19:45:11 RRSAgent has joined #ssn 19:45:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/19-ssn-irc 19:45:13 RRSAgent, make logs world 19:45:13 Zakim has joined #ssn 19:45:15 Zakim, this will be 7769 19:45:15 ok, trackbot; I see INC_SSN()4:00PM scheduled to start in 15 minutes 19:45:16 Meeting: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Teleconference 19:45:16 Date: 19 May 2010 19:45:30 agenda+ Roll call 19:45:50 agenda+ Actions from last meetings 19:45:56 agenda+ Operational/survival range and restrictions 19:46:02 agenda+ Deployments, Systems and Devices 19:46:08 agenda+ AOB 19:46:16 Chair: Holger 19:46:27 Regrets: Cory, Luis 19:53:32 INC_SSN()4:00PM has now started 19:53:40 + +61.3.623.2.aaaa 19:53:57 zakim, +61.3.623.2.aaaa is me 19:53:57 +Holger; got it 19:55:06 kelsey has joined #ssn 19:55:14 +david 19:55:39 Arthur has joined #ssn 19:58:18 krzysztof_j has joined #ssn 20:00:53 +[IPcaller] 20:02:02 zakim, IPcaller is me 20:02:02 +Arthur; got it 20:02:23 krp has joined #ssn 20:04:20 +[IPcaller] 20:04:35 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 20:04:35 +krzysztof_j; got it 20:05:59 + +0797376aabb 20:06:13 zakim, +0797376aabb is me 20:06:13 +krp; got it 20:07:12 zakim, who's here? 20:07:12 On the phone I see Holger, david, Arthur, krzysztof_j, krp 20:07:13 On IRC I see krp, krzysztof_j, Arthur, kelsey, Zakim, RRSAgent, Holger, trackbot 20:09:45 hi 20:12:27 agenda? 20:14:03 iam 20:14:07 -krzysztof_j 20:14:46 ScribeNick: krp 20:15:45 Topic: email to Luis re: MMI ontology 20:16:13 Holger: sent email; Luis not on call 20:16:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/File:OperatingModel.png 20:16:51 Holger: not heard from Payam on operation/survival model 20:17:05 +[IPcaller] 20:17:18 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 20:17:18 +krzysztof_j; got it 20:17:50 Holger: has anyone heard anything from Payam regarding the operating model? 20:17:50 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Deployments,_Systems_and_Devices 20:18:50 Topic: alignment of MMI device and platform ontologies and SSN 20:19:08 Holger: MMI are aware of the alignment issues; work is in progress 20:20:55 Holger: how are deployments being handled? Attached to platform or instrument? 20:21:35 ... how are sub-deployments being handled in relation to a new deployment? 20:22:06 Which wiki page is this, Holger? 20:22:19 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Deployments,_Systems_and_Devices 20:25:45 ack, in this case it is a process 20:26:20 Holger: is deployment a state... a lifetime of a system 20:26:57 krp: Is deployment an event.. a process that happens to the installation 20:26:59 yes, i would think so 20:28:10 entity:sensor participatesIn process:deployment 20:28:46 Can you re-deploy the same system instance? 20:28:50 ack 20:29:49 Holger: the deployment is putting the sensors in the field, not the time the sensor is in the field 20:30:11 krzysztof_j: and the configuration of the sensors for that environment 20:31:05 Holger: three options: the act of putting the system in the field 20:31:14 ... the time the system is in the field 20:31:36 ... the configuration of the system for that environment 20:33:35 indeed - does it matter 20:33:39 ? 20:36:25 kelsey: we need to remember that many sensor are not static. Data from them moves in space and time. 20:40:55 In the wider framework of: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Key_Sensor_Concepts 20:41:23 michael has joined #ssn 20:41:42 Holger: would it make sense to have an act of deployment, which is a process? Construction and deconstruction 20:42:34 +[IPcaller] 20:42:56 zakim, IPcaller is me 20:42:56 +michael; got it 20:43:44 installed = commissioned and uninstalled = decomissioned? 20:43:55 yes, that's clear terminology 20:45:22 Arthur: should be some way to represent that the sensor is deployed in one place, and then another 20:50:32 I can - but you'll have to catch me up on the bits I just missed 20:50:44 What is the intention of the diagram on the wiki from MMI? 20:50:55 in relation to whether it's the event of deployment 20:51:12 or is it trying to solve being able to resolve when and where an observation was made 20:51:13 ? 20:51:49 Right.. so what we care about is where the *measurement* was made.. 20:51:56 ... but we're talking about devices and systems 20:53:43 +q 20:54:40 Holger: we next need to look at time 20:54:49 ack michael 20:55:04 michael: dolce has the idea of moving through space and time... so is a location fixed in both time and space? 20:55:51 krzysztof_j: entities participating over the lifetime 20:56:17 locations are participants in the lifetime/deployment of the sensor 20:57:16 how is a lifetime scoped? would a given system have more than one? (lifetime ~=deployment?) 20:57:34 yes 20:57:39 +1 20:58:50 so lifetime/deployment is scoped as between commissioning and decommissioning? 20:59:04 ok 20:59:30 yes 21:01:21 arthur and holger: lifetime is perhaps misleading, but can define deployment in terms of (de)commissioning 21:02:00 kelsey: what is the relationship between the system lifetime and that of the constituent devices 21:03:14 do we have to decide if we can model both cases? 21:04:21 agreed, those are options our model should allow 21:04:35 right, to whatever granularity is appropriate 21:05:05 +q 21:05:29 Yes, many thanks! 21:05:47 YES, thanks holger! 21:05:49 Thank you Holger and best wishes in your new pursuits! 21:05:57 michael: thanks to Holger for his work chairing the group 21:06:59 bye bye 21:07:02 -david 21:07:07 -krzysztof_j 21:07:10 -michael 21:07:25 -krp 21:07:29 -Arthur 21:07:37 zakim, bye 21:07:37 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Holger, david, Arthur, krzysztof_j, krp, michael 21:07:37 Zakim has left #ssn 21:07:47 rrsagent, make log public 21:07:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:07:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/19-ssn-minutes.html Holger 21:08:10 rrsagent, bye 21:08:10 I see no action items