14:29:54 RRSAgent has joined #svg 14:29:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/07-svg-irc 14:29:56 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:29:56 Zakim has joined #svg 14:29:58 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 14:29:58 ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()10:30AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 14:29:59 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 14:29:59 Date: 07 June 2010 14:30:43 ChrisL has joined #svg 14:30:44 GA_SVGWG()10:30AM has now started 14:30:51 +[IPcaller] 14:30:58 Zakim, [IP is me 14:30:58 +ed; got it 14:31:41 +ChrisL 14:32:15 +Shepazu 14:34:08 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/struct.html#InterfaceSVGElementInstanceList 14:46:58 zakim, who is here? 14:46:58 On the phone I see ed, ChrisL, Shepazu 14:46:59 On IRC I see ChrisL, Zakim, RRSAgent, ed, f1lt3r, shepazu, karl, anthony, ed_work, trackbot 14:57:34 jwatt has joined #svg 14:58:57 patrickd has joined #svg 14:59:26 +[Microsoft] 15:01:59 +[IPcaller] 15:09:58 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/masking.html#OverflowProperty 15:13:24 pdengler has joined #svg 15:13:29 scribenick: pdengler 15:13:48 Though we agreed to close this conf call early, a few topics came up that required a scribe 15:13:59 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/masking.html#OverflowProperty 15:14:20 zakim, who is noisy? 15:14:31 ChrisL, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [Microsoft] (94%), ed (4%) 15:14:39 zakim, mute microsoft 15:14:39 [Microsoft] should now be muted 15:14:39 First, I am concerned about the quality of the test cases. I will return on Thursday's conf call such that we can identify whether or not Microsoft can add resources to review the details. The concern is that 'draft' tests have been moved into accepted without propper review 15:14:52 pdengler has joined #svg 15:15:48 pdengler: Topic: HTML5 and SVG. Should overflow property default to overflow:visible 15:15:53 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/master/masking.html.diff?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&f=h 15:16:05 ACTION-2203 15:16:12 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2203 15:16:34 shepazu : We think that this solves the questino 15:16:37 ACTION-2203 15:16:37 Add to the 1.1 Full errata that the initial value for the root overflow property is scroll rather than hidden 15:16:42 -[Microsoft] 15:16:46 wait 15:16:46 zakim, unmute patrick 15:16:46 sorry, ChrisL, I do not know which phone connection belongs to patrick 15:16:52 zakim, unmute microsoft 15:16:52 sorry, ChrisL, I do not know which phone connection belongs to microsoft 15:17:07 scribe: ChrisL 15:17:20 +[Microsoft] 15:17:40 doug: hyatt raised a similar issue which is why we changed 1.1. Agreed by the WG at the time, ROC was in on the discussion 15:18:05 ... action is now closed. solves the question from the svg side but not necessarily from the html side 15:18:12 .... solves for inline svg 15:18:29 ... for iframes, object, embed it needs to be clarified 15:18:36 jwatt: treated the same 15:18:41 ed: yes 15:18:51 doug: so html5 spec needs to say so 15:18:56 Not sure why I cannot be heard on the phone 15:19:12 but we are saying that overflow=visible for inline SVG 15:19:14 zakim, who is here? 15:19:14 On the phone I see ed, ChrisL, Shepazu, [IPcaller], [Microsoft] 15:19:16 On IRC I see pdengler, jwatt, ChrisL, Zakim, RRSAgent, ed, f1lt3r, shepazu, karl, anthony, ed_work, trackbot 15:19:22 ack microsoft 15:19:48 patrick: so for inline overflow is visible 15:20:16 ...and for the others its the default 15:20:59 ed: if its inside a container then you dont use overflow 15:21:23 patrick: overflow visible is the right thing for an html developer 15:21:32 doug: html needs to take care of the rest 15:21:54 ed: more of a css issue, html does need to change. Its what type of block is generated 15:22:17 chris: so what specifically needs to change in css? 15:22:36 ed: type of layout box generated by the inline html element needs to be specified 15:22:47 ... perhaps in svg. tiny specifies it well 15:23:21 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/coords.html#IntrinsicSizing 15:23:49 ed: this plus css 2.1 is enough to define it 15:24:13 ... need to know how big the element covers when overlow is visible. can't be bigger than its container 15:25:13 patrick: if overflow is not visible, people will wonder where the content went 15:25:26 doug: where are the natural dimensions defined? 15:25:50 ... if i am dynamically adding it 15:25:59 ed: well, 100% is the default 15:26:58 chris: need to distinguish between the renderde size and the range of coordinate space being used 15:28:16 ... depends on whether viewBox is set or not 15:28:59 doug: as well as width&height and the viewbox we need the intrisicc width and height 15:29:18 jwat: but those terms are used already 15:29:25 chris: boundingBox? 15:29:41 ed: yes the bounding box can be bigger than the viewBox 15:30:09 chris: needs 4 coordinates not two 15:30:34 doug: an attr with 4 values is a pain 15:31:19 ... inkscape confuses width and height with te overall bounding box 15:32:26 ISSUE: Differentiate bounding box from viewbox and width and height 15:32:26 Created ISSUE-2329 - Differentiate bounding box from viewbox and width and height ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2329/edit . 15:32:57 patrick: for svg in html5 overflow visible, correct? 15:33:00 (all) no 15:33:30 doug: discussed with css wg, defsault size for all replaced content is 150x300 15:33:32 ewww 15:33:43 s/no// 15:33:53 ed: css 2.1 covers this now 15:34:50 action: patrick to make some html5 and svg combined tests that exercise overflow 15:34:51 Created ACTION-2795 - Make some html5 and svg combined tests that exercise overflow [on Patrick Dengler - due 2010-06-14]. 15:35:10 doug: should discuss in fx tf once we have the tests 15:35:13 ACTION: ed to add ACTION-2203 to the changes appendix for SVG 1.1F2 15:35:13 Created ACTION-2796 - Add ACTION-2203 to the changes appendix for SVG 1.1F2 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-14]. 15:35:49 patrick: whats the default in firefox nightlies? 15:35:54 jwatt: hidden 15:36:42 rrsagent, make minutes 15:36:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/07-svg-minutes.html ChrisL 15:37:20 -ChrisL 15:37:31 -[Microsoft] 15:37:32 -ed 15:37:46 -Shepazu 15:38:23 -[IPcaller] 15:38:24 GA_SVGWG()10:30AM has ended 15:38:25 Attendees were [IPcaller], ed, ChrisL, Shepazu, [Microsoft] 15:38:37 Zakim, IPcaller is me 15:38:37 sorry, jwatt, I do not recognize a party named 'IPcaller' 15:38:46 Zakim, [IPcaller] is me 15:38:46 sorry, jwatt, I do not recognize a party named '[IPcaller]' 17:30:06 ChrisL has joined #svg 17:46:13 Zakim has left #svg 18:21:48 eseidel has joined #svg 18:22:19 eseidel has left #svg