14:32:05 RRSAgent has joined #svg 14:32:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-svg-irc 14:32:07 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:32:07 Zakim has joined #svg 14:32:09 Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG 14:32:09 ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()10:30AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago 14:32:10 Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference 14:32:10 Date: 22 April 2010 14:32:47 GA_SVGWG()10:30AM has now started 14:32:53 +[IPcaller] 14:33:00 Zakim, [IP is me 14:33:00 +ed; got it 14:33:15 +Shepazu 14:33:21 +ChrisL 14:36:21 +[Microsoft] 14:36:48 patrickd has joined #svg 14:37:35 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/types.html#DataTypeNumber 14:39:22 ACTION-2730? 14:39:22 ACTION-2730 -- Chris Lilley to fix the broken grammar for scientific notation in SVG 1.1 and 1.2T -- due 2010-02-18 -- OPEN 14:39:22 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2730 14:39:39 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/11-svg-minutes.html#ActionSummary 14:40:00 9e-1 14:40:19 scientific-number ::= decimal-number [Ee] integer 14:40:41 http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/types.html#DataTypeInteger 14:42:54 9e-.4 14:42:54 scribe: chris 14:43:01 scribenick: chrisl 14:43:39 .6e3 14:45:43 action: chris to fix the definition of number to allow scientific notation in attribute values 14:45:44 Created ACTION-2765 - Fix the definition of number to allow scientific notation in attribute values [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-04-29]. 14:46:45 implementations certainly allow .3 and i think they allow .3e3 as well 14:47:40 need to add a test for that syntax for stroke width or something 14:49:55 "When used in an SVG attribute that is not also a presentation attribute, a is defined differently, to allow numbers with large magnitudes to be specified more concisely:" 14:50:22 should be changed to allow scientific notation in presentation attributes 14:50:59 that text is new, wrong, and easily fixed 14:51:15 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010AprJun/0031.html 14:51:35 Topic: Moving/closing open issues and actions on SVG 1.1F2 14:52:34 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010AprJun/0025.html 14:53:34 There was some discussion recently on Line caps drawing on zero length lines 14:53:54 jeff schiller argued it was pointless, dr olaf said it was needed 14:54:34 ISSUE-2259? 14:54:34 ISSUE-2259 -- Inconsistent use of symbol -- RAISED 14:54:34 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2259 14:54:48 chris: hard to grep for url( in the tests 14:55:05 erik: some errors in the markup, maybe from master to publish 14:55:16 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/masking.html#MaskProperty 14:55:33 should use func 14:55:47 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/masking.html#ClipPathProperty 14:56:09 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/master/masking.html#ClipPathProperty 14:56:42 &ltfunc;iri> 14:57:15 yes needs to be fixed in master 14:58:07 erik: is it only properties that use funcIRI? 14:58:11 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/propidx.html (looks broken there too) 14:58:23 chris: in 1.1 yes. 1.2t also uses it for navigation 14:59:44 erik: need to check all of these from the property table. not autogenerated. need to edit idd files? 15:01:35 erik: will have a look at the scripts in case there is automation there 15:02:00 ISSUE-2305? 15:02:00 ISSUE-2305 -- Line caps drawing on zero length lines -- RAISED 15:02:00 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2305 15:02:11 ISSUE-2314? 15:02:11 ISSUE-2314 -- Negative values in polygon/polyline points -- RAISED 15:02:11 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2314 15:02:21 erik: lets move that to 2.0 15:02:40 doug: jeff would rather adress it now I think. 15:06:10 (we think most implementations allow space to be omitted if the second argument is negative) 15:06:15 moveto-argument-sequence: 15:06:15 coordinate-pair 15:06:15 | coordinate-pair comma-wsp? lineto-argument-sequence 15:06:15 moveto-argument-sequence: 15:06:15 coordinate-pair 15:06:16 | coordinate-pair comma-wsp? lineto-argument-sequence 15:06:50 coordinate-pair: 15:06:50 coordinate comma-wsp? coordinate 15:07:12 so it should be 15:07:31 coordinate-pair: 15:07:31 coordinate comma-wsp? coordinate | coordinate negativecoordinate 15:09:47 (we do some browser testing on the fly with inconsistent results) 15:10:17 patrick: opera and ie9 both read the negative as a separator 15:10:21 ... firefox is not 15:10:33 erik: safari has a green rect 15:10:59 erik: trying batik .... 15:11:07 ...green rect as well 15:11:27 chris: so all but firefox, in summary 15:12:04 i think this is one we should do now 15:12:13 doug: illustrator shows a green box too 15:12:38 points="0,0,100,0,100,-100,0,-100" /> 15:12:38 points="0,0,100,0,100-100,0-100" /> 15:12:38 points="0,0,100,0,100,-100,0,-100" /> 15:12:41 points="0,0,100,0,100-100,0-100" /> 15:14:19 15:14:21 15:14:23 15:14:25 15:14:29 action chris: edit path bnf for Negative values in polygon/polyline points 15:14:29 Created ACTION-2766 - Edit path bnf for Negative values in polygon/polyline points [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-04-29]. 15:14:49 action chris: test for path bnf for Negative values in polygon/polyline points 15:14:49 Created ACTION-2767 - Test for path bnf for Negative values in polygon/polyline points [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-04-29]. 15:15:09 ISSUE-2317? 15:15:09 ISSUE-2317 -- Give different result for feGaussianBlur stdDeviation=0 -- RAISED 15:15:09 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2317 15:15:38 erik: made some changes to a local copy of svg filters, not completed yet, will split the equation for x and y 15:15:48 ... as dr hoffman suggested 15:16:29 chris: we try to avoid having zero be a singularity 15:16:49 erik: ok will do in filters, then backport to 1.1 if it works ok and there is time 15:16:58 action-2189? 15:16:58 ACTION-2189 -- Erik Dahlström to clarify that stdDeviation="25,0" for feGaussianBlur still means that the filter must be rendered -- due 2008-12-31 -- OPEN 15:16:58 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2189 15:17:20 erik: added some tests for this in filter module so can add those 15:17:44 ... but no implementation handles it, they all give no output for zero 15:18:04 chris: can opera change to add that? 15:18:11 erik: already done, ha! 15:18:37 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/filters/test/svg/filters-gauss-201.svg 15:19:25 ISSUE-2318? 15:19:25 ISSUE-2318 -- How should text-decorations be rendered wrt boundingbox units (gradients, filters)? -- RAISED 15:19:25 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2318 15:19:35 erik: more of a clarification 15:20:50 chris: a test with a small text string like "..." would show this 15:21:02 erik: or an svg font with a huge underline offset 15:21:14 s/this/this with strikethrough and underline/ 15:21:31 doug: better to do in 2.0 as we attack decorated bounding box then 15:21:33 chris: yes 15:21:45 erik: can test with getBbox 15:22:02 doug: depends what it takes into account. eg not stroke width 15:22:10 erik: its the glyphbox 15:23:20 chris: it all depends on whether the strike and underline are considered part of the glyph or are considered extra graphics drawn along with the glyph 15:23:32 erik: text decoration not implemented in firefox 15:23:48 doug: text support in svg in firefox needs work 15:24:07 ... jwatt aware of the issue 15:24:21 chris: agree, move to 2.0 15:24:27 erik: updating issue now 15:25:01 Topic: open 1.1 actions 15:25:04 ACTION-2077? 15:25:04 ACTION-2077 -- Erik Dahlström to test implementations for percentage values in clipPath, etc. -- due 2008-07-03 -- OPEN 15:25:04 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2077 15:25:30 erik: mre exploratory, change how clippath percent units are resolved, more of a 2.0 thing 15:25:40 s/mire/more/ 15:25:49 moved to 2.0 15:26:18 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/1 15:26:29 erik: hmm the issue is already 2.0 but it shows in tracker as a 1.1 action, odd 15:27:34 chris (some tracker bugs if issues and actions are on different products) 15:28:31 erik: want a deadline for completing these actions 15:28:38 chris: one week 15:28:52 erik: ok, one week. if not done, mark as 2.0 15:29:18 patrick: if they don't get attention then we can move thwem and worry later if they still are relevant 15:29:41 patrick: cvs access still not working 15:30:20 ACTION-2590? 15:30:20 ACTION-2590 -- Cameron McCormack to ensure javadocs get published when 1.1F2 is published -- due 2009-06-09 -- OPEN 15:30:20 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2590 15:30:28 erik: not sure if that has been done 15:30:35 doug: mail heycam and ask 15:30:39 erik: will do 15:30:51 action erik to mail heycam about ACTION-2590 15:30:51 Created ACTION-2768 - Mail heycam about ACTION-2590 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-04-29]. 15:31:29 ACTION-2644? 15:31:29 ACTION-2644 -- Chris Lilley to update the 1.1 DTD under /Graphics/SVG when publishing 1.1SE -- due 2009-08-12 -- OPEN 15:31:29 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2644 15:31:53 chris: do we want a dtd? we are guiding people away from them 15:32:29 chris: we would need to update the DTD for all changes 15:32:40 erik: ned to harvest already for default values 15:33:11 chris: much clearer to say "if not specified" than to have a dtd snippet 15:33:30 action: erik check the DTD for defaulted values and put lacuna wording in the spec for each one 15:33:31 Created ACTION-2769 - Check the DTD for defaulted values and put lacuna wording in the spec for each one [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-04-29]. 15:34:23 chris: did we add or remove attributes or elements? 15:34:34 erik: something about font or font face elements. 15:34:38 ... not sure 15:34:44 ... check the errata page 15:35:11 chris; ok if we already made dtd changes from errata we need to republish that DTD 15:35:12 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml 15:35:32 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#font_module_add_fontface 15:36:50 ok so only one dtd change, easy to do 15:37:05 erik: it was correct in the dtd not in the spec snippet 15:37:15 ... so we can copy the old DTD in fact 15:37:35 chris: if its identical no need for an update 15:38:24 close ACTION-2644 15:38:24 ACTION-2644 Update the 1.1 DTD under /Graphics/SVG when publishing 1.1SE closed 15:38:50 ACTION-2743? 15:38:50 ACTION-2743 -- Chris Lilley to make a harness version of the 1.1SE errata tests and link to imp report -- due 2010-03-22 -- OPEN 15:38:50 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2743 15:39:59 chris: if there are unapproved tests then i will agenda+ them for monday 15:41:20 erik: is it better to change the fx taskforce telcon now or have the call and decisde on the call a new time? 15:41:37 doug: better for me to have it the week after (www2101) 15:42:05 ... better to change the time now ad postpone the call 15:42:09 erik: ok 15:42:21 topic: f2f agenda 15:42:23 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Brussels%2C_Belgium_F2F#Agenda 15:43:19 erik: day planning is usuall done in the first session so its not fixed yet 15:43:41 patrick: wondering if we want to spend a full day on second edition work? 15:43:59 erik: if its done before then not, otherwise its a way to get it done 15:45:09 patrick: what is this about a conformance report? 15:45:58 These tests, and the corresponding implementation reports are intended not to test implementations 15:46:00 (explains the difference between implementation testing and conformance certification) 15:46:51 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Test_Suite_Overview 15:47:54 These tests, and the corresponding implementation reports are intended not to certify implementations as conforming, but rather the interoperable implementability of the specification itself. 15:47:59 the wonders of wiki 15:49:19 http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-report.html 15:50:12 patrick: the 1.1 test suite is seen by the public as a conformance suite. and there are a lot of animation tetss, which we don't pass 15:51:13 doug: this is a fundamental part of the process. we have to make implementation reports 15:53:39 chris: all the browsers started with low scores. this is not surprising 15:54:48 doug:yes we do need more tests 15:55:46 erik: we can do more testing of interactions 15:56:10 doug: also svg=html tets are needed - good to test, but outside our current scope 15:56:21 s/svg=/svg+/ 15:56:35 erik: want to see that in the charter for the new work in svg 2.0 15:57:00 doug: very bad for morale to hold up 1.1se while the test suite gets bigger 15:57:41 patrick: happy to contribute more tests as long as they are reviewed 15:58:02 doug: its time consuming work. 1.2T spent a year to do that 15:58:18 erik: we need a new automated test harness really 15:58:29 doug: can call this out more explicitly 16:03:05 doug: goot to have microsoft join the SVG IG to help with torture tests 16:04:09 patrick: location for the extra two days are now confirmed 16:04:13 adjourned 16:04:15 -ed 16:04:17 -[Microsoft] 16:04:20 -Shepazu 16:04:40 -ChrisL 16:04:42 GA_SVGWG()10:30AM has ended 16:04:43 Attendees were [IPcaller], ed, Shepazu, ChrisL, [Microsoft] 16:07:35 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/22-svg-minutes.html ChrisL 17:02:21 Zakim has left #svg 18:12:47 shepazu has joined #svg 19:00:52 eseidel has joined #svg 19:02:12 eseidel_ has joined #svg 20:33:20 eseidel has joined #svg 20:33:30 eseidel_ has joined #svg 21:51:59 eseidel has joined #svg 22:15:52 eseidel has joined #svg 23:01:56 shepazu has joined #svg