W3C

- DRAFT -

Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference

30 Apr 2010

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Yolanda, +49.621.181.aaaa, +1.619.524.aacc, Yogesh, Irini, kai, +1.915.603.aaff, +1.217.417.aagg, michaelp, [IPcaller], smiles, jcheney, +1.518.763.aahh, +1.518.276.aaii, Jose_
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
Yolanda

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 30 April 2010

<JimM> JimM is muted

<michaelp> I think the static comes from ??P1.

<kai> 61#

<kai> is the code for the phone

<smiles> * zakim, who is muted?

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Prov_XG_Live#Face_to_Face_Meeting_April_25-26.2C_2010

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings

<JimM> Since the number of terms is limited, perhaps w could have terms in the columns and the vocabularies and current columns as rows?

<JimM> Just thinking I'd like to scan across all vocabs to see which have what mappings and scrolling sideways through many vocabs seems harder

<Paulo> +q

<kai> i second that, wanted to mention the same

<smiles> +q

<Paulo> just to capture my concern: how one can understand the semantics of, for example, opm:Agent so that we can map to terms on other models

scenario details are in: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_News_Aggregator_Scenario

sorry Paulo, i needed to move on

<Yogesh> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_News_Aggregator_Scenario

note that the tech requs in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Requirements have the same ids as in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Analysis_of_News_Aggregator_Scenario

and yet we changed the description of the requirement so it would be more clear

<DeborahMcG> i will point a student to it. i will let you know if the timing works

<Jose_> definitely it is interesting

<DeborahMcG> Related announcement - IPAW is accepting late breaking submissions for posters and/or demos. http://tw.rpi.edu/portal/IPAW2010/cflbc. also registration will go up next week.

<DeborahMcG> +q

<DeborahMcG> we had discussed considering a mini f2f co-located with ipaw or semtech - is either happening?

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/04/30 16:11:02 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Yolanda
Inferring Scribes: Yolanda

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Yolanda, +49.621.181.aaaa, +1.619.524.aacc, Yogesh, Irini, kai, +1.915.603.aaff, +1.217.417.aagg, michaelp, [IPcaller], smiles, jcheney, +1.518.763.aahh, +1.518.276.aaii, Jose_
Present: Yolanda +49.621.181.aaaa +1.619.524.aacc Yogesh Irini kai +1.915.603.aaff +1.217.417.aagg michaelp [IPcaller] smiles jcheney +1.518.763.aahh +1.518.276.aaii Jose_
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Apr/0022.html

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 30 Apr 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/04/30-prov-xg-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]