19:52:01 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:52:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/03/15-au-irc 19:52:06 Zakim, this will be AUWG 19:52:06 ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 52 minutes ago 19:52:12 Meeting: WAI AU 19:52:24 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0119.html 19:52:47 Regrets: Ann M., Andrew R, SueAnn N. 19:53:23 Chair: Jan Richards 20:00:19 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 20:00:26 +??P0 20:00:40 zakim, ??P0 is really Jan 20:00:40 +Jan; got it 20:01:59 +Jeanne 20:02:32 +??P2 20:02:55 +Greg_Pisocky 20:04:18 zakim, ??P2 is really Jutta 20:04:18 +Jutta; got it 20:08:19 Topic: 0- F2F postponement 20:09:25 JS: Haven't talked CS yet...but she wants to change. 20:09:56 JR: Late May? 20:10:18 GP: Last week of May is Memorial Day holiday. 20:10:33 GP: May 31 is mem day. 20:11:04 Topic: 1- Working through survey questions 20:11:24 Topic: Whether to keep "option" in the glossary 20:12:30 JR: The wording in the question in the survey was not correct. I want to just look at the definition in the glossary. 20:14:33 ... the keywords "local" and "global" are no longer used and would be confusing. 20:14:51 ... I am recommending removing local and global and keeping the rest of the definition 20:15:10 Resolution: Use definition of option: When an author is presented with choices. 20:15:59 Topic: Rewording A.3.6.4: 20:16:51 Resolution: Use rewording of A.3.6.4: PREFERENCES Assistance: The authoring tool includes a mechanism to help the author(s) configure any PREFERENCE SETTINGS related to Part A of this document. (Level AAA) 20:18:28 Topic: Rewording B.3.1.1,2,3 20:18:54 Resolution: Use rewording of THREE success criteria B.3.1.1,2,3: Accessible Options Prominent (WCAG Level A,AA,AAA): If authors are provided with a choice of authoring actions for achieving the same authoring outcome (e.g., styling text), then options that will result in web content conforming to WCAG 2.0 Level A are at least as prominent as options that will not. (Level A) 20:19:08 Topic: Rewording B.2.2.6 20:21:53 Resolution: Accept new "B.2.2.6 Status Report: Authors can receive an accessibility status report based on the results of the accessibility checks. (Level AA) Note: The format of the accessibility status is not specified. For example, the status might be a listing of problems detected or a WCAG conformance level, etc. " 20:22:14 Action: JR follow up with TB re: issue of testability of new B.2.2.6 20:22:15 Created ACTION-266 - Follow up with TB re: issue of testability of new B.2.2.6 [on Jan Richards - due 2010-03-22]. 20:23:29 Topic: Removing B.2.2.7 Save Status for Repair 20:23:45 Resolution: Remove B.2.2.7 Save Status for Repair 20:24:09 Topic: 2- Proposed "metadata" requirement wording 20:24:26 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20100305/results#xq4 20:28:25 JT: Accepts wording from: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20100305/results#xq4 20:28:39 JR: This gives us enough support to go ahead... 20:29:05 Resolution: B.2.2.8 Metadata Production: Authors have the option of associating accessibility checking results with the web content as metadata. (Level AA) Note: The metadata format that is implemented will dictate the nature of the associated results (e.g., low-level check results, high-level conformance claims, etc.). The INTENT section will include further information about metadata for... 20:29:07 ...resource discovery. 20:29:32 Topic: 3- New proposal on B.2.1.1 "Decision Support" attempting to address Greg's issue 20:37:28 GP: Gives example of a word processer with an image, that gives an error that when the format changes the alt text would be lost. That would be ok. But if it is video captioning, there are so many different ways it can be done, it is too difficult. 20:38:34 JT: But the authoring tool doesn't support captioning in that case. It needs a warning it cannot be captioned in that tool. 20:40:00 GP: so what if the caption cannot be done in that tool, but can be done in another tool. I don't want to see these rules invluence the marketplace so that people are forced to use tools inappropriate to the job. 20:41:05 JR: We don't either. If there are a problems in the workflow in the tools they have chosen, people should be warned. Not every tool does the captioning. Captioning is a downstream production using unknown tools. 20:41:37 s/We don't either. /We don't either. GP: 20:43:33 GP: Video workflows are not good examples. Video formats are so varied by the purpose. 20:44:09 JR: No, it is what the authoring tool allows you to do with it. If the authoring tool supports quicktime, but not quicktime sprites, it should have a warning. 20:45:22 + +1.301.987.aaaa 20:45:24 GP: I would be happy with language that says that if the tool is used to edit video in other formats, then the captioning information will be lost. The language seems to require that the tools be smarter than that. 20:46:50 Action: Jan, Greg: To reword the decision support proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0117.html 20:46:50 Sorry, couldn't find user - Jan, 20:47:22 JS: Want there to be a simpler example...without implication of too much AI 20:47:49 GP: Language around what accessibility supports can be provided and what can't be provided 20:49:40 Topic: 5- Charter discussion 20:49:52 http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2010/draft_auwg_charter_09mar10.html 20:50:34 JS: It's been a while since chaters were inline 20:56:12 JR: Milestones too close? 20:59:57 Resolution: Accept the draft charter at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2010/draft_auwg_charter_09mar10.html 21:00:53 - +1.301.987.aaaa 21:00:56 -Greg_Pisocky 21:01:16 -Jan 21:01:19 -Jeanne 21:01:22 -Jutta 21:01:24 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended 21:01:26 Attendees were Jan, Jeanne, Greg_Pisocky, Jutta, +1.301.987.aaaa 21:01:39 rrsagent, make minutes 21:01:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/15-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:01:56 rrsagent, make logs public 21:02:02 rrsagent, make minutes 21:02:02 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/15-au-minutes.html jeanne 21:03:15 sure, it sounds like you ahve enough to do this week! :)