12:51:30 RRSAgent has joined #mw4d 12:51:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/15-mw4d-irc 12:51:41 MEeting: MW4D bi-monthly meeting 12:51:46 Scribe:steph 12:51:48 chair:steph 12:52:12 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2010Feb/0002.html 12:52:17 Present: steph 12:55:59 zkim, this will be mw4d 12:56:03 zakim, this will be mw4d 12:56:03 ok, steph; I see MWI_MW4D IG()8:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 12:56:09 zakim, code ? 12:56:09 the conference code is 6493 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), steph 12:56:20 MWI_MW4D IG()8:00AM has now started 12:56:27 + +58160aaaa 12:56:33 zakim, aaaa is me 12:56:33 +steph; got it 12:58:04 mib_r1ekxc has joined #mw4d 12:58:31 hello 12:59:18 betty has joined #mw4d 12:59:35 Helo, it's Betty Purwandari from Univ of Southampton 12:59:44 hi Betty 12:59:47 miraS has joined #mw4d 13:02:21 + +1.202.342.aabb 13:02:34 zakim, aabb is Mira 13:02:34 +Mira; got it 13:02:44 Present+Mira 13:03:03 + +0750070aacc 13:03:12 zakim, aacc is betty 13:03:12 +betty; got it 13:03:17 PResent+Betty 13:04:55 nicolas has joined #mw4d 13:05:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2010Feb/0002.html 13:06:44 Topic: approval of last meeting minutes 13:06:52 + +31.62.247.aadd 13:06:56 http://www.w3.org/2010/01/18-mw4d-minutes.html 13:07:03 zakim, aadd is Nicolas 13:07:03 +Nicolas; got it 13:07:15 Present+Nicolas 13:07:44 approved 13:07:44 Renjish has joined #mw4d 13:08:04 Topic: update of W3C process 13:08:19 steph: charter http://www.w3.org/2010/01/MW4Dcharter2.html 13:08:49 + +01312799aaee 13:09:01 zakim, aaee is renjish 13:09:01 +renjish; got it 13:09:06 Present+Renjish 13:10:12 steph explains the W3C process 13:12:18 nicolas: how long the whole process ? 13:12:28 steph: probably till mid march 13:12:36 nicolas: critical mass ? 13:13:43 steph: issue indeed 13:14:29 mira: how are we going to organize 13:14:33 the big work ? 13:14:43 Topic: Organizing new work 13:20:49 mira: difficult to select case studies we select 13:21:24 mira: on the other hand, focusing on best practices, innovative approached 13:22:05 nicolas: both relevant. how to select them ? that's the question 13:22:25 selecting one domain might be the right way. 13:22:35 do we do our own aggregation ? 13:24:46 mira: lots of difference 13:25:33 nicolas: so look at concept first instead of doing a per domain 13:25:37 ? 13:25:40 mira: yes 13:27:08 hard to compare initiatives between them 13:27:23 e.g esoko close to txteagles 13:27:29 lots of government initiative 13:31:14 mira: a way to start this might be to gather input form the groups on examples 13:31:28 on business models, impact, adoption model 13:32:12 impact evaluation 13:33:28 nicolas: bit and pieces in tools and business model around, we can collect 13:33:39 not true for adoption methodology 13:33:54 mira: adoption ? 13:34:10 nicolas: e.g. co-creation 13:34:37 low hanging fruits: impact, business models tools 13:35:27 mira: perhaps reorganizing resources available 13:35:28 q+ 13:35:44 nicolas: let's start with this 3 and see if extra work needed ? 13:35:50 mira: +1 13:36:10 ack betty 13:36:19 Is it possible to put ideas into a table? The rows are domains. The columns are concepts. W3C members can write from their convenient starting points. 13:36:50 E.g. I find Mira's ideas is more feasible, since I'm doing impact analysis troughout domains. Other members working on specific domain may find another way around. There'll be compilation of the table towards the end of writing process. 13:37:40 stephane: +1 13:38:16 steph: how do we move on ? 13:38:23 q+ 13:38:46 nicolas: start with the three points 13:38:51 and request contribution on th elist 13:38:55 ack renjish 13:39:42 renjish: prioritizing the list first is critical 13:40:16 good approach ? 13:40:46 ordering ? 13:42:42 nicolas: ask the mailing-list with the three and see 13:43:18 Resolution: start to address business model, impact analysis and tools and see who are the contributors 13:43:56 Action: steph to organize the wiki 13:44:29 Action: stephane identify relevant resources from each theme 13:44:59 nicolas: interested to contribute to business model 13:45:13 mira: interested to contribute to impact analysis 13:45:30 My research is about impact analysis, so I can contribute on that part. 13:45:47 renjish: interested in the all three, particularly from the agriculture and government aspect 13:47:14 renjish: idneitfying hte question we want to adress in the document ? 13:47:44 for bmodel, you cannot analyze them without impact analysis 13:48:13 so what are the questions ? 13:48:18 zakim, who is making noise ? 13:48:30 steph, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: steph (27%), betty (77%), Nicolas (4%), renjish (12%) 13:48:44 zakim, mute betty 13:48:44 betty should now be muted 13:50:52 http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/trai/upload/misc/127/Callforpapers.pdf 13:51:49 Topic: next call 13:52:04 march 1st 13:52:53 -betty 13:52:54 -Nicolas 13:52:54 -steph 13:52:56 -renjish 13:52:56 MWI_MW4D IG()8:00AM has ended 13:52:58 Attendees were +58160aaaa, steph, +1.202.342.aabb, Mira, +0750070aacc, betty, +31.62.247.aadd, Nicolas, +01312799aaee, renjish 13:57:59 rrsagent, make log public 13:58:04 rrsagent, make minutes 13:58:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/15-mw4d-minutes.html steph 15:58:35 Zakim has left #mw4d