IRC log of xproc on 2010-02-11

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:56:41 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #xproc
15:56:41 [RRSAgent]
logging to
15:56:42 [Norm]
Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
15:56:42 [Norm]
Date: 11 Feb 2010
15:56:42 [Norm]
15:56:42 [Norm]
Meeting: 167
15:56:44 [Norm]
Chair: Norm
15:56:46 [Norm]
Scribe: Norm
15:56:48 [Norm]
ScribeNick: Norm
15:57:00 [Norm]
Regrets: Paul
15:59:47 [alexmilowski]
alexmilowski has joined #xproc
16:00:04 [Zakim]
XML_PMWG()11:00AM has now started
16:00:11 [Zakim]
16:01:20 [Zakim]
16:03:03 [Zakim]
16:03:16 [Zakim]
16:03:32 [Norm]
Zakim, Jeroen is Vojtech
16:03:32 [Zakim]
+Vojtech; got it
16:06:15 [Zakim]
16:07:06 [ht]
ht has joined #xproc
16:07:15 [ht]
zakim, please call ht-781
16:07:15 [Zakim]
ok, ht; the call is being made
16:07:35 [Vojtech]
Vojtech has joined #xproc
16:07:52 [ht]
I think I'm connected
16:07:57 [ht]
but I can't hear anyone
16:08:00 [ht]
16:08:05 [Norm]
then you aren't connected
16:08:06 [ht]
zakim, who is on the call?
16:08:06 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Norm, Alex_Milows, MoZ
16:08:09 [ht]
16:08:19 [Zakim]
16:08:24 [ht]
My 'phone thinks I'm connected???
16:08:31 [Norm]
your phone is mistaken
16:08:43 [Norm]
or maybe you're connected to people you'd like tot alk to more than us
16:08:46 [ht]
zakim, please call ht-781
16:08:46 [Zakim]
ok, ht; the call is being made
16:09:05 [Norm]
Norm, zakim, it's not.
16:09:14 [Norm]
16:09:27 [Norm]
Topic: Accept this agenda?
16:09:27 [Norm]
16:09:37 [Norm]
16:09:39 [ht]
zakim, code?
16:09:39 [Zakim]
the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152), ht
16:09:43 [Norm]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
16:09:43 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Norm, Alex_Milows, MoZ, Vojtech
16:09:53 [Norm]
Present: Norm, Alex, Mohamed, Vojtech, Henry
16:10:06 [Norm]
Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
16:10:06 [Norm]
16:10:11 [Norm]
16:10:17 [Norm]
Topic: Next meeting: telcon, 18 Feb 2010?
16:10:23 [Norm]
16:10:26 [Zakim]
16:10:41 [Norm]
Mohamed gives regrets for 18 Feb
16:10:41 [ht]
zakim, HT is me
16:10:41 [Zakim]
+ht; got it
16:11:03 [Norm]
Topic: LC003: XSLT match pattern
16:11:58 [Norm]
Vojtech: We discussed this.
16:12:23 [Norm]
Norm: Ok, I'll dig back further to see what I can find.
16:12:56 [Norm]
Topic: 010 Scoping of options and variables
16:13:06 [Norm]
Norm: I didn't understand, I guess.
16:13:31 [MoZ]
Norm, w.r.t pattern see
16:13:43 [Norm]
Henry: Take option and variable names together and make them the same as step names.
16:14:39 [Norm]
Henry: There's no lexical shadowing, only dynamic shadowing.
16:14:42 [Norm]
Norm: Ok.
16:15:04 [Vojtech]
XSLT match pattern discussion:
16:15:20 [Norm]
Topic: 013: multiple inputs in test expression
16:15:49 [Norm]
Norm discusses his thoughts about inputs and collection()
16:19:03 [Norm]
Vojtech: I think we need to make it well defined behavior, or leave it as it is
16:19:21 [Norm]
Alex: Is collection() in XPath 2.
16:19:23 [Norm]
Norm: yes.
16:20:11 [Norm]
Vojtech: What I would see as the right solution would be to allow multiple documents appearing in the XPath context and we say we take the first one as the context item. But you can use collection() to get to the others.
16:21:20 [Norm]
Norm: I think this has gone as far as it needs to.
16:21:25 [Norm]
Alex: The status quo is implementation defined.
16:21:54 [Norm]
Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo, do nothing.
16:22:00 [Norm]
16:22:10 [Norm]
Topic: 016: pipelines with infinite recursion
16:22:21 [Norm]
Vojtech: I was just wondering, but Norm replied.
16:22:26 [Norm]
Norm: I think we say enough.
16:23:00 [Norm]
Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo.
16:23:07 [Norm]
16:23:33 [Norm]
Norm: Test suite progress
16:23:52 [Norm]
Norm: Has the schema test resolution quesiton been resolved?
16:24:09 [Norm]
Vojtech: It's valid-xsd-004 and 011. They're the same and one is expected to succeed and one is expected to fail.
16:25:09 [Norm]
...One relies on the default value for use-location-hints and the other sets it to false, which is the default.
16:25:42 [Norm]
Norm: Do we have another test that explicitly sets it to true?
16:26:43 [Norm]
...Yes, 008.
16:27:15 [Norm]
Norm: I think we should change 004 so that it's expected to fail, just like 11.
16:27:32 [Norm]
Vojtech: Do we want to change the default on validate-with-xmlschema?
16:28:38 [Norm]
Norm: Henry, what does the world expect?
16:29:05 [Norm]
Henry: For XSV, they're true and true, respectively. For Saxon, I think it's true and false, respectively.
16:34:49 [Norm]
...No, the default is false. That's probably why we did it the way we did.
16:35:02 [Norm]
Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo and change the test.
16:35:09 [Norm]
16:35:48 [Norm]
Topic: Change the type of prefix value to NCName
16:36:39 [Norm]
Norm: Mohamed observes that we have options that are expected to contain prefixes that are of type string. He suggests we change their types to NCName.
16:36:46 [Norm]
Norm: I have no objection.
16:36:52 [Norm]
Henry: I don't think that's a breaking change.
16:37:04 [Norm]
Proposal: Accept this change?
16:37:12 [Norm]
16:37:33 [Norm]
Topic: More string changes
16:38:22 [Norm]
Mohamed: There are at least two issues in p:label-elements
16:43:53 [Norm]
Some discussion of the questions. Type of label changed to XPathExpression.
16:44:46 [Norm]
Topic: Any other business?
16:44:51 [Norm]
None heard.
16:44:54 [Norm]
16:44:58 [Zakim]
16:44:59 [Zakim]
16:44:59 [Zakim]
16:45:05 [Norm]
RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
16:45:08 [Zakim]
16:45:09 [Zakim]
XML_PMWG()11:00AM has ended
16:45:09 [Norm]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:45:09 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate Norm
16:45:11 [Zakim]
Attendees were Norm, Alex_Milows, MoZ, Vojtech, ht
17:19:45 [ht]
ht has joined #xproc
18:08:37 [alexmilowski]
alexmilowski has left #xproc
18:29:59 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #xproc
19:20:12 [Norm]
RRSAgent, bye
19:20:12 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items