15:52:08 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 15:52:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/03/12-prov-xg-irc 15:52:10 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:52:10 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 15:52:12 Zakim, this will be 98765 15:52:12 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 15:52:13 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 15:52:13 Date: 12 March 2010 15:52:19 i have not gotten koffee yet, that's why 15:52:26 Meeting: prov-xg 15:52:38 chair: Yolanda Gil 15:52:44 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Mar/0007.html 15:52:52 Scribe: Yolanda 15:53:03 zakim, save agenda 15:53:03 the agenda has not been entered yet, Yolanda 15:53:09 hah! 15:54:08 INC_PROVXG()11:00AM has now started 15:54:15 +Yolanda 15:54:46 zakim, dial ivan-voip 15:54:46 ok, ivan; the call is being made 15:54:47 -Yolanda 15:54:47 +Yolanda 15:54:48 +Ivan 15:55:12 + +0329331aaaa 15:55:37 +??P5 15:56:20 zakim, +0329331aaaa is SamCoppens 15:56:20 +SamCoppens; got it 15:56:49 afreitas has joined #prov-xg 15:57:24 Christine has joined #prov-xg 15:58:21 +??P4 15:58:28 Irini has joined #prov-xg 15:58:36 + +1.619.223.aabb 15:58:55 + +30281039aacc 15:59:00 - +30281039aacc 15:59:26 + +30281039aadd 16:00:02 +Luc 16:00:15 Luc has joined #prov-xg 16:03:47 +??P11 16:04:18 +??P12 16:04:22 JimM has joined #prov-xg 16:04:32 Paolo has joined #prov-xg 16:05:03 +jun 16:05:10 jun has joined #prov-xg 16:07:27 I can do it 16:07:32 (if I remember how...) 16:08:34 zakim, mute me 16:08:34 jun should now be muted 16:08:56 Yolanda: we are 1/2 way through the life of the incubator group 16:10:41 today's goals: this is a good time to checkpoint, so we want to make sure that we communicate to people outside this group 16:11:02 reaching out is a priority 16:11:35 1) current organisation of the wiki 16:12:10 + +1.801.712.aaee 16:12:21 Yolanda has been updating the wiki in terms of content 16:12:33 ideas to make it more useful/usable? 16:12:44 +q 16:13:14 Sam Coppens: found what I was looking for 16:13:30 Should the date be February 2010 rather than 2009 for the quote attributed to John Sheridan? 16:13:34 q+ 16:14:34 q- SamCoppens 16:14:35 (Juliana Freire - Univ. Utah introduces herself) 16:14:58 Is the Mendeley list referenced on the main wiki page? 16:15:31 ack Paolo 16:15:35 @Jim seems not 16:16:31 + +1.518.608.aaff 16:18:12 Paolo: will see how to best advertise the current Mendely content and make it broadly available 16:18:16 q+ 16:18:27 q- 16:18:46 Yolanda: our first deliverable is a synthesis of the requirements for provenance 16:19:10 centered around 3 "mega use cases" that Paul Groth is assembling 16:19:50 J Cheney is also putting together one of these cases 16:19:58 these will be discussed on the 19th 16:20:27 q+ 16:20:28 DeborahMcG has joined #prov-xg 16:21:01 3) what should we be doing to prepare for the next deliverable as we go through the thematic discussions 16:21:41 at some point in the telecon, i would like to announce that the updated abstract deadline for IPAW 2010 is tonight midnight hawaii time (and the updated full paper due date is next friday midnight) 16:23:10 ack Paolo 16:24:58 Paolo: need to be careful not to lose information 16:25:04 Luc has joined #prov-xg 16:25:14 ack jun 16:25:21 Re the subject matter calls - there seem to be from 2 main perspectives: (1) What work is going on in the provenance space (2) Areas that would find provenance useful (e.g. e Gov) 16:25:27 because the deliv is likely to be the main doc that external people will look at 16:25:33 q+ 16:25:49 ack jun 16:25:56 Yolanda: is the current mechanism ok? calls/irc/ external guests as we have done so far 16:26:52 Jun: comment on the mega- use case: 16:27:17 see if specific application areas (eg e-government) can be generalised 16:27:22 as a matter of method 16:27:57 Jun: good immediacy to the invited talks, eg the opm session allowed for immediate feedback and clarifications 16:28:02 -??P4 16:28:15 esp for people who wouldn't spend a long time going through the spec 16:28:36 +??P4 16:28:54 Hi. I missed that. Dropped off the call. 16:28:59 Yolanda: what topics for the coming weeks 16:29:29 could someone talk about premis? 16:29:29 -multimedia, then Dublin Core, then PML, then provenance vocabulary already planned 16:29:37 q+ 16:29:46 ack Paolo 16:30:18 zakim, mute me 16:30:18 jun should now be muted 16:30:37 q+ 16:30:48 I can talk about PREMIS 16:31:27 If we can it might also be useful to hear from other industries/areas that would benefit from developments in provence 16:31:41 +q 16:32:04 PREMIS will be add to the list 16:32:18 add -> added 16:33:01 Luc: +1 for provenir, possibly along with tjhe provenance vocabulary 16:33:13 Luc: when are we moving to the next phase of the incubator? 16:33:51 Yolanda: the goal of the presentations is to help us gain some perspective 16:34:07 prior to setting out to working on the final report 16:34:08 q- SamCoppens 16:34:37 Luc: need to understand what the SOA report will contain, to drive further presentations/topics 16:34:56 something like different task forces? 16:35:29 could we build a matrix technology x requirements? 16:35:42 ack jun 16:35:48 Yolanda: when discussing deliv. 1 on March 19th it is a good chance to checkpoint 16:36:55 q+ 16:36:55 q+ 16:36:59 zakim, mute me 16:36:59 jun should now be muted 16:37:14 Yolanda: we could group task forces around the three main groups of provenance dimensions we have identified 16:37:31 Luc: tech/requirements matrix 16:37:36 - +1.619.223.aabb 16:38:07 Yolanda: will try to organise the task forces on the 19th 16:39:07 Jim: hard to do a synthesis activity online, maybe the f2f is the right place? 16:40:04 we may be able to collapse many requirements using a limited set of technology solutions 16:40:25 but this process is best carried out in the F2F 16:40:37 next topic: should we have an agreed upon working definition of provenance? 16:40:44 or patterns rather than technologies 16:41:02 Agree we should have a definition 16:41:10 ok thanks Jim 16:41:12 e.g. metadata (of a wide range of types) + causality covers many use cases 16:41:18 this may take the rest of the incubator life! 16:41:43 i agree. i will send out what we are using in our slides later today when i am better connected 16:41:46 It would be useful for people outside the provenance space 16:42:03 I usually explain by examples 16:42:24 +1 for a working definition capturing the core 16:42:34 and those tend to be context-specific 16:43:02 q+ 16:43:06 -q 16:43:21 ack Luc 16:43:39 ack Paolo 16:45:24 + +1.518.763.aagg 16:45:30 Yolanda to create a wiki page where people can contribute their own defs of what provenance is or is not 16:45:33 Juliana +1 16:45:37 - +1.518.608.aaff 16:45:43 (was that Juliana?) 16:46:26 next topic: a set of slides to be used to present the group's activities 16:48:18 Yolanda: who can contribute? 16:48:49 Ivan: no immediate need to delvier a presentation to other W3C chairs, the times should be mature 16:50:44 +1 for some shared slides about the WG - I'd be happy to comment/contribute 16:51:02 Ivan: presentation could be done to the W3C chairs beyond the SW activity, but when and only if the message is ready to be delivered 16:51:21 s/W3C chairs/W3C team/ 16:51:27 +1 16:51:44 we should also discuss the provenance of WHAT? 16:52:04 next topic: what may be the best use of our face to face meeting? 16:52:27 Jim: use it to do a working meeting for synthesis activity 16:53:00 Yolanda: suggestions on how to run the meeting and use the time? 16:53:11 a definition of provenance, a taxonomy of provenance systems, patterns for provenance... 16:55:26 Jim: patterns of provenance: for example causality + certain tyeps of metadata is a pattern 16:55:35 that can capture many reqs at once 16:56:09 so patterns as a concise way to describe large number of reqs 16:57:32 q+ 16:57:57 Yolanda: where do we sit on the layer cake? 16:58:16 -??P4 16:58:22 I used to have a slide with provenance in the layer cake ;-) 16:58:24 quick thought: it's a vertical like security... 16:58:33 +??P4 16:58:54 Ivan: the layer cake may be outdated wrt current technology -- so may not be worth doing the exercise 16:59:13 last topic: do we need to adjust our planned activities or change our process? 16:59:36 (no comments) 16:59:57 +1 for skipping :-) 17:00:02 +1 17:00:03 I will not be able to attend 17:00:05 +1 for skipping 17:00:05 I will be away anyway:-) 17:00:13 schools are closed... 17:00:21 ack jun 17:00:22 -??P5 17:00:25 - +1.801.712.aaee 17:00:27 -Ivan 17:00:28 -Yolanda 17:00:28 -??P11 17:00:29 - +30281039aadd 17:00:30 -??P4 17:00:31 - +1.518.763.aagg 17:00:32 ivan has left #prov-xg 17:00:32 -??P12 17:00:34 -Luc 17:00:36 -SamCoppens 17:00:38 -jun 17:00:40 INC_PROVXG()11:00AM has ended 17:00:42 Attendees were Yolanda, Ivan, SamCoppens, +1.619.223.aabb, +30281039aacc, +30281039aadd, Luc, jun, +1.801.712.aaee, +1.518.608.aaff, +1.518.763.aagg 17:01:05 SamCoppens has left #prov-xg 17:07:11 rrsagent, set log public 17:07:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:07:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/12-prov-xg-minutes.html Yolanda 17:16:08 DeborahMcG has joined #prov-xg 17:16:34 trackbot, etnd telcon 17:16:34 Sorry, Yolanda, I don't understand 'trackbot, etnd telcon'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 17:16:40 trackbot, end telcon 17:16:40 Zakim, list attendees 17:16:40 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 17:16:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:16:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/12-prov-xg-minutes.html trackbot 17:16:42 RRSAgent, bye 17:16:42 I see no action items