14:56:39 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 14:56:39 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/21-prov-xg-irc 14:56:41 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:56:41 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 14:56:42 Irini has joined #prov-xg 14:56:43 Zakim, this will be 98765 14:56:43 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 14:56:44 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 14:56:44 Date: 21 May 2010 14:57:00 Zakim, this will be inc_provxg 14:57:00 ok, jcheney, I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM already started 14:57:30 olaf has joined #prov-xg 14:57:32 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010May/0011.html 14:57:45 +??P4 14:57:53 chair: Yolanda Gil 14:57:57 Zakim, who is on the call? 14:57:57 On the phone I see [IPcaller], Yolanda, ??P4 14:57:59 zakim, ??p4 is SamCoppens 14:57:59 +SamCoppens; got it 14:58:02 Scribe: James Cheney 14:58:08 smiles has joined #prov-xg 14:58:09 ScribeNick: jcheney 14:58:17 rrsagent, make logs public 14:58:19 +??P5 14:58:28 zakim, ??P5 is smiles 14:58:28 +smiles; got it 14:59:03 +??P0 14:59:09 + +1.619.223.aaaa 14:59:11 zakim, ??P0 is me 14:59:11 +jcheney; got it 14:59:16 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:59:16 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:59:18 +Ivan 14:59:22 + +1.617.768.aabb 14:59:45 +Irini 14:59:50 michaelp has joined #prov-xg 15:00:05 zakim, mute me 15:00:05 Ivan should now be muted 15:00:44 dgarijo has joined #prov-xg 15:00:49 +olaf 15:01:17 +michaelp 15:01:38 jun has joined #prov-xg 15:01:43 + +86528aacc 15:01:43 +[IPcaller.a] 15:01:48 Yolanda: not on IRC 15:02:00 Topic: Provenance in social web 15:02:43 Yolanda: New members? 15:03:04 JimM has joined #prov-xg 15:03:11 +??P14 15:03:29 loving swan 15:03:45 ssahoo2 has joined #prov-xg 15:03:58 (didn't catch your name...) 15:04:31 SWAN ontology one of ontologies we are trying to integrate 15:04:42 JimM_ has joined #prov-xg 15:05:19 jcheney, his name is Paolo Ciccarese I believe 15:05:26 Thanks 15:05:46 While we wait for harry, discuss other agenda items 15:05:53 harry is dialing in now 15:06:00 jcheney, sorry about that. Paolo Ciccarese is my name indeed 15:06:20 Discussion of scenarios including news aggregator - adding technical requirements leading to state of art/technology & indentfy gap 15:06:39 + +1.937.775.aadd 15:07:39 Paul: followup - architecture diagrams, association between tech and user requirements 15:08:07 Do we want to do this for all three scenarios? Or just web scenario? 15:08:14 + +0238059aaee 15:08:18 Yolanda: finish first, next in June 15:08:29 Luc has joined #prov-xg 15:08:32 Paul: Need one more diagram (Yogesh), then tech reqs 15:08:47 hhalpin has joined #prov-xg 15:09:38 Yolanda: Any other interest in state-of-art report? 15:09:42 Luc: yes 15:10:25 Olaf: will have a look 15:10:31 +harry 15:11:19 Paul: will sort out next steps with Yogesh and others 15:12:41 + +1.518.763.aaff 15:12:47 Yolanda: Harry will give an overview of story so far with Prov & Social Web XG interaction, scenarios 15:13:17 Harry: Social Web XG looking at standardization for distributed open social networks 15:13:35 Harry: Broad scope, trying to zero in on candidates for standards 15:14:06 http://www.foaf-project.org/ 15:14:18 RDF, FOAF emerging. Some adoption but most use cases not possible with RDF 1.0 15:14:25 Need versioning, access control, provenance 15:14:40 and most use cases involve these 15:15:22 Determining genuineness as data moves between social nets: need a solution, no good one now 15:15:53 http://www.internetidentityworkshop.com/ 15:16:10 openid, certicate, foaf+ssl 15:16:18 Most activity so far: what is a good internet ID? (>50% of social web XG so far) 15:16:38 URIs, Web ID 15:16:59 policy-driven 15:17:17 Provenance needs identity (personal, authority, certificates); also foundational for policy driven use cases, esp. privacy 15:17:17 the privacy jungle 15:17:25 trust 15:17:45 provenance 15:17:51 Objective, data-driven measures of trust? 15:18:00 lkagal has joined #prov-xg 15:18:26 Harry: Questions? 15:18:42 +Lalana 15:19:07 provenance == source of ~FOAF network info -- info about the authority stating it? 15:19:10 Luc: You think prov should be based on identity in soc. nets. What does this mean? 15:19:32 it means (i think ) that provenance "grounds out" in identity 15:19:42 Harry: Identity needed to determine "Who" in open systems. (lack of central authentication?) 15:20:02 What is a reliable open-ended system for identifying people over internet? 15:20:38 Use cases: demonstrate provenance, but problematizes identity 15:20:57 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories 15:20:57 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Social_Web 15:21:25 People in social web have multiple identities 15:21:42 Related project for identifying people http://esw.w3.org/Foaf%2Bssl 15:21:53 Ability to "take down" your data (facebook death) 15:22:16 whereas most provenance is "append only". Need to support deletion of provenance? 15:22:53 In social network, need to track down copies and delete them too (difficult...) 15:22:58 we added that 15:22:59 :-) 15:23:04 +??P29 15:23:37 Paul: We did add a deletion" aspect to use case 15:24:07 afreitas has joined #prov-xg 15:24:11 Harry: Not much academic work on this 15:24:45 Iranian election - false information, which messages are real 15:25:10 (on the other hand, maybe the Iranian twitterers didn't want to be easily identifiable!) 15:26:06 need "anonymous IDs" - know this is the same person but not who it really is? persistence of trust relationships 15:26:57 government-level spamming of social network sites 15:27:39 Vocabulary for "person made claim on date" - still need to build "time" and "versioning" into RDF to support this 15:28:19 http://activitystrea.ms/ 15:28:36 Example: Activity Streams (FriendFeed) allow sharing of updates among sites. 15:28:40 atom-based protocol 15:29:11 Define a simple atom-based protocol for profile updates (non-RDF, finite vocab) 15:29:19 change-control 15:29:30 Lack of provenance framework to deal with change control 15:29:31 who-why-what 15:29:40 atom 15:30:25 Problem with Atom: Have to subscribe and poll feed to see if anything changed 15:30:31 real-time updates 15:30:44 HTTP GET 15:30:54 5000 http atom feed 15:30:58 Need push model instead of "pull" / polling model 15:31:00 load 15:31:22 pubsubhub 15:31:24 Server overload problem due to centralization 15:31:32 push 15:32:04 vodafone onesocialweb 15:32:22 social web XG members developing products (Vodafone, Google Buzz) using pubsubhub, atom, activitystreams 15:33:21 atom describes updates, but not fine-grained deletion, identity; not as rich as opm 15:33:44 q+ 15:34:04 ack JimM 15:34:45 Jim: Is RDF the problem or is the problem the lack of an RDF syndication/update formalism? 15:34:57 Harry: Lacks notification, change control 15:35:32 rdf lacks change control, real-time notification, and a rich model of identity. 15:35:32 Jim: Seems like a non-technical issue 15:35:41 +q 15:36:21 Harry: The difference is that there are de facto standards for updates (Atom) and pub/sub (PubSubHub). 15:36:25 ack pgroth 15:37:09 Jim: Prov community could encourage standardization, recognition of importance of pub/sub issues 15:37:50 Harry: Scalability to 100,000s of users (why facebook bought friendfeed) 15:38:20 q- 15:38:30 Jim: OPM accounts may handle some of these issues 15:39:36 a few years ago, (using the pasoa model), we had defined a provenance-aware rss, which required headers to be communicated, as part of messages. 15:39:51 Paul: Jim, is it enough develop a vocabulary, or are there protocol/architecture issues (with RDF pub/sub)? 15:39:59 so, it's both vocabulary and protocol! 15:40:29 -SamCoppens 15:40:37 Jim: Third option: prov vocabularies plus other vocabularies 15:40:48 can't hear you harry 15:40:55 +[IPcaller.aa] 15:41:19 zakim, [IPcaller.aa] is SamCoppens 15:41:19 +SamCoppens; got it 15:41:22 cvs on rdf 15:41:34 Harry: want declarative vocabulary, but also want (distributed?) CVS for RDF 15:42:01 versioning and vocabulary and realtime update mechanism 15:42:14 atom/xmpp/json 15:42:15 Versioning a subset of prov vocabulary, and real-time (change driven) update mechanism. 15:42:44 would RDF named graph help in managing RDF graph versioning? 15:42:49 yes 15:42:59 Really would like clear connection between prov and policy, trust. 15:43:37 q+ 15:43:39 Social Web XG running until Sept 2010, drafts of final report in next month or two, will circulate 15:44:17 ack ssahoo2 15:45:12 Satya: how complicated are queries in social web context? is more complicated analysis of provenance required? 15:46:11 Harry: Example: want to distribute photo update to (possibly complicated) group of friends, possibly inferred from previous user actions 15:47:00 Satya: Could be related to comparison/diff of provenance graphs 15:47:37 Harry: No one does this yet, but coming - Google Buzz, facebook policy mishaps leading to changes, policy imposition 15:48:06 Privacy, trust wasn't built-into system 15:48:43 Satya: Requirement in eScience that users want to be able to repeat experiments. Social web: reconstruct history? 15:49:34 Harry: Might want to be able to replay / script /infer actions or privacy policies 15:49:55 Example: User changes jobs, privacy policy for new job can be based on that for old job 15:50:36 Yolanda: Moving on to additional topics 15:50:46 Next item: RDF Next Steps workshop submission 15:51:35 Jun: Draft started last month, based on user requirements 15:52:17 Message: Need best practice for common requirements for PDF concerning provenance, vocabulary for provenance patterns 15:52:39 Need proper identity management (data, graphs, annotation) 15:52:59 is it accepted? 15:53:23 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/images/3/3f/RDFNextStep_ProvXG-submitted.pdf 15:53:26 excellent! 15:53:32 Accepted for presentation, small changes needed 15:53:51 Three other papers mention provenance 15:54:00 ian davis 15:54:25 http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws06/, http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws12, http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws09 15:54:39 Next topic: Query provenance (Irini) 15:55:37 Irini: goal was to show how existing relational data provenance models can be used for SPARQL/RDF 15:55:41 http://www.csd.uoc.gr/~theohari/files/OnProvenanceOfQueriesForWebData.pdf 15:55:56 Showed that existing model works for positive SPARQL 15:56:05 Negation problematic (as usual...) 15:56:34 Thanks to Olaf for comments 15:56:53 Can discuss in future meeting 15:57:02 -harry 15:57:04 Yolanda: Questions? 15:57:20 - +1.619.223.aaaa 15:58:12 Next topic: New use case, internet architecture use case 15:58:30 - +0238059aaee 15:58:46 Will revisit next week 15:58:57 zakim, drop me 15:58:57 Ivan is being disconnected 15:58:58 Adjourned 15:58:59 -Ivan 15:58:59 -??P29 15:59:00 -[IPcaller] 15:59:00 -Lalana 15:59:01 -Yolanda 15:59:01 - +1.937.775.aadd 15:59:03 - +1.518.763.aaff 15:59:04 -smiles 15:59:06 -Irini 15:59:08 -??P14 15:59:10 -michaelp 15:59:11 afreitas has left #prov-xg 15:59:12 -SamCoppens 15:59:14 -olaf 15:59:16 -[IPcaller.a] 15:59:18 -jcheney 15:59:19 michaelp has left #prov-xg 15:59:20 - +1.617.768.aabb 15:59:30 rrsagent, set log public 15:59:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:59:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/21-prov-xg-minutes.html jcheney 15:59:40 - +86528aacc 15:59:41 INC_PROVXG()11:00AM has ended 15:59:42 Attendees were [IPcaller], Yolanda, SamCoppens, smiles, +1.619.223.aaaa, jcheney, Ivan, +1.617.768.aabb, Irini, olaf, michaelp, +86528aacc, +1.937.775.aadd, +0238059aaee, harry, 15:59:45 ... +1.518.763.aaff, Lalana 15:59:45 trackbot, end telcon 15:59:45 Zakim, list attendees 15:59:46 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:59:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/21-prov-xg-minutes.html trackbot 15:59:46 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 15:59:47 RRSAgent, bye 15:59:47 I see no action items