Difference between revisions of "CommentResponse:PW2"

From SPARQL Working Group
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Dear Peter,
 
Dear Peter,
  
the Working Group has considered your comments about allowing FROM and FROM NAMED clauses after the SERVICE clause but we opted for the current design for simplicity. In despite of that, the group will investigate more about how datasets will interact with the new federated query form. In that way it will be studied that a future SPARQl-WG adds your comments to the document. Besides of that, the Working Group has very tight deadlines and there is no much time left for implementing your suggestion now. During this week we are voting to go for CR/PR and implementing such changes would require another Last Call for the Federation document.  
+
The Working Group has considered your comments about allowing FROM and FROM NAMED clauses after the SERVICE clause but we've opted for the current design for simplicity and due to a lack of implementation experience. Along these lines, the group will investigate more about how datasets will/can interact with the new federated query form as the community gets more implementation experience. Based on this, a future SPARQL-WG will be able to consider your comments in more depth. Unfortuantely, the Working Group has very tight deadlines and there is not much time left to design and implement substantive changes to the specification now.  
  
 
We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
 
We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
  
 
Carlos, on behalf of the SPARQL WG
 
Carlos, on behalf of the SPARQL WG

Latest revision as of 17:42, 2 October 2012

Dear Peter,

The Working Group has considered your comments about allowing FROM and FROM NAMED clauses after the SERVICE clause but we've opted for the current design for simplicity and due to a lack of implementation experience. Along these lines, the group will investigate more about how datasets will/can interact with the new federated query form as the community gets more implementation experience. Based on this, a future SPARQL-WG will be able to consider your comments in more depth. Unfortuantely, the Working Group has very tight deadlines and there is not much time left to design and implement substantive changes to the specification now.

We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.

Carlos, on behalf of the SPARQL WG