Difference between revisions of "Transition Request Oct 2012"

From SPARQL Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
We propose to publish the following documents as Candidate Recommendation (CR), Proposed Recommendation (PR), and Proposed Edited Recommendation (PER) respectively:
We propose to publish the following documents as Proposed Recommendation (PR), Candidate Recommendation (CR), or Proposed Edited Recommendation (PER), as indicated:
!WG Resolution to publish
!Shortname<br/>(TR Link)
!Title<br/>(ED Link)
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml SPARQL 1.1 Query Language] @@@fix link to final html@@@
|[http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ sparql11-query]
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-02#resolution_4 2012-10-02]
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml SPARQL 1.1 Query Language]  
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml SPARQL 1.1 Update] @@@fix link to final html@@@
|[http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/ sparql11-update]
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-10-09#resolution_2 2012-10-09]
|[http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml SPARQL 1.1 Update]
Line 35: Line 36:
== Abstracts and Status Sections ==
== Abstracts and Status Sections ==

Revision as of 00:14, 12 October 2012

This is a transition request, and also serves as an agenda for a Transition Meeting with the Director.

See [@@@ @@@archived e-mail version].

This is a mixed transition request, with documents going to CR, PR, and PER.


1 Titles

We propose to publish the following documents as Proposed Recommendation (PR), Candidate Recommendation (CR), or Proposed Edited Recommendation (PER), as indicated:

(TR Link)
(ED Link)
PR sparql11-query SPARQL 1.1 Query Language
PR sparql11-update SPARQL 1.1 Update

The estimated publication date is 23 October 2012

2 Abstracts and Status Sections

Document (ED Link) Abstract
@@@ @@@

3 Decisions to Request Transition

3.1 To Proposed Recommendation

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml as PR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query1.1/rq25.xml as PR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml as PR

RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 Service Description as PR contingent completion of ACTION-696

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service.xml as PR ("Query Federation")

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml as PR

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html as PR

3.2 To Proposed Edited Recommendation

RESOLVED: Publish Proposed Edited Recommendation (stage before "Recommendation, Second Edition") of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ with errata addressed, cross-links updated, and mentioning other results format documents (JSON, CSV, TSV). Contingent on completion of ACTION-698, ACTION-699, and ACTION-700.

3.3 To Candidate Recommendation

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/ as CR ("Entailment Regimes")

RESOLVED: publish SPARQL1.1 protocol as CR ("Protocol")

RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ as CR ("Graph Store Protocol")

4 Changes since Last Call

See the documents themselves:

  1. http://www.w3.org/@@/#changelog
  2. http://www.w3.org/@@/#changelog

All of these changes are minor and editorial.

5 Satisfies Group's Requirements

The requirements have not changed since the previous transition. None of the many reviews have claimed that the documents fail to satisfy the group's requirements.

The charter deliverables are by the group's publications, along with the test suite website.

6 Dependencies


7 Received Wide Review

See list of comments: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments

8 Issues Formally Addressed


9 Objections

There have been no formal objections.

10 Implementations

The group maintains a [http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/

table of implementations and test results] ([@@@ @@@snapshot 9 October 2012]).

The group [@@@ @@@ approved] the exit criteria of have each approved test past by two or more implementations.

11 Patent Disclosures