 -> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Framework.html Editors draft of Policy Framework document 14:09:43 .... it will change a bit, but minor changes -- overall well defined 14:09:47 richt has joined #dap 14:09:48 ... I think it's okay 14:10:20 RESOLUTION: CfC for Framework OK 14:10:20 darobin: objection to start call for consensus for framework doc? 14:10:28 ACTION: Robin to issue CfC for Framework 14:10:28 Created ACTION-184 - Issue CfC for Framework [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:10:32 ... no objections 14:10:47 s/ RESOLUTION/ RESOLUTION/ 14:10:49 q+ 14:10:50 ack me 14:10:55 q+ 14:10:59 ack LauraA 14:10:59 ... XACML profile ready for 1 public WD? 14:11:03 ack Suresh 14:11:14 q- 14:11:22 Suresh: any IPR analysis has been done? 14:11:30 darobin: no idea, frederick might know 14:11:35 q+ 14:11:43 ack LauraA 14:12:07 Suresh: maybe someone from the staff could do this analysis? 14:12:34 drogersuk: you can go to the OASIS website for information 14:12:41 -> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml XACML TC 14:12:51 darobin: frederick involved in OASIS, he might be the right person to ask 14:13:04 ACTION: frederick to investigate IP status for XACML 14:13:04 Created ACTION-185 - Investigate IP status for XACML [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2010-06-16]. 14:13:05 q- 14:13:14 -> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/ipr.php "This TC operates under the RF on Limited Terms Mode of the OASIS IPR Policy" 14:13:23 darobin: do we want to block on this? 14:13:27 zakim, call thomas-781 14:13:28 ok, tlr; the call is being made 14:13:28 +Thomas 14:13:40 (it's normative) 14:14:03 Suresh: need to check if references to XACML are normative of informative 14:14:18 darobin: agree, that can be an issue 14:14:43 ... pending resolution for the XACML profile doc 14:15:07 RESOLUTION: issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate 14:15:12 Would prefer to resolve it sooner than later 14:15:17 ACTION: Robin to issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate 14:15:17 Created ACTION-186 - Issue CfC for XACML, noting that there are some potential IP issues to investigate [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:15:42 darobin: third doc Examples document 14:15:45 q+ 14:15:47 ack me 14:16:17 ... it is not very normative, should we make it right track? (??) 14:16:35 s/right track? (??)/REC track?/ 14:16:42 -> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Profile.html XACML Profile draft 14:16:54 -> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/Overview.html DAP WG home page 14:17:03 dom: suggests making it a non-normative recommendation 14:17:07 -> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Examples.html Policy Examples 14:17:07 http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy/Examples.html 14:17:40 RESOLUTION: issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative 14:17:43 darobin: are we Ok with the CfC for the examples doc, but non-normative? 14:17:46 ACTION: Robin to issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative 14:17:46 Created ACTION-187 - Issue CfC for Examples, rectrack/non-normative [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:17:53 s/ RESOLUTION/ RESOLUTION/g 14:18:09 -> http://www.w3.org/mid/E37E3443-AF7B-4135-9C2D-A11FFE2A2480@nokia.com Frederick on policy reqs reorg 14:18:16 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2010Jun/att-0065/Proposal.html Proposed rework of policy requirements 14:18:19 darobin: e-mail from Frederick about policy reqs, suggesting reorganisation 14:18:32 ... any opinions on this proposal? anyone read it? 14:18:56 I read it. I'm confused about what a prompt is 14:19:05 dom: suggest moving it to CVS 14:19:33 q+ jsalsma 14:19:44 ack jsalsma 14:20:27 ISSUE-28? 14:20:27 ISSUE-28 -- Requirement for NO security prompting -- pending review 14:20:27 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/28 14:20:41 jsalsman: conflicting position papers in the action item number 28, issue 28 14:21:02 ... 3 different position docs: 2 in agreement, 1 against 14:21:09 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/28 14:21:10 darobin: not sure about the impact on this doc 14:21:48 jsalsman: ambiguity about what it is a prompt 14:22:18 q+ 14:22:21 ... saying we want to eliminate prompts may not be the right thing (both modal and non-modal, they are both promtps) 14:22:27 q+ 14:22:28 q+ 14:23:30 ack bryan_sullivan 14:23:39 darobin: the idea is to avoid prompts as far as possible 14:23:56 bryan_sullivan: intent to minimise prompt 14:24:08 ... policy can be defined to provide choice in the level of prompting 14:24:31 ack jmorris 14:24:33 ... goal is not to eliminate prompts entirely, that's not possible 14:24:39 q- 14:24:40 ack alissa 14:24:46 q+ jmorris 14:25:09 alissa: we might need to clarify what we understand under prompt, modal prompt etc. 14:25:14 +1 14:25:16 ack jmorris 14:25:17 ... having a definition might be helpful 14:26:37 drogersuk: since we've separated the docs, we need to address that so that one can not take the APIs separately without taking into account the policy bit 14:27:01 darobin: who wrote the piece about convinience or not of prompt? 14:27:12 drogersuk: probably bondi 14:27:46 darobin: need a person to assign this action to 14:27:48 q+ 14:28:01 ack LauraA 14:28:45 action: Laura to propose clarification language around prompting, involving Paddy and James as needed 14:28:45 Created ACTION-188 - Propose clarification language around prompting, involving Paddy and James as needed [on Laura Arribas - due 2010-06-16]. 14:28:49 -Claes 14:29:21 darobin: back to previous topic, should we give an action to frederick to put reqs doc into CVS? 14:29:25 dom: I'll do it 14:29:40 darobin: CfC for reqs doc? 14:29:47 RESOLUTION: Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs 14:29:48 ... no objections 14:29:53 ACTION: Robin to Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs 14:29:53 Created ACTION-189 - Issue a CfC for Policy Reqs [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:30:07 darobin: anything else about policy? 14:30:13 ... nothing. 14:30:19 topic: Privacy 14:30:26 darobin: more docs to publish 14:30:41 ... reqs doc and rule set doc 14:30:48 +Claes 14:31:17 +1 on waiting for ruleset 14:31:21 alissa: for the W3C privacy doc submitted rule set doc as position paper 14:31:43 ... might be worth waiting after the W3C privacy workshop 14:31:54 darobin: anyone objects to waiting? 14:32:10 ... agreed not to publish the privacy ruleset yet 14:32:46 Suresh: about the ruleset doc, is it API independent like policy or linked to APIs? 14:33:08 alissa: not handled yet how APIs deal with rulesets 14:33:22 ACTION-106? 14:33:23 ACTION-106 -- Robin Berjon to address how licenses could be handled by the API's -- due 2010-03-23 -- OPEN 14:33:23 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/106 14:33:40 ... there are ideas but nothing documented yet 14:34:08 -LauraA 14:34:58 Alissa: thus far we haven't settled on how rulesets will intersect with the existing APIs 14:35:20 +LauraA 14:35:46 RESOLUTION: Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements 14:35:50 ACTION: Robin to Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements 14:35:50 Created ACTION-190 - Issue a CfC for the Privacy Requirements [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:36:00 -LauraA 14:36:20 Topic: APIs, SysInfo 14:37:25 Robin: split core and extended? 14:37:28 alissa: prefer to split 14:37:33 +1 14:37:58 richt has joined #dap 14:38:01 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: split operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc to a separate, extended specification 14:38:19 a+ 14:38:20 q+ 14:38:33 And SSID and Mac address are dropped, right? 14:38:35 richt has joined #dap 14:38:37 this is for http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/ right? 14:38:49 q- 14:41:13 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: drop operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc from SysInfo, revisit an Extended spec later 14:41:22 +1 14:41:33 richt has joined #dap 14:41:35 RESOLUTION: drop operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc from SysInfo, revisit an Extended spec later 14:42:03 q+ 14:42:09 ack alissa 14:42:15 ACTION-183? 14:42:15 ACTION-183 -- Dzung Tran to drop connections[] and activeConnection, move to activeConnections[] and define clearly what "active" means -- due 2010-06-09 -- OPEN 14:42:15 http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/183 14:42:31 +LauraA 14:42:52 q+ to note codecs 14:42:56 ack me 14:42:56 dom, you wanted to note codecs 14:43:12 darobin: any objections to CfC? 14:43:28 richt2 has joined #dap 14:43:31 http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/#audio-and-video-codecs 14:43:35 richt2 has joined #dap 14:43:46 ISSUE-85 was raised for the capture API 14:43:54 jsalsman: see some issues with this section, could be developed a bit more 14:44:25 darobin: james, could you review SysInfo and share it in the list? 14:44:30 jsalsman: sure 14:44:43 ACTION: James to send pre-LC editorial comments on sysinfo 14:44:43 Created ACTION-191 - Send pre-LC editorial comments on sysinfo [on James Salsman - due 2010-06-16]. 14:45:31 PROPOSED RESOLUTION: issue a CfC of SysInfo for LC after ACTION-191 and subsequent edits, ACTION-183, and operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc have been dropped 14:45:44 RESOLUTION: issue a CfC of SysInfo for LC after ACTION-191 and subsequent edits, ACTION-183, and operatorName, apn, mcc, mnc have been dropped 14:45:54 s/ RESOLUTION/ RESOLUTION/g 14:46:08 topic: Contacts 14:46:25 -> http://www.w3.org/mid/AANLkTikT_RBr08jWh_-CKAPs1pCqHU_hJ-KhDqbaVGln@mail.gmail.com Contacts API updates 14:46:32 darobin: richard sent an e-mail, he made quite a few changes based on feedback received before 14:47:04 +1 on heartbeat publication 14:47:21 ... anyone objects to hearbeat publication for this API? 14:47:28 -David_Rogers 14:47:32 ... no objections 14:47:34 RESOLUTION: publish a heartbeat of Contacts 14:47:41 richt has joined #dap 14:47:45 ACTION: robin to request publication of Contacts 14:47:45 Created ACTION-192 - Request publication of Contacts [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-06-16]. 14:47:54 richt, you missed the discussion! 14:47:59 q+ to ask about LC goals 14:48:07 richt, anything you want to say before we move on? 14:48:11 sorry I'm having serious issues with phone and wifi today :-( 14:48:56 + +035128935aakk 14:49:31 richt: sorry missed Contacts discussion 14:49:46 darobin: dom just asked about plans to move into LC 14:49:47 zakim, aakk is richt 14:49:47 +richt; got it 14:50:05 ... given current status of spec, and feedback received we could move to LC during the July F2F 14:50:45 richt: I made some updates from the received feedback. there are a few questions that still need answering 14:50:54 ack dom 14:50:54 dom, you wanted to ask about LC goals 14:50:56 ... i'll be creating a new document before next week's call 14:51:26 richt: I would like to wait until the next version of the spec 14:51:33 ... still need more feedback 14:51:50 ... would like to produce a larger set of properties 14:51:51 +1 on waiting for feedback on larger set of properties 14:52:16 darobin: agree, if you have updates coming, it makes sense to wait 14:52:59 (this relates to ISSUE-71 I think) 14:52:59 ... objections on waiting for publication? 14:53:17 ... no objections in the call 14:53:25 -richt 14:53:26 ... other issues to be discussed in the mailing list 14:53:39 RESOLUTION: overturn previous resolution to publish contacts, wait for next update 14:54:02 darobin: end of the agenda 14:54:05 ... AOB? 14:54:19 -bryan_sullivan 14:54:19 thanks and good bye 14:54:20 -enewland 14:54:20 -Thomas 14:54:21 -Suresh 14:54:21 -darobin 14:54:23 -Dom 14:54:23 -jsalsman 14:54:24 -alissa 14:54:26 -Claes 14:54:30 -LauraA 14:54:32 -jmorris 14:54:34 -maoteo 14:54:36 -wojtekM 14:54:38 UW_DAP()10:00AM has ended 14:54:40 Attendees were +1.972.373.aaaa, Suresh, alissa, +1.650.335.aacc, Dom, +1.301.581.aadd, +04871719aaee, jsalsman, jmorris, darobin, +1.202.637.aaff, enewland, wojtekM, +04610801aagg, 14:54:43 ... Claes, +0777541aahh, +1.425.214.aaii, LauraA, David_Rogers, bryan_sullivan, +03491337aajj, maoteo, Thomas, +035128935aakk, richt 14:56:15 RRSAgent: make minutes 14:56:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-dap-minutes.html darobin 14:58:36 richt has joined #dap 14:59:16 all finished? I will read the minutes. 15:00:15 there's a market for decent phone and internet here in Portugal :-) 15:01:54 Marcos has joined #dap 15:09:10 jsalsman has left #dap 15:16:30 Marcos has joined #dap 15:45:21 tlr has joined #dap 16:23:07 Marcos has joined #dap 16:54:30 Zakim has left #dap