21:58:31 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 21:58:31 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/02-html-a11y-irc 21:58:33 RRSAgent, make logs world 21:58:33 Zakim has joined #html-a11y 21:58:35 Zakim, this will be 2119 21:58:35 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(A11Y)6:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 21:58:36 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 21:58:36 Date: 02 June 2010 21:58:47 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0008.html 21:58:51 chair: John_Foliot 21:59:05 janina has joined #html-a11y 21:59:26 zakim, call janina 21:59:26 ok, janina; the call is being made 21:59:29 regrets: Markku_Hakkinen, Geoff_Freed, Laura_Carlson 22:00:30 zakim, this is 2119 22:00:30 ok, MichaelC; that matches WAI_PFWG(A11Y)6:00PM 22:00:38 zakim, who's on the phone? 22:00:38 On the phone I see +1.650.862.aaaa, +1.408.307.aabb, Janina, Michael_Cooper 22:01:01 zakim, aaaa is John_Foliot 22:01:01 +John_Foliot; got it 22:01:06 zakim, aabb is Eric_Carlson 22:01:06 +Eric_Carlson; got it 22:01:28 mkobayas has joined #html-a11y 22:01:41 + +0154558aacc 22:03:54 MikeSmith has joined #html-a11y 22:04:11 +Judy 22:04:37 Judy has joined #html-a11y 22:04:37 zakim, aacc is Sean_Hayes 22:04:37 +Sean_Hayes; got it 22:04:38 Zakim, call Mike 22:04:38 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 22:04:40 +Mike 22:05:00 Zakim, Mike is me 22:05:00 +MikeSmith; got it 22:05:21 Zakim, mute me 22:05:21 MikeSmith should now be muted 22:06:21 scribe: janina 22:06:44 john: let's start with open actions review 22:07:28 john: judy's actions? 22:08:06 judy: have been working on a comparison to iso, seems orthogonal 22:08:42 judy: will post my conclusions 22:09:50 judy: so complete on iso comparison, but not on checking with other key individuals 22:10:36 judy: also unsure how to engage external people effectively without overwhelming them 22:11:22 judy: while action wasn't recroded, i did some work on the disability language in the doc, and will still complete that 22:11:54 john: is frank here? 22:11:57 [silence] 22:13:01 zakim, next topic 22:13:01 I don't understand 'next topic', janina 22:13:15 topic: requirements document review 22:13:56 john: john: not sure how to break our log jam and move forward 22:14:40 john: much media will be pushed via the net, whether via specialized ua, or a general browser, our doc is important 22:15:06 + +61.3.986.4.aadd 22:15:19 john: we don't have the luxury to continue debating the doc, though 22:15:51 john: our survey was to make sure our doc is complete 22:16:08 john: think going through the doc detail by detail is premature 22:16:30 eric: perhaps i misunderstood what our purpose was in these requirements 22:16:30 zakim, aadd is Kenny_Johar 22:16:30 +Kenny_Johar; got it 22:16:47 eric: i understood that these would be required of any ua that implemented html5 media 22:17:33 john: my understanding, from the a11y side, is to fully participate in consumption of this media 22:17:39 q! 22:17:42 q+ 22:17:52 I think other implementors are liking to view requirements in the same way that Eric just described -- as implementation requirements 22:18:32 john: for instance, sign-language differs from country to country 22:18:45 Sean has joined #html-a11y 22:19:21 john: it'll be a tricky balancing 22:19:47 shawn: i think a lot of our requirements aren't technically difficult 22:19:54 ack s 22:20:29 eric: not so sure 22:21:23 eric: hard to decode on small platform 22:21:30 shawn: but there are other ways to achieve this 22:25:38 janina: we need it in the spec so that it can be covered 22:25:59 q+ 22:26:05 eric: but, even on the desktop smil2 is lots of work 22:26:18 eric: so not necessarily easy to do 22:26:43 eric: are these rfc2119 musts? 22:26:47 q+ to say that's why we separated out what the user needs vs how they can be technically achieved, so we wouldn't go into that 22:27:21 shawn: not necessarily that we need smil, but that we need the ability to do these things 22:27:44 judy: we specifically separated user needs to avoid this conundrum 22:27:53 eric: but we need to discuss what is required 22:27:58 judy: absolutely agree 22:28:01 Zakim, unmute me 22:28:01 MikeSmith should no longer be muted 22:28:52 eric: my concern is that 'requirement' rfc2119 'must' on the user agent 22:29:31 john: i think everyone here is realistic 22:29:46 john: we should remember the concept of "graceful degradation" 22:30:49 john: yes, going back to the described video example, it's a balancing thing here too 22:32:07 john: some kind of switching mechanism may be needed between a generalized broser and a more specialized player ua 22:33:12 q+ what we ultimately need in regard to the spec is a specific (sub)set of requirements for HTML UAs 22:33:14 janina: it's a question of what html5 wants to be, if a rich media platform, all these requirements will be needed somewhere, though probably almost never on any individual content item 22:33:16 q+ to say what we ultimately need in regard to the spec is a specific (sub)set of requirements for HTML UAs 22:33:39 ack ja 22:33:48 ack ju 22:33:48 Judy, you wanted to say that's why we separated out what the user needs vs how they can be technically achieved, so we wouldn't go into that 22:34:23 judy: we keep hearing the question of whether we need to prioritize these 22:34:57 judy: should we discuss prioritization? 22:35:15 john: also my question in some ways 22:35:42 q+ 22:36:09 john: a bit disappointed in so few responses 22:36:25 q+ to then ask whether there are things that we could do with the call today that would help people get through their surveys more easily 22:36:31 ack M 22:36:31 MikeSmith, you wanted to say what we ultimately need in regard to the spec is a specific (sub)set of requirements for HTML UAs 22:36:52 mike: i think eric's response will be typical of browser developers 22:37:10 mike: the spec provides conformance criteria 22:37:53 mike: if there are requirements on something other than browsers, then it's not about html 22:38:34 Zakim, mute me 22:38:34 MikeSmith should now be muted 22:39:45 janina: i can support rfc2119 should, but the spec needs to comprehend most of these because the intent seems to be a full gammut of media hosted via html 22:40:27 john: so our experience to date has been that addons and plugins may play something launched from the browser 22:42:13 john: expect the browser will be more limited janina: not sure that browser may need to drive it all 22:43:08 zakim, who's on the phone? 22:43:08 On the phone I see John_Foliot, Eric_Carlson, Janina, Michael_Cooper, Sean_Hayes, Judy, MikeSmith (muted), Kenny_Johar 22:43:32 judy: want to raise a different point ... 22:43:39 q? 22:43:56 judy: want to come back to the question of what will help move forward 22:44:27 judy: only one person on this call has filled out the survey, so can we ask a new deadline for survey? 22:45:31 john: so, is this a wrong understanding of where we're headed? 22:45:34 eric: what? 22:46:21 john: html 22:47:06 john: is should language overly onorous 22:47:34 eric: seems we want interoperable content on the web, so a spec that all user agents that most people use will implement 22:48:01 eric; so description of any feature in the spec needs to be so well described that it will be implemented consistently 22:48:37 shawn: but it's about how we capture author intent, not how user agents provide it 22:48:52 shawn: roughly the same way sounds ok, but not exactly the same way my competitor does 22:49:27 eric: so spec doesn't say how to do some thing, but what it should do 22:49:38 eric: so external file format needs specification 22:50:01 john: so, eric, you mentioned multiple audio streams unsupportable on some devices today 22:50:36 john: so maybe not today, but who knows about a year from now? I recall touch interfaces were experimental just a few years ago 22:51:45 john: we just don't want today's device limitations constrain our specification of what's needed 22:52:08 shawn: so there's an issue of balance between providing the data in a form that something can be done with it 22:52:22 shawn: so that's authoring--give the data in a usable way 22:52:28 shawn: the must of what the content supports 22:52:34 shawn: and the should of what the ua does 22:52:41 shawn: we need to capture the musts 22:52:46 john: agree 22:52:49 janina well said 22:53:23 john: do we have agreement of where to go with this? 22:53:23 q+ 22:53:29 silence -- taken as ascent 22:53:48 john: so, judy ... 22:53:50 zakim, who's on the phone? 22:53:50 On the phone I see John_Foliot, Eric_Carlson, Janina, Michael_Cooper, Sean_Hayes, Judy, MikeSmith (muted), Kenny_Johar 22:55:00 judy: i expect so few have completed the form because there's so much to do in completing it 22:55:21 shawn: will do, but want weekend 22:55:43 janina: ditto 22:55:49 kenny: end of today 22:56:01 john: by monday 22:56:25 Zakim, unmute me 22:56:25 MikeSmith should no longer be muted 22:56:35 mike: don't plan to respond 22:56:45 michael: don't feel qualified on this 22:56:54 Zakim, mute me 22:56:54 MikeSmith should now be muted 22:56:56 judy: monday is better for me 22:57:55 john: so can we extend this until monday? 22:58:18 john: and we need to send around another explanation that we want to capture user requirements 22:58:33 +1 to accept input via email as well 22:59:06 janina: extend to 23:59 boston time 22:59:15 s/time/time monday/ 22:59:33 john: so we should have more complete results next wednesday 23:00:33 janina: not sure that's the correct breakdown 23:00:53 ...Sean Hayes helped us understand constaints around the authored requirements 23:00:58 -Kenny_Johar 23:01:02 ...the must part might be on what the spec provides 23:01:15 ...maybe the should are what the user agent can do 23:02:03 ...if this is going to be a media platform, then we don't want the breakdown to be 'we can do text descriptions but we can't provide for audio description tracks" 23:03:16 Janina: if you don't have a way to support how you implement something in the spec then you're nowhere 23:06:09 janina: i'm not clear that prioritizing these is the right way to go 23:08:49 Janina: if HTML5 is to become the platform for media, then we need to ensure that we have a means to capture all of these requirements, alternatives and requirements specified 23:09:36 john: don't disagree, but wonder whether we should start with author or 'must and should' 23:09:51 john: think the latter because of what the engineers are saying 23:10:33 john: think we should start with user agent requirements 23:11:25 john: if our user reqs doc is more or less complete, i suggest our next discussion is ua requirements 23:12:46 q+ 23:15:54 q- 23:17:00 Sean: next step is to turn user requirements to tech requirements 23:17:35 Eric: next step is to get clarification of some of the user requirements 23:17:42 Sean: agrees with Eric 23:17:58 shawn: next step is to turn these into tech reqs, then to decide what's on content and what's on ua 23:18:16 eric: think we first need to agree on the user reqs 23:20:26 john: so that should be our agenda for next week--item by item discussion and sign off 23:20:59 john: any other business, questions for now? 23:21:20 john: thanks to everyone! 23:21:21 Zakim, drop me 23:21:21 MikeSmith is being disconnected 23:21:22 -MikeSmith 23:21:23 -Sean_Hayes 23:21:26 -John_Foliot 23:21:27 -Eric_Carlson 23:21:27 -Judy 23:21:27 zakim, bye 23:21:27 Zakim has left #html-a11y 23:21:28 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.650.862.aaaa, Janina, +1.408.307.aabb, Michael_Cooper, John_Foliot, Eric_Carlson, +0154558aacc, Judy, Sean_Hayes, MikeSmith, 23:21:31 ... +61.3.986.4.aadd, Kenny_Johar 23:21:34 rrsagent, make minutes 23:21:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/02-html-a11y-minutes.html janina