ISSUE-4: Determine the proper XML namespaces document to refer to in the RDFa specification
Normative XML namespaces document
Determine the proper XML namespaces document to refer to in the RDFa specification
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2010-02-07
- Description:
- The RDFa Syntax Recommendation should have referenced the Namespaces in XML Recommendation Second Edition - published in 2006. It was an error that it did not. XMLNS2e references the XML Recommendation Fourth Edition. So that is brought in too.
We must determine if the scope of characters in NCNAME are affected and pick the proper normative spec while seeing if we can update to a newer version of XML Namespaces.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-04 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-04)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
- Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-01)
- ISSUE-4 (Normative XML namespaces document): Determine the proper XML namespaces document to refer to in the RDFa specification [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-07)
Related notes:
The issue was re-raised by Dan Connolly in this thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Feb/0015.html
This affects the characters that are allowed in xmlns: declarations:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Jan/0060.html
The references section in the XHTML+RDFa errata and the RDFa Core 1.1 document have been updated
Steven Pemberton, 4 Mar 2010, 15:21:40Display change log
