20:00:26 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #svg
20:00:26 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/03/01-svg-irc
20:00:28 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
20:00:28 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #svg
20:00:30 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
20:00:30 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG()3:00PM scheduled to start now
20:00:31 <trackbot> Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
20:00:31 <trackbot> Date: 01 March 2010
20:01:22 <Zakim> GA_SVGWG()3:00PM has now started
20:01:29 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
20:01:36 <Zakim> +Shepazu
20:01:54 <ed> Zakim, [IP is me
20:01:56 <Zakim> +ed; got it
20:04:12 <Zakim> +ChrisL
20:04:40 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
20:05:09 <anthony> Zakim, [IP is me
20:05:09 <Zakim> +anthony; got it
20:09:13 <anthony> Scribe: anthony
20:09:18 <anthony> Chair: Erik
20:09:42 <anthony> Topic: Test Suite
20:09:50 <anthony> CL: I saw your email before the telcon
20:09:53 <anthony> ... good work
20:10:04 <anthony> ... for the cases where the fonts are missing
20:10:06 <ed> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/0063.html
20:10:11 <anthony> ... they should be in the old test suite
20:10:32 <anthony> ED: In the cases I've seen the conversion script probably ripped them out
20:10:54 <anthony> ... some of the tests have hard coded arial sections instead of using the SVG Font with fallback
20:11:13 <anthony> CL: I think in most cases that's an error except for where it's Arial Font Family
20:11:25 <anthony> ED: Where the SVG fonts are lost Anthony can you look at those to repair them
20:11:31 <anthony> AG: Yes
20:11:49 <anthony> ACTION: Anthony to look at missing fonts in 1.1 SE test suite
20:11:49 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2734 - Look at missing fonts in 1.1 SE test suite [on Anthony Grasso - due 2010-03-08].
20:11:57 <anthony> ED: There are a number of empty tests
20:12:02 <anthony> ... not sure what the point of that is
20:12:18 <anthony> CL: It was to do with the old process of making tests
20:12:38 <anthony> ... originally a blank test was made as a place marker
20:13:17 <anthony> ... So deleting any empty ones should be fine
20:13:44 <anthony> ACTION: Erik to Delete all the empty tests in the 1.1 SE tests suite
20:13:44 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2735 - Delete all the empty tests in the 1.1 SE tests suite [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-03-08].
20:14:12 <anthony> ED: We need italic and sans faces for the fonts
20:14:20 <anthony> ... I never think we got around to getting those
20:14:27 <anthony> CL: I think I have an action for that
20:14:32 <anthony> ... I'll get around to doing that
20:14:38 <anthony> ED: We have two colour tests
20:14:52 <anthony> ... they are both complete except they still had the draft water mark
20:15:04 <anthony> CL: Ok, probably just remove the colour draft water mark
20:15:16 <anthony> ED: Just a bunch of tests need image patches
20:15:33 <anthony> CL: What don't when people do them they can email in response to that thread?
20:15:44 <anthony> ED: I can put that on the wiki if that helps
20:16:06 <anthony> ... my plan was to start from the bottom and work my way up the list
20:16:13 <anthony> ... hoping that someone can start at the top or the middle
20:16:20 <anthony> and work downwards
20:17:13 <anthony> CL: I select that many of them don't have the pass criteria specified in the right category?
20:17:29 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObject/struct-dom-12-b.html
20:17:33 <anthony> ... we should upgrade all the tests to have a defined pass criteria and description
20:17:42 <anthony> ED: That makes most sense
20:18:11 <anthony> ... this test here is ready to go. Just made an image patch for it. I was hoping we could accept this one
20:18:28 <anthony> CL: PNG is a grey rectangle?
20:18:44 <anthony> ... presumably the PNG should be a green rectangle?
20:18:56 <anthony> ... Is the rectangle suppose to change colour?
20:19:07 <anthony> ED: Both the text and the rectangle should change colour
20:19:19 <anthony> CL: The pass criteria should say that
20:19:31 <anthony> ED: So with that change can we approve the test?
20:19:33 <anthony> CL: Yes
20:19:41 <anthony> DG: Yes
20:20:45 <anthony> ED: There are a few that looked really small
20:20:51 <anthony> ... which is kind of strange
20:20:59 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObject/text-spacing-01-b.html
20:21:02 <anthony> ... missing a view box or something
20:21:24 <anthony> CL: I know we had different sizes for Tiny, Basic and Full
20:22:21 <anthony> ... it says width=100% and height=100% and the viewBox is the standard one
20:22:54 <anthony> ... it's not that it's too small it just doesn't use the same area
20:23:47 <anthony> ... it's not dependent on font size. Just take out that closing <g> and the rest will be fixed
20:24:06 <jwatt> jwatt has joined #svg
20:26:19 <anthony> ED: We should have an explanation at the top about the reason for the Water Mark
20:26:30 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
20:27:10 <anthony> ACTION: Anthony to Add text at the top of the test harness explaining in the Draft Water Mark
20:27:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2736 - Add text at the top of the test harness explaining in the Draft Water Mark [on Anthony Grasso - due 2010-03-08].
20:27:31 <ChrisL> zakim, ipcaller is jwatt
20:27:31 <Zakim> +jwatt; got it
20:27:38 <ChrisL> zakim, mute jwatt
20:27:38 <Zakim> jwatt should now be muted
20:30:20 <jwatt> rrsagent, make minutes
20:30:20 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/01-svg-minutes.html jwatt
20:30:53 <anthony> Topic: Gradient wording
20:30:55 <anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/master/pservers#Gradients
20:31:31 <anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/errata/errata.xml#clarification_of_how_object_transforms_are_applied_to_gradients
20:33:59 <anthony> CL: Resolution should say why we've gone one way
20:34:24 <anthony> ... wording about why an implementation method was chosen should be added
20:34:40 <anthony> ... could quote the email you sent about what authoring tools did
20:34:51 <anthony> ED: So it's only adding new wording
20:35:01 <eseidel> eseidel has joined #svg
20:35:02 <anthony> AG: Correct, so only new wording
20:35:08 <anthony> ED: Looks fine to me
20:35:31 <anthony> CL: Wording looks fine to me
20:35:44 <anthony> AG: What about the diagrams are they ok?
20:35:45 <eseidel_> eseidel_ has joined #svg
20:36:30 <anthony> ... is the radial one too big?
20:36:35 <anthony> ED: They look fine to me
20:37:31 <anthony> ... do you have an SVG version of the PNG?
20:37:35 <anthony> AG: Yes
20:37:45 <anthony> CL: Would they make good tests?
20:37:50 <anthony> AG: Possibly
20:38:03 <anthony> ED: Would be nice to have a test in the test suite that checks these conditions
20:38:55 <anthony> CL: Seems reasonably easy to test
20:39:03 <anthony> ... and we have more than two implementations passing it
20:39:20 <ChrisL> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/implementation-report.html
20:39:28 <anthony> ... we'd  need to add it to the implementation report
20:43:35 <anthony> ACTION: Anthony to Create test cases that test the new wording added on gradients
20:43:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2737 - Create test cases that test the new wording added on gradients [on Anthony Grasso - due 2010-03-08].
20:46:22 <ed> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010JanMar/0046.html
20:46:45 <anthony> Topic: API Binding
20:46:57 <anthony> DS: This is something that only affects future specs
20:47:17 <anthony> ... because we don't plan on making the IDL inline do we?
20:48:42 <anthony> ... Just something to keep in mind
20:49:53 <anthony> Topic: FX Task Force telcon
20:50:09 <anthony> ... I think we haven't clearly defined when the telcon times are on
20:50:20 <anthony> ... I think CSS people are a bit confused
20:50:31 <anthony> ... should probably send and agenda with time out
20:50:53 <anthony> DS: So send something out for next Thursday
20:51:04 <anthony> ... why don't we try this Thursday?
20:51:20 <anthony> ED: Might be better to give people time to prepare
20:52:00 <anthony> DS: We could have it on Monday?
20:52:10 <anthony> CL: That would also be confusing
20:52:35 <anthony> DS: We could send an email in advance to let people know
20:53:21 <anthony> ... do we need a new tracker?
20:53:36 <anthony> CL: Would make things easier
20:54:24 <anthony> DS: I will try to get a tracker instance set up
20:55:16 <anthony> ED: Should we try for next Monday then?
20:57:07 <anthony> DS: Send an email to FX and bcc SVG and CSS and let them know the time
20:57:16 <anthony> ED: Another question is where the spec would be checked in
20:57:27 <anthony> DS: Well lets solve that next week
20:58:19 <anthony> ACTION: Erik to Write up an agenda and send email to the public FX group
20:58:19 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2738 - Write up an agenda and send email to the public FX group [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-03-08].
20:59:10 <anthony> Topic: Image Fit and Image Position
20:59:28 <anthony> ED: There was some discussion in the style group about Image Fit and Image Position
20:59:46 <anthony> ... those properties are suppose to override the preserve aspect ratio
21:00:15 <anthony> ... if you include an SVG using an object element and you don't specify anything at all
21:00:40 <anthony> ... then you'd get a stretched image
21:00:45 <ed> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0295.html
21:01:43 <anthony> ED: I think this would break backwards compatibility
21:02:41 <anthony> CL: I think an email from the chair saying this will break backwards compatibility would be good
21:04:28 <anthony> DS: Maybe this could be one of things we talk about next Monday
21:05:29 <anthony> ACTION: Erik to Respond with Working Groups thoughts on image position
21:05:30 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2739 - Respond with Working Groups thoughts on image position [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-03-08].
21:05:43 <anthony> ED: What we want is to be able to use it for SVG as well right
21:05:56 <anthony> ... and not break backwards compatible
21:06:44 <anthony> CL: We should also point out that would also break HTML implementations
21:07:27 <ed> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2010Feb/0082.html
21:08:06 <anthony> Topic: Pattern
21:08:22 <anthony> ED: Was taking a look at some code and came across this problem with patterns
21:08:40 <anthony> ... Not sure if SVG 11 was expecting lots of files to be referenced
21:09:01 <anthony> ... For a pattern in external file the coordinate system needs to be specified
21:09:25 <anthony> CL: We want people to use libraries of patterns
21:09:52 <anthony> ... the pattern designer doesn't know the coordinate system it's going to be used in
21:10:14 <anthony> ... if you were to take that rect from the first example and paste it in the second example with the #pattern
21:10:36 <anthony> ... the result should work the same if you migrate them to external file
21:10:50 <anthony> ED: If you put a width and height on the external SVG file
21:11:16 <anthony> ... you could argue that is not a view port
21:11:31 <anthony> CL: I agree it is good authoring advice to have a viewBox on the element
21:11:42 <anthony> ... but we need to define what happens if you don't
21:11:50 <anthony> ... and that needs to be sensible and reasonable
21:12:01 <anthony> ED: It only came up because we were doing some bug fixing
21:13:22 <anthony> CL: You should be able to produce the pattern
21:13:28 <anthony> ... and use that where ever you want
21:13:57 <anthony> ED: I think in my opinion it would be required to use absolute viewPort in the file
21:14:16 <anthony> ... problem is you can't access the percentages in the pattern
21:14:23 <anthony> ... which would be useful in some cases
21:15:01 <anthony> CL: We don't have percents on defined, only 'OnUse'
21:17:46 <anthony> DS: We could make patterns so they overlap in a certain way
21:17:54 <anthony> CL: That's a new feature
21:18:29 <anthony> ED: I think Dr Hoffmann is asking about
21:18:47 <ed> s/is asking about/was asking about this before too/
21:19:50 <anthony> DS: Rather than change patterns in SVG 2.0
21:19:58 <anthony> ... we could do tiling
21:20:16 <anthony> ... so rather than deprecate them, recognise they are of limited use
21:20:32 <anthony> CL: Might do the same thing for tiling and map tiling
21:20:52 <anthony> DS: In mapping each tile is a different resource
21:21:19 <anthony> ... but for a pattern you could have the tiles point to a limited number of resources and have them titled
21:21:29 <anthony> s/titled/tiled/
21:21:35 <shepazu> (discussion about SVG Tiling and Layering proposal from KDDI... hope they can rejoin)
21:21:44 <shepazu> ack jwatt
21:22:29 <shepazu> Issue: allow more advance tiling and pattens in SVG 2.0
21:22:29 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-2310 - Allow more advance tiling and pattens in SVG 2.0 ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2310/edit .
21:27:03 <anthony> ACTION: Chris to Add note to CSS 2 referencing pointing to CSS 2.1
21:27:03 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2740 - Add note to CSS 2 referencing pointing to CSS 2.1 [on Chris Lilley - due 2010-03-08].
21:28:56 <Zakim> -ChrisL
21:28:58 <Zakim> -ed
21:28:59 <Zakim> -jwatt
21:29:05 <Zakim> -anthony
21:29:09 <Zakim> -Shepazu
21:29:10 <Zakim> GA_SVGWG()3:00PM has ended
21:29:12 <Zakim> Attendees were Shepazu, ed, ChrisL, anthony, jwatt
21:29:26 <anthony> Zakim, bye
21:29:26 <Zakim> Zakim has left #svg
21:29:34 <anthony> RRSAgent, make minutes
21:29:34 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/03/01-svg-minutes.html anthony
22:22:17 <eseidel> eseidel has joined #svg
22:36:52 <eseidel> eseidel has joined #svg