16:51:19 RRSAgent has joined #core 16:51:19 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-irc 16:51:28 zakim, this will be I18N 16:51:28 ok, aphillip; I see I18N_CoreWG()12:30PM scheduled to start in 39 minutes 16:51:37 RRSAgent, set logs world-visible 16:51:52 Meeting: Internationalization Teleconference 16:51:57 Chair: Addison Phillips 16:52:02 Scribe: Addison Phillips 16:52:05 ScribeNick: aphillip 16:52:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2010Feb/0018.html 16:52:36 Regrets: Felix 16:52:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 16:53:26 andrewc has joined #core 16:54:21 Agenda add-ons: ITS in Widgets, XHTML PER 17:25:38 David has joined #core 17:25:54 Hello all 17:29:20 r12a has joined #core 17:29:31 Aharon has joined #core 17:29:51 zakim, dial richard please 17:29:51 ok, r12a; the call is being made 17:29:52 I18N_CoreWG()12:30PM has now started 17:29:53 +Richard 17:30:16 zakim, who's here ? 17:30:16 On the phone I see Richard 17:30:17 On IRC I see Aharon, r12a, David, andrewc, RRSAgent, Zakim, aphillip 17:30:30 hi andrew 17:30:34 hi addison 17:30:42 +aphillip 17:30:43 + +41.88.8.aaaa 17:30:44 hi richard 17:31:16 +??P1 17:31:17 zakim, +41 david 17:31:17 I don't understand '+41 david', David 17:31:39 +[IPcaller] 17:32:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 17:33:48 Topic: Agenda 17:33:57 its in widgets and xhtml per added to agenda 17:34:24 Topic: Action Items 17:34:39 Richard: respond on our behalf to CSS on ruby issue 17:34:42 in progress 17:34:54 Dan: update draft to support option C for specifying preferences in ws-i18n 17:35:05 Richard: while awaiting comments, port the document to W3C WG Note format and prepare for publication as a First Public Working Draft. 17:35:17 basically done, some tweaks remain 17:35:50 link to follow 17:35:52 all, to review http://www.w3.org/International/wiki/BidiProposal and comment on public-i18n-core mailing list, with a view to agreeing to move forward with publication as FPWD on 22nd during telecon 17:36:12 Topic: Info Share 17:36:36 david: doing a review of MS WebExpressions3 17:36:50 ... actually generates stds compliant 17:36:57 najib has joined #core 17:37:26 http://www.w3.org/International/docs/html-bidi-requirements/ 17:37:40 richard: above is the link to the note-ified bidi document 17:38:03 richard: Najib joined via IRC from Rabat (note to other attendees)... 17:38:08 Welcome Najib 17:38:27 Topic: HTML Issue-88 17:38:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2010Feb/0022.html 17:39:25 richard: discussion on html list 17:39:40 ... hixie wants to change to have only one language 17:39:45 ... not how it works now 17:39:55 ... hixie thinks they use it differently 17:40:26 ... summary of various events as in email 17:41:04 Hello to all! 17:41:21 addison: was surprised by hixie's latest reaction 17:41:51 andrew: he believes that older docs should be able to pass at html5 17:42:29 ... change to would go against that 17:43:18 richard: this is meta information as opposed to attribute based information 17:44:35 ... introduces more confusion, since the syntax changes 17:44:47 ... and blurs the meta data usage 17:45:02 +??P25 17:45:07 fantasai has joined #core 17:45:16 richard: will WG support comments 17:45:17 hi elika 17:45:20 RRSAgent: pointer 17:45:20 See http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-irc#T17-45-20 17:45:51 andrew: supports it 17:46:01 david: think the inconsistency argument belongs also 17:46:02 zakim, fantasia is fantasai 17:46:02 +fantasai; got it 17:46:07 addison: I support it 17:46:16 fantasai: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2010Feb/0022.html 17:46:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 17:50:32 ACTION: richard: send WG response on Issue-88 based on your email to Hixie and HTML-WG 17:50:48 q+ 17:51:04 ack najib 17:51:16 najib? 17:51:32 About the bidi proposal. 17:51:38 Happy to see it as WG proposal. 17:51:45 At a first reading, I have some remarks about the examples given in section 2.1 17:51:51 I think we can summarize them into more simple problem statement. 17:51:56 I'm going to send an email about it. 17:52:02 I'll send other feedbacks later on. 17:52:08 That's all. 17:52:29 addison: great! thank you. look forward to the email. 17:52:37 Topic: XHTML PER 17:52:56 richard: proposed edited rec through process 17:53:13 ... domain leader: they reference RFC 3066 (or its successor) 17:53:20 [BCP47] 17:53:20 Tags for Identifying Languages, A. Phillips and M. Davis, Editors, September 2006. 17:53:20 Available at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt 17:53:25 ... would make sense as PER to change to BCP 47 17:53:44 addison: that's the old date 17:53:51 ... point to 5646 17:54:23 Topic: Bidi Proposal 17:54:44 http://www.w3.org/International/docs/html-bidi-requirements/ 17:55:02 note format of document, link above 17:55:13 today... start moving to FPWD 17:55:21 ... we gave WG a week to review 17:55:33 ... after FPWD, wide announcement and receive comments 17:55:45 addison: separate comments list or winter? 17:55:52 richard: discussing with Aharaon 17:56:15 ... need to move to w3c list to support process 17:56:20 ... thinking of using winter 17:56:43 ... should there be separate IG list, now or later? 17:58:33 About 40 people on my list. 17:59:31 andrew: ask the 40 people what they prefer? 17:59:41 Good idea - will ask. 18:01:12 addison: it is proposed that we publish as FPWD 18:01:25 ... are there any objections? anything we need to do first? 18:01:55 andrew: may need to do some things first 18:02:21 ... trying to work out which part are initiated by consistency/bugs in browsers 18:02:30 ... which are just good ideas 18:02:39 ... and which are bad design workarounds 18:02:50 ... and then some things where I think "should it work that way?" 18:03:11 ... useful to publish wide to get more comments 18:03:18 richard: not necessary to be polished 18:04:29 andrew: yes, publish, but personally wondering if we'd be better off filing bugs; some things more developer stuff 18:04:38 ... rahter than things to fix in html 18:04:45 ...but some things need fixing in html5 18:05:15 andrew: need to be more distinct about which things go where 18:05:35 richard: think its all good stuff 18:05:44 .. and good to get into htnml5 spec 18:05:52 s/htnml/html/ 18:06:14 ... tell implementers what they ought to do but tryijng to ensure they actually do it via html5 18:06:44 ... otherwise vendors may not take action or may "innovate" 18:07:10 andrew: parts for developers should be more explicitly written for that audience 18:07:42 addison: useful to send explicit comment 18:07:58 fantasai: sent most of comments in via email 18:08:16 ... one about algorithm and conformance implementations 18:08:26 ... and the general confusion about having more than one 18:08:37 fantasai: and bdi not neutral 18:09:26 chair: anyone against publishing as FPWD 18:09:48 fantasai: support publication 18:09:53 andrew: support moving forward 18:10:00 addison: +1 18:10:11 aharon: safely assume I do too 18:10:19 david: +1 18:10:30 resolved: publish bidi document as FPWD 18:10:38 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 18:11:09 +1 18:11:12 richard: bring up idea about a second document more squarely targetted at CSS 18:11:23 aharon: interested in collaborating on it 18:12:21 addison: information for authors, perhaps tutorials? or what? 18:12:41 aharon: meant to help browser vendors implement better 18:12:53 ... some things missing are 18:13:18 ... control over kind of numerals to use 18:14:18 that would be a text-transform value 18:14:20 (such as using language to do numeric shaping) 18:14:37 aharon: left-right commonly used instead of start-end 18:14:43 There is a Bidi problem with CSS, display 18:14:49 Sorry 18:15:16 There is a Bidi problem with CSS, display inline. 18:15:30 ... just adding start-end doesn't solve problem, since ancestor may affect it 18:15:53 ... float start or end depends on context, padding, etc. 18:16:14 aharon: some tools exist to mirror a CSS file offline 18:16:22 ... should not require an offline tool to do it 18:16:55 q+ 18:17:02 aharon: explicit control over scroll bar location 18:17:20 fantasai: css wg has carefully avoided scroll bar positioning 18:17:49 ... selectors based on direction of element 18:18:05 ... would have to do that at selectors matching time 18:18:13 ... performance impact could be large 18:18:27 ... start/end properties has been discussed but not considered urgent 18:18:40 ... no objection for stuff like float 18:18:55 ... but significant complications for stuff like padding (and vast number thereof) 18:19:17 fantasai: problems (rather than features) should be done sooner rather than later 18:19:24 ... as CSS1 wants to be done 18:19:31 ... do in next month or so 18:19:36 s/CSS1/CSS2.1/ 18:19:38 ack r12a 18:19:43 s/complications/cascading complications/ 18:19:54 r12a: sounds like a lot to be done, but needs more thought 18:20:06 ... a discuss right now on CSS WG list on start-end 18:20:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 18:20:37 r12a: @ f2f about 18months ago floated 18:20:45 Q+ to ask if scroll bar is matter of GUI, rather than style 18:20:48 ... css folks felt people might not need that? 18:21:11 ... describe what you want to be able to do and make case for that it would help a lot 18:21:24 ... CSS needs to hear from field users 18:21:33 ack najib 18:21:33 najib, you wanted to ask if scroll bar is matter of GUI, rather than style 18:21:51 fantasai: kind of affects both 18:22:26 ... if author knows more content will appear, want to force scroll bars (or hide them) 18:22:37 ... to prevent layout jumping 18:22:49 r12a: default behavior part of GUI 18:22:55 ... but maybe override that?? 18:23:05 ... text transform is like that too? 18:23:14 q- 18:24:17 fantasai: send any problems to CSS 2.1 right away 18:24:22 ... and then do feature requests 18:24:33 Would it be possible for fantasai to provide links to existing work and discussions on relevant topics? 18:24:40 r12a: real showstoppers 18:25:04 ... so that css can close down 18:25:26 fantasai: be sure that all 2.1 issues get to them in next month or two 18:25:49 Issues that impact HTML may also impact CSS 18:26:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 18:26:32 Thank you! 18:26:35 CSS can't be inconsistent with HTML 18:26:50 so, e.g., if white space behavior is changed for HTML it has to be changed for CSS too 18:26:50 fantasai: think a document like the html focused documenbt would be very useful 18:27:05 s/documenbt/document/ 18:27:27 Aharon: can fantasai help me identify what should be directed to CSS? 18:27:53 fantasai: whitespace, bullets, ... anything that doesn't pertain to markup rather than html 18:28:13 aharon: will make first pass to identify CSS issues 18:28:29 ... so if you can proofread, that would be really great 18:28:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 18:30:55 http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#direction 18:30:55 Topic: ITS and Widgets 18:31:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2010Feb/0025.html 18:31:49 addison to attend too? 18:31:57 it's at 6AM 18:33:10 richard: discussed with ITS 18:33:19 ... could drop namespace as long as behavior is there 18:33:32 ... e.g. span and dir rather than its:span 18:34:03 ... showed me example with both dir and its:dir 18:34:56 -fantasai 18:34:57 fantasai has left #core 18:36:21 Topic: AOB? 18:37:38 ACTION: richard: publish FPWD of Bidi WG-Note and complete all transreq requirements pertaining thereto 18:37:57 -David 18:37:59 -aphillip 18:38:01 -Aharon 18:38:02 -Richard 18:38:09 rrsagent, make minutes 18:38:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-minutes.html aphillip 18:38:11 -andrewc 18:38:12 I18N_CoreWG()12:30PM has ended 18:38:13 Attendees were Richard, aphillip, +41.88.8.aaaa, David, [IPcaller], Aharon, andrewc, fantasai 18:38:34 zakim, bye 18:38:34 Zakim has left #core 18:38:41 RRSagent, bye 18:38:41 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-actions.rdf : 18:38:41 ACTION: richard: send WG response on Issue-88 based on your email to Hixie and HTML-WG [1] 18:38:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-irc#T17-50-32 18:38:41 ACTION: richard: publish FPWD of Bidi WG-Note and complete all transreq requirements pertaining thereto [2] 18:38:41 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-core-irc#T18-37-38