IRC log of xproc on 2010-02-25
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:59:16 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 15:59:16 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-xproc-irc
- 15:59:20 [Norm]
- Zakim, this will be xproc
- 15:59:33 [Zakim]
- ok, Norm; I see XML_PMWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
- 15:59:35 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 15:59:35 [Norm]
- Date: 25 Feb 2010
- 15:59:35 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/25-agenda
- 15:59:35 [Norm]
- Meeting: 169
- 15:59:35 [Norm]
- Chair: Norm
- 15:59:36 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 15:59:38 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 16:00:04 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
- 16:00:42 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has now started
- 16:00:56 [Zakim]
- +[ArborText]
- 16:01:34 [Vojtech]
- Vojtech has joined #xproc
- 16:02:45 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has joined #xproc
- 16:02:53 [Zakim]
- +Norm
- 16:03:15 [Zakim]
- +Vojtech
- 16:03:18 [MoZ]
- Zakim, code?
- 16:03:18 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), MoZ
- 16:03:49 [Norm]
- Zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:03:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [ArborText], Norm, Vojtech
- 16:03:55 [Norm]
- Zakim, [Arbor is PGrosso
- 16:03:55 [Zakim]
- +PGrosso; got it
- 16:04:03 [Zakim]
- +MoZ
- 16:04:08 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Milows
- 16:04:48 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has joined #xproc
- 16:05:28 [Norm]
- Present: Paul, Norm, Vojtech, Mohamed, Alex
- 16:06:14 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda?
- 16:06:14 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
- 16:06:28 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:06:33 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
- 16:06:33 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes
- 16:06:36 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:06:41 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: telcon, 04 Mar 2010?
- 16:06:51 [Norm]
- No regrets heard.
- 16:07:12 [Norm]
- Topic: xslt step with text output
- 16:07:17 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021
- 16:07:48 [Norm]
- Norm: I propose we close this without action.
- 16:07:50 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:08:02 [Norm]
- Topic: Test suite: variable-005
- 16:08:11 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023
- 16:08:45 [ht]
- ht has joined #xproc
- 16:08:55 [ht]
- zakim, please call ht-781
- 16:08:55 [Zakim]
- ok, ht; the call is being made
- 16:08:57 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 16:11:10 [Norm]
- Vojtech: We now require a binding in p:xpath-context, so what does the sentence in 4.4 mean.
- 16:12:00 [Norm]
- ...it says you need a default readable port.
- 16:12:13 [Norm]
- Norm: Yes, I think an editorial change here makes sense, to explicitly note that the default readable port can be undefined
- 16:12:50 [Norm]
- Proposal: Leave the status quo, with the editorial fix mentioned above.
- 16:13:03 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:13:12 [ht]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:13:12 [Zakim]
- Ht should now be muted
- 16:13:17 [Norm]
- Topic: Test suite: err-s0004-005
- 16:13:26 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024
- 16:14:26 [Norm]
- Norm describes the issue.
- 16:14:36 [Norm]
- Norm: I don't feel strongly about it.
- 16:14:43 [Norm]
- Vojtech: We do a similar thing with parameter input port.
- 16:14:56 [Norm]
- Norm: I concede that this a little inconsistent.
- 16:15:51 [Norm]
- Proposal: Allow required='false' when select is used on p:option
- 16:17:09 [Norm]
- Vojtech: This change will also simplify tools that build pipelines.
- 16:17:14 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:17:26 [Norm]
- Topic: try-namespaces
- 16:17:37 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026
- 16:18:53 [Norm]
- Vojtech: In 2008, we decided to add "try-namespace"
- 16:19:17 [Norm]
- Norm: Ok, it was editorial sloppiness then
- 16:19:42 [Norm]
- Proposal: Fix the bug, change to try-namespace.
- 16:19:50 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:20:02 [Norm]
- Topic: Namespace hint
- 16:20:10 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027
- 16:21:03 [Norm]
- Norm: What if the document element is in no namespace.
- 16:21:15 [Norm]
- Vojtech: Just ignore the hint.
- 16:21:17 [Norm]
- Norm: I agree.
- 16:21:22 [Norm]
- Proposal: Ignore the hint.
- 16:21:37 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:22:10 [Norm]
- Norm: And if there isn't a document there, that's ok true.
- 16:22:14 [Norm]
- s/true/too/
- 16:22:39 [Norm]
- General agreement
- 16:22:54 [Norm]
- Topic: Progress towards PR
- 16:23:12 [Norm]
- -> http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
- 16:23:25 [Norm]
- -> -> http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html
- 16:23:47 [Norm]
- Norm: We're done!
- 16:23:50 [Norm]
- Henry: Woo hoo!
- 16:26:25 [alexmilowski]
- Yippie!
- 16:26:26 [Norm]
- Norm: I assert that we have a complete test suite and two implementations of every relevant feature.
- 16:26:31 [Norm]
- Paul: Congratulations.
- 16:26:50 [Norm]
- Norm: I propose that we request transition to PR
- 16:27:01 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 16:27:55 [ht]
- http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/
- 16:28:35 [Norm]
- Norm: Henry, what are the next steps?
- 16:28:53 [Norm]
- Henry: You put together a transition request, I review it, and you send it.
- 16:29:08 [Norm]
- Paul: If you look at the draft transition request that I sent out for XLink 1.1, that should help.
- 16:29:42 [ht]
- http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl
- 16:30:46 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business
- 16:31:06 [Norm]
- None heard.
- 16:31:32 [Zakim]
- -Alex_Milows
- 16:31:33 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 16:31:35 [Zakim]
- -PGrosso
- 16:31:35 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 16:31:36 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
- 16:31:37 [Zakim]
- -Vojtech
- 16:31:39 [Zakim]
- -MoZ
- 16:31:40 [Norm]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 16:31:40 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 16:31:41 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
- 16:31:43 [Zakim]
- Attendees were [ArborText], Norm, Vojtech, PGrosso, MoZ, Alex_Milows, Ht
- 16:32:43 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has left #xproc
- 16:36:14 [Norm]
- I am opening a bottle of Champagne with dinner tonight!
- 16:39:23 [ht]
- So, remind me (he says unkindly), what year was it we were going to finish in 1 of?
- 16:47:24 [Norm]
- I think it might have been '08
- 16:52:18 [Norm]
- If it was '07, I don't want to know.
- 18:16:02 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has left #xproc
- 18:30:05 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc