13:34:35 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
13:34:35 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-irc
13:34:37 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #rdfa
13:34:40 <trackbot> trackbot has joined #rdfa
13:35:38 <manu> trackbot, setup meeting
13:35:38 <trackbot> Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, setup meeting'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
13:35:43 <manu> trackbot, start meeting
13:35:45 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:35:47 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332
13:35:47 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 25 minutes
13:35:48 <trackbot> Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference
13:35:48 <trackbot> Date: 08 April 2010
13:36:07 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Apr/0026.html
13:36:28 <manu> Regrets: Steven, Markus
13:37:00 <manu> Present: Manu, Ivan, Dongmei, MarkB
13:42:11 <dongmei> hi,manu,i'm a new user of IRC.
13:42:26 <manu> ah, well you won't have to do much during the telecon
13:42:37 <manu> we usually just use IRC to paste URLs or write out examples.
13:42:53 <manu> IRC is also used by the person that is recording the minutes of the telecon - the scribe.
13:42:58 <manu> is this your first W3C telecon?
13:43:10 <dongmei> i know, this is my first teleconference
13:43:12 <dongmei> yes
13:43:15 <manu> ok
13:43:36 <manu> well, usually what happens during a telecon is a review of action items, then we go through the agenda.
13:43:46 <manu> todays agenda is here:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Apr/0026.html
13:44:31 <dongmei> thank you
13:44:35 <manu> This working group is currently trying to get our documents in order for our first publishing cycle - which is called First Public Working Draft
13:44:58 <dongmei> i see
13:45:37 <manu> We must submit the drafts next week to W3C Publications - at which time they will be announced and placed on the W3C website for public review.
13:46:24 <manu> W3C Working groups are usually required to publish drafts every couple of months (usually 2-4 months) to demonstrate that we're making progress.
13:47:03 <dongmei> what happens after the review, go to next draft?
13:47:09 <manu> This Working group started in February 2010, so we're in the 3rd month of operation - thus, we're trying to demonstrate progress by publishing three documents: RDFa Core 1.1, XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and RDFa DOM API.
13:47:46 <manu> Well, the review and working on the next draft happen at the same time... so while the public is reviewing the First Public Working Drafts, we work on the next draft in parallel
13:48:19 <dongmei> i see
13:48:26 <markbirbeck> Hi Manu. I'm going to have trouble making the call.
13:48:39 <manu> ahh, too bad :(
13:48:43 <markbirbeck> I've answered the poll, and I wanted to update you on the API.
13:48:45 <manu> can you fill out the doodle form?
13:48:47 <manu> ah
13:48:48 <manu> ok
13:48:51 <manu> thanks
13:49:03 <manu> What's up with the API?
13:49:23 <manu> Regrets+ MarkB
13:50:04 <markbirbeck> I've written a wiki-based first draft, but it's not in a spec format. I was hoping to get Benjamin's input earlier this week but that didn't happen.
13:50:34 <markbirbeck> If I work with him tomorrow afternoon (assuming he is free), will we still make your schedule?
13:50:53 <manu> We submit to W3C Pubs next Thursday
13:51:05 <manu> so as long as it's done before then (with a little time for review), then we're good.
13:51:38 <markbirbeck> (I can be on IRC during the call, by the way, if you want to ask Benjamin what his availability is on the call. It's just that I've got a lot of things that must be done by close of play today.)
13:52:00 <markbirbeck> Ok. Great.
13:52:04 <manu> sure, if you can stick around on IRC, that would be great.
13:52:08 <markbirbeck> Will do.
13:52:25 <manu> I'll follow-up after the call to see how we can get this done before next Thursday.
13:52:38 <Knud> Knud has joined #rdfa
13:52:43 <manu> hope the rest of the day is super productive for you :)
13:52:51 <markbirbeck> Jeez...I hope so too. :)
13:53:21 <markbirbeck> It's not been bad so far, but I have this magic to-do list, like one of those pots in the stories. ;)
13:53:52 <manu> let me guess - the pot is always full? :P
13:54:03 <Benjamin> Benjamin has joined #rdfa
13:54:24 <manu> zakim, code?
13:54:24 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), manu
13:55:25 <manu> hi Benjamin :)
13:55:42 <Benjamin> hi how are you?
13:55:53 <manu> good - how has this week been treating you? :)
13:55:56 <markbirbeck> Worse...you take something out of the pot, and then it magically fills up again. :)
13:56:05 <manu> heh
13:56:21 <manu> Benjamin: Mark said that he put something on the wiki - RDFa API stuff - needs you to review it, give feedback and integrate it if possible.
13:56:38 <Benjamin> Oh sure
13:56:43 <manu> Benjamin: Could you work with Mark tomorrow on that, or some time early next week?
13:56:59 <Benjamin> Early next week would be better
13:57:08 <Benjamin> Since when is it in the wiki?
13:57:21 <manu> earlier this week... don't know the url... Mark? 
13:57:47 <markbirbeck> Didn't say it was in the wiki...sorry.
13:57:53 <markbirbeck> It's in 'wiki format'. :)
13:57:57 <manu> woops
13:58:01 <manu> oh - ha!
13:58:12 <Benjamin> ok, where can I read it :)
13:58:22 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started
13:58:30 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
13:58:34 <markbirbeck> I'd like to go through it with you Benjamin.
13:58:49 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
13:59:07 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
13:59:07 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
13:59:08 <Zakim> +Ivan
13:59:15 <tinkster> tinkster has joined #rdfa
13:59:24 <Zakim> +knud
13:59:32 <Knud> zakim, mute me
13:59:32 <Zakim> knud should now be muted
13:59:35 <Zakim> +[MIT528]
13:59:40 <manu> Present+ Abhijit
13:59:43 <markbirbeck> Early next week I'll be in a caravan with the family. :) (Don't ask...)
13:59:49 <Zakim> +tinkster
14:00:00 <markbirbeck> So I can't count on internet access.
14:00:16 <markbirbeck> So if we can speak before Benjamin, that would be good.
14:00:16 <Zakim> +Benjamin
14:00:26 <markbirbeck> Even if it's just briefly tomorrow, on IM.
14:00:39 <markbirbeck> Anyway, I'll let you get on with the telecon.
14:00:42 <ivan> zakim, who is here?
14:00:42 <Zakim> On the phone I see [IPcaller], [IPcaller.a], Ivan, knud (muted), [MIT528], tinkster, Benjamin
14:00:45 <Zakim> On IRC I see tinkster, Benjamin, Knud, trackbot, Zakim, RRSAgent, dongmei, markbirbeck, ivan, manu
14:01:10 <ivan> zakim, IPcaller.a is manu
14:01:10 <Zakim> +manu; got it
14:01:44 <ivan> zakim, IPcaller is Abhijit
14:01:44 <Zakim> +Abhijit; got it
14:02:47 <ivan> zakim, MIT528 is dongmei
14:02:47 <Zakim> +dongmei; got it
14:02:52 <manu> zakim, who is on the call
14:02:52 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', manu
14:02:54 <manu> zakim, who is on the call?
14:02:54 <Zakim> On the phone I see Abhijit, manu, Ivan, knud (muted), dongmei, tinkster, Benjamin
14:03:30 <Knud> I'm here! :)
14:03:47 <Knud> I'm mute, but I'll scribe
14:03:56 <ivan> scribenick: Knud
14:04:16 <Knud> TOPIC: Action Items
14:04:16 <manu> Agenda for today: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Apr/0026.html
14:04:54 <Knud> ACTION-20: Mark has written something up, Benjamin needs to review it
14:04:54 <trackbot> ACTION-20 Work with Benjamin to revise RDFa DOM API 1.1 notes added
14:04:55 <ShaneM> ShaneM has joined #rdfa
14:05:58 <Knud> there is a pseudo-deadline for those documents next week
14:06:33 <Knud> there will be a vote on those documents next week
14:08:05 <Knud> Manu: any objections to publishing first version of RDFa DOM API 1.1 as it is now?
14:08:31 <Knud> Ivan: this will need to be answered next week
14:09:24 <Knud> Manu: will send document with W3C spec requirements to Benjamin
14:09:35 <Benjamin> q+
14:09:58 <manu> ack benjamin
14:10:18 <Knud> Benjamin: some native speaker please review api document
14:10:46 <manu> ACTION: Manu to review RDFa DOM API document before FPWD
14:10:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-22 - Review RDFa DOM API document before FPWD [on Manu Sporny - due 2010-04-15].
14:10:53 <Benjamin> thanx nanu
14:11:16 <manu> http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en
14:11:17 <Knud> ACTION-21: review of RDFa Core 1.1 is done
14:11:17 <trackbot> ACTION-21 Review RDFa Core 1.1 notes added
14:11:32 <manu> trackbot, close ACTION-21
14:11:32 <trackbot> ACTION-21 Review RDFa Core 1.1 closed
14:11:47 <Knud> (ah, that's how it's done...)
14:11:51 <manu> trackbot, comment ACTION-21document is annotated at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en
14:11:51 <trackbot> Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, comment ACTION-21document is annotated at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
14:12:05 <manu> trackbot, ACTION-21 comment document is annotated at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en
14:12:05 <trackbot> Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, ACTION-21 comment document is annotated at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
14:12:13 <manu> trackbot, comment ACTION-21 document is annotated at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AVqnjblvbeDwZGY2Nm4zdm5fMGduNWg2a2My&hl=en
14:12:13 <trackbot> ACTION-21 Review RDFa Core 1.1 notes added
14:12:47 <ShaneM> sorry!  
14:13:22 <Knud> TOPIC: Agenda Item 2, Support prefix in RDFA Profile documents
14:13:30 <manu> http://www.doodle.com/69pimmumcwd62thr
14:14:14 <Zakim> +ShaneM
14:14:22 <Knud> 9 in favour, 2 opposed (Ben Adida amd Toby Inkster)
14:15:10 <Knud> issue: it will be hard to tell where a prefix comes from
14:15:10 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-21 - It will be hard to tell where a prefix comes from ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/21/edit .
14:15:13 <Knud> argh
14:17:49 <manu> PROPOSAL: Support the declaration of prefixes for CURIEs in the RDFa Profile document.
14:17:51 <Knud> (can we remove this bogus issue I accidentally created?)
14:17:57 <ivan> +1
14:18:05 <Knud> +1
14:18:06 <manu> +1
14:18:13 <Benjamin> +1
14:18:19 <ShaneM> +1 I guess
14:18:25 <tinkster> I think this is a bad idea because if the profile document disappears, the CURIE looks like a URI. But I'm not going to -1, so I'll +0.
14:18:46 <manu> RESOLUTION: Support the declaration of prefixes for CURIEs in the RDFa Profile document.
14:19:13 <ShaneM> ACTION: ShaneM ensure prefix declarations are permitted in RDFa Profile documents
14:19:13 <trackbot> Created ACTION-23 - Ensure prefix declarations are permitted in RDFa Profile documents [on Shane McCarron - due 2010-04-15].
14:19:52 <Knud> TOPIC: Agenda Item 3, ISSUE-13, empty @typeof creates bnode
14:20:10 <Knud> all in favour in the doodle poll
14:20:12 <ShaneM> So, if @typeof is present and has no value or has an illegal value, a bnode is created
14:20:14 <manu> PROPOSAL: Support an empty @typeof attribute triggering bnode creation: typeof="" creates a bnode
14:20:15 <tinkster> (I think this is how a lot of RDFa 1.0 processors work anyway.)
14:20:36 <ivan> +1
14:20:39 <manu> +1
14:20:39 <Knud> +1
14:20:42 <Benjamin> +1
14:21:05 <tinkster> +1
14:21:32 <manu> RESOLUTION: Support an empty @typeof attribute triggering bnode creation: typeof="" creates a bnode
14:22:06 <manu> PROPOSAL: Support the existence of a @typeof attribute containing no valid terms/CURIES triggering bnode creation: typeof="invalidfoo"
14:22:26 <tinkster> +1
14:22:29 <Knud> +1
14:22:31 <manu> +1
14:22:33 <Benjamin> +1
14:22:34 <ShaneM> +1
14:22:35 <ivan> (addition to Toby, this is also how my distiller works already...)
14:22:36 <ivan> +1
14:22:50 <tinkster> Both of these already work in RDF::RDFa::Parser.
14:23:35 <tinkster> relative URIs are only for about/resource/src/href
14:23:47 <manu> RESOLUTION: Support the existence of a @typeof attribute containing no valid terms/CURIES triggering bnode creation: typeof="invalidfoo"
14:24:17 <Knud> TOPIC: Agenda Item 4, ISSUE-14, alternate prefix declaration mechanism
14:24:40 <ShaneM> ACTION: Shane to add text about @typeof to RDFa Core
14:24:40 <trackbot> Created ACTION-24 - Add text about @typeof to RDFa Core [on Shane McCarron - due 2010-04-15].
14:24:45 <Knud> four different options in doodle poll
14:24:49 <manu> The options we are discussing are: 
14:24:51 <manu> prefix="a=http://example.org/ay# b=http://example.org/bee#"
14:24:56 <manu> prefix="a: http://example.org/ay# b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:25:02 <manu> prefix="a: http://example.org/ay#; b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:25:09 <manu> prefix="a http://example.org/ay# b http://example.org/bee#"
14:25:23 <manu> This seems to have the most support: prefix="a: http://example.org/ay# b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:25:25 <tinkster> RDF::RDFa::Parser already supports the equals-sign syntax, though it's disabled by default. (I think PyRDFa does too.)
14:25:48 <ivan> q+
14:25:56 <ShaneM> q+ to express opposition as well
14:26:02 <manu> ack ivan
14:26:12 <Knud> URIs already contain colons, which is why some don't like colon-based option
14:26:38 <Knud> Toby and Ivan don't like this
14:27:15 <Knud> Ivan: equal sign option is less error-prone
14:28:03 <manu> This is what XML Schema location uses: prefix="a http://example.org/ay# b http://example.org/bee#"
14:29:37 <Knud> toby: this option might lead to maintenance issues when people delete declarations
14:29:38 <manu> prefix="a: http://example.org/ay#; b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:29:59 <tinkster> semicolons are valid parts of URIs anyway.
14:30:18 <ShaneM> Yeah - we cant use semicolons
14:30:33 <manu> ack shanem
14:30:33 <Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to express opposition as well
14:31:25 <tinkster> people who are used to CSS will forget about the space.
14:31:36 <tinkster> the space isn't needed in CSS.
14:32:07 <manu> prefix="a=http://example.org/ay# b=http://example.org/bee#"
14:32:08 <ivan> q+
14:33:13 <tinkster> seems like a sensible way out.
14:33:17 <Knud> ivan: this is hard to resolve, yet only a small syntax issue. Let's adopt the one with most votes for the moment.
14:33:26 <ShaneM> Thats fine
14:33:31 <manu> PROPOSAL: Support the colon/whitespace syntax for the prefix attribute: prefix="a: http://example.org/ay# b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:33:36 <manu> +1
14:33:38 <ivan> +1
14:33:40 <Knud> +1
14:33:42 <tinkster> +1
14:33:49 <Benjamin> +1
14:34:13 <manu> RESOLUTION: Support the colon/whitespace syntax for the prefix attribute: prefix="a: http://example.org/ay# b: http://example.org/bee#"
14:34:40 <Knud> TOPIC: RDFa Core issues
14:35:35 <manu> q+
14:35:39 <manu> ack ivan
14:36:39 <Knud> where does the split between RDFa Core and host languages (XHTML, ...) go?
14:37:13 <ivan> q+
14:37:22 <ivan> ack manu
14:37:24 <Knud> to be independet from e.g. XHTML, we might have to move references to things like "head", etc. to the host languages
14:37:38 <Knud> manu: but that would lead to a lot of duplication between core and host languages
14:37:56 <manu> q+ to discuss @rel/@rev
14:38:22 <Knud> (can someone post the link the this thread on the mailing list?)
14:39:17 <manu> This is one of the threads: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Apr/0004.html
14:41:26 <manu> ack ivan
14:41:41 <ShaneM> and @content and @property
14:41:52 <manu> ack manu
14:41:52 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to discuss @rel/@rev
14:41:54 <tinkster> I think @src/@href need to be in Core. Otherwise establishing subject URIs can become error-prone.
14:41:55 <Knud> ivan: referring to attributes is more problematic than referring to attributes
14:42:11 <ivan> -> http://www.w3.org/mid/D002012D-DB62-45A0-A37C-01060A6314D6@w3.org my last mail on that issue
14:42:16 <tinkster> <head>/<body>/<base> I'm happy to live in XHTML+RDFa.
14:42:36 <Knud> ivan: referring to elements is more problematic than referring to attributes (correction)
14:42:51 <ShaneM> me too, really.  but we would need to change the sequence to not talk about head and body.
14:43:35 <ShaneM> The current document says "This specification assumes that certain   elements are present in the Host Language (e.g.,   head).  If these elements are not supported in   the Host Language, then the corresponding processing rules   are not relevant for that language."  Does that help?
14:45:17 <tinkster> They are stupid rules.
14:46:25 <ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/xhtml-rdfa/Overview-src.html#additional-rdfa-processing-rules
14:46:49 <tinkster> The default subject is *already* the current document in RDFa 1.0.
14:47:05 <tinkster> e.g. <html property=":foo" content="bar" />
14:47:49 <tinkster> Or a typeof on <head>.
14:49:34 <ShaneM> tinkster: You are correct.
14:50:20 <tinkster> The XHTML namespace isn't the default prefix.
14:50:40 <Knud> ivan's other issue is use of xhtml namespace as default namespace
14:50:42 <tinkster> <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml> vs <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#>.
14:51:15 <tinkster> The XHTML vocab is generically useful though - I've used it in Turtle.
14:51:35 <ShaneM> I agree - I think it provides a nice base of terms that will always be available.
14:52:10 <tinkster> Create a unified vocab, but place it at <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#> for 1.0 compatibility.
14:56:18 <manu> q+ to end the telecon
14:57:07 <ivan> q+
14:57:26 <Benjamin> I would be really thankful for any input or comments
14:57:46 <manu> ack manu
14:57:54 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to end the telecon
14:58:08 <manu> ack ivan
14:59:07 <dongmei> +q
14:59:14 <dongmei> thank you all, i've enjoyed a great experience here. 
15:00:03 <Knud> (how do I make the bot create the actual minutes?)
15:01:00 <tinkster> bye
15:01:03 <Zakim> -tinkster
15:01:05 <Zakim> -dongmei
15:01:06 <Zakim> -ShaneM
15:01:08 <ivan> zakim, mute me
15:01:10 <Zakim> -Abhijit
15:01:12 <Zakim> -Benjamin
15:01:14 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted
15:01:15 <ivan> zakim, drop me
15:01:19 <Zakim> -knud
15:01:26 <Zakim> Ivan is being disconnected
15:01:28 <Zakim> -Ivan
15:01:32 <Zakim> -manu
15:01:33 <ivan> rrsagent, draft minutes
15:01:33 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-minutes.html ivan
15:01:34 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended
15:01:36 <Zakim> Attendees were Ivan, knud, tinkster, Benjamin, manu, Abhijit, dongmei, ShaneM
15:01:44 <Knud> ah, thanks ivan
15:01:56 <ivan> manu, do you take care of the minutes via the wiki?
15:02:06 <manu> yes, Ivan - I'll do the minutes.
15:02:32 <dongmei> dongmei has left #rdfa
15:02:48 <ivan> great!
15:02:49 <Knud> can you just quickly outline how the minute-making process works from this point on?
15:02:56 <Knud> just out of curiosity
15:03:21 <ivan> http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/manual is the source of all wisdom
15:03:40 <manu> yes, specifically, Common Scribe: http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/panel/
15:03:49 <Knud> ah, great. Thanks!
15:04:15 <ivan> and Sandro Hawke is the real source, he is the one who hacked all this together:-)
15:18:43 <ShaneM> how long until the minutes appear?
15:18:49 <ShaneM> I want to check the resolutions...
15:19:24 <ivan> depends on manu...
15:22:20 <manu> working on the minutes right now.
15:22:38 <manu> jeez... so demanding... :P
15:35:40 <ShaneM> no - I hjust meant that when I click tha tlink it doesn't work.
15:58:55 <manu> rrsagent, make logs public
15:59:04 <manu> that's probably why you couldn't read the link, Shane.
17:03:47 <Zakim> Zakim has left #rdfa
17:10:27 <manu> rrsagent, bye
17:10:27 <RRSAgent> I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-actions.rdf :
17:10:27 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Manu to review RDFa DOM API document before FPWD [1]
17:10:27 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-irc#T14-10-46
17:10:27 <RRSAgent> ACTION: ShaneM ensure prefix declarations are permitted in RDFa Profile documents [2]
17:10:27 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-irc#T14-19-13
17:10:27 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Shane to add text about @typeof to RDFa Core [3]
17:10:27 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/08-rdfa-irc#T14-24-40
17:10:29 <manu> trackbot, bye
17:10:29 <trackbot> trackbot has left #rdfa