15:49:57 RRSAgent has joined #prov-xg 15:49:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/02/05-prov-xg-irc 15:49:59 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:49:59 Zakim has joined #prov-xg 15:50:01 Zakim, this will be 98765 15:50:01 ok, trackbot; I see INC_PROVXG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 15:50:02 Meeting: Provenance Incubator Group Teleconference 15:50:02 Date: 05 February 2010 15:50:17 Paolo has joined #prov-xg 15:51:19 Yolanda has joined #prov-xg 15:51:31 thank you Jose Manuel! 15:51:40 zakim, agenda? 15:51:40 I see nothing on the agenda 15:52:30 no probs ;-) 15:52:40 INC_PROVXG()11:00AM has now started 15:52:47 +YolandaG 15:52:51 + +03491334aaaa 15:53:59 Meeting: prov-xg 15:54:30 pgroth has joined #prov-xg 15:55:11 +??P5 15:55:31 + +3858880aabb 15:55:41 Zakim, +??P5 is pgroth 15:55:41 sorry, pgroth, I do not recognize a party named '+??P5' 15:55:58 Zakim, ??P5 is pgroth 15:55:58 +pgroth; got it 15:56:29 chair: yolanda gil 15:56:32 genda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Feb/0003.html 15:56:42 Scribe: Jose 15:56:45 keckert has joined #prov-xg 15:56:51 ScribeNick: JoseManuel 15:57:01 zakim, save agenda 15:57:01 the agenda has not been entered yet, JoseManuel 15:57:17 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Feb/0003.html 15:57:43 +??P7 15:57:55 + +49.621.181.aacc 15:58:21 Luc has joined #prov-xg 15:58:30 Zakim, +49.621.181.aacc is really me 15:58:30 +keckert; got it 15:58:32 Oleksiy has joined #prov-xg 15:58:37 zakim, save agenda 15:58:37 the agenda has not been entered yet, JoseManuel 15:58:48 +??P1 15:59:07 hi everybody 15:59:11 + +1.540.449.aadd 15:59:11 hi 15:59:15 hi 15:59:27 +Betty 15:59:42 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-prov/2010Feb/0003.html 16:00:18 +Irini 16:00:21 Irini has joined #prov-xg 16:00:23 Christine has joined #prov-xg 16:00:30 lkagal has joined #prov-xg 16:00:59 + +1.571.481.aaee 16:01:07 jun has joined #prov-xg 16:01:39 +??P1 is Paolo 16:01:57 +jun 16:02:05 zakim, mute me 16:02:05 jun should now be muted 16:02:18 plan is to focus on discussion on requirements by co-editors 16:02:29 another topic is to advance with Mendelay 16:03:08 +Felix 16:03:13 ivan has joined #prov-xg 16:03:43 the SWPM workshop ended with a community-provided 16:03:47 research agenda 16:03:57 I will send the link to the relevant page 16:04:00 zakim, dial ivan-voip 16:04:00 ok, ivan; the call is being made 16:04:01 +Ivan 16:04:04 New question proposed to be asked to the group: what should research focus on in case a project on provenance was proposed? 16:04:13 jcheney has joined #prov-xg 16:04:14 SWPM workshop: http://wiki.knoesis.org/index.php/SWPM-2009 16:04:26 co-editors report on state of requirements 16:04:36 zakim, mute me 16:04:36 Ivan should now be muted 16:04:46 Pgroth we cannot hear you 16:04:49 zakim, who is making noise? 16:04:51 lots of noice in the line... 16:04:54 thank Satya. in partocular: http://wiki.knoesis.org/index.php/SWPM_discussion 16:04:59 Irini, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +03491334aaaa (20%), ??P1 (45%), YolandaG (5%), pgroth (49%), +1.571.481.aaee (24%) 16:05:04 zakim, mute me 16:05:04 keckert should now be muted 16:05:05 +??P17 16:05:19 zakim, ??P17 is me 16:05:19 +jcheney; got it 16:05:33 Paul: every dimension has requirements 16:05:58 Paul: labels added to requirements 16:07:44 Paul I would tep in again if that's ok in this phase 16:07:45 co-editors to continue clean up of requirements. Others to add if anything is missing. 16:07:50 tep->step 16:08:03 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Requirements_Clean 16:08:04 zakim, who is here? 16:08:04 On the phone I see YolandaG, +03491334aaaa, pgroth, +3858880aabb, ??P7, keckert (muted), ??P1 (muted), +1.540.449.aadd, Betty, Irini, +1.571.481.aaee, jun (muted), Felix, Ivan 16:08:07 ... (muted), jcheney 16:08:08 On IRC I see jcheney, ivan, jun, lkagal, Christine, Irini, Oleksiy, Luc, keckert, pgroth, Yolanda, Paolo, Zakim, RRSAgent, JoseManuel, ssahoo2, trackbot 16:08:19 + +1.443.527.aaff 16:08:44 q+ 16:10:09 q+ 16:10:20 ack Paolo 16:10:22 ack 16:10:48 paul proposes a way to get rid of overlapping bw. requirements 16:11:04 zakim, 1.443.527.aaff is me 16:11:04 sorry, lkagal, I do not recognize a party named '1.443.527.aaff' 16:11:26 Zakim, +03491334aaaa is really me 16:11:26 +JoseManuel; got it 16:12:06 jcheney volunteers to be involved in the process 16:12:33 q- 16:12:39 zakim, +1.443.527.aaff is me 16:12:40 +lkagal; got it 16:12:46 yes 16:12:58 q+ 16:13:10 zakim, mute me 16:13:10 lkagal should now be muted 16:13:45 ack 16:13:50 ? 16:13:57 q? 16:14:06 q- 16:14:35 a period for contributing comments on requirements and unifying them is opened. Then, this will be taken to the final doc 16:14:46 q+ 16:16:14 q- 16:16:23 fine by me 16:16:28 yes 16:16:34 fine by me 16:17:38 q+ 16:17:51 group agrees, yolanda agrees 16:17:59 ack 16:18:16 q+ 16:18:20 paul: still not clear how to eliminate redundancy 16:19:33 paolo: deadline for document to be completed? 16:19:56 end of march is the rdf workshop submission deadline... 16:20:23 yolanda: when is fine, but who is also needed 16:20:29 q? 16:20:37 q- 16:21:52 yolanda: many requirements do not stem clearly from the use cases 16:22:03 agree 16:22:14 with Yolanda 16:22:59 I agree with luc 16:23:19 Luc proposes to have a few flagship use cases to build the narrative around them. However, he would not discard the remaining ones because they might be relevant to some readers while flagship ones maybe aren't. 16:23:34 ok, but who decides which use cases are key? 16:24:04 agreed with yolanda 16:24:12 how to pick the flagship use cases? 16:24:12 ok 16:24:27 Yolanda: first merge existing ones, then pick 16:24:32 +1 16:24:42 I agree with that 16:25:23 Yolanda: prioritization is needed. There are more than 170 requirements 16:26:06 i usggested to make erequirements hierarchical where possible 16:27:15 yolanda: ok with prioritizing. A hierarchy of res shall be defined 16:27:40 Paul agrees to do it 16:27:49 happy to help as well 16:27:53 i am happy to help too 16:28:03 I can also help 16:28:09 +1 16:28:26 happy to help in other ways too 16:28:32 cool 16:28:34 all other co-editors to support 16:33:19 agree 16:33:20 Deadline: end of February- beginning of March 16:33:23 that's a reasonable timeline 16:33:57 q+ 16:34:14 Yolanda: how to index our literature references. Do we do it on the current set of reqs or wait until a definitive doc is redy? 16:34:24 ack Luc 16:34:27 ack Paolo 16:34:41 q+ 16:35:07 what is the core? 16:37:31 paolo proposes to use Mendelay and create a core of references from those mentioned in the use cases and bound to the requirements. 16:39:01 q- 16:39:27 so the suggestion is to just add references to the requirements page 16:39:57 where are the other 300? 16:40:24 all papers have urls 16:40:41 how to point to an intem in the Mendelay collection? Just get an id 16:41:28 +1 for requirements 16:41:42 not the narrative 16:42:40 wiki 16:42:47 can we make a big wiki page with bibtex entries? 16:42:55 yes 16:43:07 paul I'm checking 16:43:43 reqs document agreed to be a wiki document 16:44:49 Paul I see 194 refs in the Mendely collection 16:45:11 i was referring to luc's paper :-) 16:45:32 ah sorry :-) 16:45:47 +1 to tyolanda 16:45:51 +1 16:46:04 everyone to contribute references to requirements 16:47:01 - +1.540.449.aadd 16:47:02 i'll take money from the us :-) 16:47:12 next topic: Mark's point on provenance project 16:47:44 correction. next topic: planning next phase of the group 16:48:35 yolanda: bringing speaker from DC, DB, CC, user community, named graph... 16:49:56 Ivan contacted ben adida. interested, but not clear when could participate 16:50:11 i can get someone who is on the e-government calls 16:50:30 cool 16:50:36 data.gov.uk 16:50:48 John Sheridan from UK national archive to come talk to us next week 16:50:53 excellent thanks Yolanda 16:50:58 great! 16:52:20 Chris Bizer to present on named graphs in March 16:53:55 - +3858880aabb 16:54:22 yes, i have this on my list and will contact michael next week about that 16:54:36 q+ 16:54:42 Kai to bring someone from DC 16:54:43 q+ 16:56:11 q- 16:56:25 so questioning our group think :-) 16:57:50 q- 16:58:01 paolo to bring people from digital preservation and DLs, important topics in next calls in EU, to share their views on provenance with us. 16:58:34 +1 to paolo's proposal 16:59:47 next topic: session devoted to OPM? 16:59:52 +1 16:59:59 yes 16:59:59 +1 to OPM session 17:00:02 +1 to OPM 17:00:08 +1 17:00:15 +1 17:01:18 thanks for the reminder 17:02:28 so Luc's role is facilitation rather than lecturing? 17:02:37 Luc to present the major features of OPM to the group (30 mins, rest of telco time for discussion) 17:02:48 ok 17:03:00 15 minutes 17:03:03 all to read relevant documents ahead 17:03:07 it's not that complicated 17:03:33 Luc proposes to shorten presentation to 15 minutes. 17:03:39 26 is better 17:03:53 OPM session on 19th 17:04:24 maybe we can put this entire dense social agenda on the wiki somewhere? 17:04:34 all the speakers etc 17:05:28 -Ivan 17:05:29 -pgroth 17:05:31 -Irini 17:05:33 -jcheney 17:05:34 -Betty 17:05:35 bye! 17:05:36 -jun 17:05:37 -lkagal 17:05:39 -??P1 17:05:40 ivan has left #prov-xg 17:05:44 -keckert 17:06:43 -Felix 17:06:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:06:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/05-prov-xg-minutes.html JoseManuel 17:07:19 trackbot, end telcon 17:07:19 Zakim, list attendees 17:07:19 As of this point the attendees have been YolandaG, +3858880aabb, pgroth, keckert, +1.540.449.aadd, Betty, Irini, +1.571.481.aaee, jun, Felix, Ivan, jcheney, JoseManuel, lkagal 17:07:20 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:07:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/02/05-prov-xg-minutes.html trackbot 17:07:21 RRSAgent, bye 17:07:21 I see no action items