ISSUE-106: Should RDFa support the creation of ordered lists?

Should RDFa support the creation of ordered lists?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-08-25
Description:
Started by Jeni's blog: http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/165

This is an issue that has been discussed before:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/16

and was closed, but the microdata/RDFa discussion brought new elements into the picture.

Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Official response to RDFWA WG ISSUE-106: Ordered lists (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-10-11)
  2. Official response to RDFWA WG ISSUE-106: Ordered lists (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-10-09)
  3. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-26)
  4. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-25)
  5. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-25)
  6. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
  7. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2011-09-21)
  8. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
  9. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2011-09-21)
  10. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-16)
  11. Re: Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-16)
  12. Updated the core spec (ISSUE-106 ISSUE-107) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-16)
  13. Telecon Agenda - September 15th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-09-13)
  14. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from msclrhd@googlemail.com on 2011-09-12)
  15. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-09-12)
  16. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from sebastian.germesin@dfki.de on 2011-09-12)
  17. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from tsteiner@google.com on 2011-09-12)
  18. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-09-10)
  19. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-10)
  20. Re: Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-10)
  21. Poll of the WG on list management (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-10)
  22. Telecon Agenda - September 8th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-09-07)
  23. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-05)
  24. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-05)
  25. Re 2: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-05)
  26. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-05)
  27. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-04)
  28. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-09-02)
  29. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-02)
  30. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-09-02)
  31. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-09-02)
  32. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-09-01)
  33. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-08-31)
  34. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-27)
  35. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-27)
  36. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-08-26)
  37. Re 2: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-26)
  38. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-26)
  39. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-08-26)
  40. Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-26)
  41. Fwd: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-26)
  42. ISSUE-106: Should RDFa support the creation of ordered lists? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-25)

Related notes:

Previous discussion:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0043.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0045.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0053.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0055.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0056.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Aug/0057.html

Ivan Herman, 26 Aug 2011, 07:20:52

Issue was closed, per http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-09-15#ISSUE__2d_106__3a__Ordered_Lists by adopting list management.

Ivan Herman, 16 Sep 2011, 09:30:26

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 106.html,v 1.1 2015/03/27 14:12:18 vivien Exp $