14:39:08 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 14:39:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-rdfa-irc 14:39:27 trackbot, start telecon 14:39:29 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:39:31 Zakim, this will be 7332 14:39:31 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 21 minutes 14:39:32 Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference 14:39:32 Date: 25 February 2010 14:39:52 Chair: Manu Sporny 14:39:57 Regrets: Ben Adida 14:41:05 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Feb/0073.html 14:41:22 Scribe: Shane McCarron 14:43:18 action-3 due in 1 week 14:43:18 ACTION-3 Get in touch with LibXML developers about TC 142 due date now in 1 week 14:57:13 trackbot, status 14:58:53 SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started 14:59:00 +Benjamin 14:59:02 +Knud 14:59:08 Knud has joined #rdfa 14:59:12 mgylling has joined #rdfa 14:59:19 zakim, dial ivan-voip 14:59:19 ok, ivan; the call is being made 14:59:20 +Ivan 14:59:30 hello 14:59:39 +[IPcaller] 14:59:46 zakim, I am IPcaller 14:59:46 ok, manu, I now associate you with [IPcaller] 14:59:49 hello everybody 15:00:01 RobW has joined #rdfa 15:00:02 hi Knud, Benjamin :) 15:00:28 zakim, dial steven-work 15:00:28 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:00:29 +Steven 15:00:39 zakim, who is on the call? 15:00:40 markbirbeck has joined #rdfa 15:00:40 On the phone I see Benjamin, Knud, Ivan, [IPcaller], Steven 15:00:53 +mgylling 15:00:59 zakim, who is on the call? 15:01:04 On the phone I see Benjamin, Knud, Ivan, [IPcaller], Steven, mgylling 15:01:08 I'm totally in awe of how this irc/phone mapping works 15:01:17 zakim, who is on the call? 15:01:18 On the phone I see Benjamin, Knud, Ivan, [IPcaller], Steven, mgylling 15:01:42 trackbot, status 15:01:59 + +1.978.692.aaaa 15:02:08 zakim, code? 15:02:08 the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 15:02:22 zakim, mute me 15:02:22 Ivan should now be muted 15:02:29 zakim, who is making noise? 15:02:30 zakim, [IP is Manu 15:02:30 +Manu; got it 15:02:43 manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (25%), mgylling (5%), Knud (10%) 15:02:44 zakim, who is noisy? 15:02:55 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Manu (10%), mgylling (10%), Benjamin (9%) 15:03:07 zakim, mute mgylling 15:03:07 mgylling should now be muted 15:03:12 I'm mute now 15:03:21 +Mark_Birbeck 15:03:30 zakim, who is noisy 15:03:30 I don't understand 'who is noisy', Steven 15:03:35 zakim, who is here? 15:03:35 On the phone I see Benjamin, Knud, Ivan (muted), Manu, Steven, mgylling (muted), +1.978.692.aaaa, Mark_Birbeck 15:03:37 zakim, who is noisy? 15:03:39 On IRC I see markbirbeck, RobW, mgylling, Knud, RRSAgent, Zakim, manu, Steven, Benjamin, ivan, trackbot 15:03:46 zakim, unmute mgylling 15:03:46 mgylling should no longer be muted 15:03:47 zakim, unmute me 15:03:47 Ivan should no longer be muted 15:03:47 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Manu (24%), Benjamin (14%), Knud (5%), Mark_Birbeck (5%) 15:04:00 zakim, who is noisy? 15:04:01 +ShaneM 15:04:10 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.978.692.aaaa (39%), Knud (39%), Mark_Birbeck (4%), ??P36 (8%) 15:04:12 zakim, aaaa is RobW 15:04:13 +RobW; got it 15:04:46 zakim, who is noisy? 15:04:56 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Manu (39%), mgylling (8%), Knud (22%), Mark_Birbeck (33%) 15:05:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Feb/0073.html 15:05:12 zakim, mute knud temporarily 15:05:12 Knud should now be muted 15:05:27 Knud should now be unmuted again 15:05:36 zakim, mute knud 15:05:36 Knud should now be muted 15:06:03 scribenick: markbirbeck 15:06:06 really? I muted my phone from here, actually 15:06:20 Knud, I think it your line, not your phone 15:06:21 Topic: Action items 15:06:34 action-3? 15:06:34 ACTION-3 -- Manu Sporny to get in touch with LibXML developers about TC 142 -- due 2010-02-24 -- OPEN 15:06:34 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/3 15:06:54 trackbot, action-3 due in 1 week 15:06:54 ACTION-3 Get in touch with LibXML developers about TC 142 due date now in 1 week 15:07:05 action-4? 15:07:05 ACTION-4 -- Mark Birbeck to generate spec text for @token and @prefix -- due 2010-02-24 -- OPEN 15:07:05 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/4 15:07:10 http://webbackplane.com/mark-birbeck/blog/2010/02/vocabularies-token-bundles-profiles-rdfa 15:07:30 q+ 15:08:08 trackbot, comment action-4 proposal at http://webbackplane.com/mark-birbeck/blog/2010/02/vocabularies-token-bundles-profiles-rdfa 15:08:08 ACTION-4 Generate spec text for @token and @prefix notes added 15:08:08 ack i 15:08:29 Ivan: Could we move the write-ups onto the wiki? 15:09:56 Mark: Don't mind. It was more that it didn't work as an email. 15:10:06 action-5? 15:10:06 ACTION-5 -- Mark Birbeck to generate spec text for pulling in external vocabulary documents -- due 2010-02-24 -- OPEN 15:10:06 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/5 15:10:51 trackbot, action-4 due in 1 week 15:10:51 ACTION-4 Generate spec text for @token and @prefix due date now in 1 week 15:10:54 trackbot, action-5 due in 1 week 15:10:54 ACTION-5 Generate spec text for pulling in external vocabulary documents due date now in 1 week 15:11:12 trackbot, close action-7 15:11:12 ACTION-7 Send Invited Expert proposals to Ivan closed 15:11:25 q+ 15:12:11 Manu: Have proposed Toby Inkster and Benji. 15:12:52 ACTION: Manu to get Toby to fill out Invited Expert form. 15:12:52 Created ACTION-10 - Get Toby to fill out Invited Expert form. [on Manu Sporny - due 2010-03-04]. 15:12:56 ...Benji says he is too busy to take up the Invited Expert position. Also, he says that he wants large changes to RDFa, and doesn't see that happening. 15:13:19 Ivan: Toby needs to fill in the IE form. 15:13:26 Manu: Will chase. 15:14:19 Ivan: What should we do with the issues that Benjamin raised? 15:14:39 ISSUE-12? 15:14:39 ISSUE-12 -- Analyze Benji's wishlist and determine if there are suggestions that will improve RDFa -- OPEN 15:14:39 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/12 15:14:52 Manu: Think we should keep the issues. Any other views on that? 15:14:56 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Jan/0065.html 15:14:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Jan/0065.html 15:15:29 Manu: Can we discuss this on the list? 15:15:57 Ivan: Some of them are pretty substantial; change attribute names, harmonise with Microdata. 15:16:44 Manu: Agree, but the action is to look at the suggestions and see what might be used from there. 15:18:31 q+ 15:18:36 ack ivan 15:18:38 ack ivan 15:18:51 ack markbirbeck 15:19:36 Mark: Maybe we should re-visit ISSUE-12 in a couple of weeks. 15:20:06 action-8? 15:20:06 ACTION-8 -- Shane McCarron to coordinate with the PFWG on @role and how @role integrates with RDFa -- due 2010-02-26 -- OPEN 15:20:06 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/8 15:20:39 (did we talk about Action-6?) 15:21:24 ISSUE: Coordinate with PFWG on @role and how @role integrates with RDFa 15:21:24 Created ISSUE-17 - Coordinate with PFWG on @role and how @role integrates with RDFa ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/17/edit . 15:21:44 Shane: RDFa needs a way for other groups to be able to add attributes and elements to the list. 15:21:54 s/to the list/to the list of supported attributes/ 15:22:27 trackbot, drop action-8 15:22:27 Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, drop action-8'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 15:22:32 trackbot, close action-8 15:22:32 ACTION-8 Coordinate with the PFWG on @role and how @role integrates with RDFa closed 15:22:57 trackbot, comment action-8 Closed action in favor of creating as ISSUE-17 15:22:58 ACTION-8 Coordinate with the PFWG on @role and how @role integrates with RDFa notes added 15:23:41 Yay! RDFa stylesheets! 15:24:05 action-6? 15:24:05 ACTION-6 -- Shane McCarron to identify the requirements for html2ps and see about getting reSpec to support them -- due 2010-02-24 -- OPEN 15:24:05 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/actions/6 15:24:16 Shane: Will write up a proposal on how other people might indicate in documents that other attributes are supported. 15:24:21 trackbot, close action-6 15:24:21 ACTION-6 Identify the requirements for html2ps and see about getting reSpec to support them closed 15:24:34 trackbot, comment action-6 it works. 15:24:34 ACTION-6 Identify the requirements for html2ps and see about getting reSpec to support them notes added 15:24:57 Topic: Review High-level Work Plan 15:25:00 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Work-plan 15:25:42 Manu: Very high level proposal on the wiki. 15:26:17 ...On the API document we have Benjamin Adrian. 15:26:29 ...We probably need other editors -- anyone? 15:26:40 q+ 15:26:41 q+ 15:27:01 ack steven 15:27:40 Steven: Ben has experience of working on APIs -- would seem an obvious choice. 15:27:43 ack markbirbeck 15:28:03 Mark: I was going to offer my services - I've been working on a Javascript library, so I'm interested. 15:28:32 Mark: Jenni Tennison has a slightly different notion about the API - sits on top of SPARQL. We may try to harmonize with that work. 15:29:08 q+ 15:29:52 Mark: Do we want this in a separate document? 15:29:55 ack Ivan 15:30:27 Mark: Experience of XForms WG is that if we have 'owners' of work, it tends to create a little fragmentation in the spec. 15:30:53 Ivan: True that it's separate in the charter, but might not be a problem to change our minds later. So can defer this. 15:31:07 q+ to discuss taking the discussion to the mailing list. 15:31:32 Mark: Fine. 15:32:34 Manu: Could move this to the mailing-list. 15:32:39 ack manu 15:32:39 Manu, you wanted to discuss taking the discussion to the mailing list. 15:33:26 s/Jenni/Jeni/ 15:33:36 q+ 15:33:56 ack steven 15:34:01 s/different notion about the API/different API that is related/ 15:34:35 q+ 15:34:42 Steven: How were people assigned to issues? Randomly? 15:34:45 ack knud 15:34:46 I'm muted 15:35:02 Manu: No. I tried to look at issues and who had the skills to address them. 15:35:09 q+ 15:35:29 ...I may have failed, so please comment on whether you think you should be dealing with an issue (and of course, if not). 15:35:35 ack ivan 15:35:36 zakim, mute knud 15:35:37 Knud should now be muted 15:35:48 Knud: What is the Triple Store API about? 15:36:07 Manu: I assigned you because I thought your name came up on that. 15:36:26 q+ to explain that RDFa triplestore API is /not/ a required piece of work. 15:36:42 Ivan: The idea is that rather than having an RDFa-specific API, we could look at something more generic. 15:37:19 zakim, mute me 15:37:19 Mark_Birbeck should now be muted 15:37:29 q- 15:37:51 zakim, unmute knud 15:37:51 Knud should no longer be muted 15:38:10 ...but it's not a required piece of work. 15:38:20 Knud: So it's not a generic API, but a JavaScript one? 15:38:26 Ivan: Yes, that's right. 15:38:31 zakim, mute knud 15:38:31 Knud should now be muted 15:39:26 Ivan: If there are documents that we'd like to be involved in, but not as lead editor, what should we do? 15:39:36 Manu: Go ahead and add yourself to the end of the list. 15:39:55 Topic: ISSUE-2: Extend RDFa to allow URIs in all RDFa attributes 15:39:57 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/2 15:40:00 ISSUE-2? 15:40:00 ISSUE-2 -- Extend RDFa to allow URIs in all RDFa attributes -- OPEN 15:40:00 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/2 15:42:12 Manu: The RDFa TF discussed and voted to support 'URIs anywhere'. 15:42:19 q+ 15:42:26 ack ivan 15:42:27 ...We need to decide whether we will bring that proposal in. 15:42:59 Ivan: Might be worth setting the context. 15:43:20 zakim, unmute me 15:43:21 Mark_Birbeck should no longer be muted 15:43:39 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-rdfa-syntax-20100113/ 15:43:51 That's the latest text. 15:44:01 Mark: The key thing is that 15:44:16 ShaneM has joined #rdfa 15:44:22 ... realization that after working on CURIEs and URIs is that you could tell the difference between a CURIE and a URI 15:44:49 ... basically, if there is a prefix, it's a CURIE 15:44:59 ... if there isn't a prefix, it's a URI. 15:45:19 i/Mark: The key thing is that/scribenick: manu 15:45:48 q+ 15:45:53 Mark: The motivation for this is that for small pieces of markup, it allows one to just use URIs instead of defining a ton of namespace prefix mappings. 15:46:32 Mark: It also allows easy cut-and-paste, which is a more overstated problem than it really is, but if you're concerned about that, this goes toward solving that issue. 15:46:55 Ivan: This is a fairly trivial implementation. 15:47:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Nov/0081.html 15:47:12 Ivan: separate issue, how will this change affect values for @resource and @about? 15:47:34 Ivan: @resource and @about are defined to have URIs or Safe CURIEs, but with the same logic, we can unify all attributes. 15:48:08 Ivan: let me explain with some markup 15:48:15 xmlns="a:xxxxx" resource="a:something" 15:49:13 Mark: We were warned off of doing that in @href, so that's why we don't support it in @resource. 15:49:28 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/rdfawg/rdfa-core/ 15:49:48 Ivan: We shouldn't touch @href and @src 15:49:48 lol 15:50:57 Mark: We now use the token 'URIorCURIEs' in the spec, which means it will be everywhere. 15:51:07 Shane: Yes, it's already done. 15:51:25 Manu: We don't need to agree the solution here, we just need to vote on whether we want this. 15:51:46 ACTION: Shane to suggest short names for each working group deliverable by 1 March 2010 15:51:46 Created ACTION-11 - Suggest short names for each working group deliverable by 1 March 2010 [on Shane McCarron - due 2010-03-04]. 15:52:03 ...Any other questions on this? Would people feel comfortable doing a staw-poll now? 15:53:08 PROPOSAL: Add support for full URIs in RDFa attributes where CURIEs are allowed. 15:53:31 PROPOSAL: Add support for full URIs in RDFa attributes.. 15:53:42 PROPOSAL: Add support for full URIs in RDFa attributes, barring @href and @src. 15:54:03 href has full URIs alrady 15:54:34 PROPOSAL: Allow both URIs and CURIEs in all RDFa attributes, except @href and @src. 15:54:38 PROPOSAL: for all attributes, except @href and @src, both CURIE and URI-s can be used, with priority to the former 15:56:34 PROPOSAL: Allow both URIs and CURIEs in all RDFa attributes, except @href and @src. 15:56:38 +1 15:56:39 +1 15:56:41 +1 15:56:41 +1 15:56:42 +1 15:56:43 +1 15:56:45 +1 15:56:47 +1 15:56:48 +1 15:56:59 RESOLUTION: Allow both URIs and CURIEs in all RDFa attributes, except @href and @src. 15:57:06 rrsagent, make minutes 15:57:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-rdfa-minutes.html Steven 15:57:21 q+ 15:57:27 ack ivan 15:58:45 Topic: Process 15:58:49 and I will have a draft RDFa Core document by Monday 15:59:13 Ivan: How do changes such as this work there way into the HTML 5 version of the draft? 15:59:16 ISSUE-11? 15:59:16 ISSUE-11 -- Determine if there is a subset of popular prefix declarations that should be enabled in all RDFa Processors -- OPEN 15:59:16 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/11 16:00:24 -RobW 16:00:27 RobW has left #rdfa 16:00:28 -mgylling 16:00:34 -Knud 16:00:40 -Steven 16:00:46 -Mark_Birbeck 16:00:48 -ShaneM 16:01:06 -Benjamin 16:01:06 http://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/manual 16:01:11 @Manu: I didn't catch the end of your response to Ivan. Could you add something? (Re: changes going into HTML5+RDFa.) 16:05:14 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Meetings 16:09:44 -Manu 16:09:45 -Ivan 16:09:47 SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended 16:09:49 Attendees were Benjamin, Knud, Ivan, [IPcaller], Steven, mgylling, +1.978.692.aaaa, Manu, Mark_Birbeck, ShaneM, RobW 17:28:03 zakim, bye 17:28:03 Zakim has left #rdfa 17:28:06 trackbot, bye 17:28:06 trackbot has left #rdfa 17:28:10 rrsagent, bye 17:28:10 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-rdfa-actions.rdf : 17:28:10 ACTION: Manu to get Toby to fill out Invited Expert form. [1] 17:28:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-rdfa-irc#T15-12-52 17:28:10 ACTION: Shane to suggest short names for each working group deliverable by 1 March 2010 [2] 17:28:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-rdfa-irc#T15-51-46