See also: IRC log
<kei> scribenick Matthias
kei: agenda will start with don's demo of his iPhone app
<Donald_Doherty> Download slides from:
<Donald_Doherty> http://www.actionpotential.com/SemanticWb_beta2_1.pdf
kei: then we will go on to the microarray use-case and discussion of cross-task activities
<kei> http://www.actionpotential.com/SemanticWb_beta2_1.pdf
TOPIC -- Don's iPhone Application
don: slides are at http://www.actionpotential.com/SemanticWb_beta2_1.pdf
... if you go to iTunes and donwload the "SemanticWb"
application, you can choose between SPARQL endpoints
... i will be using the Neurocommons endpoint
... i will show version 2.1, which will soon be available
... you have to run the application on the iPhone / iPod Touch
/ iPad, you cannot run it through iTunes directly
... you can do a lot with a central server where you aggregate
everything, but what could i do with accessing SPARQL
endpoints?
... you cannot do complex calculations or reasoning on an
iPhone
... to start, you type in something interesting.
... autocomplete turned out to be too slow
... MeSH terminology is integrated into the system
... search gives you MeSH results
... you can navigate to proteins (e.g., amyloid beta)
... from there to articles
<sudeshna> Hi! Ti asked me to join the call - can you please send a pointer to the presenatation?
don: associated genes [slide 10]
http://www.actionpotential.com/SemanticWb_beta2_1.pdf
that is the link, sudeshna
<sudeshna> Thanks!
scribe: association of genes, gene products...
don: ... summary of information
about a protein, acess to UniProt website, structure data
... structure data and images can be browsed
... including 3d views
<mscottm> <applause>
don: the newest version will be available on iTunes in 1-2 weeks
kei: this is interesting and
impressive, gives people a feel of what can be done on an
iPhone.
... have you thought about adding links to podcasts etc.?
don: not yet, but great idea
kei: other ideas: scientific newsfeeds? using the iPhone during meetings and conferences?
don: yes, quickly looking up something during meetings is important
<mscottm> scott: It would be nice to add a tab that integrates the BioRDF microarray use case in a generic way.
but i'm back.
<mscottm> thanks for coming back :)
<mscottm> ..Specific idea (if possible?): add a 'data tab' next to the existing tabs that allows you see gene lists from specific microarray data sets within the context of Alzheimer's Disease.
who is talking? i can take over scribing again.
<mscottm> Michael Miller
michael: bioconductor could be useful in this context
<mscottm> Michael: mentioned that Misha Kapushesky demo'd a cloud application of BioConductor at an MGED meeting
kei: don, can you create a wiki page for the iPhone app?
don: yes, i will do that.
scott: if you could annotate /
aTag you own relation and add it to the HCLS or Concept Web
Alliance knowledge base (protein a has something to do with
protein b etc.), this could be valuable
... the idea behind the Concept Wiki, for example, is to find
people that have made similar research statements like you
<kei> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/MicroarrayExperimentContext
TOPIC -- Microarray use-case
kei: if you scroll down on
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/MicroarrayExperimentContext
you find a long list of provenance terms
... i used the NCBO Biomedical Annotator on Pubmed abstracts
and experiment texts to identify terms
... we also identify some provenance ontologies -- Provenir,
MGED, NIF etc.
... gene lists represent a nice use-case for provenance
information
... gene lists are not treated as a standard submission for
microarray databases, we could work with MGED to make this part
of the standard submission process (in addition to raw
data)
scott: people know that there is
a need for disclosing gene lists, this would be a good
extension for MAGE-TAB, but there is also a policy decision if
MGED requires the disposition of this data
... decisions on this might be made during the next MGED
meeting.
michael: one of the things about
MGED, which started out as a grass-roots organization: people
are enthusiastic, but realization can be tricky.
... gene lists are disclosed, but mostly as supplemental data
in a non-machine-readable way.
... not everything in the paper is useful, even though authors
might claim so.
kei: if MGED or MIAME could define a very simple standard/spreadsheet/template, this would already be a small step forward.
michael: it is not a MIAME issue, MIAME does not state a format
sudeshna: MIAME gives you the
essential elements, but not more
... having an entry mask where people enter text and generate
RDF this way, this could be useful
... tim clark was talking to carole goble, linking SWAN to
MyExperiment ontology, linking to SWAN claims
kei: with named graphs you could
capture some of the provenance information
... based on your experience, maybe we could come up with a way
to represent provenance
<mscottm> Scott: Chris Stoeckert (current MGED board president) suggested the basic requirements for gene list disclosure to be: probe ID (could be a list as multiple probes are often combined and averaged), Gene symbol (could be optional), plus the protocol and parameters used for generating the gene list.
kei: to have something concrete
to suggest to MGED
... maybe even a standard Excel format for entry
michael: kei, that is exactly what i was thinking
kei: this would facilitate the cross-task work between BioRDF and Scientific Discourse
<mscottm> Her name is Aedin.
<ssahoo2> I have been contact with Tim Clark regarding a provenance use case from scientific discouse community - I will get back in touch with him
scott: last week in boston, kei, tim, I and some other people noted that provenance work was done is several task forces.
<ericP> jun, i believe you can type "ack me" to be immediately unmuted -- less typing
<jun> great tip, thanks
kei: to make this synergistic, it
would be crucial to move this project forward and to make a
real impact on the communities
... i just came back from an NSF workshop (about
visualisation)
... the Concept Web Alliance and the VIVO community could also
be potentially synergistic
... some people at this workshop were aware of our work
... people confuse BioRDF and Bio2RDF. want to know about
overlap etc.
... I chatted with Michel, we should try to clarify
rob: there is another group that is comparable to VIVO called eagle-i, less focusing on people, but on research resources, consortium made up of 9 institutions, headed by harvard.
<jun> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/WWW2010/Workshop
<rfrost> currently collaborating with VIVO, NIF, OBI and BRO groups on ontology dev
kei: we will meet again in two weeks
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: matthias_samwald Inferring Scribes: matthias_samwald WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Bin Don_Doherty Donald_Doherty IPcaller Kei_Cheung P1 P17 aaaa aabb don ericP inserted jun kei matthias matthias_samwald michael mscottm rfrost rob scott ssahoo2 sudeshna You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 08 Mar 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/03/08-hcls-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]