AnswerToIreneCelino

To: irene.celino@gmail.com
CC: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Comment response] To Irene Celino

Dear Irene,

Thank you for your comment
     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0034.html>
on the RDFa 1.1 drafts.

1. You write:

 >In section 3.10 and at the beginning of section 5, @src is only
> indicated as a way to indicate a URI object, but later in the document
>(paragraph 8.1.1.3) the examples use @src as a way to indicate a
>subject. Maybe it would be useful to clarify @src possible uses.

This is indeed a good point, and we will take care of this in the next release.

2. You write:

>In section 2.2, in the example regarding the definition of an RDFa
>profile, the example snippet contains
>   <span property="rdfa:uri">http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#</span>
>Is this correct? Shouldn't it be like the following:
>    <span rel="rdfa:uri"
>resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" />

That is intentional. An RDF Triple referring to a resource makes a statement _on that resource_ ie, in this case, it would be on RDF as an abstract notion. However, in a profile document, we make statements only on the URI as a string, and a possible abbreviation thereof. From a modeling point of view, it is better not to make the difference...

3. You write:

> A final comment about the "appearance" of examples in the document. I
> believe that example numbering would improve readability of the 
> document (and it would ease making references as well...). Moreover,
> whenever a "wrong" example is given (like the first example in section
> 8.3.1.3), it would be nice to use a different visual indication (like
> a different font color for example) to make clear that it is something
> people should not replicate.

This is indeed a good idea, and we will take care of this in the next release.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-rdfa-wg@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,

Ivan Herman

on behalf of the RDFa Working Group

CUT AND PASTE THE BODY OF THE MESSAGE (I.E. FROM "Dear" TO "Group") INTO THE BODY OF AN EMAIL MESSAGE. SET THE To:, CC:, AND Subject: LINES ACCORDINGLY.

PLEASE TRY TO REPLY IN A WAY THAT WILL ALLOW THREADING TO WORK APPROPRIATELY, I.E., SO THAT YOUR REPLY CONTINUES THE THREAD STARTED BY THE ORIGINAL COMMENT EMAIL