ISSUE-123: Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce the concept of an HTMLLiteral?
HTMLLiterals
Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce the concept of an HTMLLiteral?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2011-12-07
- Description:
- Gregg Kellogg raised the question about whether or not RDFa Core 1.1 should replace the concept of an XMLLiteral with an HTMLLiteral:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Nov/0177.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-147 (preserve markup by default): RDFa Processors should preserve markup by default [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (from sebastian.heath@gmail.com on 2012-12-28)
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-123 from RDF Web Apps WG (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2012-01-28)
- Official Response to ISSUE-123 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
- Telecon Agenda - December 15th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-12-11)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2011-12-08)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-12-08)
- Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-12-07)
- ISSUE-123 (HTMLLiterals): Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce the concept of an HTMLLiteral? [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-07)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: Ensure that language in XHTML+RDFa 1.1 does not prevent the implementation of an HTMLLiteral datatype in the future. Ensure that HTML+RDFa 1.1 is not prevented from implementing an HTMLLiteral datatype.
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-12-15#resolution_1
Display change log
