15:01:11 RRSAgent has joined #sparql 15:01:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/01/05-sparql-irc 15:01:15 We do! 15:01:22 trackbot, start meeting 15:01:24 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:01:26 Zakim, this will be 77277 15:01:27 Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference 15:01:27 Date: 05 January 2010 15:01:30 Zakim, ??P4 is [Garlik] 15:01:35 +??P18 15:01:40 ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now 15:01:42 I already had ??P4 as ??P4, SteveH 15:01:46 Zakim, [Garlik] has SteveH, LukeWM 15:01:54 sorry, SteveH, I do not recognize a party named '[Garlik]' 15:01:54 zakim, ??P4 is me 15:01:58 I already had ??P4 as ??P4, MattPerry 15:02:04 zakim, dial ivan-voip 15:02:05 sorry 15:02:05 MattPerry, ??P4 is us 15:02:06 ok, ivan; the call is being made 15:02:15 zakim, ??P18 is me 15:02:17 ...I think 15:02:20 I already had ??P18 as ??P18, MattPerry 15:02:42 AxelPolleres has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-01-05 15:02:45 Souri has joined #sparql 15:02:48 Zakim, ??P4 is temporarily [Garlik] 15:02:52 I already had ??P4 as ??P4, SteveH 15:03:00 Zakim, P4 is [Garlik] 15:03:02 sorry, SteveH, I do not recognize a party named 'P4' 15:03:17 zakim, who is talking? 15:03:18 sorry, sandro, I don't know what conference this is 15:03:22 hmmm, I have some echo... 15:03:27 zakim, this is sparql 15:03:32 ok, sandro; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 15:03:32 zakim, what's wrong with you? 15:03:34 +??P26 15:03:36 I don't understand your question, LukeWM. 15:03:38 zakim, who is talking? 15:03:38 Zakim: ??P26 is me 15:03:42 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:03:44 +AlexPassant; got it 15:03:54 Zakim, who is on the phone? 15:03:56 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Souri (29%), Axel (59%), Ivan (11%) 15:04:01 On the phone I see dcharbon2, bglimm, kasei, AndyS, ??P18, Ivan, Axel, Sandro, tkoivula, Souri, AlexPassant 15:04:04 +??P4 15:04:11 What was wrong with Zakim was that no one had said "Zakim, this is sparql" 15:04:13 Zakim, ??P4 is [Garlik] 15:04:13 +[Garlik]; got it 15:04:19 zakim, ??P18 is me 15:04:19 +MattPerry; got it 15:04:40 Zakim, Garlik has LukeWM, SteveH 15:04:40 +LukeWM, SteveH; got it 15:04:45 Zakim, who is on the phone? 15:04:45 On the phone I see dcharbon2, bglimm, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, Ivan, Axel, Sandro, tkoivula, Souri, AlexPassant, [Garlik] 15:04:48 [Garlik] has LukeWM, SteveH 15:05:01 ok 15:05:12 scribe: Alex Passant 15:05:24 scribenick:AlexPassant 15:05:32 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-01-05 15:05:49 AxelPolleres: main goal is to check how far we are on the reviews 15:05:53 ... + discuss schedule 15:05:58 topic: admin issues 15:06:03 PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-12-22 15:06:14 AxelPolleres: minutes approval - any objections ? 15:06:21 ... minutes approved 15:06:22 RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-12-22 15:06:30 chimezie has joined #sparql 15:06:38 ... next meeting next week 15:06:49 Zakim, passcode? 15:06:49 the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), chimezie 15:06:50 ... david will scribe 15:07:09 ... updates on comments ? 15:07:09 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments any updates? 15:07:19 +Chimezie_Ogbuji 15:07:26 ... no updated 15:07:29 topic: liaisons 15:07:32 Zakim, mute me 15:07:32 Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted 15:07:35 no updates. 15:07:47 topic: Document reviews 15:08:03 Zakim, mute me 15:08:03 bglimm should now be muted 15:08:13 AxelPolleres: schedule: publish in 2 weeks max 15:08:18 ... few reviews missing 15:08:31 ... kindly ask reviewers to review in the next few days 15:08:39 ... so that we can decide on publishing next week 15:09:01 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ 15:09:04 ... first: query document 15:09:18 ... several reviews from bglimm, Souri, AxelPolleres and MattPerry 15:09:24 ... andy to summarize 15:09:36 AndyS: nothing outstanding on the query side 15:09:47 ... if so, please remind 15:10:48 Souri: sent another e-mail with minor question 15:11:02 ... not a critical one 15:11:34 ... reviewers should check if their comments have been addressed 15:11:39 fine with me 15:11:48 ... will not give separate actions to reviewers 15:12:13 q? 15:12:14 ... eveyone free to make some comments, but please keep the schedule in mind 15:12:28 s/eveyone free/everyone is free/ 15:12:37 ... next doc: Update 15:12:45 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml 15:12:51 ... Paul sent regrets, difficult to discuss it today 15:12:59 ... quick look through the reviews sent so far 15:13:19 AndyS: comments not addressed so far 15:13:30 AxelPolleres: postpone discussion until Paul is back 15:13:34 Please replace 20100126 with 2010126 in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/WD-sparql11-query-2010126/ 15:14:09 sorry the other way 15:14:17 ... next: protocol 15:14:18 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/ 15:14:45 david: short update - hoping to get some feedback 15:15:27 ... mail not yet in the archives 15:15:29 i can't see your mail in the archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/ 15:15:32 ... sent about 1h ago 15:16:57 david: should we update to WSDL2.0 15:17:29 3 messages from dcharbon approved 15:18:21 q? 15:19:07 AxelPolleres: did we agree on getting only HTTP POST for the update 15:19:15 AndyS: cannot do update with a GET by HTTP design 15:19:42 probably POST is the only reasonable way to do it. 15:20:02 ... true. 15:20:23 dcharbon2: graphs do exit / vs do not exist when updating data 15:20:32 under what circumstances are those errors? 15:20:37 ... query gramatically correct but error when running it - suggestion to add a new error 15:20:40 don't we have an open issue about this? 15:20:56 q+ 15:21:04 ... ... should we have something more generic (e.g. semantic execution fault) 15:21:11 AndyS: how this maps down to HTTP 15:21:22 ... caring about the corresponding HTTP code 15:22:11 5xx codes reflect that something went wrong. 15:22:20 yes, 500 soundsw wrong to me 15:22:27 dcharbon2: last question on the update doc 15:22:42 ... protocol could be conformat by implementing only a subset of the interface 15:22:51 ... seems not to be the case with WSDL 15:23:17 ack me 15:24:34 ... have to implement one or both to be compliant ? 15:26:05 todo for david: WSDL and types update, and pointers from the overview doc. 15:26:32 ACTION: david send mail about readiness for review by tonight 15:26:32 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - david 15:26:32 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. dcharbon2, dnewman2) 15:26:50 AxelPolleres: reviewers needed for protocol 15:27:09 ACTION: dcharbon2 send mail about readiness for review by tonight 15:27:10 Created ACTION-173 - Send mail about readiness for review by tonight [on David Charboneau - due 2010-01-12]. 15:27:29 ACTION: axel to review protocol changes 15:27:29 Created ACTION-174 - Review protocol changes [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-01-12]. 15:27:39 Zakim, pick a victim 15:27:39 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose [Garlik] 15:28:27 ACTION: Luke to review protocol changes 15:28:27 Created ACTION-175 - Review protocol changes [on Luke Wilson-Mawer - due 2010-01-12]. 15:28:47 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/ 15:28:49 ... next document: Service Description 15:30:03 kasei: before publication, would like to add a link to entailement profiles URIs 15:30:11 ... get the RDF published for the vocab as well 15:30:24 ... will check with Ivan / Sandro about the RDF 15:30:26 q+ 15:30:37 ... commited comments yesterday on future things (not for that draft) 15:30:53 ... just a few things to address before publishing 15:31:15 ivan: happy to publish the RDF 15:31:23 ... discussed RDFa version in the email 15:31:37 ... can be postpone to a later stage 15:31:44 kasei: happy with RDF/XML at the moment 15:31:53 +1 on kasei 15:31:57 +1 RDF/XML for the first version RDFa as an option for future 15:32:51 ACTION: greg to ensure RDF Schema gets published in time 15:32:51 Created ACTION-176 - Ensure RDF Schema gets published in time [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-01-12]. 15:33:13 kasei: addressed the issues sent by reviewers 15:34:26 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ 15:34:36 AxelPolleres: next doc - RDF Update 15:34:41 ... reviews missing 15:34:42 Zakim, unmute me 15:34:42 Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted 15:35:02 chimezie: standing review is AndyS' one 15:35:08 ... issues look straightforward 15:35:15 ... it not, email correspondance will help 15:35:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0673.html 15:35:40 AndyS: issue around graph naming is problematic 15:36:36 chimezie: need some interface to specify different URIs to update / delete a graph 15:36:56 ... several suggestions (query parameters) 15:37:04 +Sandro.a 15:37:06 -Sandro 15:37:06 ... specify the semantics of the interface should address the problem 15:37:18 ... can be addressed in the next round 15:38:24 ACTION: Axel to ping all editor's to reply to unresponded reviews. 15:38:24 Created ACTION-177 - Ping all editor's to reply to unresponded reviews. [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-01-12]. 15:38:28 ... can address most of the original comments / suggestions 15:38:48 ... could produce a version that incorporate the comments by the next telecon 15:39:00 AxelPolleres: should have the other reviews by then 15:39:08 ... discuss the last reviews next time 15:39:18 Zakim, mute me 15:39:18 Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted 15:39:24 ... next doc : property path document 15:39:25 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/Overview.xml 15:39:38 LeeF has joined #sparql 15:39:40 ... 2 open reviews 15:40:28 AndyS: lots of comments (longer period of time) 15:40:33 ... now processed all of them 15:40:39 I am fine 15:40:40 ... if something is missing, please remind 15:41:16 I have checked and I am happy 15:41:20 AxelPolleres: reviewers should check if the comments have been addressed 15:41:27 q+ 15:41:30 ... then decision on publication on next TC 15:43:37 ACTION: Matt to start an email thread about fregments of propertypaths that could be dealt with in SWL 15:43:37 Sorry, couldn't find user - Matt 15:43:41 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/Overview.xml#Outstanding_Issues 15:44:06 q? 15:44:34 ivan: we may want to do a formal vote on the publishing to go on the request for the shortname 15:45:20 sandro: WG resolves the publishing, then do the short name decision 15:45:24 i have to leave right now, unfortunately 15:45:30 -Chimezie_Ogbuji 15:45:32 "sparql11-property-paths" is the natural short name, I think. 15:45:47 strawpoll on the name? sparql11-property-paths 15:45:51 AxelPolleres: strawpoll on the shortname ? 15:45:54 q+ 15:45:59 ... anyone opposed on sparql11-property-paths ? 15:46:01 ack ivan 15:46:11 q+ 15:46:15 q? 15:46:19 Isn't it just a feature of query? 15:46:47 sandro: is the sparql11 prefix in any shortname 15:46:50 AxelPolleres: yes 15:47:15 q- 15:47:18 I was wondering the same thing as LukeWM. 15:47:27 PROPOSED: short name for property paths FPWD will be sparql11-property-paths 15:47:32 q? 15:47:51 Luke, if time (;-) but I think it needs a name to publish this round separately as well. 15:48:02 SteveH: will it be a standalone doc or part of the query doc in the last call ? 15:48:15 Ah, I see, so it can be merged across at the very end if required. 15:48:23 AxelPolleres: can we include it later in the rec ? 15:48:30 ivan: correct 15:48:54 q? 15:49:03 q- 15:49:20 sandro: different winow for disclosure but shall not be a problem 15:49:29 s/winow/window 15:49:33 if it's going to be rolled into query11 it doesn't matter does it? 15:49:38 which was why I asked 15:50:10 AxelPolleres: 2 options sparql11-paths / sparql11-property-paths 15:50:29 For incorporation, only prob I see is one of balance - the pp doc is relatively long for the size of feature compared to rest of feature set. 15:50:34 -AlexPassant 15:50:50 AndyS, I don't see that being a big issue, myself 15:50:59 strawpoll on "property-" ? 15:51:05 +1 for property 15:51:06 0 15:51:07 0 15:51:07 +1 15:51:11 0 15:51:14 0 15:51:14 +1 for property 15:51:17 +1 to property 15:51:23 sandro: -1 to property 15:51:29 +1 15:51:36 +??P26 15:51:43 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:51:43 +AlexPassant; got it 15:51:44 +1 to property-path 15:51:49 +1 for plural 15:51:49 SteveH, agree - merely the bigg*est* issue I could think of. 15:51:51 +1 to plural 15:51:51 +1 to plural 15:51:56 +1 for plural 15:52:00 +1 for paths (plural) 15:52:03 +1 for plural 15:52:04 strawpoll: plural yes/no? (paths) 15:52:05 AndyS, ah, I see 15:52:07 +1 for plural 15:52:11 0 15:52:12 0 15:52:12 sandro: 0 15:52:12 +0 15:52:13 0 15:52:14 0 15:52:16 0 15:52:44 AxelPolleres: property-paths seems to be the consensus 15:52:51 PROPOSED: short name for property paths FPWD will be sparql11-property-paths 15:52:57 +1 15:53:08 Seconded 15:53:13 +1 15:53:38 RESOLVED: short name for property paths FPWD will be sparql11-property-paths 15:53:59 Zakim, unmute me 15:53:59 bglimm should no longer be muted 15:54:01 AxelPolleres: nothing more to add on property path ? 15:54:09 ... one document open: entailment 15:54:09 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml 15:54:19 bglimm: currently working through ivan's comment 15:54:28 ... should be finished today so that ivan can have another look 15:55:31 will try to look through OWL until tomorrow then. 15:55:43 ... updated OWL direct semantics with changes that ivan suggested 15:55:57 q+ 15:56:35 AndyS: trying to respond to every comment, what are the general expectations for comments 15:56:50 ... for the internal reviews 15:57:02 ... so that nothing gets lost 15:57:33 q+ 15:57:37 ack me 15:58:08 ivan: public comments coming in on the ML 15:58:11 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 15:58:25 AxelPolleres: should check the comments list if that's up to date + new comments coming 15:58:36 ACTION: Axel to check comments archives and add new comments if necessary 15:58:36 Created ACTION-178 - Check comments archives and add new comments if necessary [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-01-12]. 15:58:53 AxelPolleres: anybody can edit the page and pick-up open comments 15:58:57 Are there any glaring late responses currently? 15:59:08 ... should go through the comments next week if time permits 16:00:06 ... meeting ajourned 16:00:10 bye 16:00:13 -Souri 16:00:14 -Sandro.a 16:00:15 -bglimm 16:00:16 -dcharbon2 16:00:16 -Ivan 16:00:18 -tkoivula 16:00:19 Alex, will you do the minutes magic? 16:00:20 -[Garlik] 16:00:22 -kasei 16:00:22 -MattPerry 16:00:32 yep, will try to recall how to do it 16:00:40 -Axel 16:02:21 general summary for the reviews: open reviews, plese complete iff any possible within the next one or two days, and try to get back to the editors in time, editors, please respond/acknowledge all reviews by next time, if possible! 16:02:51 rrsagent, make records public 16:03:12 ok Im editing the minutes 16:07:26 AxelPolleres: minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-05 16:07:50 alex, can you add regrets? 16:07:58 regrets: LeeF, PaulG 16:08:08 member:rrsagent, make records public 16:08:25 rrsagent, make records public 16:10:41 how can I do that (regrets) ? 16:11:12 ok done 16:11:30 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-05 16:11:40 -AlexPassant 16:35:00 disconnecting the lone participant, AndyS, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 16:35:03 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended 16:35:04 Attendees were dcharbon2, bglimm, kasei, AndyS, Ivan, Axel, Sandro, tkoivula, Souri, AlexPassant, MattPerry, LukeWM, SteveH, Chimezie_Ogbuji 16:35:32 AndyS has joined #sparql 17:09:01 AndyS has joined #sparql 18:02:28 Zakim has left #sparql 19:50:11 AndyS has joined #sparql