ISSUE-11: Determine if there is a subset of popular prefix declarations that should be enabled in all RDFa Processors

Default prefix declarations

Determine if there is a subset of popular prefix declarations that should be enabled in all RDFa Processors

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDFa 1.1 Core
Raised by:
Manu Sporny
Opened on:
2010-02-07
Description:
Determine if there is a list of popular prefix declarations that should be enabled in all RDFa Processors. This proposal would pre-define commonly used prefixes like dc, dcterms, foaf, rdf, vcard, xsd and a variety of other commonly used prefixes.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-11: default prefix declarations (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-09-03)
  2. PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-11: default prefix declarations (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-09-02)
  3. Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from markus.gylling@gmail.com on 2010-03-11)
  4. Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-11)
  5. Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-08)
  6. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-03-08)
  7. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from ben@adida.net on 2010-03-08)
  8. Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-04)
  9. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  10. Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  11. ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-03)
  12. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-03)
  13. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-03)
  14. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  15. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  16. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  17. Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-03-03)
  18. Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-03-01)
  19. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-03-01)
  20. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-02-28)
  21. Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-02-28)
  22. Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-02-28)
  23. vocabularies, token bundles, profiles (on ACTION-4) (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-02-26)
  24. Telecon Agenda - 25th February 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-02-23)
  25. Telecon Agenda - 18th February 2010, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-02-23)
  26. ISSUE-11 (Default prefix declarations): Determine if there is a subset of popular prefix declarations that should be enabled in all RDFa Processors [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-07)

Related notes:

We also need to consider whether or not there would be default terms in RDFa Core. Things like datatype="xml" instead of needing to specify datatype="rdf:XMLLiteral".

Manu Sporny, 13 May 2010, 14:43:54

Closing issue as RESOLVED per the given proposal:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Sep/0008.html

Manu Sporny, 2 Oct 2010, 20:28:19

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 11.html,v 1.1 2015/03/27 14:12:18 vivien Exp $