16:40:34 RRSAgent has joined #ua 16:40:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-irc 16:40:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:40:36 Zakim has joined #ua 16:40:38 Zakim, this will be WAI_UAWG 16:40:38 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_UAWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 20 minutes 16:40:39 Meeting: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 16:40:39 Date: 01 April 2010 16:41:01 chair: Jim_Allan, Kelly_Ford 16:45:11 Bim has joined #UA 16:57:31 sharper has joined #ua 16:57:43 zakim, code? 16:57:43 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), sharper 16:58:17 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started 16:58:24 +Jim_Allan 16:59:14 Agenda+ U.S. Accessboard draft update to Sec 508 and 255 16:59:15 http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/draft-rule.htm 16:59:17 Agenda+ Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2) 16:59:18 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100302/ 16:59:20 Agenda+ review 3.1.3 and 3.1.5 16:59:21 Agenda+ discussion of 3.3.1 16:59:35 Agenda+ ACTION-325 - 3.3.2 Location in Hierarchy 16:59:44 +??P6 16:59:46 zakim, ??P6 is sharper 16:59:46 +sharper; got it 17:01:03 + +0190476aaaa 17:01:57 KimPatch has joined #ua 17:01:59 zakim, aaaa is really Bim_Egan 17:01:59 +Bim_Egan; got it 17:03:08 + +1.617.325.aabb 17:03:10 - +1.617.325.aabb 17:03:13 +??P12 17:03:21 jeanne has joined #ua 17:04:07 zakim, code? 17:04:07 the conference code is 82941 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), jeanne 17:04:17 +Jeanne 17:04:43 patrickhlauke has joined #ua 17:04:55 + +1.617.325.aacc 17:05:12 zakim, aacc is really KimPatch 17:05:12 +KimPatch; got it 17:05:35 zakim, p12 is really PatrickLauke 17:05:35 sorry, AllanJ, I do not recognize a party named 'p12' 17:05:48 zakim, ??p12 is really PatrickLauke 17:05:48 +PatrickLauke; got it 17:05:59 -PatrickLauke 17:06:20 kford has joined #ua 17:06:32 regrets: GregL, MarkH 17:06:33 +??P1 17:06:48 I can monitor IRC during my conflict. 17:06:55 zakim, ??p1 is really PatrickLauke 17:06:55 +PatrickLauke; got it 17:08:53 scribe: PatrickLauke 17:09:05 zakim, agenda: 17:09:05 I don't understand 'agenda:', AllanJ 17:09:09 zakim, agenda? 17:09:09 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 17:09:10 1. U.S. Accessboard draft update to Sec 508 and 255 [from AllanJ] 17:09:11 2. Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2) [from AllanJ] 17:09:13 3. review 3.1.3 and 3.1.5 [from AllanJ] 17:09:15 4. discussion of 3.3.1 [from AllanJ] 17:09:17 5. ACTION-325 - 3.3.2 Location in Hierarchy [from AllanJ] 17:10:48 Judy is looking at draft response, particularly for keyboard access. 508 going to mirror pretty much WCAG and looking to include user agent stuff 17:11:36 Bim: 508 won't affect UK, we don't have any similar legislation 17:11:58 Bim: DDA (similar to ADA) is only thing we have 17:12:33 zakim, take up item 5 17:12:33 agendum 5. "ACTION-325 - 3.3.2 Location in Hierarchy" taken up [from AllanJ] 17:19:01 Simon: if a hierarchy is not marked up hierarchically in the HTML etc, but is only faked via CSS, the browser needs to create a simplified hierarchy... 17:19:16 SH: perhaps should be in 4.7 per GregL message. 17:19:22 AllanJ: are we happy with comment by Greg to move this to 4.7? 17:19:26 +1 17:19:29 +1 17:19:52 Bim and Kim +1 17:20:34 Bim: ...avoiding duplication and clearly separating the intents 17:20:58 Kim: happy with it as it basically says "you need to tag things properly" 17:21:25 can we cross-reference 3.1 to 4.7? 17:22:36 Action: Jeanne to move 3.3.2 to 4.7 and add a resource to Implementing 3.3.1 that links to the new location for former 3.3.2 17:22:37 Created ACTION-338 - Move 3.3.2 to 4.7 and add a resource to Implementing 3.3.1 that links to the new location for former 3.3.2 [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2010-04-08]. 17:23:25 PL: what is browser mechanism to make this happen. some algorithm to create a breadcrumb 17:24:19 SH: yes. Artist, Album, track, song name. if it makes up its own structure, then it should share that implied structure. 17:25:15 PL: so the UA would build its own model, from its implied structure 17:26:17 ...simple example. broken page with bad markup, it will repair and create its own markup. 17:26:34 it = browser 17:29:13 PL: this would only apply when there is no structure. Author coding vs browser inference. Author must follow WCAG 17:31:04 PL: authoring tool should help repair content during writing of the code. browser should not infer meaning. too many variables 17:35:58 Discussion of browser repair functions and author responsibilities 17:36:41 BE: quirks mode, strange characters on the screen. 17:38:20 Patrick: request some time to put this back to list and flesh out some more 17:40:06 Patrick: danger at the moment that wording of 3.3.2 (even if moved) is too general and may not be possible in all cases (not all the time UA can infer a structure of visually positioned/presented items beyond knowing internally that there's a form of visual canvas and there are things positioned here and there, overlap a bit, etc) 17:40:57 AllanJ: move 3.3.2 as it is in current draft to 4.7 and we then work on rewording in situ? 17:40:59 +1 17:41:01 Bim: +1 17:41:08 AllanJ +1 17:41:13 Simon +1 17:41:24 zakim, agenda? 17:41:24 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 17:41:25 1. U.S. Accessboard draft update to Sec 508 and 255 [from AllanJ] 17:41:27 2. Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2) [from AllanJ] 17:41:29 3. review 3.1.3 and 3.1.5 [from AllanJ] 17:41:30 4. discussion of 3.3.1 [from AllanJ] 17:41:32 5. ACTION-325 - 3.3.2 Location in Hierarchy [from AllanJ] 17:41:35 zakim, close item 1 17:41:35 agendum 1, U.S. Accessboard draft update to Sec 508 and 255, closed 17:41:36 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:41:38 2. Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2) [from AllanJ] 17:41:48 zakim, close item 5 17:41:48 agendum 5, ACTION-325 - 3.3.2 Location in Hierarchy, closed 17:41:49 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:41:51 2. Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2) [from AllanJ] 17:43:18 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100302/ 17:43:37 zakim, take up item 2 17:43:37 agendum 2. "Discuss survey (start at 3.5.2)" taken up [from AllanJ] 17:43:54 topic 3.5.2 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20100302/results#xq11 17:44:09 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/ED-IMPLEMENTING-UAAG20-20100226/#gl-interaction-highlight 17:45:01 text in pink from that to discuss 17:45:03 Intent of Success Criterion 3.5.2: 17:45:03 A low vision user needs control over what visual elements work best for highlighting. These include foreground colors, background colors, and visual borders. 17:45:03 Examples of Success Criterion 3.5.2: 17:45:03 A low vision wants to know where the text boxes are on a web form. The user wants to set a thick black border around all text boxes. The user agent provides a dialog box allowing the user to override any author settings. 17:45:04 Related Resources for Success Criterion 3.5.2: 17:45:06 To be written 17:46:53 Patrick: small change in example "A low vision USER wants to know..." 17:47:22 action: jeanne to fix Examples of SC 3.5.2 to fix small change in example "A low vision USER wants to know..." 17:47:22 Created ACTION-339 - Fix Examples of SC 3.5.2 to fix small change in example "A low vision USER wants to know..." [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2010-04-08]. 17:50:14 AllanJ: is this at risk of being too complex, requiring user agents to provide a rich dialog to style all sorts of visual highlight aspects? 17:50:27 Bim: we want to keep at least foreground/background 17:51:41 AllanJ: maybe not borders, but focus 17:51:43 Kim +1 17:51:55 Jeanne +1 17:52:06 JA +1 17:52:16 SH +1 17:52:38 I'd like to see something along the lines of: visual indication of focus 17:53:32 AllanJ: particularly now that web authors do things like removing outline on focus 17:53:51 Bim: +1 for users having control to override web authors 17:56:05 Kim: don't just make it keyboard focus though 17:56:20 discussion of keyboard focus, tab focus, mouse focus. 17:58:11 PL: need to be more general 'visual indicator of focus' so we don't exclude anybody 17:59:08 Patrick: if keyboard input focus is broad enough to mention in this text without excluding cursor focus with mouse then fine 17:59:21 AllanJ/Kim: it's just called input focus 17:59:45 Patrick: in that case +1 for using "input focus" in the wording for 3.5.2 18:00:21 AllanJ: action for jeanne to change 3.5.2 18:00:25 action: Jeanne to change 3.5.2 to change (c) from "borders" to "input focus" 18:00:25 Created ACTION-340 - Change 3.5.2 to change (c) from "borders" to "input focus" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2010-04-08]. 18:00:25 -sharper 18:00:59 AllanJ: moving to 3.6.1 - 3.6.4 18:01:08 AllanJ: Greg had suggestions 18:01:37 AllanJ: that's our next topic, have to review these 18:01:42 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2010JanMar/0072.html 18:01:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009AprJun/0058.html 18:02:25 Topic: 3.6.1 - 3.6.4 18:02:27 AllanJ: don't think we had discussion of those on list 18:06:31 discussion of 0072 email. and conflict with iso. 18:07:31 PL: Example 1 not relevant to UAAG, example 2 is relevant and implemented 18:11:41 -Jeanne 18:12:13 PL: suggest NOT implementing Greg's suggested change, as OPTION to keep distinction in size also means that UAs need to implement the "draft mode", which none do atm 18:12:16 +1 18:12:25 AllanJ: +1 18:12:27 Bim: +1 18:13:10 AllanJ: we don't have enough people to reach quorum 18:13:53 AllanJ: suggest ending here and picking up next time from here 18:14:18 -PatrickLauke 18:14:19 -KimPatch 18:14:38 patrickhlauke has left #ua 18:19:27 -Jim_Allan 18:19:28 -Bim_Egan 18:19:30 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has ended 18:19:32 Attendees were Jim_Allan, sharper, +0190476aaaa, Bim_Egan, +1.617.325.aabb, Jeanne, +1.617.325.aacc, KimPatch, PatrickLauke 18:21:19 rrsagent, make minutes 18:21:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-minutes.html AllanJ 18:21:31 zakim, please part 18:21:31 Zakim has left #ua 18:21:43 rrsagent, make minutes 18:21:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-minutes.html AllanJ 18:22:51 rrsagent, please part 18:22:51 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-actions.rdf : 18:22:51 ACTION: Jeanne to move 3.3.2 to 4.7 and add a resource to Implementing 3.3.1 that links to the new location for former 3.3.2 [1] 18:22:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-irc#T17-22-36 18:22:51 ACTION: jeanne to fix Examples of SC 3.5.2 to fix small change in example "A low vision USER wants to know..." [2] 18:22:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-irc#T17-47-22 18:22:51 ACTION: Jeanne to change 3.5.2 to change (c) from "borders" to "input focus" [3] 18:22:51 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/04/01-ua-irc#T18-00-25